· Private foundation
He Stumberg Sr Orphans Crippled Children & Handicapped Persons Trust
Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Trinity University | $369,894 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–23, $1.1M) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
18 repeat relationships — 0 still active in FY2024, 18 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $370k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- TSTEXAS SCOTTISH RITE HOSPITAL FOR CRIPPLED CHILDREN6× · 2017–2023 · $1.0M · revenue +63%
- MRMISSION ROAD DEVELOPMENTAL CENTER5× · 2017–2023 · $1.0M · revenue +22%
- BCBRIGHTON CENTER3× · 2021–2023 · $60k · revenue +60%
Funded once
- CJCAMP JOHN MARCone grant, 2023 · $955k
- SLSA Life Academygraduatedone grant, 2022 · $15k · revenue +119%
- TSTHE SHRINERS' HOSPITAL FOR CHILDRENgraduatedone grant, 2022 · $15k · revenue +47%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
It is the mission of Sargent Rehabilitation Center to rehabilitate children and young adults with disabilities for maximum community access to education daily living and employment.
South central los angeles regional center, (sclarc), believes special needs deserve special attention. we are committed to the provision of culturally sensitive services which enhance the inherent strengths of the family and enable…
Provide a spectrum of resources and support to our community and to the individuals with intellectual and developmental disabilities.
We help advance the independence of individuals with disabilities & other special needs.
To provide dynamic enrichment programs for children with special needs and respite for their families.
Founded in 1887, the center is the oldest children's nonprofit in the region accredited by the joint commission for its excellence in quality of care. the center provides a continuum of therapeutic & educational services to youth &…
ConnectAbility's mission is to empower those with life altering disabilities and their caregivers to reach their fullest potential.
To provide child and adult day services, vocational, therapy and support services for individuals with acquired or developmental disabilities or other special needs, and their families.
Teamability strives to ensure that children with severe multiple disabilities have the opportunity to benefit from therapeautic educational intervention to participate actively in life.
Based upon medical prescription, the organization provides speech therapy, physical therapy occupational therapy and feeding therapy. the organization provides therapy serices to children with developmental disabilities and developmental…
To provide an environment where children on the autistic spectrum can develop their potential academically, emotionally, socially, communicatively, physically and gain functional independence using programs and methods that are selected…
We empower central texans with intellectual and developmental disabilities and their families through compassionate case management and innovative programs.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Mission Road Developmental Center and the most unlike its peers is Sa Life Academy. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 23 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds TEXAS SCOTTISH RITE HOSPITAL FOR CRIPPLED CHILDREN ↗
- Who funds MISSION ROAD DEVELOPMENTAL CENTER ↗
- Who funds Trinity University ↗
- Who funds BRIGHTON CENTER ↗
- Who funds CHILDREN'S ASSOC FOR MAXIMUM POTENTIAL ( ↗
- Who funds THE CHILDREN'S SHELTER ↗
- Who funds AUTISTIC TREATMENT CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds Kinetic Kids Inc ↗
- Who funds MISSION ROAD MINISTRIES ↗
- Who funds THE ARC OF SAN ANTONIO INC ↗
- Who funds REACHING MAXIMUM INDEPENDENCE ↗
- Who funds CLARITY CHILD GUIDANCE CENTER ↗
- Who funds Morgan's Wonderland ↗
- Who funds THE SADDLE LIGHT CENTER FOR THERAPEUTIC HORSEMANSHIP ↗
- Who funds SA Life Academy ↗
- Who funds THE SHRINERS' HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN ↗
- Who funds Project MEND ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: San Antonio Area Foundation · Faye L & William L Cowden Charitable Foundation · The Texas Cavaliers Charitable Foundation · Harvey E Najim Charitable Foundation · Pryor Myra Stafford Char Tr F0030100 · John L Santikos Charitable Foundation · Marcia & Otto Koehler Foundation · The Charity Ball Association of San Antonio Inc · St Luke's Lutheran Health Ministries Inc · Nancy Smith Hurd Foundation · Professional Contract Services Inc · Keith M Orme and Pat Vigeon Orme Charitable Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization He Stumberg Sr Orphans Crippled Children & Handicapped Persons Trust funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- The Shriners' Hospital for Children — 6% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to He Stumberg Sr Orphans Crippled Children & Handicapped Persons Trust?
Find your warmest path to He Stumberg Sr Orphans Crippled Children & Handicapped Persons Trust through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.