· Private foundation
Healthcare Services Group Charitable Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2019
- Under $10k81 grants · $213k
- $10k–50k2 grants · $55k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| BJC HEALTHCARE | $44,000 |
| CAPITAL REGION MEDICAL CENTER | $11,380 |
| MOSAIC LIFE CARE | $8,000 |
| MERCY HOSPITAL CARTHAGE | $8,000 |
| SOUTHEASTHEALTH | $8,000 |
| UNITED WAY | $6,526 |
| FITZGIBBON HOSPITAL | $4,000 |
| HANNIBAL REGIONAL HOSPITAL | $4,000 |
| MADISON MEDICAL CENTER | $4,000 |
| NEVADA REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER | $4,000 |
| RANKEN JORDAN PEDIATRIC BRIDGE HOSPITAL | $4,000 |
| EXCELSIOR SPRINGS HOSPITAL | $4,000 |
| CAPITAL REGION MEDICAL CENTER | $4,000 |
| CITIZENS MEMORIAL HOSP DIST | $4,000 |
| MERCY HOSPITAL LINCOLN | $4,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–19, $1k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 26% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +59% since the first grant, against +52% for the ones you funded once.
76 repeat relationships — 66 still active in FY2019, 10 since wound down; 12 grantees were first funded in FY2019 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2019, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- FHFREEMAN HEALTH SYSTEM3× · 2017–2019 · $16k · revenue +30%
- MHMERCY HOSPITAL CARTHAGE3× · 2017–2019 · $14k · revenue +81%
- MHMERCY HOSPITAL LINCOLN3× · 2017–2019 · $13k · revenue +59%
Funded once
- CRCAMERON REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTERone grant, 2018 · $3k · revenue +8%
- CHCOMMUNITY HOSPITAL FAIRFAXone grant, 2017 · $3k
- BCBARTON COUNTY MEMORIAL HOSPITALone grant, 2017 · $3k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
University health is an academic health center providing accessible, state-of-the-art quality healthcare to our community regardless of the ability to pay.
Morristown-Hamblen Hospital Association provides quality healthcare, in alignment with Covenant Health's mission to serve the community by improving the quality of life through better health, regardless of the patient's ability to pay.
Methodist Medical Center provides quality healthcare, in alignment with Covenant Health's mission to serve the community by improving the quality of life through better health regardless of a patient's ability to pay.
Methodist le bonheur healthcare, in partnership with its medical staffs, will collaborate with patients and their families to be the leader in providing high quality, cost-effective patient-and family-centered care. services will be…
Mission: johns hopkins howard county medical center, a member of johns hopkins medicine, strives to provide the highest quality care to improve the health of our entire community through innovation, collaboration, service excellence,…
Through our exceptional health care services, we reveal the healing presence of god.
Fort Sanders Regional Medical Center provides quality healthcare, in alignment with Covenant Health's mission to serve the community by improving the quality of life through better health, regardless of a patient's ability to pay.
Washington regional is committed to improving the health of people in communities we serve through compassionate, high-quality care, prevention, and wellness education.
Fort Loudoun Medical Center provides quality healthcare, in alignment with Covenant Health's mission to serve the community by improving the quality of life through better health, regardless of a patient's ability to pay.
Roane County Medical Center provides quality healthcare, in alignment with Covenant Health's mission to serve the community by improving the quality of life through better health, regardless of a patient's ability to pay.
The primary mission or purpose of methodist health system is to serve people in defined service areas by meeting their health needs effectively and in a manner that reflects a "commitment to the christian concepts of life and learning" as…
To operate a health care system providing medical excellence to the eastern region of south carolina and the extreme southeastern region of north carolina.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Compass Health Inc and the most unlike its peers is Dreams to Reality. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 42 years old; the field is 19. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 21% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
41 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 41 of the 108 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds PERRY COUNTY HEALTH SYSTEM ↗
- Who funds Capital Region Medical Center ↗
- Who funds FREEMAN HEALTH SYSTEM ↗
- Who funds MERCY HOSPITAL CARTHAGE ↗
- Who funds MERCY HOSPITAL LINCOLN ↗
- Who funds Carroll County Memorial Hospital ↗
- Who funds Lake Regional Health System ↗
- Who funds HANNIBAL REGIONAL HEALTHCARE SYSTEM INC ↗
- Who funds The Ranken-Jordan Home For Convalescent Crippled Children ↗
- Who funds TEXAS COUNTY MEMORIAL HOSPITAL ↗
- Who funds MISSOURI DELTA MEDICAL CENTER ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF STE GENEVIEVE COUNTY MEMORIAL HOSPITAL ↗
- Who funds OZARKS MEDICAL CENTER ↗
- Who funds FREEMAN NEOSHO HOSPITAL INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Hospital Industry Data Institute · Community Foundation of the Ozarks Inc · The Patterson Family Foundation · United Way of Central Missouri Inc · Commerce Bancshares Foundation · Veterans United Foundation · Edward Jones Foundation · Enterprise Holdings Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Healthcare Services Group Charitable Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Healthcare Services Group Charitable Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Healthcare Services Group Charitable Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.