Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Alden Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$14k
Granted FY2025still arriving
19
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$3k
Largest
01What you fund
0185% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20192025.

Philanthropy$25kYouth Development$13kEducation$12kHuman Services$11kFood & Nutrition$10kArts & Culture$6kInternational$4kHousing & Shelter$3kOther$0
02FY2025 · 19 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$500
Median grant
3
States reached
$45k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNITED WAY$2,500
THE FOOD BANK$2,500
THE CENTER PROJECT$1,000
MTPC$1,000
UNIV OF MISSOURI TIGER SCHOLARSHIP$1,000
VOLUNTARY ACTION CENTER$1,000
GRANNY'S HOUSE$500
TRUE NORTH WOMENS SHELTER$500
BE THE CHANGE VOLUNTEERS$500
NEIGHBOR TO NEIGHBOR$500
GRADE A PLUS$500
HOPE FOR TOMORROW$500
OLIVET CHRISTIAN CHURCH$500
Individual grant recipient$500
Individual grant recipient$350
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY19–25, $9k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 64% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%HOPE FOR TOMORROW: $500 → 8%HOPE FOR TOMORROW: $500 → 8%HOPE FOR TOMORROW: $500 → 8%HOPE FOR TOMORROW: $500 → 8%HOPE FOR TOMORROW: $500 → 8%HOPE FOR TOMORROW: $500 → 8%HOPE FOR TOMORROW: $250 → 8%CITY OF REFUGE: $1k → 17%CITY OF REFUGE: $750 → 17%UNITED COMMUNITY BUILDERS: $300 → 17%CITY OF REFUGE: $250 → 17%CITY OF REFUGE: $250 → 17%CITY OF REFUGE: $250 → 17%THE CENTER PROJECT: $1k → 17%THE CENTER PROJECT: $1k → 17%JOB POINT: $250 → 17%JOB POINT: $250 → 17%JOB POINT: $250 → 17%JOB POINT: $250 → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$94k · 22 repeat orgs$6k to everyone else

22 repeat relationships — 15 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

22
8

Total granted

$94k
$3k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+16%
+147%

Still filing today

45%
38%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 80% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesInternationalEducationArts & CultureReligionRecreation & SportsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BT
    Be The Change Vacations
    7× · 2019–2025 · $4k · revenue +16%
  • GA
    GRADE A PLUS INCORPORATED
    7× · 2019–2025 · $4k · revenue +621%
  • HF
    HOPE FOR TOMORROW INC
    7× · 2019–2025 · $3k · revenue +4%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2021 · $500
  • CC
    CARDLE CAREER ALLIANCE
    one grant, 2019 · $500
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2019 · $500

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Teach St Louis

Founded In 2018, Teach St. Louis (formerly St. Louis Teacher Residency) launched to improve teacher quality and retention in St. Louis, a city where 40% of new teachers exit the classroom in their first three years. Teach St. Louis…

Education
2
Carolina Collaborative Prep

Carolina collaborative prep (ccp) is a non-profit academic center that serves students in grades 3-12 with learning differences, empowering them to thrive in school and in life.

Education
3
Central Ozarks Private Industry Council

Central Ozarks Private Industry Council, Incorporated (COPIC) strives to provide all customers with access to professional, high-quality workforce development services, resulting in sustainable employment and contributing to positive…

Employment
4
World Affairs Council of St Louis

Education, non-partisan, membership organization that encourages people and organizations in the region to take an interest in, to learn more about, and to participate to a greater extent in global matters.

International
5
Coalition for Missouri Values

The coalition for missouri values seeks to bring members of our community together around a core set of values that undergird our society and community. together, we aim to gather information, educate and inform our fellow citizens and…

6
Central Missouri Community Action

To build relationships to empower people, strengthen resilience, and improve quality of life for all members of the community.

7
Main Street Corridor Development Corp Dba Midtown Kc Now

Work to suport commercial, mixed use, and residential progress and effective community, economic, and aesthetic development to create and encourage the renewal and vitality of Midtown Kansas City, Missouri.

Community Improvement
8
United Inner City Services Inc

Earlystart carries out its mission "building bridges. inspiring minds. impacting futures." through the earlystart child and family development centers. highly-trained faculty utilize a project-based curriculum in an arts-infused…

Human Services
9
Missouri Valley Community Action Agency

To engage communities and coordinate resources to improve the lives of people experiencing poverty.

10
St Louis Council of Construction Consumers

The slc3 is a community of design and construction industry professionals with a common interest in the betterment of our region through prioritizing innovation, continuing education, equity empowerment and all-inclusive workforce…

Community Improvement
11
Greater Ozarks Cooperating School Districts

To serve member districts by promoting collaboration of resources to ensure educational opportunites are maximized thus allowing member districts to focus on advancement of educational opportunities for students served at all educational…

Education
12
Vision for Children At Risk Inc

Strive to improve the well-being of children in the St. Louis region, especially those facing serious socio-economic risk, by providing information on well-being, building collaborative strategic action for promoting child well-being, and…

Human Services

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is United Community Builders Community Development Co and the most unlike its peers is American Heart Association Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 34 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/14
Grantees still filing
13/14
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

UNITED WAY — $24,750 · OtherUNITED WAYLOVE INC — $12,800 · OtherLOVE INCTHE FOOD BANK — $8,500 · OtherTHE FOOD BANKUNIV OF MISSOURI TIGER SCHOLARSHIP — $5,000 · OtherUNIV OF MISSOURI TIGER SCHOLARSHIPGRANNY'S HOUSE — $4,350 · OtherGRANNY'S HOUSEIndividual grant recipient — $3,500 · OtherTRUE NORTH WOMENS SHELTER — $3,350 · Other+15 more — $10,500 · Other+15 moreHOPE FOR TOMORROW INC — $3,250 · Human ServicesHOPE FOR T…CITY OF REFUGE — $2,500 · Human ServicesCITY OF RE…Mid-Missouri Center Project Inc — $2,000 · Human ServicesMid-Missou…JOB POINT — $1,000 · Human ServicesJOB POINT+1 more — $300 · Human ServicesRAGTAG FILM SOCIETY — $4,500 · Arts & CultureBe The Change Vacations — $4,000 · InternationalMOBILITY WORLDWIDE — $250 · InternationalNora Stewart Early Learning Center — $2,350 · EducationCOLUMBIA PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION — $1,600 · EducationGRADE A PLUS INCORPORATED — $3,500 · ReligionVOLUNTARY ACTION CENTER — $1,000 · Philanthropy
Other$72,750Human Services$9,050Arts & Culture$4,500International$4,250Education$3,950Religion$3,500Philanthropy$1,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetRAGTAG FILM SOCIETY — $4,500 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetBe The Change Vacations — $4,000 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetGRADE A PLUS INCORPORATED — $3,500 over 7y, 0.5% of budgetHOPE FOR TOMORROW INC — $3,250 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetCITY OF REFUGE — $2,500 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetNora Stewart Early Learning Center — $2,350 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetMid-Missouri Center Project Inc — $2,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetCOLUMBIA PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION — $1,600 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetJOB POINT — $1,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc — $550 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED COMMUNITY BUILDERS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CO — $300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMOBILITY WORLDWIDE — $250 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAPPALACHIAN TRAIL CONSERVANCY — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds RAGTAG FILM SOCIETY
  • Who funds Be The Change Vacations
  • Who funds GRADE A PLUS INCORPORATED
  • Who funds HOPE FOR TOMORROW INC
  • Who funds CITY OF REFUGE
  • Who funds Nora Stewart Early Learning Center
  • Who funds Mid-Missouri Center Project Inc
  • Who funds COLUMBIA PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION
  • Who funds JOB POINT
  • Who funds VOLUNTARY ACTION CENTER
  • Who funds American Heart Association Inc
  • Who funds UNITED COMMUNITY BUILDERS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CO
  • Who funds MOBILITY WORLDWIDE
  • Who funds APPALACHIAN TRAIL CONSERVANCY

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Veterans United FoundationMO25.7× affinity10 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Veterans United Foundation · Boone County Community Trust · Heart of Missouri United Way Inc · Boone Electric Community Trust · Community Foundation of Central Mo · Allen P and Josephine B Green · Orscheln Industries Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Alden Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 34 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph