Skip to content

· Private foundation

Hayswood Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$724k
Granted FY2025still arriving
28
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$420k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$2.4MArts & Culture$1.1MYouth Development$676kHousing & Shelter$261kCommunity Improvement$259kHuman Services$252kRecreation & Sports$139kReligion$111kOther$0
02FY2025 · 28 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k13 grants · $57k
  • $10k–50k14 grants · $247k
  • $250k+1 grant · $420k
$10,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$13M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$419,624
TOM BROWNING BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB$30,000
MAYSVILLE PLAYERS$30,000
KY GATEWAY MUSEUM CENTER$30,000
MAYSVILLE INITIATIVES$30,000
Individual grant recipient$18,323
CASA PROGRAM$15,500
LIMESTONE FAMILY YMCA$15,000
ST PATRICK SCHOOL$13,000
WALD PARK INC$12,600
RUSSELL THEATRE CORP$12,450
AUGUSTA ART GUILD$10,000
OHIO VALLEY ARTIST GUILD$10,000
JOHOVAH JIREH HOUSE$10,000
CENTER FOR VIOLENCE PREVENTION$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $252k) land where the poverty rate runs at 20%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%LIMESTONE FAMILY YMCA: $30k → 20%LIMESTONE FAMILY YMCA: $30k → 20%LIMESTONE FAMILY YMCA: $25k → 20%LIMESTONE FAMILY YMCA: $25k → 20%LIMESTONE FAMILY YMCA: $25k → 20%LIMESTONE FAMILY YMCA: $25k → 20%LIMESTONE FAMILY YMCA: $24k → 20%LIMESTONE FAMILY YMCA: $20k → 20%LIMESTONE FAMILY YMCA: $15k → 20%ION CENTER: $13k → 20%MAYSVILLE HANDS OF HOPE: $6k → 20%WOMENS CRISIS CENTER: $6k → 20%WOMENS CRISIS CENTER: $3k → 20%WOMENS CRISIS CENTER: $3k → 20%WOMENS CRISIS CENTER: $3k → 20%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$5.2M · 39 repeat orgs$150k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +52% since the first grant, against -8% for those funded once.

39 repeat relationships: 23 still active in FY2025, 16 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

39
13

Total granted

$5.2M
$112k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+52%
-8%

Still filing today

23%
8%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $38k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesReligionYouth DevelopmentArts & CultureCommunity ImprovementHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TB
    TOM BROWNING BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB
    9× · 2017–2025 · $523k · revenue +29%
  • LF
    LIMESTONE FAMILY YMCA INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $219k · revenue +39%
  • LM
    LIMESTONE MINISTRIES INC
    8× · 2017–2025 · $51k · revenue +52%

Funded once

  • MM
    MAYSVILLE MASON CO LIBRARY
    one grant, 2017 · $25k
  • MC
    MAYSLICK COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
    one grant, 2019 · $17k
  • LV
    LICKING VALLEY COLLEGE
    one grant, 2017 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Marys House of Restoration

Marys house mission is to provide transitional living environment which provides residential care, individual and group counceling, assessment

—
2
House of Hope

We assist young mothers with housing and wrap around services.

Human Services
3
Mayo Home for Youth Development Inc

Mayo Home for Youth provides a home for an average of 16 young male individuals providing food, shelter and supervision 24/7

Human Services
4
Mary's Shelter Inc

TO assist single women facing crisis pregnancies

Human Services
5
Room in the Inn Bowling Green Inc

Provides shelter for the homeless

Housing & Shelter
6
Marys Homes Inc

Recovery home

Housing & Shelter
7
The Remnant House

The remnant house, located in lee county, mississippi provides men and women with a faith-based christian transitional living home and recovery program. our christ-centered one year transitional living recovery program allows an individual…

Health
8
Fresh Start Outreach Ministry Inc

It is the mission of Fresh Start Ministry to be the hands and feet of God by serving others in need in Monroe County. we have a mens and womans shelter and a program to help people get back on there feet

Human Services
9
Madison County Sheltered Workshop Inc

To provide employement opportunities to mentally or physically disabled individuals.

Human Services
10
Hope Center of Hendersonville

It is our mission to nuture an environment where individuals with intellectual and developmental disabilities are valued, provided opportunities, and treated with god's love and compassion.

Religion
11
The Inn Ministry

The Inn Ministry is a sanctuary for pregnant mothers and mothers with small children in crisis. Safe housing, counseling, parenting classes and teach them basic decision making skills. The mothers are offered options such as adoption and…

—
12
The Makers Child

The Maker's Child offers a respite program for special needs children and adults monthly in Marshall County. This program is an opportunity for families to leave their special needs child and siblings for a night of games, music, lessons,…

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Maysville Initiatives Inc; the most unlike its peers is Tom Browning Boys and Girls Club. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 57 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

3
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/12
Grantees still filing
8/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $2,189,048 · OtherIndividual grant recipientKY GATEWAY MUSEUM CENTER: $434,500 · OtherKY GATEWAY MUSEUM CENTERWALD PARK INC: $139,000 · Other+45 more: $1,110,585 · Other+45 moreTOM BROWNING BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB: $522,500 · Youth DevelopmentTOM BROWNIN…MAYSVILLE PLAYERS INC: $320,379 · Arts & CultureLIMESTONE FAMILY YMCA INC: $219,000 · Human ServicesIon Center for Violence Prevention Inc: $27,330 · Human Services+1 more: $6,000 · Human ServicesMAYSVILLE INITIATIVES INC: $225,000 · Community ImprovementRIVER OUTREACH CORPORATION: $60,000 · ReligionLIMESTONE MINISTRIES INC: $50,500 · ReligionPREGNANCY RESOURCE CENTER INC: $14,000 · Health
Other$3,873,133Youth Development$522,500Arts & Culture$320,379Human Services$252,330Community Improvement$225,000Religion$110,500Health$14,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTOM BROWNING BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB: $522,500 over 9y, 17% of budgetMAYSVILLE PLAYERS INC: $320,379 over 9y, 29% of budgetMAYSVILLE INITIATIVES INC: $225,000 over 9y, 28% of budgetLIMESTONE FAMILY YMCA INC: $219,000 over 9y, 2.3% of budgetWALD PARK INC: $139,000 over 9y, 7.0% of budgetRIVER OUTREACH CORPORATION: $60,000 over 2y, 57% of budgetLIMESTONE MINISTRIES INC: $50,500 over 8y, 5.6% of budgetIon Center for Violence Prevention Inc: $27,330 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetPREGNANCY RESOURCE CENTER INC: $14,000 over 4y, 2.4% of budgetSPRINKLES OF HOPE INC: $10,320 over 2y, 9.9% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds TOM BROWNING BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB ↗
  • Who funds MAYSVILLE PLAYERS INC ↗
  • Who funds MAYSVILLE INITIATIVES INC ↗
  • Who funds LIMESTONE FAMILY YMCA INC ↗
  • Who funds WALD PARK INC ↗
  • Who funds RIVER OUTREACH CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds LIMESTONE MINISTRIES INC ↗
  • Who funds Ion Center for Violence Prevention Inc ↗
  • Who funds PREGNANCY RESOURCE CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds SPRINKLES OF HOPE INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

International Paper Company FoundationTN21.5× affinity8 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: International Paper Company Foundation · The Charles E and Mary Elizabeth Scripps Foundation Inc · Claire Adair Hendrickson Foundation Inc · Burnette Family Charitable Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Hayswood Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Hayswood Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%4%15%34%60%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 57 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Hayswood’s filings →

    More from the funding graph