Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Stafford Family Charitable Trust

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$146k
Granted FY2025still arriving
8
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$40k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Human Services$215kEnvironment$150kFood & Nutrition$125kHealth$105kEducation$102kCrime & Legal$82kArts & Culture$70kHousing & Shelter$64kOther$0
02FY2025 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $6k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $140k
$15,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$2.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MID-MO HIGH STEPPERS$40,000
BOONE COUNTY NATURE SCHOOL$37,500
HEART OF MISSOURI CASA$25,000
POLICE FOUNDATION OF HALLSVILLE$15,000
THE HALO FOUNDATION$12,430
FAYETTE SENIOR CITIZENS INC$10,150
STONEBRIDGE HOUSE$5,000
COMO MOBILE AID COLLECTIVE$1,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $143k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%SERVE INC: $36k → 11%SERVE INC: $10k → 11%COYOTE HILL CHRISTIAN CHILDREN'S HOME: $7k → 17%AUDRAIN COUNTY CRISIS INTERVENTION SERVICES: $3k → 18%YMCA OF CALLAWAY COUNTY: $7k → 11%YMCA OF CALLAWAY COUNTY: $5k → 11%COMO MOBILE AID COLLECTIVE: $20k → 17%CENTRAL MISSOURI DIABETIC CHILDREN'S CAMP: $10k → 17%COMO MOBILE AID COLLECTIVE: $1k → 17%CARING HEARTS AND HANDS OF COLUMBIA: $7k → 17%PET MISSOURI - COLUMBIA MO: $27k → 17%LOVE COLUMBIA: $7k → 17%CHILD DEVELOPMENT CENTER: $3k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

53%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$601k · 16 repeat orgs$536k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +29% since the first grant, against +16% for the ones you funded once.

16 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2025, 13 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
53

Total granted

$601k
$454k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+29%
+16%

Still filing today

63%
51%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 43% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $83k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthEducationHousing & ShelterEmploymentCrime & LegalOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CC
    Columbia Center for Urban Agriculture
    3× · 2017–2022 · $105k · revenue +354%
  • SI
    SERVE INC
    2× · 2018–2024 · $46k · revenue +30%
  • HO
    HEART OF MISSOURI CASA
    2× · 2020–2025 · $28k · revenue +427%

Funded once

  • FO
    FRIENDS OF THE FARM
    one grant, 2019 · $50k
  • PM
    PET MISSOURI - COLUMBIA INC
    one grant, 2020 · $27k · revenue -15%
  • UC
    UNITED COMMUNITY BUILDERS DEVELOPMENT CORP
    one grant, 2021 · $20k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Carthage Crisis Center Inc

The carthage crisis center is committed to restoring homeless and needy people to self sufficiency with god's help.

Health
2
Crisis Center of Russell County

The Crisis Center of Russell County was organized to provide assistance and temporary housing to victims of domestic abuse through secured temporary housing and education with job placement to transition them back into society. In…

Public Safety & Disaster
3
North Central Kansas Housing Opportunities Inc
Community Improvement
4
Gibson Center for Behavioral Change

The Gibson Center for Behavorial Change is committed to providing comprehensive services which promote new behaviors for a healthy lifestyle.

Health
5
House Everyone Stl

Our Mission is to solve homelessness as we know it by establishing a pathway for our unhoused neighbors to a home with dignity.

Housing & Shelter
6
Capital City Casa

It is the mission of the capital city casa to advocate for the best interests of abused and neglected children with the 19th judicial circuit of missouri, based on the belief that all children are entitled to a safe and permanent home. the…

Crime & Legal
7
Harcum House

Our mission is to reduce trauma and enhance healing by providing advocacy, education and outreach.

Human Services
8
Nova Center of the Ozarks Inc

Nova center of the ozarks, inc strives to make possible the potential for positive change in the quality of life for every individual with a developmental disability, regardless of the nature of that disability.

Human Services
9
Restoration House of Greater Kansas City

ReHope empowers and elevates survivors of human trafficking and sexual exploitation through its faith-based, trauma-informed residence and recovery programs.

Housing & Shelter
10
Community Workshop & Training Center Inc

Our central Illinois organization provides programs and services to adults with disabilities; enriching their quality of life, promoting social change, and optimizing their potential for independence.

Human Services
11
Womens Crisis Center of Taney County Inc

The Crisis Center provides shelter and services to victims and their children of domestic and sexual violence.

Human Services
12
Missouri Valley Housing Corporation

Provide housing for elderly

Housing & Shelter

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Heart of Missouri Casa and the most unlike its peers is Child Development Center. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyProfessional & Industry Ass…Columbia Community Organiza…Firefighter Support & Memor…Youth Sports ProgramsCollegiate Fraternity Organ…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 35 years old; the field is 24. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number19%5%<5yr11%8%5–10yr15%19%10–20yr14%16%20–35yr12%32%35–55yr28%19%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value19%5%<5yr11%6%5–10yr15%21%10–20yr14%14%20–35yr12%29%35–55yr28%25%55yr+

The field is 19% startups (under 5 years old) — 5% of your grantees by number, and just 5% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/47
the rest of the field
13%
163/1,272

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

43 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 43 of the 74 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
14
Early backer (in before they grew)
39/43
Grantees still filing
28/43
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

BOONE COUNTY NATURE SCHOOL — $150,000 · OtherBOONE COUNTY NATURE SCHOOLFRIENDS OF THE FARM — $50,000 · OtherFRIENDS OF THE FARMKOPN — $45,000 · OtherKOPNMID-MO HIGH STEPPERS — $40,000 · OtherMID-MO HIGH STEPPERS+45 more — $382,087 · Other+45 moreSERVE INC — $46,000 · Human ServicesSERVE INCPET MISSOURI - COLUMBIA INC — $26,873 · Human ServicesPET MISSOURI - C…Central Missouri Diabetic Childrens Camp Camp Hickory Hill — $25,000 · Human ServicesCentral Missouri…COMO MOBILE AID COLLECTIVE — $21,000 · Human ServicesCOMO MOBILE AID …YMCA OF CALLAWAY COUNTY — $11,764 · Human ServicesYMCA OF CALLAWAY…TRUE NORTH OF COLUMBIA INC — $10,110 · Human ServicesTRUE NORTH OF CO…Love Columbia Corp Love Columbia — $7,250 · Human ServicesCaring Hearts And Hands of Columbia — $7,159 · Human ServicesCoyote Hill Foster Care Ministries — $7,000 · Human Services+2 more — $5,740 · Human ServicesColumbia Center for Urban Agriculture — $105,000 · EnvironmentColumbia C…COLUMBIA COLLEGE — $75,000 · EducationCENTRAL METHODIST UNIVERSITY — $10,000 · Education+1 more — $2,500 · EducationHEART OF MISSOURI CASA — $28,475 · Crime & LegalPOLICE FOUNDATION OF HALLSVILLE — $15,000 · Crime & LegalSpectrum Health Care — $13,580 · HealthSAVING KIDSIGHT — $8,150 · HealthRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF MID MISSOURI INC — $6,710 · HealthUNITED CEREBRAL PALSY HEARTLAND — $5,000 · HealthINDEPENDENT LIVING CENTER OF MID-MO — $2,682 · HealthSHOW-ME CENTRAL HABITAT FOR HUMANITY — $15,000 · Housing & ShelterAUDRAIN COUNTY SHELTER RESOURCE COALITION — $10,000 · Housing & ShelterSTONEBRIDGE HOUSE — $5,000 · Housing & Shelter
Other$667,087Human Services$167,896Environment$105,000Education$87,500Crime & Legal$43,475Health$36,122Housing & Shelter$30,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetColumbia Center for Urban Agriculture — $105,000 over 3y, 10% of budgetCOLUMBIA COLLEGE — $75,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetSERVE INC — $46,000 over 2y, 1.4% of budgetHEART OF MISSOURI CASA — $28,475 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetPET MISSOURI - COLUMBIA INC — $26,873 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetCentral Missouri Diabetic Childrens Camp Camp Hickory Hill — $25,000 over 2y, 31% of budgetCOMO MOBILE AID COLLECTIVE — $21,000 over 2y, 6.4% of budgetDo Something Right Now Inc — $20,140 over 2y, 9.6% of budgetIN2ACTION — $17,890 over 2y, 2.7% of budgetSHOW-ME CENTRAL HABITAT FOR HUMANITY — $15,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetPOLICE FOUNDATION OF HALLSVILLE — $15,000 over 1y, 15% of budgetGREAT CIRCLE — $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBOONE COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY — $13,815 over 3y, 1.3% of budgetSpectrum Health Care — $13,580 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetYMCA OF CALLAWAY COUNTY — $11,764 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetMISSOURI COALITION AGAINST DOMESTIC AND SEXUAL VIOLENCE — $10,625 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetTRUE NORTH OF COLUMBIA INC — $10,110 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetCENTRAL METHODIST UNIVERSITY — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWELCOME HOME INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetAUDRAIN COUNTY SHELTER RESOURCE COALITION — $10,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetGreat Rivers Council - Boy Scouts of America — $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetCENTRAL MISSOURI HUMANE SOCIETY — $10,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetCHILD ABUSE AND NEGLECT EMERGENCY SHELTER INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetCANCER RESEARCH CENTER — $9,273 over 1y, 4.2% of budgetCEDAR CREEK THERAPEUTIC RIDING CENTER — $9,000 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetSAVING KIDSIGHT — $8,150 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetLOVE MY JOB TRAINING CENTER — $8,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetLove Columbia Corp Love Columbia — $7,250 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCaring Hearts And Hands of Columbia — $7,159 over 1y, 3.0% of budgetCoyote Hill Foster Care Ministries — $7,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF MID MISSOURI INC — $6,710 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetTHE FOOD BANK FOR CENTRAL & NORTHEAST MISSOURI — $6,600 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED CEREBRAL PALSY HEARTLAND — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKINGDOM PROJECTS INC — $4,780 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetAUDRAIN COUNTY CRISIS INTERVENTION — $3,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetHARVEST HOUSE INC — $2,900 over 1y, 3.6% of budgetINDEPENDENT LIVING CENTER OF MID-MO — $2,682 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNora Stewart Early Learning Center — $2,500 over 1y, 0.7% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Veterans United FoundationMO61.2× affinity29 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Veterans United Foundation · Fred V & Dorothy H Heinkel Charitable Foundation · Allen P and Josephine B Green · Boone Electric Community Trust · Orscheln Industries Foundation Inc · Boone County Community Trust · Mfa Oil Foundation · Heart of Missouri United Way Inc · Griffin Family Foundation Inc · McCortney Foundation · United Way of Central Missouri Inc · Edward Jones Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Stafford Family Charitable Trust funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%3%10%23%40%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    15report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 74 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph