· Private foundation
Hayswood Foundation Inc
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k13 grants · $57k
- $10k–50k14 grants · $247k
- $250k+1 grant · $420k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Individual grant recipient | $419,624 |
| KY GATEWAY MUSEUM CENTER | $30,000 |
| MAYSVILLE PLAYERS | $30,000 |
| MAYSVILLE INITIATIVES | $30,000 |
| TOM BROWNING BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB | $30,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $18,323 |
| CASA PROGRAM | $15,500 |
| LIMESTONE FAMILY YMCA | $15,000 |
| ST PATRICK SCHOOL | $13,000 |
| WALD PARK INC | $12,600 |
| RUSSELL THEATRE CORP | $12,450 |
| CENTER FOR VIOLENCE PREVENTION | $10,000 |
| OHIO VALLEY ARTIST GUILD | $10,000 |
| AUGUSTA ART GUILD | $10,000 |
| JOHOVAH JIREH HOUSE | $10,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $252k) land where the poverty rate runs at 20%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +52% since the first grant, against -8% for the ones you funded once.
39 repeat relationships — 23 still active in FY2025, 16 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $38k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- TBTOM BROWNING BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB9× · 2017–2025 · $523k · revenue +29%
- LFLIMESTONE FAMILY YMCA INC9× · 2017–2025 · $219k · revenue +20%
- LMLIMESTONE MINISTRIES INC8× · 2017–2025 · $51k · revenue +52%
Funded once
- MMMAYSVILLE MASON CO LIBRARYone grant, 2017 · $25k
- MCMAYSLICK COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENTone grant, 2019 · $17k
- LVLICKING VALLEY COLLEGEone grant, 2017 · $10k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Marys house mission is to provide transitional living environment which provides residential care, individual and group counceling, assessment
We assist young mothers with housing and wrap around services.
Mayo Home for Youth provides a home for an average of 16 young male individuals providing food, shelter and supervision 24/7
TO assist single women facing crisis pregnancies
Provides shelter for the homeless
Recovery home
The remnant house, located in lee county, mississippi provides men and women with a faith-based christian transitional living home and recovery program. our christ-centered one year transitional living recovery program allows an individual…
It is the mission of Fresh Start Ministry to be the hands and feet of God by serving others in need in Monroe County. we have a mens and womans shelter and a program to help people get back on there feet
To provide employement opportunities to mentally or physically disabled individuals.
It is our mission to nuture an environment where individuals with intellectual and developmental disabilities are valued, provided opportunities, and treated with god's love and compassion.
The Inn Ministry is a sanctuary for pregnant mothers and mothers with small children in crisis. Safe housing, counseling, parenting classes and teach them basic decision making skills. The mothers are offered options such as adoption and…
The Maker's Child offers a respite program for special needs children and adults monthly in Marshall County. This program is an opportunity for families to leave their special needs child and siblings for a night of games, music, lessons,…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Maysville Initiatives Inc and the most unlike its peers is Tom Browning Boys and Girls Club. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 57 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds TOM BROWNING BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB ↗
- Who funds MAYSVILLE PLAYERS INC ↗
- Who funds MAYSVILLE INITIATIVES INC ↗
- Who funds LIMESTONE FAMILY YMCA INC ↗
- Who funds WALD PARK INC ↗
- Who funds RIVER OUTREACH CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds LIMESTONE MINISTRIES INC ↗
- Who funds Ion Center for Violence Prevention Inc ↗
- Who funds PREGNANCY RESOURCE CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds SPRINKLES OF HOPE INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: International Paper Company Foundation · The Charles E and Mary Elizabeth Scripps Foundation Inc · Claire Adair Hendrickson Foundation Inc · Burnette Family Charitable Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Hayswood Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.