Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

HD Supply Charitable Fund Inc

HD Supply Charitable Fund, Inc., a Delaware non-profit non-stock corporation, d/b/a The HD Supply Giving Fund and The HD Supply Helping Hand Fund (the "Fund") is organized and shall be operated exclusively for charitable purposes, including, for such purposes, the making of distributions to organizations that qualify as exempt…

$1.1M
Granted FY2025still arriving
7
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$515k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20232025.

Health$925kFood & Nutrition$150kHuman Services$100kHousing & Shelter$100kEducation$25kPhilanthropy$25k
02FY2025 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 7 grants below total $1,050,000 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $1,127,236 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $77,236 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k2 grants · $50k
  • $50k–250k4 grants · $485k
  • $250k+1 grant · $515k
$100,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$2.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
City of Hope$515,000
ALSACSt Jude Children's Research Hospital$185,000
Children's Healthcare of Atlanta Foundation$100,000
Move For Hunger$100,000
Habitat For Humanity In Alanta Inc$100,000
Shepherd Center Foundation Inc$25,000
United Way of San Antonio and Bexar County$25,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY23–23, $100k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%The Home Depot Foundation: $100k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

35%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$460k · 3 repeat orgs$865k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +48% since the first grant, against +9% for the ones you funded once.

3 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2025, 0 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

3
2

Total granted

$460k
$125k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+48%
+9%

Still filing today

100%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 30% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $740k went to new ones.

50%100%’23’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’23’25
PhilanthropyHealthHousing & ShelterReligionFood & NutritionHuman ServicesOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AL
    AMERICAN LEBANESE SYRIAN ASSOCIATED CHARITIES INC
    3× · 2023–2025 · $235k · revenue +23%
  • MF
    MOVE FOR HUNGER INC
    3× · 2023–2025 · $150k · revenue +48%
  • SC
    SHEPHERD CENTER FOUNDATION INC
    2× · 2023–2025 · $75k · revenue ×121

Funded once

  • TI
    THDF II Inc DBA The Home Depot Foundation & Homer Fund
    2× · 2023–2024 · $100k · revenue +9%
  • UNITED NEGRO COLLEGE FUND INC
    2× · 2023–2024 · $25k · revenue -56%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
United Way for Greater Austin

United way for greater austin brings our community together to break economic barriers and build opportunity for all.

Philanthropy
2
United Way Quad Cities

United way qc mission is mobilizing people and resources to improve lives in our community. united way qc develops, supports and invests in the most impactful strategies and partners to strengthen education, income and health--the building…

Philanthropy
3
United Ways of Alabama

The mission of the united ways of alabama is to advance the interests of the programs of its member organizations by providing a vehicle for common effort. this effort may take the form of discussions, studies, recommendations or actions…

Philanthropy
4
United Way of Greater Milwaukee & Waukesha County Inc

We unite people to create positive lasting change in our community.

Philanthropy
5
The Nashville Chamber Public Benefit Foundation

The nashville chamber public benefit foundation supports the work of the nashville area chamber of commerce through efforts to improve the quality of education, encourage public and private efforts around education, and to facilitate the…

6
United Way of Greater Charlotte Inc

United way uses collective giving to build pathways to economic opportunity for all, primarily through neighborhood-based, grassroots and responsive solutions.continued on schedule o.united way was founded 90 years ago in mecklenburg…

Philanthropy
7
United Way of Southeast Louisiana

United way of southeast louisiana (uwsela) is a not-for-profit 501(c)(3) charitable organization founded in 1952 serving residents of jefferson, orleans, plaquemines, st. bernard, st. tammany, tangipahoa and washington parishes and…

Philanthropy
8
Urban League of Louisiana

To empower communities and help change liver for african americans and other emerging communities and groups. the urban league seeks to eliminate barriers to opportunity and assist individuals in attaining economic self sufficiency.

Human Services
9
Nashville Area Chamber of Commerce

The nashville area chamber of commerce facilitates community leadership to create economic prosperity.

10
United Way of Massachusetts Bay Inc

To advance an economically just region where prosperity is shared across race and ethnicity.

Philanthropy
11
United Way of Dane County Foundation Inc

The United Way of Dane County Foundation, Inc. exists to support the United Way of Dane County mission: to unite the community to achieve measurable results that change lives. By providing a base of support, the Foundation helps United Way…

12
United Way of Acadiana Inc

United way of acadiana's mission is to unite people and organizations with passion, expertise and resources to create more opportunities for a better life.

Philanthropy

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is United Way of Greater Atlanta Inc and the most unlike its peers is Bama Works Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 27 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%5%<5yr14%10%5–10yr19%14%10–20yr16%24%20–35yr13%33%35–55yr16%14%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%0%<5yr14%0%5–10yr19%19%10–20yr16%15%20–35yr13%64%35–55yr16%2%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 5% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/22
the rest of the field
13%
240,396/1,819,543

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

20 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
20/20
Grantees still filing
8/20
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

CITY OF HOPE — $515,000 · HealthCITY OF HOPEAMERICAN LEBANESE SYRIAN ASSOCIATED CHARITIES INC — $235,000 · ReligionAMERICAN LEBANESE SY…MOVE FOR HUNGER INC — $150,000 · Food & NutritionMOVE FOR HUN…CHILDRENS HEALTHCARE OF ATLANTA INC — $100,000 · OtherHABITAT FOR HUMANITY IN ATLANTA INC — $100,000 · Housing & ShelterTHDF II Inc DBA The Home Depot Foundation & Homer Fund — $100,000 · Human ServicesSHEPHERD CENTER FOUNDATION INC — $75,000 · PhilanthropyUNITED WAY OF SAN ANTONIO AND BEXAR COUNTY — $25,000 · PhilanthropyUNITED NEGRO COLLEGE FUND INC — $25,000 · Education
Health$515,000Religion$235,000Food & Nutrition$150,000Other$100,000Housing & Shelter$100,000Human Services$100,000Philanthropy$100,000Education$25,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetAMERICAN LEBANESE SYRIAN ASSOCIATED CHARITIES INC — $235,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMOVE FOR HUNGER INC — $150,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetTHDF II Inc DBA The Home Depot Foundation & Homer Fund — $100,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetUNITED NEGRO COLLEGE FUND INC — $25,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED WAY OF SAN ANTONIO AND BEXAR COUNTY — $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Charities Aid Foundation AmericaVA13.6× affinity7 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Charities Aid Foundation America · The Community Foundation for Greater Atlanta Inc · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Enterprise Holdings Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization HD Supply Charitable Fund Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2023
202122232425
no gov · 10%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 9 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph