· Private foundation
Healy Foundation Nm Md & Fl 058704-000
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2020–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k8 grants · $38k
- $10k–50k38 grants · $728k
- $50k–250k12 grants · $1.2M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| SAVORY INSTITUTE | $200,000 |
| NEW MEXICO BUREAU OF GEOLOGY & | $150,000 |
| NEW MEXICO DESALINATION ASSOCIATION | $150,000 |
| PENASCO VALLEY HIST PRES SOCIETY | $100,000 |
| PACE INC | $100,000 |
| FRACTURED ATLAS INC | $92,600 |
| JACKSONVILLE UNIVERSITY | $80,000 |
| CHESAPEAKE WILDLIFE HERITAGE | $70,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $57,000 |
| NEW MEXICO BIOPARK SOCIETY | $55,800 |
| LANDON SCHOOL | $50,000 |
| FILM INDEPENDENT INC | $50,000 |
| POTOMAC CONSERVANCY | $40,000 |
| NORTH FLORIDA LAND TRUST | $35,000 |
| NEW MEXICO RODEO ASSOCIATION | $30,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–23, $410k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +40% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.
55 repeat relationships — 43 still active in FY2025, 12 since wound down; 15 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 65% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $667k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- LSLANDON SCHOOL6× · 2020–2025 · $600k · revenue +21%
- JUJacksonville University6× · 2020–2025 · $440k · revenue +40%
- MFMAUI FAMILY YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION4× · 2020–2023 · $410k · revenue +164%
Funded once
- NMNEW MEXICO BUREAU OF GEOLOGY AND MINERAL RESOURCESone grant, 2020 · $200k
- TLTHE LOOMIS INSTITUTE D/B/A THE LOOMIS CHAFFEE SCHOOLone grant, 2023 · $100k · revenue 0%
- CGCOMMON GROUND COLLECTIVEone grant, 2024 · $75k · revenue 0%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Conservation legacy engages future leaders who protect, restore, and enhance our nation's lands through community-based service.in 2024, conservation legacy engaged 2,524 participants who completed over 1.5 million service hours on public…
Cuenca los ojos works to preserve and restore the biodiversity of the us/mexican borderlands through land protection, habitat restoration and wildlife reintroduction.
The organization's mission is to conserve and promote new england's native plants to ensure healthy, biologically diverse landscapes.
To enrich life by perpetuating tropical plants, ecosystems and cultural heritage through discovery, scientific research, conservation, and education.
To establish and promote programs to protect the global climate, forests, wildlife and the natural environment, through research, advocacy, and investigation.
Naples zoo is accredited by the american zoo & aquarium association (aza) and has numerous animal exhibits placed on its 45-acre site. (continued on schedule o)each exhibit is unique and designed to simulate typical conditions for the…
The institutes mission is to cultivate a responsibility for the natural environment and our human communities through interdisciplinary science education.
To preserve new mexico's land heritage by helping people conserve the places they love. nmlc works with landowners and others to protect wildlife habitat, agricultural lands, scenic open space, cultural and historic resources, and…
The aquarium of the pacific's mission is to instill a sense of wonder, respect, and stewardship for the pacific ocean, its inhabitants, and ecosystems.
Eastern national promotes the public's understanding and support of america's national parks and other public trust partners by providing quality educational experiences, products and services.
Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.
To sustain, restore, and enhance the nation's fish, wildlife, plants, and habitats.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is New Mexico Biopark Society Inc and the most unlike its peers is Jacksonville Jaguars Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 31 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 6% of your grantees by number, and just 3% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
51 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2026, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 51 of the 94 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds SAVORY INSTITUTEORG INC ↗
- Who funds LANDON SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds CHESAPEAKE WILDLIFE HERITAGE INC ↗
- Who funds Jacksonville University ↗
- Who funds MAUI FAMILY YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds NEW MEXICO RODEO ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds SEABURY HALL ↗
- Who funds THE POTOMAC CONSERVANCY INC ↗
- Who funds NORTH FLORIDA LAND TRUST INC ↗
- Who funds THE HUMANE SOCIETY OF DORCHESTER COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds LEADERSHIP NEW MEXICO ↗
- Who funds ST JOHNS RIVERKEEPER INC ↗
- Who funds Teach for America Inc ↗
- Who funds WILDERNESS LEADERSHIP & LEARNING INC ↗
- Who funds KRISTI HOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds FILM INDEPENDENT ↗
- Who funds THE LOOMIS INSTITUTE D/B/A THE LOOMIS CHAFFEE SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds FRACTURED ATLAS INC ↗
- Who funds HEROES Inc ↗
- Who funds Enchantment Legacy Inc ↗
- Who funds JACKSONVILLE ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY INC ↗
- Who funds SOUTHERN LEGAL COUNSEL INC ↗
- Who funds MANZANO DAY SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds VOLUNTEER LIFE SAVINGS CORP INC ↗
- Who funds Jacksonville Jaguars Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds NEIGHBORHOOD SERVICE CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds COMMON GROUND COLLECTIVE ↗
- Who funds DONA ANA COUNTY FAIR ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Community Foundation for Northeast Florida Inc · The Taos Community Foundation Inc · Mid Shore Community Foundation Inc · Pga Tour Inc · T Rowe Price Program for Charitable Giving Inc · Texas Instruments Foundation · The Bessemer Giving Fund · Ibm International Foundation · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Healy Foundation Nm Md & Fl 058704-000 funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- North Florida Land Trust Inc — 81% of income from government
- Kristi House Inc — 49% of income from government
- Epilepsy Foundation of America — 22% of income from government
- Chesapeake Bay Maritime Museum Inc — 17% of income from government
- Echo Hill Outdoor School Inc — 5% of income from government
- Jacksonville University — 3% of income from government
- Jacksonville Zoological Society Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.