Skip to content
Healthcomp Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Healthcomp Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$622k
Granted FY2024still arriving
20
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$117k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$1.6MHuman Services$660kCommunity Improvement$340kPhilanthropy$280kCrime & Legal$170kCivil Rights$90kHousing & Shelter$85kYouth Development$85kOther$0
02FY2024 · 20 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k19 grants · $505k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $117k
$25,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$8.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CUYAHOGA COUNTY BOARD OF HEALTH$117,183
PREGNANT WITH POSSIBILITIES$35,000
NE OHIO COALITION FOR HOMELESS$35,000
EQUALITY OHIO EDUCATION FUND$35,000
CLEVELAND NEIGHBORHOOD PROGRESS$35,000
A PLACE FOR ME$30,000
ADOPTION NETWORK CLEVELAND$30,000
SEEDS OF LITERACY$25,000
SMART DEVELOPMENT$25,000
CENTER FOR COMMUNITY SOLUTIONS$25,000
STELLA MARIS$25,000
PARTNERSHIP FOR GOOD HEALTH$25,000
COLLABORATION TO END HUMAN TRAFFICKING$25,000
FAMILY PROMISE OF GREATER CLEVELAND$25,000
GREATER CLEVELAND CONGREGATIONS$25,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–24, $490k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 65% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%COMMUNITY ACTION WAYNEMEDINA: $170k → 10%ADOPTION NETWORK CLEVELAND: $30k → 17%ADOPTION NETWORK CLEVELAND: $30k → 17%RESOURCE CLEVELAND: $25k → 17%JOSEPH AND MARY'S HOME: $25k → 17%JOSEPH'S HOME: $25k → 17%SEEDS OF LITERACY: $25k → 17%WEST SIDE COMMUNITY HOUSE: $25k → 17%PARTNERSHIP FOR GOOD HEALTH: $25k → 17%PASSAGES INC: $25k → 17%ASIAN SERVICES IN ACTION: $25k → 17%UNIVERSITY SETTLEMENT: $20k → 17%THEA BOWMAN CENTER: $40k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

61%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.1M · 17 repeat orgs$1.4M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +18% since the first grant, against +9% for those funded once.

17 repeat relationships: 10 still active in FY2024, 7 since wound down; 10 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

17
34

Total granted

$2.1M
$1.1M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+18%
+9%

Still filing today

71%
79%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 56% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $275k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesCommunity ImprovementHealthYouth DevelopmentEducationCrime & LegalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • GC
    GREATER CLEVELAND CONGREGATIONS INC
    3× · 2021–2024 · $75k · revenue +18%
  • VO
    VILLAGE OF HEALING
    2× · 2021–2023 · $60k · revenue ×22 · 64% of their budget
  • AN
    ADOPTION NETWORK CLEVELAND
    2× · 2023–2024 · $60k · revenue +69%

Funded once

  • CA
    COMMUNITY ACTION WAYNEMEDINA
    one grant, 2021 · $170k · revenue +5%
  • D
    DIGITALCgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $70k · revenue +365%
  • LA
    LEGAL AID SOCIETY OF CLEVELANDgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $50k · revenue +49%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Cleveland Mediation Center

Our mission is to promote a just and peaceful community by honoring all people, building their capacity to act, and facilitating opportunities for them to engage in conflict constructively. We continue to fulfill our mission by…

Crime & Legal
2
Global Cleveland

Global cleveland is dedicated to growing northeast ohio's economy by welcoming and connecting international people to opportunities and fostering a more inviting community for those seeking a place to call home.

Human Services
3
Cleveland Jobs With Justice

To work as a coalition of labor unions, community organzation, and religious community to raise the public awarness of and build campaigns to promote workers rights an social justice issues.

Education
4
Lead Ohio

At lead ohio our goal is to make a difference in communities across ohio by recruiting, training, supporting and empowering progressive leaders in all regions of the state.

Education
5
Ywca of Northwest Ohio

The ywca of northwest ohio strives to be a powerful proactive force for the support and advancement of women and girls in our community that will continue to work for peace, justice, equality, and dignity for all people.

Human Services
6
Cleveland Leadership Center

The mission of cleveland leadership center (the organization) is to build a continuum of civic leaders committed to our community's excellence by serving as a catalyst for civic engagement. the organization achieves its mission by…

Education
7
Central Ohio Workers Center Inc

The Central Ohio Worker Center is a non-profit organization that educates, empowers, and advocates for and with low-wage and immigrant workers in Central Ohio.

Civil Rights
8
Greater Cleveland Volunteers

Greater cleveland volunteers enriches the community and indivuduals through volunteer service. volunteers age 18 and older are recruited and placed in the agency's programs or referred to local nonprofit or public organizations to help…

Philanthropy
9
Cincinnati Works

Cincinnati works brings hope and encouragement to people living in poverty while assisting them in advancing to self-sufficiency through employment. we provide free training and coaching services.

Human Services
10
United Way of North Central Ohio Inc

At united way of north central ohio, we bring people, organizations, and resources together to create solutions that improve the lives of every person in every community in our region.

—
11
The Ohio Environmental Council

To protect the environment and health of all ohio communities through legal and policy advocacy, decision-maker accountability, and civic engagement.

Environment
12
Greater Cincinnati Behavioral Health Services

To ensure people with mental illness, addiction, and related challenges lead healthy and productive lives.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Family Promise of Greater Cleveland; the most unlike its peers is Smart Development Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

50 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 50 of the 62 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
8
Early backer (in before they grew)
48/50
Grantees still filing
28/50
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CUYAHOGA COUNTY OFFICE OF EARLY CHILDHOOD: $1,127,670 · OtherCUYAHOGA COUNTY OFFICE OF EARLY CHILDHOODPREGNANT WITH POSSIBILITIES: $110,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $100,000 · Other+28 more: $945,000 · Other+28 moreCOMMUNITY ACTION WAYNEMEDINA: $170,000 · Human ServicesCOMMUNITY ACTI…ADOPTION NETWORK CLEVELAND: $60,000 · Human ServicesADOPTION NETWO…JOSEPHS HOME: $50,000 · Human ServicesJOSEPHS HOMETHEA BOWMAN CENTER: $40,000 · Human ServicesTHEA BOWMAN CE…RESOURCE CLEVELAND: $25,000 · Human ServicesPassages Connecting Fathers & Sons: $25,000 · Human ServicesWEST SIDE COMMUNITY HOUSE: $25,000 · Human ServicesPARTNERSHIP FOR GOOD HEALTH: $25,000 · Human ServicesSEEDS OF LITERACY: $25,000 · Human ServicesASIAN SERVICES IN ACTION INC: $25,000 · Human ServicesUNIVERSITY SETTLEMENT INC: $20,000 · Human ServicesTHE CENTER FOR COMMUNITY SOLUTIONS: $100,000 · Community ImprovementTHE CENTER…DIGITALC: $70,000 · Community ImprovementDIGITALCVILLAGE OF HEALING: $60,000 · Community ImprovementVILLAGE OF…NEIGHBORHOOD PROGRESS INC: $35,000 · Community ImprovementNEIGHBORHO…UNION MILES DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $25,000 · Community ImprovementUNION MILE…SMART DEVELOPMENT INC: $25,000 · Community ImprovementSMART DEVE…HOLA OHIO: $25,000 · Community ImprovementHOLA OHIOTHE CLEVELAND FOUNDATION: $230,000 · PhilanthropySTELLA MARIS INC: $50,000 · HealthMENTAL HEALTH & ADDICTION ADVOCACY COALITION: $35,000 · HealthPLANNED PARENTHOOD OF GREATER OHIO: $25,000 · HealthAUTISM SOCIETY OF GREATER AKRON: $25,000 · HealthBeech Brook: $25,000 · HealthCOURAGE TO CAREGIVERS INC: $15,000 · HealthIDEASTREAM: $50,000 · Youth DevelopmentWRITERS IN RESIDENCE: $35,000 · Youth DevelopmentEFFECTIVE LEADERSHIP ACADEMY: $25,000 · Youth DevelopmentRID-ALL FOUNDATION INC: $25,000 · Youth DevelopmentEquality Ohio Education Fund: $60,000 · Civil RightsCASA BOARD VOLUNTEER ASSOCIATION IN: $25,000 · Civil Rights
Other$2,282,670Human Services$490,000Community Improvement$340,000Philanthropy$230,000Health$175,000Youth Development$135,000Civil Rights$85,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE CLEVELAND FOUNDATION: $230,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetCOMMUNITY ACTION WAYNEMEDINA: $170,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetTHE CENTER FOR COMMUNITY SOLUTIONS: $100,000 over 4y, 1.0% of budgetGREATER CLEVELAND CONGREGATIONS INC: $75,000 over 3y, 1.9% of budgetDIGITALC: $70,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetLINKING EMPLOYMENT ABILITIES AND POTENTIAL: $60,000 over 2y, 1.6% of budgetEquality Ohio Education Fund: $60,000 over 2y, 1.9% of budgetVILLAGE OF HEALING: $60,000 over 2y, 64% of budgetADOPTION NETWORK CLEVELAND: $60,000 over 2y, 4.7% of budgetUNITED LABOR AGENCY INC: $55,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetLEGAL AID SOCIETY OF CLEVELAND: $50,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetJOURNEY CENTER FOR SAFETY AND HEALING: $50,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetSTELLA MARIS INC: $50,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetJOSEPHS HOME: $50,000 over 2y, 1.6% of budgetIDEASTREAM: $50,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetTHEA BOWMAN CENTER: $40,000 over 1y, 6.6% of budgetMENTAL HEALTH & ADDICTION ADVOCACY COALITION: $35,000 over 1y, 5.9% of budgetGOLDEN CIPHERS: $35,000 over 1y, 14% of budgetWRITERS IN RESIDENCE: $35,000 over 2y, 12% of budgetNEIGHBORHOOD PROGRESS INC: $35,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetYOUNG WOMENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF CLEVELAND OHIO: $30,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetGREATER CLEVELAND FOOD BANK INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEFFECTIVE LEADERSHIP ACADEMY: $25,000 over 1y, 2.8% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD OF GREATER OHIO: $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetUNION MILES DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $25,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetSMART DEVELOPMENT INC: $25,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetRESOURCE CLEVELAND: $25,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetPassages Connecting Fathers & Sons: $25,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetA VISION OF CHANGE INCORPORATED: $25,000 over 1y, 7.5% of budgetHOLA OHIO: $25,000 over 1y, 2.6% of budgetAUTISM SOCIETY OF GREATER AKRON: $25,000 over 1y, 5.8% of budgetWEST SIDE COMMUNITY HOUSE: $25,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetBeech Brook: $25,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCASA BOARD VOLUNTEER ASSOCIATION IN: $25,000 over 1y, 7.3% of budgetPARTNERSHIP FOR GOOD HEALTH: $25,000 over 1y, 83% of budgetSEEDS OF LITERACY: $25,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetWOMENSAFE INC: $25,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetMOBILEMED1 INC DBA MEDWORKS: $25,000 over 1y, 5.9% of budgetTORCHLIGHT YOUTH MENTORING ALLIANCE: $25,000 over 1y, 3.5% of budgetFAMILY PROMISE OF GREATER CLEVELAND: $25,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetWOMEN'S RECOVERY CENTER: $25,000 over 1y, 3.2% of budgetTHE COLLABORATIVE TO END HUMAN TRAFFICKING: $25,000 over 1y, 3.8% of budgetASIAN SERVICES IN ACTION INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetUNIVERSITY SETTLEMENT INC: $20,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetTHE TEACHING CLEVELAND FOUNDATION: $15,000 over 1y, 7.1% of budgetCOURAGE TO CAREGIVERS INC: $15,000 over 1y, 9.0% of budgetBUILDING HOPE IN THE CITY: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Cleveland Foundat…The George Gund Found…The Char and Chuck Fo…The Abington Foundati…Higley Fund of the Cl…Saint Lukes Foundatio…Dominion Energy Chari…United Way of Greater…Mt Sinai Health Care …The Reinberger Founda…Medwish MedworksWoodruff Foundation
The Cleveland FoundationOH77.8× affinity40 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Cleveland Foundation · The George Gund Foundation · The Char and Chuck Fowler Family Foundation · The Abington Foundation · Higley Fund of the Cleveland Foundation · Saint Lukes Foundation of Cleveland Ohio · Dominion Energy Charitable Foundation · United Way of Greater Cleveland · Mt Sinai Health Care Foundation · The Reinberger Foundation · Medwish Medworks · Woodruff Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Healthcomp Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Healthcomp Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%23%51%90%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    28report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 62 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Healthcomp’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home