· Public charity
Health Care for All Inc
Health care for all advocates for health justice in massachusetts by working to promote health equity and ensure coverage and access for all.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2021–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k2 grants · $11k
- $10k–50k18 grants · $645k
- $50k–250k28 grants · $2.6M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| TRUE ALLIANCE CENTER INC | $210,510 |
| HAITIAN COMMUNITY PARTNERS FOUNDATION INC | $189,760 |
| BOSTON CHINA TOWN NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER | $137,926 |
| MASSACHUSETTS SENIOR ACTION COUNCIL | $137,534 |
| IMMIGRANT FAMILY SERVICE INSTITUTE INC | $131,260 |
| IMMIGRANTS' ASSISTANCE CENTER INC | $109,334 |
| CAMBODIAN MUTUAL ASSISTANCE ASSOCIATION OF GREATER LOWELL INC | $109,334 |
| BRAZILIAN AMERICAN CENTER INC - BRACE | $107,250 |
| AFRICAN COMMUNITY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT OF NEW ENGLAND | $102,834 |
| AGENCIA ALPHA | $90,084 |
| BOSTON MISSIONARY BAPTIST COMMUNITY CENTER INC | $86,926 |
| MOUNT OLIVES COMMUNITY CENTER | $86,926 |
| EVANGELICAL FIRST CHURCH OF WORCESTER | $86,926 |
| OLIVE IN JULY INC | $79,834 |
| QUINCY ASIAN RESOURCES INC | $78,500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY21–25, $5.1M) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 96% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
49 repeat relationships — 40 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $215k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- TATRUE ALLIANCE CENTER INC3× · 2023–2025 · $617k · revenue +8% · 52% of their budget
- HCHAITIAN COMMUNITY PARTNERS FOUNDATION INC3× · 2023–2025 · $596k · revenue +126% · 28% of their budget
- BABRAZILIAN AMERICAN CENTER INC4× · 2021–2025 · $471k · revenue +118% · 32% of their budget
Funded once
- ESELDER SERVICES OF WORCESTER AREA INCgraduatedone grant, 2023 · $20k · revenue +27%
Groundwork Lawrence Incone grant, 2023 · $20k · revenue -12%
PINE STREET INN INCone grant, 2023 · $20k · revenue +22%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To promote the general welfare and independence of asian elders via a network of culturally sensitive and linguistically appropriate programs and services.
Aaca's mission is to empower low-income individuals and families by providing education, guidance, resources, and support. our goal is to help them achieve economic stability and mobility, enabling them to build wealth and secure a strong…
To advance the interests of the human services sector and providers through advocacy, education, and engagement of diverse stakeholders for collective impact.
To assist refugees and new immigrants to resettle in their new adopted communities
Massachusetts education and career opportunities, inc. (massedco, inc.) is a statewide network of service sites that provides education and career advising to over 12,000 low-income, first generation individuals each year. massedco…
development of Latin American community
Maha breaks down barriers facing first-time and first-generation home buyers and owners through education, counseling, advocacy, and grassroots organizing.
The mission of the organization is to enhance access to quality health care, promote workforce development, and eliminate health inequities.
To provide home care services, referrals and advocacy to the elderly population located in the boston area.
Mfhc is committed to ending systemic housing discrimination and creating inclusive communities through education, outreach, advocacy, housing counseling and enforcement.
To strengthen and connect the statewide network of community action agencies and collectively advocate for an end to poverty.
To lead the assisted living industry in its service of seniors through advocacy, education, operational support, and enhanced growth opportunities.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Mystic Valley Aging Services Inc and the most unlike its peers is Imago Dei Fund. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 29 years old; the field is 17. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 5% of your grantees by number, and just 3% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 3% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
62 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 62 of the 70 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds TRUE ALLIANCE CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds HAITIAN COMMUNITY PARTNERS FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds BRAZILIAN AMERICAN CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds AFRICAN COMMUNITY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT OF NEW ENGLAND ↗
- Who funds MASSACHUSETTS SENIOR ACTION COUNCIL INC ↗
- Who funds AUTHENTIC CARIBBEAN FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds IMMIGRANT FAMILY SERVICES INSTITUTE INC ↗
- Who funds BOSTON CHINATOWN NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds NEWVUE COMMUNITIES INC ↗
- Who funds IMMIGRANTS' ASSISTANCE CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds MAKING OPPORTUNITY COUNT INC ↗
- Who funds Cambodian Mutual Assistance Association of Greater Lowell Inc ↗
- Who funds ASIAN WOMEN FOR HEALTH INC ↗
- Who funds THE LEARNING CENTER FOR THE DEAF INC ↗
- Who funds CHICA INC ↗
- Who funds LA ALIANZA HISPANA INC ↗
- Who funds LA COLABORATIVA INC ↗
- Who funds TRI-VALLEY INC ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY HEALTH AWARENESS NETWORK INC GROWS EQUITY INC ↗
- Who funds QUINCY ASIAN RESOURCES INC ↗
- Who funds BRAZILIAN WOMEN'S GROUP INC ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CENTER OF SOUTHEASTERN MASS ↗
- Who funds Associacao Caboverdiana De Brockton Inc ↗
- Who funds AGESPAN INC ↗
- Who funds MASSACHUSETTS IMMIGRANT AND REFUGEE ADVOCACY COALITION INC ↗
- Who funds MOUNT OLIVES COMMUNITY CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds BOSTON MISSIONARY BAPTIST COMMUNITY CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds YMCA of Greater Springfield Inc ↗
- Who funds OLIVE IN JULY INC ↗
- Who funds NEXT LEADERSHIP DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds FEDERATION FOR CHILDREN WSPECIAL NEEDS ↗
- Who funds ASSOCIATION OF HAITIAN WOMEN INC ↗
- Who funds BROCKTON WORKERS ALLIANCE INC ↗
- Who funds CHINESE PROGRESSIVE ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds LA COMUNIDAD INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Health Resources in Action Inc · Boston Foundation Inc · Eastern Bank Foundation · United Way Of Massachusetts Bay Inc · The Lenny Zakim Fund · Point32health Foundation Inc · Barr Foundation · Cummings Foundation Grants Inc (Fka Oneworld Boston Inc) · Combined Jewish Philanthropies of Greater Boston Inc · Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Foundation Inc · Third Sector New England Inc · Chinese Progressive Association
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Health Care for All Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Greater Malden Asian American Community Coalition Inc — 100% of income from government
- Disability Policy Consortium Inc — 81% of income from government
- Mab Community Services Inc — 69% of income from government
- Tri-Valley Inc — 68% of income from government
- Agespan Inc — 57% of income from government
- Community Action Inc — 52% of income from government
- Association of Haitian Women Inc — 51% of income from government
- Quincy Asian Resources Inc — 43% of income from government
- La Alianza Hispana Inc — 41% of income from government
- Newvue Communities Inc — 40% of income from government
- Boston Chinatown Neighborhood Center Inc — 38% of income from government
- Mount Olives Community Center Inc — 36% of income from government
- La Colaborativa Inc — 34% of income from government
- Making Opportunity Count Inc — 28% of income from government
- Olive in July Inc — 24% of income from government
- Immigrants' Assistance Center Inc — 14% of income from government
- Chica Inc — 12% of income from government
- Pine Street Inn Inc — 11% of income from government
- Federation for Children Wspecial Needs — 10% of income from government
- The Learning Center for the Deaf Inc — 9% of income from government
- Massachusetts Immigrant and Refugee Advocacy Coalition Inc — 8% of income from government
- Ymca of the North Shore Inc — 6% of income from government
- Authentic Caribbean Foundation Inc — 1% of income from government
- Haitian Community Partners Foundation Inc — 1% of income from government
- Brazilian Women's Group Inc — 0% of income from government
- Asian Women for Health Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.