Skip to content
He Stumberg Sr Orphans Crippled Children & Handicapped Persons Trust at a glance

· Private foundation

He Stumberg Sr Orphans Crippled Children & Handicapped Persons Trust

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$370k
Granted FY2024still arriving
1
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$370k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$1.3MRecreation & Sports$1.2MHuman Services$1.1MEducation$455k
02FY2024 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$369,894
Median grant
1
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Trinity University$369,894
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–23, $1.1M) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%CHILDRENS SHELTER: $12k → 16%CHILDRENS SHELTER: $11k → 16%CHILDRENS SHELTER: $11k → 16%CHILDRENS SHELTER: $10k → 16%CHILDRENS SHELTER: $10k → 16%MISSION ROAD DEVELOPMENT CENTER: $955k → 16%MISSION ROAD DEVELOPMENT CENTER: $35k → 16%MISSION ROAD DEVELOPMENTAL CENTER: $10k → 16%REACHING MAXIMUM INDEPENDENCE INC: $7k → 16%MISSION ROAD DEVELOPMENTAL CENTER: $10k → 16%REACHING MAXIMUM INDEPENDENCE INC: $5k → 16%MISSION ROAD DEVELOPMENTAL CENTER: $10k → 16%REACHING MAXIMUM INDEPENDENCE INC: $5k → 16%REACHING MAXIMUM INDEPENDENCE INC: $5k → 16%SADDLE LIGHT CENTER INC: $5k → 16%SADDLE LIGHT CENTER INC: $5k → 16%SADDLE LIGHT CENTER INC: $5k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

66%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.6M · 18 repeat orgs$1.4M to everyone else

18 repeat relationships: 0 still active in FY2024, 18 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

18
4

Total granted

$2.6M
$988k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+27%
+119%

Still filing today

78%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $370k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthHuman ServicesRecreation & SportsEducationReligionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TS
    TEXAS SCOTTISH RITE HOSPITAL FOR CRIPPLED CHILDREN
    6× · 2017–2023 · $1.0M · revenue +145%
  • MR
    MISSION ROAD DEVELOPMENTAL CENTER
    5× · 2017–2023 · $1.0M · revenue +22%
  • BC
    BRIGHTON CENTER
    3× · 2021–2023 · $60k · revenue +60%

Funded once

  • CJ
    CAMP JOHN MARC
    one grant, 2023 · $955k
  • SL
    SA Life Academygraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $15k · revenue +119%
  • TS
    THE SHRINERS' HOSPITAL FOR CHILDRENgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $15k · revenue +47%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Sargent Rehabilitation Center Inc

It is the mission of Sargent Rehabilitation Center to rehabilitate children and young adults with disabilities for maximum community access to education daily living and employment.

Education
2
South Central Los Angeles Regional Center for Dev Disabled Persons Inc

South central los angeles regional center, (sclarc), believes special needs deserve special attention. we are committed to the provision of culturally sensitive services which enhance the inherent strengths of the family and enable…

Human Services
3
Marc Inc

Provide a spectrum of resources and support to our community and to the individuals with intellectual and developmental disabilities.

—
4
Easter Seals North Texas

We help advance the independence of individuals with disabilities & other special needs.

Health
5
Special Reach Inc

To provide dynamic enrichment programs for children with special needs and respite for their families.

Human Services
6
San Diego Center for Children

Founded in 1887, the center is the oldest children's nonprofit in the region accredited by the joint commission for its excellence in quality of care. the center provides a continuum of therapeutic & educational services to youth &…

Human Services
7
Connectability

ConnectAbility's mission is to empower those with life altering disabilities and their caregivers to reach their fullest potential.

Human Services
8
United Rehabilitation Services of Greater Dayton

To provide child and adult day services, vocational, therapy and support services for individuals with acquired or developmental disabilities or other special needs, and their families.

—
9
Teamability Inc

Teamability strives to ensure that children with severe multiple disabilities have the opportunity to benefit from therapeautic educational intervention to participate actively in life.

Education
10
Children's Therapy Center of the Quad Cities Nfp

Based upon medical prescription, the organization provides speech therapy, physical therapy occupational therapy and feeding therapy. the organization provides therapy serices to children with developmental disabilities and developmental…

—
11
Alexander Leigh Center for Autism

To provide an environment where children on the autistic spectrum can develop their potential academically, emotionally, socially, communicatively, physically and gain functional independence using programs and methods that are selected…

