Skip to content
Haynes Family Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Haynes Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$328k
Granted FY2024still arriving
15
Grants FY2024still arriving
5
States reached
$90k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead

Read this first · the figures below need context

60% of Haynes Family Foundation’s FY2025 grant dollars went to Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2025 names 0 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2024, the last year Haynes Family Foundation named its own grantees at scale: 13 organizations, $328k. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

13
’17
14
’18
29
’19
11
’20
16
’21
10
’22
9
’23
13
’24
0
’25

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$990kPhilanthropy$520kHealth$272kHuman Services$169kCommunity Improvement$87kEmployment$58kYouth Development$44kHousing & Shelter$22kOther$0
02FY2024 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k4 grants · $21k
  • $10k–50k10 grants · $217k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $90k
$13,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$1.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NORWICH UNIVERSITY$90,000
BOSTON UNIVERSITY$40,000
WORCESTER RISE HEALTH$30,000
BATES COLLEGE$30,000
BRIDGTON ACADEMY$25,000
CRAIG HOSPITAL FOUNDATION$23,000
MASTER S APPRENTICE$23,000
BELAY ENTERPRISES$13,000
SAVE OUR YOUTH$13,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
ANCHOR CENTER FOR BLIND CHILDREN$10,000
AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION$6,000
FRIENDS OF BASS RIVER$5,000
MUSEUM OF OUTDOOR ARTS$5,000
SOLDIERS' ANGELS$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–21, $46k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 60% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%SAFE SPACE: $5k → 10%BIG CAT RESCUE: $1k → 13%1 MILLION HOMES: $17k → 9%MAIN STAY THERAPEUTIC FARM: $1k → 6%MUSANA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ORGANIZATION: $2k → 12%THE CHOSEN AND DEARLY LOVED FOUNDATION: $10k → 12%THE CHOSEN AND DEARLY LOVED FOUNDATION: $10k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
VT
WA
IL
NY
MA
OH
CA
UT
CO
NE
VA
TN
NC
DC
OK
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 28% of Haynes Family Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

Haynes Family Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 25% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

81%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.6M · 20 repeat orgs$367k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +61% since the first grant, against +27% for those funded once.

20 repeat relationships: 10 still active in FY2024, 10 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call). Read against FY2024, the last year this funder named its own grantees directly; its giving has since run through a sponsor, which reports no donor behind each grant.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

20
35

Total granted

$1.6M
$103k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+61%
+27%

Still filing today

85%
66%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $208k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesEducationInternationalEnvironmentCrime & LegalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NU
    Norwich University
    8× · 2017–2024 · $549k · revenue +20%
  • BA
    Bridgton Academy
    8× · 2017–2024 · $165k · revenue +8%
  • TRUSTEES OF BOSTON UNIVERSITY
    7× · 2017–2024 · $131k · revenue +45%

Funded once

  • MF
    MULLEN FAMILY SCHOLARSHIP
    one grant, 2021 · $20k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2018 · $10k
  • WR
    WILLIAM R HIATT ENDOWED CHARITY
    one grant, 2019 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
2
Banner -University Medical Group

Assist banner health complete its mission to make health care easier so life can be better by providing integrated & coordinated care & population health management.

Health
3
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

—
4
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
5
City of Hope

City of Hope's mission is to make hope a reality for all touched by cancer and diabetes. PLEASE SEE SCHEDULE O FOR A CONTINUATION OF OUR MISSION

Health
6
Central Indiana Corporate Partnership Inc

Central indiana corporate partnership (cicp) is an alliance of indiana's business and research university leaders coming together to foster long-term prosperity for the region. cicp's mission is to transform the economy of indiana in order…

Community Improvement
7
Furman University

The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.

Education
8
Seattle Biomedical Research Institute

We conduct fundamental infectious disease research to generate critical new knowledge about pathogens and their interactions with see schedule o for continuationhumans to enable the discovery and development of novel interventions,…

—
9
Allosource

Inspired by the gift of donation from our communities, allosource responsibly provides innovative cellular and tissue allografts to advance patient healing.

Health
10
University Corporation for Atmospheric Research

See schedule ouniversity corporation for atmospheric research (ucar), on behalf of, and in cooperation with its member university members, is engaged in the management of long-term atmospheric and related research and educational…

Science & Tech
11
Activate Global Inc

Activate empowers scientists to reinvent the world by bringing their research to market. activate partners with u.s. based funders, research institutions, and other pillars of the hard technology community to help entrepreneurial…

Environment
12
Friends of the Earth

Friends of the earth strives for a more healthy and just world by defendng the environment and human health while advancing social and economic justice by conducting research and education, transforming the economy so it protects the…

Environment
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Opportunity International Inc D/B/a Opportunity International-Us; the most unlike its peers is Museum of Outdoor Arts. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

