Skip to content

Missouri · Private foundation

Fred V & Dorothy H Heinkel Charitable Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$155k
Granted FY2025(still arriving)
10
Grants FY2025
10
Organizations funded FY2024
30%
First-time grantees FY2024
Read the full brief
Median grant, FY2025
$15,928
Largest grant, FY2025
$20,000
Organizations funded a year
8 to 13
FY2018 to FY2024
States reached, FY2025
1
Total assets, FY2025
$2.8M
Applications
Takes unsolicited applications
Per its most recent filing; check its own site

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2024, 30% of the organizations Fred V & Dorothy H Heinkel Charitable Foundation funded were first-time grantees, receiving 39% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 61% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $53k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesHealthEducationPhilanthropyArts & CultureHousing & ShelterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY2025still arriving10$155k40%
FY202410$134k30%
FY20238$142k38%
FY20229$166k33%
FY202110$138k70%
FY202011$138k73%
FY20199$112k44%
FY201813$159k77%
100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Human Services$329kHealth$130kEducation$130kFood & Nutrition$114kHousing & Shelter$109kRecreation & Sports$104kYouth Development$100kEmployment$96kOther$0

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2017 to FY2025, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

Show all 30 grantees

What it could do for these grantees

Plus 23 recipients with no EIN on record ($411k), not named here.

Where it is load-bearing

Fred V & Dorothy H Heinkel Charitable Foundation supplied at least a quarter of the budget for 1 of its grantees at some point. The chart plots its 28 largest grantees; load-bearing ones sit top left.

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetColumbia Center for Urban Agriculture: $75,000 over 3y, 5.2% of budgetColumbia College: $70,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetVoluntary Action Center: $59,501 over 4y, 1.2% of budgetJob Point: $57,500 over 4y, 0.8% of budgetBoone County Historical Society: $52,154 over 4y, 5.7% of budgetUnited Community Builders Community Development Co: $50,000 over 2y, 4.5% of budgetStephens College: $40,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetCoyote Hill Foster Care Ministries: $37,600 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetLove Columbia Corp Love Columbia: $36,789 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetIn2action: $35,395 over 5y, 2.0% of budgetArrow Rock Lyceum Theatre Inc: $35,000 over 2y, 2.4% of budgetAudrain County Shelter Resource Coalition: $30,445 over 2y, 30% of budgetChild Abuse and Neglect Emergency Shelter Inc: $30,000 over 3y, 1.0% of budgetGreat Circle: $28,109 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetRonald McDonald House Charities of Mid Missouri Inc: $25,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetThe Help Center Inc: $20,000 over 1y, 6.3% of budgetBoys & Girls Club of the Columbia Area: $20,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetComo Mobile Aid Collective: $18,000 over 1y, 5.8% of budgetDo Something Right Now Inc: $17,000 over 1y, 15% of budgetThe Food Bank for Central & Northeast Missouri: $16,661 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGirl Scouts of the Missouri Heartland Inc: $14,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetMissouri Coalition Against Domestic and Sexual Violence: $13,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetCentral Missouri Diabetic Childrens Camp Camp Hickory Hill: $10,000 over 1y, 4.8% of budgetCedar Creek Therapeutic Riding Center: $10,000 over 1y, 2.5% of budgetUnited Cerebral Palsy Heartland: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWelcome Home Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetShow-Me Central Habitat for Humanity: $7,700 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetHarvest House Inc: $404 over 1y, 0.5% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 28.

Nonprofits that may fit its grantmaking

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Stafford Family Charitable TrustMO49.6× affinity21 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Stafford Family Charitable Trust · Veterans United Foundation · Boone Electric Community Trust · Allen P and Josephine B Green · Orscheln Industries Foundation Inc · Boone County Community Trust · Heart of Missouri United Way Inc · Mfa Oil Foundation · Griffin Family Foundation Inc · Psalm 103 Family Foundation · Commerce Bancshares Foundation · Hagan Trust

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare Fred V & Dorothy H Heinkel Charitable Foundation with peer funders

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Fred V & Dorothy H Heinkel Charitable Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Fred V & Dorothy H Heinkel Charitable Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

About Fred V & Dorothy H Heinkel Charitable Foundation

How much does Fred V & Dorothy H Heinkel Charitable Foundation give?
Fred V & Dorothy H Heinkel Charitable Foundation reported 10 grants totaling $155,428 in its FY2025 IRS filing. It funded between 8 and 13 organizations a year over FY2018 to FY2024.
What does Fred V & Dorothy H Heinkel Charitable Foundation fund?
By grant dollars over FY2017 to FY2025, its largest causes are Human Services (26%), Health (10%), Education (10%).
Who are Fred V & Dorothy H Heinkel Charitable Foundation's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2017 to FY2025: Columbia Center for Urban Agriculture ($75k), Columbia College ($70k), Voluntary Action Center ($60k).
Does Fred V & Dorothy H Heinkel Charitable Foundation fund new organizations?
In FY2024, 30% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Does Fred V & Dorothy H Heinkel Charitable Foundation accept unsolicited applications?
Its most recent filing reports that it accepts unsolicited grant applications.
Which funders back the same organizations as Fred V & Dorothy H Heinkel Charitable Foundation?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include Stafford Family Charitable Trust, Veterans United Foundation, Boone Electric Community Trust.
Where is Fred V & Dorothy H Heinkel Charitable Foundation based?
Fred V & Dorothy H Heinkel Charitable Foundation is based in MO.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 53 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Fred V & Dorothy H Heinkel’s filings →

More from the funding graph