Skip to content

· Private foundation

Hazelwood Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$381k
Granted FY2023
19
Grants FY2023
5
States reached
$305k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

67% of Hazelwood Foundation’s FY2024 grant dollars went to Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2024 names 1 organization directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2023, the last year Hazelwood Foundation named its own grantees at scale: 8 organizations, $381k. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

9
’18
13
’19
5
’20
10
’21
13
’22
8
’23
1
’24

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2024.

Religion$116kEducation$73kPhilanthropy$29kArts & Culture$21kHuman Services$21kHealth$9kAnimals$5kSocial Science$5kOther$0
02FY2023 · 19 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2023

  • Under $10k16 grants · $38k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $37k
  • $250k+1 grant · $305k
$2,500
Median grant
5
States reached
$3k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$305,487
FIDELITY CHARITABLE$21,992
Alpine Chapel$15,000
Watermark$6,000
Texas Exes$5,000
Philosophical Society of Texas$5,000
Search Ministries$3,500
Stanford Graduate School of Business$2,500
Lena Pope Home Inc$2,500
The Goodfellow Fund$2,500
Fort Worth Country Day School$2,500
St Andrews Episcopal Church$1,800
Union Gospel Mission$1,500
Kimbell Art Museum$1,000
Telluride Regional Medical Center Foundation$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–23, $21k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%Lena Pope Home Inc: $8k → 11%Lena Pope Home Inc: $6k → 11%Lena Pope Home Inc: $3k → 11%LENA POPE HOME INC: $3k → 11%LENA POPE HOME INC: $3k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MA
OH
PA
CA
CO
MO
MD
AZ
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

37%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$212k · 20 repeat orgs$357k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +14% since the first grant, against -25% for those funded once.

20 repeat relationships: 14 still active in FY2023, 6 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call). Read against FY2023, the last year this funder named its own grantees directly; its giving has since run through a sponsor, which reports no donor behind each grant.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

20
22

Total granted

$212k
$40k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+14%
-25%

Still filing today

40%
45%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationHealthArts & CultureReligionYouth DevelopmentHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • LP
    LENA POPE HOME INC
    5× · 2018–2023 · $21k · revenue +27%
  • EA
    EX-STUDENTS' ASSOCIATION OF UT
    4× · 2020–2023 · $20k · revenue +14%
  • SS
    Star Sponsorship Program Inc
    5× · 2018–2022 · $12k · revenue +39%

Funded once

  • TS
    TX & SW Cattle Raisers Foundation
    one grant, 2018 · $5k
  • ST
    South Texas Charity Weekend Inc
    one grant, 2019 · $5k · revenue -34%
  • FF
    FWCD Fund
    one grant, 2019 · $4k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Woodlands Christian Academy

TWCA is an independent, Christ-centered college preparatory school that integrates learning with biblical faith and challenges our students to reach their highest potential - intellectually, creatively, physically, and socially - for the…

—
2
Texas Agricultural Land Trust Foundation

The Foundation provides financial and other resources in support exclusively for Texas Agricultural Land Trust ("TALT"), a Texas tax exempt nonprofit corporation, classified as a 501(c)(3) organization.

Food & Nutrition
3
Witte Museum

The witte museum inspires people to shape the future of texas through transformative and relevant experiences in nature, science and culture.

Arts & Culture
4
Texas Future Farmers of America Foundation Inc

Building on the proven success of texas agriculture education and the texas ffa program, our mission is distinguished by the continued development, funding, and implementation of cutting edge learning opportunities focusing on academic…

Food & Nutrition
5
Texas & Southwestern Cattle Raisers' Foundation

Texas & southwestern cattle raisers' foundation (foundation) will build platforms to preserve the history and advance the future of the livestock industry in the southwest through cattle raisers museum exhibits, education initiatives and…

Arts & Culture
6
Texas a&M Research Foundation

To facilitate research and development within the texas a&m university system and selected other entities.

Education
7
The University of TexasTexas a&M Investment Management Company

To generate superior long-term investment returns to support The University of Texas and Texas A&M University systems as they provide world-class teaching, push the boundaries of discovery, and achieve excellence in patient healthcare for…

Education
8
Texas Trees Foundation

The mission of texas trees foundation is to improve the health of cities and people through the transformative power of trees.

—
9
Texas Prairieland Foundation
Philanthropy
10
The Fort Worth Zoological Association

With more than 1 million visitors annually, the fort worth zoo strengthens the bond between humans and the environment by promoting responsible stewardship of wildlife and ensuring diverse, high-quality educational and entertaining family…

Animals
11
Texas Business Hall of Fame Foundation

To recognize the accomplishments and contributions of our outstanding Texas business leaders and to perpetuate and inspire the values of entrepreneurial spirit, personal integrity, and community leadership in all generations of Texans.

