Skip to content
Health Care Advocates International Inc at a glance

· Public charity

Health Care Advocates International Inc

Health care advocates international is a health clinic facility with the aim of reducing the morbidity and mortality from hiv and sti's by fighting stigma & discrimination and ending homelessness via prevention programs, education, advocacy and treatment, with a focus on the lgbtq and hiv communities in the developed and developing…

$877k
Granted FY2024still arriving
14
Grants FY2024still arriving
8
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2024.

Health$1.0MHousing & Shelter$449kFood & Nutrition$176kHuman Services$59kYouth Development$45kReligion$43kEducation$20kInternational$10kOther$0
02FY2024 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 14 grants below total $355,069, the rows itemized in this filing. The $876,608 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $521,539 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k12 grants · $255k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $100k
$23,000
Median grant
8
States reached
$4.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE HEALTH COLLECTIVE$50,000
LIBERATIONS PROGRAM INC$50,000
MID FAIRFIELD AIDS PROJECT$40,000
STOP AIDS$40,000
TRANS HOUSING COALITION$35,000
SOUTHWEST CENTER FOR HIVAIDS (NOW PRISMA COMMUNITY CARE)$25,000
BALLROOM WE CARE$23,000
TONY'S PLACE$21,520
VISITING NURSE SERVICES IN WESTCHESTER$15,199
STONEWALL YOUTH$15,000
MONTANO DE LUZ$10,350
TRIANGLE COMMUNITY CENTER$10,000
ALEX INC$10,000
METROPOLITAN COMMUNITY CHURCH OF HARTFORD$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–24, $845k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 73% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%Y2Y: $205k → 8%TONY'S PLACE: $22k → 16%STAND WITH TRANS: $11k → 8%TAKE: $30k → 16%NEW HAVEN PRIDE: $110k → 12%SAMARITAN MINISTRY CENTRAL BAPTIST CHURCH: $8k → 12%OUTMEMPHIS: $20k → 17%INDIANA YOUTH GROUP: $43k → 16%STERLING HOUSE: $11k → 9%NEW HAVEN PRIDE: $93k → 12%STERLING HOUSE: $5k → 9%NEW HAVEN PRIDE: $85k → 12%YOUTH CONTINUUM: $75k → 12%NEW HAVEN PRIDE: $31k → 12%YOUTH CONTINUUM: $65k → 12%YOUTH CONTINUUM: $33k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

AK
WA
IL
MI
NY
MA
IN
OH
CT
CA
AZ
TN
NC
LA
AL
GA
TX

Grants abroad, by region: $428k on the FY2024 return

Schedule F, as filed: 2 regions. The IRS asks for region and purpose, not the recipient, so no country or grantee can be named here.

Europe (including Iceland and Greenland)$300k · 70% · 1 grant

Stated purpose: CONFERENCES

Sub-Saharan Africa$128k · 30% · 1 grant

Stated purpose: ESSENTIAL HEALTH CARE SERVICES

How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. Grants abroad on Schedule F are filed by region, purpose and amount with no recipient name, so they are shown by region and cannot be placed on the country map or matched to a grantee.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

62%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.1M · 9 repeat orgs$697k to everyone else

9 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2024, 7 since wound down; 12 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
12

Total granted

$1.1M
$392k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+35%
+56%

Still filing today

78%
92%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 14% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $305k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesHealthCommunity ImprovementReligionCivil RightsEnvironmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HH
    HUNT HILL FARM TRUST
    3× · 2021–2023 · $166k · revenue +268% · 74% of their budget
  • MF
    MID FAIRFIELD AIDS PROJECT
    3× · 2019–2024 · $76k · revenue +217%
  • TO
    Time Out Youth Inc
    2× · 2020–2022 · $20k · revenue +45%

Funded once

  • TC
    TRANSCEND CHARLOTTE INC
    one grant, 2020 · $170k · revenue -45%
  • II
    Identity Incgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $61k · revenue +31%
  • II
    IYG INCgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $43k · revenue +114%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Lesbian and Gay Community Services Center Inc

EMPOWERING LGBT PEOPLE, BUILDING STRONG COMMUNITY. NEW YORK CITY'S LESBIAN, GAY, BISEXUAL, & TRANSGENDER COMMUNITY CENTER EMPOWERS PEOPLE TO LEAD HEALTHY, SUCCESSFUL LIVES. The Center celebrates our community and advocates for justice and…

Human Services
2
Central Valley Gender Health & Wellness
Civil Rights
3
The San Diego Lesbian Gay Bisexual Transgender Community Center

The san diego lgbt community center enhances and sustains the health & well-being of the lesbian, gay, bisexual, queer, transgender, nonbinary, immigrant, and hiv communities to the betterment of our entire san diego region.

Health
4
The Attic Youth Center

The attic youth center creates opportunities for lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer, and questioning (lgbtq) youth to develop into healthy, independent, civic-minded adults within a safe and supportive community, and promotes the…

Youth Development
5
Legacy Community Health Services Inc

The mission of legacy community health services is, "driving healthy change in our communities." our vision is, "connecting our communities to health every day, in every way."

Health
6
Lgbt Center Intercultural Collective Inc

Colectivo Intercultural TRANSgrediendo is a social organization, which works on the empowerment of human rights, access and comprehensive health care of TransGNB people, strengthening the social and cultural expression of diverse gender…

Civil Rights
7
Speakout

The mission of Speak Out is to educate support and connect the LGBTQ community of color through social media engagement mentorship personal empowerment and health awareness.

Human Services
8
1N10 Inc

To provide support and resources for the local lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender and questioning (lgbtq) youth. to provide youth with life and leadership skills and the tools to improve self esteem and acceptance of who they are.

Civil Rights
9
The Alliance for Lgbtq Youth Inc

The Alliance for Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, Queer, and Questioning Youth provides mental health and care coordination services, leadership development, and policy advocacy that centers the lives and experiences of LGBTQ youth in…

Human Services
10
Southern Tier Aids Program Inc

Stap compassionately and competently meets the evolving needs of its communities by serving people affected by chronic illness and to improve public health through disease prevention, care coordination, and advocacy.

—
11
True Colors Inc Sexual Minority Youth and Family Services of Ct

True colors mission is to improve the quality of life for lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender (lgbt) youth. we work to create a world where youth of all sexual orientations and gender identities are valued and affirmed. we challenge all…

—
12
Proud Haven Inc

Our mission is to provide a safe shelter and resources for LGBTQIA youth and young adults experiencing homelessness. We also provide resources and support to all members of the LGBTQIA population.

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is New Haven Gay and Lesbian Community Center Inc; the most unlike its peers is Hunt Hill Farm Trust. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

30 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 30 of the 33 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

3
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
28/30
Grantees still filing
16/30
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

YOUTH CONTINUUM INC: $377,500 · Human ServicesYOUTH CONTINUUM INCNEW HAVEN GAY AND LESBIAN COMMUNITY CENTER INC: $319,200 · Human ServicesNEW HAVEN GAY AND LESBIAN COMMUNITY CENTER INCJim Collins Foundation Inc: $90,000 · Human ServicesJim Collins Foundation IncIYG INC: $42,500 · Human Services+7 more: $120,676 · Human Services+7 moreTRANSCEND CHARLOTTE INC: $170,305 · OtherTRANSCEND CHARLOTTE INCMID FAIRFIELD AIDS PROJECT: $75,975 · OtherMID FAIRFIELD AIDS PROJECTIdentity Inc: $60,725 · OtherIdentity IncMETROPOLITAN COMMUNITY CHURCH OF HARTFORD: $51,542 · OtherMETROPOLITAN COMMUNITY CHURCH O…HARTFORD GAY AND LESBIAN HEALTH COLLECTIVE INC: $50,000 · OtherHARTFORD GAY AND LESBIAN HEALTH…STOP AIDS: $40,000 · OtherSTOP AIDSTime Out Youth Inc: $20,000 · Other+5 more: $50,350 · Other+5 moreHUNT HILL FARM TRUST: $165,728 · EnvironmentHUNT HILL …LIBERATION PROGRAMS INC: $50,000 · HealthPRISMA COMMUNITY CARE (FKA SOUTHWEST CENTER HIV/AIDS INC): $25,000 · HealthBALLROOM WE CARE INC: $23,000 · HealthVISITING NURSE SERVICES IN WESTCHESTER INC: $15,199 · HealthTranslifeline DBA Trans Lifeline: $5,181 · HealthYALE NEW HAVEN HEALTH SERVICES CORPORATION: $5,000 · HealthTRANS HOUSING COALITION INC: $35,000 · Housing & ShelterGLSEN INC: $30,000 · Civil RightsLOVE YOUR LABELS INC: $20,000 · Community Improvement
Human Services$949,876Other$518,897Environment$165,728Health$123,380Housing & Shelter$35,000Civil Rights$30,000Community Improvement$20,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetYOUTH CONTINUUM INC: $377,500 over 4y, 4.6% of budgetNEW HAVEN GAY AND LESBIAN COMMUNITY CENTER INC: $319,200 over 4y, 17% of budgetHUNT HILL FARM TRUST: $165,728 over 3y, 74% of budgetJim Collins Foundation Inc: $90,000 over 3y, 58% of budgetMID FAIRFIELD AIDS PROJECT: $75,975 over 3y, 1.7% of budgetIdentity Inc: $60,725 over 1y, 4.0% of budgetHARTFORD GAY AND LESBIAN HEALTH COLLECTIVE INC: $50,000 over 1y, 3.0% of budgetLIBERATION PROGRAMS INC: $50,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetIYG INC: $42,500 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetTRANS HOUSING COALITION INC: $35,000 over 1y, 13% of budgetGLSEN INC: $30,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetPRISMA COMMUNITY CARE (FKA SOUTHWEST CENTER HIV/AIDS INC): $25,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTony's Place: $21,520 over 1y, 4.9% of budgetOUTMEMPHIS: $20,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetLOVE YOUR LABELS INC: $20,000 over 1y, 72% of budgetTime Out Youth Inc: $20,000 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetSTERLING HOUSE COMMUNITY CENTER INC: $16,156 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetVISITING NURSE SERVICES IN WESTCHESTER INC: $15,199 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetYOUTH OASIS: $15,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetSTONEWALL YOUTH: $15,000 over 1y, 3.2% of budgetStand With Trans: $10,500 over 1y, 3.3% of budgetMONTANA DE LUZ: $10,350 over 1y, 2.0% of budgetTRIANGLE COMMUNITY CENTER INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetSAMARITAN MINISTRIES OF TEMPLE BAPTIST CHURCH INC: $7,500 over 1y, 5.0% of budgetTranslifeline DBA Trans Lifeline: $5,181 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetYALE NEW HAVEN HEALTH SERVICES CORPORATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHoward Brown Health Center: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Centerlink IncThe World Health Clin…Leonard Litz Foundati…William Caspar Graust…Yale UniversitySynchrony FoundationEnterprise Holdings F…Charities Aid Foundat…The Pfizer Foundation…Jpmorgan Chase Founda…Network for GoodThe Bank of America C…
Centerlink IncFL19.8× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Centerlink Inc · The World Health Clinicians Inc · Leonard Litz Foundation · William Caspar Graustein Memorial Fund · Yale University · Synchrony Foundation · Enterprise Holdings Foundation · Charities Aid Foundation America · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Network for Good · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Health Care Advocates International Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Health Care Advocates International Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 9%
  • Youth Continuum Inc: 76% of income from government
  • Liberation Programs Inc: 24% of income from government
  • Mid Fairfield Aids Project: 10% of income from government
  • Hartford Gay and Lesbian Health Collective Inc: 9% of income from government
  • Sterling House Community Center Inc: 8% of income from government
  • Triangle Community Center Inc: 5% of income from government
  • Yale New Haven Health Services Corporation: 3% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Health Care Advocates International Inc?

Find your warmest path to Health Care Advocates International Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 33 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Health Care Advocates International’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home