Education
12
The Arc of the Capital Area

We empower central texans with intellectual and developmental disabilities and their families through compassionate case management and innovative programs.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Mission Road Developmental Center; the most unlike its peers is Sa Life Academy. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 23 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
17/17
Grantees still filing
15/17
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CAMP JOHN MARC: $955,106 · OtherCAMP JOHN MARCCAMP JOHN MARC (BELLE): $106,000 · OtherCAMP JOHN MARC (BELLE)SHRINERS CHILDRENS HOSP-GALV & HOUS: $50,000 · OtherAUTISTIC TREATMENT CENTER INC: $42,862 · Other+4 more: $66,500 · Other+4 moreTEXAS SCOTTISH RITE HOSPITAL FOR CRIPPLED CHILDREN: $1,025,106 · HealthTEXAS SCOTTISH RITE HOSPITAL FOR…CHILDREN'S ASSOC FOR MAXIMUM POTENTIAL (: $60,000 · Health+4 more: $75,000 · Health+4 moreMISSION ROAD DEVELOPMENTAL CENTER: $1,020,106 · Human ServicesMISSION ROAD DEVELOPMENTAL CENT…THE CHILDREN'S SHELTER: $54,000 · Human Services+2 more: $36,500 · Human ServicesTrinity University: $369,894 · EducationTrinity Univ…BRIGHTON CENTER: $60,000 · EducationBRIGHTON CEN…Kinetic Kids Inc: $39,000 · Recreation & SportsMorgan's Wonderland: $15,000 · Recreation & SportsMISSION ROAD MINISTRIES: $28,500 · Religion
Other$1,220,468Health$1,160,106Human Services$1,110,606Education$429,894Recreation & Sports$54,000Religion$28,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTEXAS SCOTTISH RITE HOSPITAL FOR CRIPPLED CHILDREN: $1,025,106 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetMISSION ROAD DEVELOPMENTAL CENTER: $1,020,106 over 5y, 5.3% of budgetTrinity University: $369,894 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBRIGHTON CENTER: $60,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetCHILDREN'S ASSOC FOR MAXIMUM POTENTIAL (: $60,000 over 6y, 0.6% of budgetTHE CHILDREN'S SHELTER: $54,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetAUTISTIC TREATMENT CENTER INC: $42,862 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetKinetic Kids Inc: $39,000 over 6y, 0.9% of budgetMISSION ROAD MINISTRIES: $28,500 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetTHE ARC OF SAN ANTONIO INC: $25,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetREACHING MAXIMUM INDEPENDENCE: $21,500 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetCLARITY CHILD GUIDANCE CENTER: $20,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetMorgan's Wonderland: $15,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetTHE SADDLE LIGHT CENTER FOR THERAPEUTIC HORSEMANSHIP: $15,000 over 3y, 2.5% of budgetSA Life Academy: $15,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetTHE SHRINERS' HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN: $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetProject MEND: $15,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds TEXAS SCOTTISH RITE HOSPITAL FOR CRIPPLED CHILDREN ↗
  • Who funds MISSION ROAD DEVELOPMENTAL CENTER ↗
  • Who funds Trinity University ↗
  • Who funds BRIGHTON CENTER ↗
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S ASSOC FOR MAXIMUM POTENTIAL ( ↗
  • Who funds THE CHILDREN'S SHELTER ↗
  • Who funds AUTISTIC TREATMENT CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds Kinetic Kids Inc ↗
  • Who funds MISSION ROAD MINISTRIES ↗
  • Who funds THE ARC OF SAN ANTONIO INC ↗
  • Who funds REACHING MAXIMUM INDEPENDENCE ↗
  • Who funds CLARITY CHILD GUIDANCE CENTER ↗
  • Who funds Morgan's Wonderland ↗
  • Who funds THE SADDLE LIGHT CENTER FOR THERAPEUTIC HORSEMANSHIP ↗
  • Who funds SA Life Academy ↗
  • Who funds THE SHRINERS' HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN ↗
  • Who funds Project MEND ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

San Antonio Area Foun…Faye L & William L Co…The Texas Cavaliers C…Harvey E Najim Charit…Pryor Myra Stafford C…John L Santikos Chari…Marcia & Otto Koehler…The Charity Ball Asso…St Luke's Lutheran He…Nancy Smith Hurd Foun…Professional Contract…Keith M Orme and Pat …
San Antonio Area FoundationTX34× affinity14 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: San Antonio Area Foundation · Faye L & William L Cowden Charitable Foundation · The Texas Cavaliers Charitable Foundation · Harvey E Najim Charitable Foundation · Pryor Myra Stafford Char Tr F0030100 · John L Santikos Charitable Foundation · Marcia & Otto Koehler Foundation · The Charity Ball Association of San Antonio Inc · St Luke's Lutheran Health Ministries Inc · Nancy Smith Hurd Foundation · Professional Contract Services Inc · Keith M Orme and Pat Vigeon Orme Charitable Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization He Stumberg Sr Orphans Crippled Children & Handicapped Persons Trust funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from He Stumberg Sr Orphans Crippled Children & Handicapped Persons Trust. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →median 6%
  • The Shriners' Hospital for Children: 6% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to He Stumberg Sr Orphans Crippled Children & Handicapped Persons Trust?

Find your warmest path to He Stumberg Sr Orphans Crippled Children & Handicapped Persons Trust through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 23 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on He Stumberg Sr Orphans Crippled Children & Handicapped Persons’ filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home