Skip to content

· Private foundation

Hazel & Henry S Grace Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$60k
Granted FY2025still arriving
24
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$8k
Largest
01What it funds
0194% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Religion$123kYouth Development$60kHealth$51kArts & Culture$41kEducation$38kCrime & Legal$27kHuman Services$24kHousing & Shelter$15kOther$0
02FY2025 · 24 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$2,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$97k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FIRST UNITED METHODIST CHURCH - SCHOOL FOR LITTLE PEOPLE$7,575
WICHITA FALLS CAREER EDUCATION CENTER$5,000
WICHITA FALLS FAITH MISSION$5,000
HOSPICE OF WICHITA FALLS$4,685
URBAN VILLAGE CHURCH$4,000
Individual grant recipient$4,000
HANDS TO HANDS COMMUNITY FUND$3,000
SPECIAL OLYMPICS TEXAS$2,500
NORTH TEXAS REHAB CENTER$2,500
SOUTHERN GRIT ADVOCACY$2,500
WICHITA FALLS AREA FOOD BANK$2,500
RIVER BEND NATURE CENTER$2,000
WICHITA FALLS YOUTH SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA$2,000
FIRST UNITED METHODIST CHURCH$2,000
INTERFAITH MINISTRIES$2,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–25, $36k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%HOSPICE OF WICHITA FALLS: $5k → 9%HOSPICE OF WICHITA FALLS: $5k → 9%HOSPICE OF WICHITA FALLS: $5k → 9%HOSPICE OF WICHITA FALLS: $5k → 9%HOSPICE OF WICHITA FALLS: $5k → 9%HOSPICE OF WICHITA FALLS: $5k → 9%HOSPICE OF WICHITA FALLS: $5k → 9%HOSPICE OF WICHITA FALLS: $1k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$429k · 30 repeat orgs$17k to everyone else

30 repeat relationships: 18 still active in FY2025, 12 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

30
2

Total granted

$429k
$2k

Still filing today

50%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 76% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $15k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureHealthHuman ServicesCrime & LegalCommunity ImprovementYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HT
    HANDS TO HANDS COMMUNITY FUND
    9× · 2017–2025 · $24k · revenue +12%
  • AC
    Arts Council Wichita Falls Area Inc
    6× · 2018–2023 · $21k · revenue +87%
  • WF
    WICHITA FALLS FAITH MISSION INC
    5× · 2021–2025 · $15k · revenue +150%

Funded once

  • WF
    WICHITA FALLS CAREER EDUCATION CENTER-AUTOMOTIVE DEPARTMENT
    one grant, 2023 · $2k
  • KF
    KMOC FM 895
    one grant, 2024 · $500
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Wichita Falls Area Community Foundation

The mission of the Wichita Falls Area Community Foundation is to enhance the quality of life in the Wichita Falls area through the promotion and support of charitable giving. Our vision is to build strong, vibrant communities inspired by…

Philanthropy
2
Wichita Falls Alliance for Arts and Culture

To provide leadership to support, promote and cultivate the arts in Wichita Falls and the surrounding area. To strengthen and elevate arts and culture including, but not limited to, visual and performing arts, literature, culinary arts,…

Arts & Culture
3
West Texas Food Bank

The WTFB exists to collect, purchase, and distribute food to feed the hungry in 19 counties in West Texas in partnership with volunteers and community organizations and to educate these partners and the public at large about the real face…

—
4
North Texas Parent & Child Development Inc

The organization is dedicated to providing quality, comprehensive services to pregnant women, infants, and toddlers. teaming with other agencies enables them to help each child and family achieve social competency. early head start…

—
5
Wichita County Community Foundation Inc

The wichita county community foundation is a nonprofit, non-sectarian organization dedicated to preserving local wealth so the communities in and around leoti and wichita county will forever remain attractive places to live, work and raise…

Community Improvement
6
Food Bank of West Central Texas

To procure and distribute nutritional food to qualified agencies that feed the hungry of West Central Texas.

Food & Nutrition
7
Childrens Advocacy Center of West Texas Inc

The Organizations mission is to bring unity and efficiency to investigations of child abuse through the use of a multi-disciplinary team and, thereby, to provide the best possible services to victims of child abuse and their families.

Crime & Legal
8
Christmas in Action

In partnership with the community, christmas in action rehabilitates the homes of low income elderly and low income disabled so that they may continue to live in warmth, safety and independence.

Housing & Shelter
9
Casa of Williamson County Texas

CASA of Williamson County, TX exists to empower community volunteers to advocate for children who have experienced abuse or neglect to find loving, safe, and permanent homes.

Crime & Legal
10
Casa of West Texas

The mission of casa of west texas is to recruit, train and support committed volunteers who are appointed by the court to advocate for the best interest of children in the foster care system.

Civil Rights
11
West Central Texas Workforce Development Board Inc

To support and compliment the work of Workforce Solutions of West Central Texas Board, which is responsible for the planning, oversight, and evaluation of a consolidated workforce system for the 19 County West Central Texas region.

Employment
12
Boys & Girls Club of Wichita Falls Endowment Fund

Aid in funding the programs of the Boys & Girls Club of Wichita Falls. Contributions are made throughout the year to the Boys & Girls Club of Wichita Falls to help defray the cost of operating the clubs and to help fund the activities for…

Youth Development
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Senior Citizen Services of North Texas Inc Dba the Kitchen; the most unlike its peers is The Museum of North Texas History. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 38 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/16
Grantees still filing
12/16
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

FIRST UNITED METHODIST CHURCH: $57,888 · OtherFIRST UNITED METHODIST CHURCHFIRST UNITED METHODIST CHURCH SCHOOL FOR LITTLE PEOPLE: $53,023 · OtherFIRST UNITED METHODIST CHURCH SCHOOL FOR LITTLE PEOPLEProject Back to School: $22,500 · OtherProject Back to SchoolIndividual grant recipient: $14,000 · OtherWICHITA FALLS CAREER EDUCATION CENTER: $10,500 · OtherSOUTHSIDE YOUTH SENTER: $10,000 · OtherKATE BURGESS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: $9,500 · OtherChild Advocates CASA of Red River: $13,000 · Other+21 more: $74,250 · Other+21 moreHospice of Wichita Falls Inc: $35,685 · Human ServicesHospice of …SENIOR CITIZEN SERVICES OF NORTH TEXAS INC DBA THE KITCHEN: $9,000 · Human ServicesSENIOR CITI…CAMP FIRE NORTH TEXAS: $44,280 · Youth DevelopmentCAMP FIRE N…Arts Council Wichita Falls Area Inc: $20,500 · Arts & CultureArts Coun…WICHITA FALLS YOUTH SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA: $13,000 · Arts & CultureWICHITA F…The Museum of North Texas History: $5,500 · Arts & CultureThe Museu…HANDS TO HANDS COMMUNITY FUND: $24,000 · PhilanthropyWICHITA FALLS FAITH MISSION INC: $15,000 · ReligionSOUTHERN GRIT ADVOCACY: $13,500 · Crime & Legal
Other$264,661Human Services$44,685Youth Development$44,280Arts & Culture$39,000Philanthropy$24,000Religion$15,000Crime & Legal$13,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCAMP FIRE NORTH TEXAS: $44,280 over 8y, 1.8% of budgetHospice of Wichita Falls Inc: $35,685 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetHANDS TO HANDS COMMUNITY FUND: $24,000 over 9y, 0.4% of budgetProject Back to School: $22,500 over 8y, 47% of budgetArts Council Wichita Falls Area Inc: $20,500 over 6y, 0.5% of budgetWICHITA FALLS FAITH MISSION INC: $15,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetSOUTHERN GRIT ADVOCACY: $13,500 over 6y, 3.4% of budgetChild Advocates CASA of Red River: $13,000 over 9y, 0.5% of budgetWICHITA FALLS YOUTH SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA: $13,000 over 7y, 2.2% of budgetSENIOR CITIZEN SERVICES OF NORTH TEXAS INC DBA THE KITCHEN: $9,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetDowntown Wichita Falls Development Inc: $7,000 over 5y, 0.6% of budgetThe Museum of North Texas History: $5,500 over 6y, 1.3% of budgetSHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN: $4,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $4,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetWICHITA FALLS AREA FOOD BANK: $3,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CAMP FIRE NORTH TEXAS ↗
  • Who funds Hospice of Wichita Falls Inc ↗
  • Who funds HANDS TO HANDS COMMUNITY FUND ↗
  • Who funds Project Back to School ↗
  • Who funds Arts Council Wichita Falls Area Inc ↗
  • Who funds WICHITA FALLS FAITH MISSION INC ↗
  • Who funds SOUTHERN GRIT ADVOCACY ↗
  • Who funds Child Advocates CASA of Red River ↗
  • Who funds WICHITA FALLS YOUTH SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA ↗
  • Who funds SENIOR CITIZEN SERVICES OF NORTH TEXAS INC DBA THE KITCHEN ↗
  • Who funds Downtown Wichita Falls Development Inc ↗
  • Who funds The Museum of North Texas History ↗
  • Who funds SHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN ↗
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
  • Who funds WICHITA FALLS AREA FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds SPECIAL OLYMPICS OF TEXAS INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Fain FoundationTX30.6× affinity12 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Fain Foundation · Bryant Edwards Foundation Inc · James N McCoy Foundation · J S Bridwell Foundation · Perkins-Prothro Foundation · Wichita Falls Area Community Foundation · Mightycause Charitable Foundation · Gene Conley Foundation · Guinn Foundation Inc · The Priddy Foundation · Kadane Foundation · Donnell Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Hazel & Henry S Grace Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Hazel & Henry S Grace Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%3%13%28%50%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Shriners Hospitals for Children: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Hazel & Henry S Grace Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Hazel & Henry S Grace Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 38 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Hazel & Henry S Grace’s filings →

More from the funding graph