Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation Dossiers
Plinth

· Private foundation

Healthcomp Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$622k
Granted FY2024still arriving
20
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$117k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
0198% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.

Health$1.6MHuman Services$660kCommunity Improvement$340kPhilanthropy$280kCrime & Legal$170kCivil Rights$90kHousing & Shelter$85kYouth Development$85kOther$0
02FY2024 · 20 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k19 grants · $505k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $117k
$25,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$8.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CUYAHOGA COUNTY BOARD OF HEALTH$117,183
NE OHIO COALITION FOR HOMELESS$35,000
PREGNANT WITH POSSIBILITIES$35,000
EQUALITY OHIO EDUCATION FUND$35,000
CLEVELAND NEIGHBORHOOD PROGRESS$35,000
A PLACE FOR ME$30,000
ADOPTION NETWORK CLEVELAND$30,000
COLLABORATION TO END HUMAN TRAFFICKING$25,000
SEEDS OF LITERACY$25,000
PARTNERSHIP FOR GOOD HEALTH$25,000
FAMILY PROMISE OF GREATER CLEVELAND$25,000
JOSEPH AND MARY'S HOME$25,000
SMART DEVELOPMENT$25,000
CENTER FOR COMMUNITY SOLUTIONS$25,000
GREATER CLEVELAND CONGREGATIONS$25,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY21–24, $490k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 65% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%COMMUNITY ACTION WAYNEMEDINA: $170k → 10%ADOPTION NETWORK CLEVELAND: $30k → 17%ADOPTION NETWORK CLEVELAND: $30k → 17%WEST SIDE COMMUNITY HOUSE: $25k → 17%JOSEPH'S HOME: $25k → 17%JOSEPH AND MARY'S HOME: $25k → 17%RESOURCE CLEVELAND: $25k → 17%SEEDS OF LITERACY: $25k → 17%PARTNERSHIP FOR GOOD HEALTH: $25k → 17%PASSAGES INC: $25k → 17%ASIAN SERVICES IN ACTION: $25k → 17%UNIVERSITY SETTLEMENT: $20k → 17%THEA BOWMAN CENTER: $40k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

61%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$2.1M · 17 repeat orgs$1.4M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +18% since the first grant, against +9% for the ones you funded once.

17 repeat relationships — 10 still active in FY2024, 7 since wound down; 10 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

17
34

Total granted

$2.1M
$1.1M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+18%
+9%

Still filing today

71%
79%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 56% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $275k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesCommunity ImprovementHealthYouth DevelopmentEducationCrime & LegalOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • GC
    GREATER CLEVELAND CONGREGATIONS INC
    3× · 2021–2024 · $75k · revenue +18%
  • AN
    ADOPTION NETWORK CLEVELAND
    2× · 2023–2024 · $60k · revenue +69%
  • VO
    VILLAGE OF HEALING
    2× · 2021–2023 · $60k · revenue ×22 · 64% of their budget

Funded once

  • CA
    COMMUNITY ACTION WAYNEMEDINA
    one grant, 2021 · $170k · revenue +5%
  • D
    DIGITALCgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $70k · revenue +365%
  • LA
    LEGAL AID SOCIETY OF CLEVELANDgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $50k · revenue +49%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Cleveland Mediation Center

Our mission is to promote a just and peaceful community by honoring all people, building their capacity to act, and facilitating opportunities for them to engage in conflict constructively. We continue to fulfill our mission by…

Crime & Legal
2
Global Cleveland

Global cleveland is dedicated to growing northeast ohio's economy by welcoming and connecting international people to opportunities and fostering a more inviting community for those seeking a place to call home.

Human Services
3
Cleveland Jobs With Justice

To work as a coalition of labor unions, community organzation, and religious community to raise the public awarness of and build campaigns to promote workers rights an social justice issues.

Education
4
Lead Ohio

At lead ohio our goal is to make a difference in communities across ohio by recruiting, training, supporting and empowering progressive leaders in all regions of the state.

Education
5
Ywca of Northwest Ohio

The ywca of northwest ohio strives to be a powerful proactive force for the support and advancement of women and girls in our community that will continue to work for peace, justice, equality, and dignity for all people.

Human Services
6
Cleveland Leadership Center

The mission of cleveland leadership center (the organization) is to build a continuum of civic leaders committed to our community's excellence by serving as a catalyst for civic engagement. the organization achieves its mission by…

Education
7
Central Ohio Workers Center Inc

The Central Ohio Worker Center is a non-profit organization that educates, empowers, and advocates for and with low-wage and immigrant workers in Central Ohio.

Civil Rights
8
Greater Cleveland Volunteers

Greater cleveland volunteers enriches the community and indivuduals through volunteer service. volunteers age 18 and older are recruited and placed in the agency's programs or referred to local nonprofit or public organizations to help…

Philanthropy
9
Cincinnati Works

Cincinnati works brings hope and encouragement to people living in poverty while assisting them in advancing to self-sufficiency through employment. we provide free training and coaching services.

Human Services
10
United Way of North Central Ohio Inc

At united way of north central ohio, we bring people, organizations, and resources together to create solutions that improve the lives of every person in every community in our region.

—
11
The Ohio Environmental Council

To protect the environment and health of all ohio communities through legal and policy advocacy, decision-maker accountability, and civic engagement.

Environment
12
Greater Cincinnati Behavioral Health Services

To ensure people with mental illness, addiction, and related challenges lead healthy and productive lives.

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Family Promise of Greater Cleveland and the most unlike its peers is Smart Development Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 27 years old; the field is 22. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number18%2%<5yr13%13%5–10yr16%21%10–20yr16%21%20–35yr19%19%35–55yr19%23%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value18%1%<5yr13%9%5–10yr16%17%10–20yr16%16%20–35yr19%18%35–55yr19%39%55yr+

The field is 18% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
2%1/51
the rest of the field
13%
1,298/9,767

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

50 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 50 of the 62 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
8
Early backer (in before they grew)
48/50
Grantees still filing
28/50
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

CUYAHOGA COUNTY OFFICE OF EARLY CHILDHOOD — $1,127,670 · OtherCUYAHOGA COUNTY OFFICE OF EARLY CHILDHOODPREGNANT WITH POSSIBILITIES — $110,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient — $100,000 · Other+28 more — $945,000 · Other+28 moreCOMMUNITY ACTION WAYNEMEDINA — $170,000 · Human ServicesCOMMUNITY ACTI…ADOPTION NETWORK CLEVELAND — $60,000 · Human ServicesADOPTION NETWO…JOSEPHS HOME — $50,000 · Human ServicesJOSEPHS HOMETHEA BOWMAN CENTER — $40,000 · Human ServicesTHEA BOWMAN CE…PARTNERSHIP FOR GOOD HEALTH — $25,000 · Human ServicesWEST SIDE COMMUNITY HOUSE — $25,000 · Human ServicesSEEDS OF LITERACY — $25,000 · Human ServicesRESOURCE CLEVELAND — $25,000 · Human ServicesASIAN SERVICES IN ACTION INC — $25,000 · Human ServicesPassages Connecting Fathers & Sons — $25,000 · Human ServicesUNIVERSITY SETTLEMENT INC — $20,000 · Human ServicesTHE CENTER FOR COMMUNITY SOLUTIONS — $100,000 · Community ImprovementTHE CENTER…DIGITALC — $70,000 · Community ImprovementDIGITALCVILLAGE OF HEALING — $60,000 · Community ImprovementVILLAGE OF…NEIGHBORHOOD PROGRESS INC — $35,000 · Community ImprovementNEIGHBORHO…SMART DEVELOPMENT INC — $25,000 · Community ImprovementSMART DEVE…HOLA OHIO — $25,000 · Community ImprovementHOLA OHIOUNION MILES DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION — $25,000 · Community ImprovementUNION MILE…THE CLEVELAND FOUNDATION — $230,000 · PhilanthropySTELLA MARIS INC — $50,000 · HealthMENTAL HEALTH & ADDICTION ADVOCACY COALITION — $35,000 · HealthBeech Brook — $25,000 · HealthPLANNED PARENTHOOD OF GREATER OHIO — $25,000 · HealthAUTISM SOCIETY OF GREATER AKRON — $25,000 · HealthCOURAGE TO CAREGIVERS INC — $15,000 · HealthIDEASTREAM — $50,000 · Youth DevelopmentWRITERS IN RESIDENCE — $35,000 · Youth DevelopmentRID-ALL FOUNDATION INC — $25,000 · Youth DevelopmentEFFECTIVE LEADERSHIP ACADEMY — $25,000 · Youth DevelopmentEquality Ohio Education Fund — $60,000 · Civil RightsCASA BOARD VOLUNTEER ASSOCIATION IN — $25,000 · Civil Rights
Other$2,282,670Human Services$490,000Community Improvement$340,000Philanthropy$230,000Health$175,000Youth Development$135,000Civil Rights$85,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTHE CLEVELAND FOUNDATION — $230,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetCOMMUNITY ACTION WAYNEMEDINA — $170,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetTHE CENTER FOR COMMUNITY SOLUTIONS — $100,000 over 4y, 1.0% of budgetGREATER CLEVELAND CONGREGATIONS INC — $75,000 over 3y, 1.9% of budgetDIGITALC — $70,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetADOPTION NETWORK CLEVELAND — $60,000 over 2y, 4.7% of budgetVILLAGE OF HEALING — $60,000 over 2y, 64% of budgetEquality Ohio Education Fund — $60,000 over 2y, 1.9% of budgetLINKING EMPLOYMENT ABILITIES AND POTENTIAL — $60,000 over 2y, 1.6% of budgetUNITED LABOR AGENCY INC — $55,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetJOURNEY CENTER FOR SAFETY AND HEALING — $50,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetSTELLA MARIS INC — $50,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetJOSEPHS HOME — $50,000 over 2y, 1.6% of budgetLEGAL AID SOCIETY OF CLEVELAND — $50,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetIDEASTREAM — $50,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetTHEA BOWMAN CENTER — $40,000 over 1y, 6.6% of budgetWRITERS IN RESIDENCE — $35,000 over 2y, 12% of budgetNEIGHBORHOOD PROGRESS INC — $35,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetGOLDEN CIPHERS — $35,000 over 1y, 14% of budgetMENTAL HEALTH & ADDICTION ADVOCACY COALITION — $35,000 over 1y, 5.9% of budgetYOUNG WOMENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF CLEVELAND OHIO — $30,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetPARTNERSHIP FOR GOOD HEALTH — $25,000 over 1y, 83% of budgetSMART DEVELOPMENT INC — $25,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetWOMENSAFE INC — $25,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetGREATER CLEVELAND FOOD BANK INC — $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMOBILEMED1 INC DBA MEDWORKS — $25,000 over 1y, 5.9% of budgetBeech Brook — $25,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetHOLA OHIO — $25,000 over 1y, 2.6% of budgetUNION MILES DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION — $25,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetWEST SIDE COMMUNITY HOUSE — $25,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD OF GREATER OHIO — $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetA VISION OF CHANGE INCORPORATED — $25,000 over 1y, 7.5% of budgetSEEDS OF LITERACY — $25,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetRESOURCE CLEVELAND — $25,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetTORCHLIGHT YOUTH MENTORING ALLIANCE — $25,000 over 1y, 3.5% of budgetEFFECTIVE LEADERSHIP ACADEMY — $25,000 over 1y, 2.8% of budgetASIAN SERVICES IN ACTION INC — $25,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetFAMILY PROMISE OF GREATER CLEVELAND — $25,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetAUTISM SOCIETY OF GREATER AKRON — $25,000 over 1y, 5.8% of budgetPassages Connecting Fathers & Sons — $25,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetWOMEN'S RECOVERY CENTER — $25,000 over 1y, 3.2% of budgetTHE COLLABORATIVE TO END HUMAN TRAFFICKING — $25,000 over 1y, 3.8% of budgetCASA BOARD VOLUNTEER ASSOCIATION IN — $25,000 over 1y, 7.3% of budgetUNIVERSITY SETTLEMENT INC — $20,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetTHE TEACHING CLEVELAND FOUNDATION — $15,000 over 1y, 7.1% of budgetCOURAGE TO CAREGIVERS INC — $15,000 over 1y, 9.0% of budgetBUILDING HOPE IN THE CITY — $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Cleveland Foundat…The George Gund Found…The Char and Chuck Fo…The Abington Foundati…Higley Fund of the Cl…Saint Lukes Foundatio…Dominion Energy Chari…United Way of Greater…Mt Sinai Health Care …The Reinberger Founda…Medwish MedworksWoodruff Foundation
The Cleveland FoundationOH77.8× affinity40 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Cleveland Foundation · The George Gund Foundation · The Char and Chuck Fowler Family Foundation · The Abington Foundation · Higley Fund of the Cleveland Foundation · Saint Lukes Foundation of Cleveland Ohio · Dominion Energy Charitable Foundation · United Way of Greater Cleveland · Mt Sinai Health Care Foundation · The Reinberger Foundation · Medwish Medworks · Woodruff Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Healthcomp Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%23%51%90%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    28report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 62 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home
    State money flows
    the interactive map of money crossing state lines