Skip to content

· Public charity

HD Supply Charitable Fund Inc

HD Supply Charitable Fund, Inc., a Delaware non-profit non-stock corporation, d/b/a The HD Supply Giving Fund and The HD Supply Helping Hand Fund (the "Fund") is organized and shall be operated exclusively for charitable purposes, including, for such purposes, the making of distributions to organizations that qualify as exempt…

$1.1M
Granted FY2025still arriving
7
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$515k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2023 to 2025.

Health$925kFood & Nutrition$150kHuman Services$100kHousing & Shelter$100kEducation$25kPhilanthropy$25k
02FY2025 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 7 grants below total $1,050,000, the rows itemized in this filing. The $1,127,236 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $77,236 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k2 grants · $50k
  • $50k–250k4 grants · $485k
  • $250k+1 grant · $515k
$100,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$2.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
City of Hope$515,000
ALSACSt Jude Children's Research Hospital$185,000
Children's Healthcare of Atlanta Foundation$100,000
Move For Hunger$100,000
Habitat For Humanity In Alanta Inc$100,000
United Way of San Antonio and Bexar County$25,000
Shepherd Center Foundation Inc$25,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY23–23, $100k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%The Home Depot Foundation: $100k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

35%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$460k · 3 repeat orgs$865k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +73% since the first grant, against +9% for those funded once.

3 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2025, 0 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

3
2

Total granted

$460k
$125k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+73%
+9%

Still filing today

100%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 30% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $740k went to new ones.

50%100%’23’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’23’25
PhilanthropyHealthHousing & ShelterReligionFood & NutritionHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AL
    AMERICAN LEBANESE SYRIAN ASSOCIATED CHARITIES INC
    3× · 2023–2025 · $235k · revenue +23%
  • MF
    MOVE FOR HUNGER INC
    3× · 2023–2025 · $150k · revenue +73%
  • SC
    SHEPHERD CENTER FOUNDATION INC
    2× · 2023–2025 · $75k · revenue ×121

Funded once

  • TI
    THDF II Inc DBA The Home Depot Foundation & Homer Fund
    2× · 2023–2024 · $100k · revenue +9%
  • UNITED NEGRO COLLEGE FUND INC
    2× · 2023–2024 · $25k · revenue -56%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
United Way for Greater Austin

United way for greater austin brings our community together to break economic barriers and build opportunity for all.

Philanthropy
2
United Way Quad Cities

United way qc mission is mobilizing people and resources to improve lives in our community. united way qc develops, supports and invests in the most impactful strategies and partners to strengthen education, income and health--the building…

Philanthropy
3
United Ways of Alabama

The mission of the united ways of alabama is to advance the interests of the programs of its member organizations by providing a vehicle for common effort. this effort may take the form of discussions, studies, recommendations or actions…

Philanthropy
4
United Way of Greater Milwaukee & Waukesha County Inc

We unite people to create positive lasting change in our community.

Philanthropy
5
The Nashville Chamber Public Benefit Foundation

The nashville chamber public benefit foundation supports the work of the nashville area chamber of commerce through efforts to improve the quality of education, encourage public and private efforts around education, and to facilitate the…

—
6
United Way of Greater Charlotte Inc

United way uses collective giving to build pathways to economic opportunity for all, primarily through neighborhood-based, grassroots and responsive solutions.continued on schedule o.united way was founded 90 years ago in mecklenburg…

Philanthropy
7
United Way of Southeast Louisiana

United way of southeast louisiana (uwsela) is a not-for-profit 501(c)(3) charitable organization founded in 1952 serving residents of jefferson, orleans, plaquemines, st. bernard, st. tammany, tangipahoa and washington parishes and…

Philanthropy
8
Urban League of Louisiana

To empower communities and help change liver for african americans and other emerging communities and groups. the urban league seeks to eliminate barriers to opportunity and assist individuals in attaining economic self sufficiency.

Human Services
9
Nashville Area Chamber of Commerce

The nashville area chamber of commerce facilitates community leadership to create economic prosperity.

—
10
United Way of Massachusetts Bay Inc

To advance an economically just region where prosperity is shared across race and ethnicity.

Philanthropy
11
United Way of Dane County Foundation Inc

The United Way of Dane County Foundation, Inc. exists to support the United Way of Dane County mission: to unite the community to achieve measurable results that change lives. By providing a base of support, the Foundation helps United Way…

—
12
United Way of Acadiana Inc

United way of acadiana's mission is to unite people and organizations with passion, expertise and resources to create more opportunities for a better life.

Philanthropy
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is United Way of Greater Atlanta Inc; the most unlike its peers is Bama Works Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

20 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
20/20
Grantees still filing
9/20
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CITY OF HOPE: $515,000 · HealthCITY OF HOPEAMERICAN LEBANESE SYRIAN ASSOCIATED CHARITIES INC: $235,000 · ReligionAMERICAN LEBANESE SY…MOVE FOR HUNGER INC: $150,000 · Food & NutritionMOVE FOR HUN…HABITAT FOR HUMANITY IN ATLANTA INC: $100,000 · Housing & ShelterCHILDRENS HEALTHCARE OF ATLANTA INC: $100,000 · OtherTHDF II Inc DBA The Home Depot Foundation & Homer Fund: $100,000 · Human ServicesSHEPHERD CENTER FOUNDATION INC: $75,000 · PhilanthropyUNITED WAY OF SAN ANTONIO AND BEXAR COUNTY: $25,000 · PhilanthropyUNITED NEGRO COLLEGE FUND INC: $25,000 · Education
Health$515,000Religion$235,000Food & Nutrition$150,000Housing & Shelter$100,000Other$100,000Human Services$100,000Philanthropy$100,000Education$25,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCITY OF HOPE: $515,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN LEBANESE SYRIAN ASSOCIATED CHARITIES INC: $235,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMOVE FOR HUNGER INC: $150,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetTHDF II Inc DBA The Home Depot Foundation & Homer Fund: $100,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetUNITED NEGRO COLLEGE FUND INC: $25,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED WAY OF SAN ANTONIO AND BEXAR COUNTY: $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Charities Aid Foundation AmericaVA13.6× affinity7 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Charities Aid Foundation America · The Community Foundation for Greater Atlanta Inc · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Enterprise Holdings Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization HD Supply Charitable Fund Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from HD Supply Charitable Fund Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2023
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 9 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on HD Supply’s filings →

    More from the funding graph