· Private foundation
Health Quest Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k18 grants · $26k
- $10k–50k4 grants · $90k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| YOSEMITE CONSERVANCY | $25,000 |
| LA JOLLA COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL | $23,000 |
| SAN DIEGO RIVER PARKS FOUNDATION | $23,000 |
| THE CAMPANILE FOUNDATION | $18,885 |
| VASCULAR CURES | $7,000 |
| KIMERA ORPHANAGE | $7,000 |
| INTERNATIONAL MOUNTAIN BIKING ASSOC | $2,625 |
| LEUKEMIA LYMPHOMA SOCIETY | $1,400 |
| OUTDOOR OUTREACH | $1,200 |
| YMCA - DAN MCKINNEY FAMILY | $1,042 |
| CALIFORNIA STATE PARKS FOUNDATION | $1,035 |
| SAN DIEGO MOUNTAIN BIKING ASSOCIATI | $1,030 |
| RADY CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION | $1,000 |
| AMERICAN ALPINE CLUB | $500 |
| GUTTMACHER | $500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–23, $26k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
35 repeat relationships — 14 still active in FY2024, 21 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $4k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- LJLA JOLLA COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL8× · 2017–2024 · $274k · revenue +43%
- YFYOSEMITE FOUNDATION7× · 2017–2024 · $177k · revenue +50%
- TSThe San Diego River Park Foundation8× · 2017–2024 · $65k · revenue +259%
Funded once
- ABACCELERATE BRAIN CANCER CURE INCone grant, 2017 · $20k · revenue -35%
- TRTHE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CAone grant, 2017 · $17k
- USUC SAN DIEGO FOUNDATIONgraduatedone grant, 2017 · $12k · revenue +78%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The san diego foundation inspires enduring philanthropy and enables community solutions to improve the quality of life in our region.
Ci works to spotlight and secure the critical benefits that nature provides to humanity.
Sustainable Conservation advances the collaborative stewardship of Californias land, air, and water for the benefit of nature and people. For over three decades, Sustainable Conservation has built coalitions of people with different…
The union of concerned scientists puts rigorous, independent science into action, developing solutions and advocating for a healthy, safe, and just future.
Rainforest trust saves endangered wildlife and protects our planet by creating rainforest reserves through partnerships, community engagement, and donor support.
The Chile-California Council is a San Francisco-based nonprofit dedicated to developing and promoting joint endeavors and cooperative relations between Chile and California, as well as individuals, legal entities and other institutions in…
Project drawdown's mission is to drive meaningful climate action by advancing science-based solutions and strategies. project drawdown's work is focused on three pillars: science - advancing science-based climate solutions and strategies;…
To advocate for policy changes by governments and corporations in order to preserve ocean life and return the oceans to their former abundance.
San diego zoo wildlife alliance is committed to saving species worldwide by uniting our expertise in wildlife care and conservation science with our dedication to inspiring passion for nature.
Nature collective's mission is to drive a passion for nature for all. we think inclusively and diversely when serving those devoid of nature those who remember nature and want to connect back to it and those who have an affinity with…
To ensure coast redwood forests in the santa cruz mountains thrive for generations to come. since 1900, sempervirens has protected more than 36,000 acres. learn more about our mission, vision, and strategic plan through 2030 at:…
Friends of the earth strives for a more healthy and just world by defendng the environment and human health while advancing social and economic justice by conducting research and education, transforming the economy so it protects the…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is California State Parks Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Kimera Orphanage. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 33 years old; the field is 14. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 24% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 1% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
68 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 68 of the 104 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds LA JOLLA COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds GENETIC ALLIANCE INC ↗
- Who funds YOSEMITE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds The San Diego River Park Foundation ↗
- Who funds THE CAMPANILE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds THE FOUNDATION TO ADVANCE VASCULAR CURES ↗
- Who funds KIMERA ORPHANAGE ↗
- Who funds RADY CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION SAN DIEGO ↗
- Who funds OUTDOOR OUTREACH ↗
- Who funds The Trauma Foundation ↗
- Who funds ACCELERATE BRAIN CANCER CURE INC ↗
- Who funds JESSE LEWIS CHOOSE LOVE MOVEMENT INC ↗
- Who funds San Diego-Imperial Council Boy Scouts of America ↗
- Who funds UC SAN DIEGO FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds SAN DIEGO MOUNTAIN BIKING ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds CUREBOUND ↗
- Who funds Transforming Youth Outdoors Inc ↗
- Who funds CALIFORNIA STATE PARKS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds MIRACLE BABIES ↗
- Who funds THEATER & ARTS FOUNDATION OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY DBA LA JOLLA PLAYHOUSE ↗
- Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF SAN MARCOS ↗
- Who funds NETWORK FOR GOOD ↗
- Who funds ARTS BRIDGE INC ↗
- Who funds RON KORNBLUT MEMORIAL FUND ↗
- Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
- Who funds PARADOX SPORTS ↗
- Who funds YMCA OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The San Diego Foundation · Sempra Foundation · Jewish Community Foundation of San Diego · The Conrad Prebys Foundation · Price Philanthropies Foundation · Rancho Santa Fe Foundation · Marin Community Foundation · Walter J & Betty C Zable Foundation · The Nordson Corporation Foundation · Kerr Family Foundation · Samuel I & John Henry Fox Foundation · The Parker Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Health Quest Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Genetic Alliance Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.