Community Improvement
12
Valor Texas Education Foundation

Valor's mission is to educate the whole person in authentic communities for a full human life. Through our K-12 tuition-free classical charter schools and the Valor Institute, we build communities dedicated to wisdom, virtue, and…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Fort Worth Country Day School Inc; the most unlike its peers is Caesar Kleberg Foundation for Wildlife Conservation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

24 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 24 of the 47 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
22/24
Grantees still filing
15/24
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $305,487 · OtherIndividual grant recipientWATERMARK COMMUNITY CHURCH: $37,000 · OtherWATERMARK COMMUNITY CHURCHTHE ALPINE CHAPEL: $25,000 · Other+33 more: $110,060 · Other+33 moreEX-STUDENTS' ASSOCIATION OF UT: $20,000 · EducationStar Sponsorship Program Inc: $11,700 · EducationFORT WORTH COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL INC: $7,500 · EducationTRUSTEES OF DEERFIELD ACADEMY: $2,000 · EducationFIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND: $23,977 · Community ImprovementLENA POPE HOME INC: $20,500 · Human ServicesAMON CARTER MUSEUM OF WESTERN ART: $15,000 · Arts & CultureKING HIGH HISTORICAL FOUNDATION: $1,500 · Arts & CultureKIDS ACROSS AMERICA: $7,200 · ReligionLigonier Ministries Inc: $1,000 · ReligionSouth Texas Charity Weekend Inc: $5,000 · Philanthropy
Other$477,547Education$41,200Community Improvement$23,977Human Services$20,500Arts & Culture$16,500Religion$8,200Philanthropy$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND: $23,977 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLENA POPE HOME INC: $20,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetEX-STUDENTS' ASSOCIATION OF UT: $20,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetAMON CARTER MUSEUM OF WESTERN ART: $15,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetStar Sponsorship Program Inc: $11,700 over 5y, 0.7% of budgetFORT WORTH COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL INC: $7,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetKIDS ACROSS AMERICA: $7,200 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE PHILOSOPHICAL SOCIETY OF TEXAS: $5,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetSouth Texas Charity Weekend Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetCAESAR KLEBERG FOUNDATION FOR WILDLIFE CONSERVATION: $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetPARKS AND WILDLIFE FOUNDATION OF TEXAS: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTRUSTEES OF DEERFIELD ACADEMY: $2,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTELLURIDE COUNCIL FOR THE ARTS AND HUMAN DBA TELLURIDE ARTS: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCook Children's Medical Center: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLigonier Ministries Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRIVERTREE ACADEMY: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJordan Elizabeth Harris Foundation: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE TELLURIDE MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTarrant Area Food Bank: $600 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAGRICULTURAL DEVELOPMENT FUND: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetYOUNG LIFE: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds FIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND ↗
  • Who funds LENA POPE HOME INC ↗
  • Who funds EX-STUDENTS' ASSOCIATION OF UT ↗
  • Who funds AMON CARTER MUSEUM OF WESTERN ART ↗
  • Who funds Star Sponsorship Program Inc ↗
  • Who funds FORT WORTH COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL INC ↗
  • Who funds KIDS ACROSS AMERICA ↗
  • Who funds THE PHILOSOPHICAL SOCIETY OF TEXAS ↗
  • Who funds South Texas Charity Weekend Inc ↗
  • Who funds CAESAR KLEBERG FOUNDATION FOR WILDLIFE CONSERVATION ↗
  • Who funds PARKS AND WILDLIFE FOUNDATION OF TEXAS ↗
  • Who funds TRUSTEES OF DEERFIELD ACADEMY ↗
  • Who funds KING HIGH HISTORICAL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds TELLURIDE COUNCIL FOR THE ARTS AND HUMAN DBA TELLURIDE ARTS ↗
  • Who funds Cook Children's Medical Center ↗
  • Who funds Ligonier Ministries Inc ↗
  • Who funds RIVERTREE ACADEMY ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Communities Foundation of Texas IncTX23.8× affinity11 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Communities Foundation of Texas Inc · Community Foundation of North Texas (Tax · Thomas M Helen McKee & John P Ryan Fo John P Ryan Foundation Inc · The Roach Foundation Inc · Garvey Texas Foundation Inc · Once Upon a Time Foundation · Leo Potishman Foundation Xxxxx3002 · Mary Potishman Lard Trust Walker C Friedman Co Trustee · Helen Irwin Littauer Educational Trust · Amon G Carter Foundation · Sid W Richardson Foundation · Textron Charitable Trust Dtd 122353

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Hazelwood Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Hazelwood Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Hazelwood Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Hazelwood Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 47 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Hazelwood’s filings →

    More from the funding graph