45 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 45 of the 64 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
10
Early backer (in before they grew)
45/45
Grantees still filing
32/45
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Norwich University: $549,000 · EducationNorwich UniversityBridgton Academy: $165,000 · EducationBridgton AcademyPRESIDENT AND TRUSTEES OF BATES COLLEGE: $90,000 · EducationPRESIDENT AND TRUSTEES OF BATES COLLEGEALLIANCE FOR CHOICE IN EDUCATION: $35,000 · Education+1 more: $1,000 · EducationIndividual grant recipient: $170,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientTRUSTEES OF BOSTON UNIVERSITY: $131,000 · OtherTRUSTEES OF BOSTON UNIVERSITYSALVATION ARMY: $110,000 · OtherSALVATION ARMYDELTA GAMMA ANCHOR CENTER FOR BLIND CHILDREN: $60,000 · OtherDELTA GAMMA ANCHOR CENTER FOR BLIN…Individual grant recipient: $38,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientWORCESTER RISE HEALTH: $30,000 · Other+33 more: $150,700 · Other+33 moreFIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND: $161,000 · Community ImprovementFIDELITY INV…BELAY ENTERPRISES INC: $85,000 · Community ImprovementBELAY ENTERP…DONOR ADVISED CHARITABLE GIVING INC: $155,000 · PhilanthropyDowning Street Foundation DBA Downing House Attn Jerri Carr: $23,500 · PhilanthropyCraig Hospital Foundation: $73,000 · HealthDana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: $70,000 · HealthBRENT ELEY FOUNDATION: $10,500 · HealthAmerican Heart Association Inc: $6,000 · Health+3 more: $8,500 · HealthTHE MASTER'S APPRENTICE INC: $58,000 · Crime & LegalSAVE OUR YOUTH INC: $43,000 · Crime & LegalTHE CHOSEN & DEARLY LOVED FOUNDATION: $37,000 · Human ServicesSAFESPACE INC: $5,000 · Human ServicesSanctuary House Inc: $5,000 · Human Services+4 more: $4,500 · Human Services
Education$840,000Other$689,700Community Improvement$246,000Philanthropy$178,500Health$168,000Crime & Legal$101,000Human Services$51,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetNorwich University: $549,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetBridgton Academy: $165,000 over 8y, 0.4% of budgetFIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND: $161,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDONOR ADVISED CHARITABLE GIVING INC: $155,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTRUSTEES OF BOSTON UNIVERSITY: $131,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetPRESIDENT AND TRUSTEES OF BATES COLLEGE: $90,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetBELAY ENTERPRISES INC: $85,000 over 8y, 1.2% of budgetCraig Hospital Foundation: $73,000 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetDana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: $70,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetDELTA GAMMA ANCHOR CENTER FOR BLIND CHILDREN: $60,000 over 4y, 1.6% of budgetTHE MASTER'S APPRENTICE INC: $58,000 over 6y, 2.2% of budgetSAVE OUR YOUTH INC: $43,000 over 6y, 0.8% of budgetTHE CHOSEN & DEARLY LOVED FOUNDATION: $37,000 over 3y, 1.4% of budgetALLIANCE FOR CHOICE IN EDUCATION: $35,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetDowning Street Foundation DBA Downing House Attn Jerri Carr: $23,500 over 4y, 2.4% of budgetOPPORTUNITY INTERNATIONAL INC D/B/A OPPORTUNITY INTERNATIONAL-US: $15,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBRENT ELEY FOUNDATION: $10,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetSOLDIERS' ANGELS: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $6,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBREAKTHROUGH T1D: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSAFESPACE INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFLORIDA OCEANOGRAPHIC SOCIETY INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSanctuary House Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetFRIENDS OF BASS RIVER INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetMUSEUM OF OUTDOOR ARTS: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAlternatives Pregnancy Center Inc: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetStand Together Foundation: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMUSANA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ORGANIZATION: $1,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetStep Denver: $1,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetGLOBALGIVING FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BOGGY CREEK GANG INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTURTLE ISLAND RESTORATION NETWORK: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL PARK FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOCEAN CONSERVANCY: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCROSSING THRESHOLDS INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE CARTER CENTER INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBIG CAT RESCUE CORP: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE UNION OF CONCERNED SCIENTISTS INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBEST FRIENDS ANIMAL SOCIETY: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMAIN STAY THERAPEUTIC FARM INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetThe Cycle Effect: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Colorado Gives Founda…Tyl FoundationThe Denver FoundationAdolph Coors Foundati…The Anschutz Foundati…The Eugene C and Flor…Richard H Lewis Famil…Daniels FundRose Community Founda…El Pomar FoundationAmg Charitable Gift F…Christian Community F…
Colorado Gives FoundationCO22.9× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Colorado Gives Foundation · Tyl Foundation · The Denver Foundation · Adolph Coors Foundation · The Anschutz Foundation · The Eugene C and Florence Armstrong Family Foundation Inc · Richard H Lewis Family Foundation · Daniels Fund · Rose Community Foundation · El Pomar Foundation · Amg Charitable Gift Foundation · Christian Community Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Haynes Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Haynes Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 50%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →median 12%
  • Friends of Bass River Inc: 36% of income from government
  • Safespace Inc: 25% of income from government
  • Trustees of Boston University: 12% of income from government
  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: 7% of income from government
  • Norwich University: 4% of income from government
  • Florida Oceanographic Society Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
5get no government money at all
6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 64 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Haynes Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home