· Private foundation
Burnette Family Charitable Foundation Inc
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 78% of BURNETTE FAMILY CHARITABLE FOUNDATION INC’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k7 grants · $29k
- $10k–50k4 grants · $75k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| LICKING VALLEY COLLEGE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION | $20,000 |
| CALVARY BAPTIST ACADEMY | $20,000 |
| COMMUNITY CARE OF MASON COUNTY | $20,000 |
| ST DOMINIC SCHOOL | $15,000 |
| THE ION CENTER | $5,000 |
| CINCINNATI REDS HALL OF FAME AND MUSEUM | $5,000 |
| KENTUCKY GATEWAY MUSEUM CENTER | $5,000 |
| AMERICAN RED CROSS BLUEGRASS CHAPTER | $5,000 |
| HOSPICE OF HOPE | $5,000 |
| OHIO VALLEY ARTIST GUILD | $2,000 |
| MAYSVILLE INITIATIVES INC | $2,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $66k) land where the poverty rate runs at 20%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
24 repeat relationships — 11 still active in FY2024, 13 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- LVLICKING VALLEY COLLEGE DEVELOPMENT CORP2× · 2023–2024 · $38k · revenue +62%
- ICIon Center for Violence Prevention Inc8× · 2017–2024 · $33k · revenue +94%
- HOHOSPICE OF HOPE INC8× · 2017–2024 · $33k · revenue +17%
Funded once
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2023 · $5k
- CICOMPREHEND INCgraduatedone grant, 2018 · $4k · revenue +25%
- RRRIVER RIDGE CHURCHone grant, 2018 · $3k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Provide quality healthcare to community.
Operation of low income housing for the elderly and handicapped, regulated and assisted by the department of housing and urban development (hud).
Provide youth activities in a summer camp program.
Providing service in occupational rehabilitation and training to handicapped individuals. assisted handicapped individuals from receiving aid to dependent family rolls. provided socio-economic interchange among the handicapped and the…
Housing for the homeless
We are a recovery resource center and sober living/recovery house. will's place is designed to accommodate men who have been through primary treatment and are looking for a sober living environment as they progress in their recovery.
To provide lower income families, the elderly, handicapped and other persons with decent affordable housing.
Maywood Christian Camp was organized and operated to promote a positive religious experience for youth. During the summer months weekly camps are in session for youth. Christian principles are taught as well as recreational activities such…
Operate a youth baseball and softball league for children aged 4 to 17 who live in the maysville school district and surrounding area.
To provide a historical museum complete with historic buildings
Will's place is a nonprofit cafe with a goal to create meaningful employment and vocational training opportunities for adults with disabilities.
To provide low income housing and related outreach services
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Licking Valley College Development Corp and the most unlike its peers is Wald Park Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 27 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Charles E and Mary Elizabeth Scripps Foundation Inc · International Paper Company Foundation · Hayswood Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Burnette Family Charitable Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Burnette Family Charitable Foundation Inc?
Find your warmest path to Burnette Family Charitable Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.