· Private foundation
Hawk Rock Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k4 grants · $15k
- $10k–50k9 grants · $205k
- $50k–250k16 grants · $1.8M
- $250k+3 grants · $946k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| HEALTHY LEARNERS | $350,000 |
| VERMONT FOODBANK | $333,340 |
| LEARNING ALLY | $262,500 |
| GLOBAL FUND FOR CHILDREN | $200,000 |
| ACCION INTERNATIONAL | $200,000 |
| NEPAL YOUTH FOUNDATION | $175,000 |
| COPLEY HOSPITAL | $175,000 |
| GLOBAL IMPACT | $153,750 |
| THE NATURE CONSERVANCY | $150,000 |
| ONESKY FOUNDATION | $150,000 |
| RAISE THE CHILDREN | $100,000 |
| APOPO | $100,000 |
| FREE GEEK | $60,000 |
| MEALS ON WHEELS OF LAMOILLE COUNTY | $60,000 |
| NORTHEASTERN VERMONT REGIONAL HOSPITAL | $50,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $2.9M) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 71% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +59% since the first grant, against -4% for the ones you funded once.
34 repeat relationships — 25 still active in FY2024, 9 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $100k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- GFGLOBAL FUND FOR CHILDREN5× · 2020–2024 · $1.1M · revenue +231%
- AIACCION INTERNATIONAL5× · 2020–2024 · $1.0M · revenue +385%
Learning Ally Inc5× · 2020–2024 · $863k · revenue +70%
Funded once
- NVNortheastern Vermont Regional Corpone grant, 2022 · $110k · revenue -4%
- AAPOPOone grant, 2020 · $100k
- GOGULF OF MAINE RESEARCH INSTITUTEgraduatedone grant, 2022 · $20k · revenue +51%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To enhance, every day, the health of our patients, our families and our communities. We do that through a range of health care services for people of all ages, in a variety of care settings.
Wri is committed to creating change that improves people's lives and ensures the natural world can thrive. (see schedule o)wri's bold vision requires a formula for success we call "count it. change it. scale it.":- count it: our work is…
Gardens for Health International works to provide lasting agricultural solutions to chronic childhood malnutrition
Global Forest Generation restores and protects forest ecosystems in partnership with grassroots leaders and local communities across vast landscapes which play a critical role in preserving water, protecting biodiversity, storing carbon,…
Devworks international is dedicated to a society where all people enjoy the freedom to pursue their own sustainable development. we contribute to this by strengthening the capacity of local organizations.
To improve the lives of people through innovative scientific and engineering research.
Global greengrants fund seeds grassroots environmental action and social justice through small grants. we support change from the ground up by channeling donations to local projects and grassroots campaigns for environmental justice around…
World coffee research unites the global coffee industry to drive science-based agricultural solutions to urgently secure a diverse and sustainable supply of quality coffee today and for generations to come. our mission is to grow, protect,…
Veic is a sustainable energy company on a mission to generate the energy solutions the world needs (continues in schedule o). (continued), working to combat the climate crisis, boost community resilience, and lower energy costs. for nearly…
Global communities brings together local ingenuity and global insights to save lives and secure strong futures.
For over 60 years, counterpart international has partnered with communities worldwide to turn local ideas into lasting solutions, connecting local vision with global opportunity. (continued on schedule o)we believe people closest to the…
A nonprofit scientific research organization that develops vaccines and antibodies for hiv, tuberculosis, and emerging infectious diseases.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Action Against Hunger - Usa and the most unlike its peers is New England Historic Genealogical Society. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 28 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
45 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 45 of the 54 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds VERMONT FOODBANK ↗
- Who funds GLOBAL FUND FOR CHILDREN ↗
- Who funds ACCION INTERNATIONAL ↗
- Who funds Learning Ally Inc ↗
- Who funds THE NATURE CONSERVANCY ↗
- Who funds NEPAL YOUTH FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds PREBLE STREET ↗
- Who funds Global Impact ↗
- Who funds HEALTHY LEARNERS ↗
- Who funds HEALTHY LEARNERS INC ↗
- Who funds APOPO US INC ↗
- Who funds RAISE THE CHILDREN INTERNATIONAL ↗
- Who funds FREE GEEK ↗
- Who funds Meals on Wheels of Lamoille County Inc ↗
- Who funds Copley Hospital Inc ↗
- Who funds THE BROWN LEDGE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds NEW YORK GENEALOGICAL AND BIOGRAPHICAL SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds NEW ENGLAND HISTORIC GENEALOGICAL SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds ACTION AGAINST HUNGER - USA ↗
- Who funds Copley Health Systems Inc ↗
- Who funds Northeastern Vermont Regional Corp ↗
- Who funds FOLK ARTS RAJASTHAN INC ↗
- Who funds GIVE2ASIA ↗
- Who funds Northeastern Vermont Regional Hosp Inc ↗
- Who funds KARUNA-SHECHEN USA ↗
- Who funds WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC ↗
- Who funds LAMOILLE COMMUNITY FOOD SHARE INC ↗
- Who funds Maine Needs Inc ↗
- Who funds MYSTIC SEAPORT MUSEUM INC ↗
- Who funds WOMEN'S COALITION OF ST CROIX ↗
- Who funds DOWNSTREET HOUSING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT INC ↗
- Who funds GULF OF MAINE RESEARCH INSTITUTE ↗
- Who funds BIOSPHERE FOUNDATION FORMERLY PLANETARY CORAL REEF FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds GREATER PORTLAND IMMIGRANT WELCOME CENTER ↗
- Who funds SOCIAL GOOD FUND INC ↗
- Who funds MAINE IMMIGRANTS' RIGHTS COALITION ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Vermont Community Foundation · Community Foundation of the Virgin Islands Inc · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Jewish Communal Fund · National Philanthropic Trust · American Endowment Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Hawk Rock Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Vermont Foodbank — 13% of income from government
- Downstreet Housing and Community Development Inc — 7% of income from government
- Free Geek — 5% of income from government
- Mystic Seaport Museum Inc — 5% of income from government
- Learning Ally Inc — 4% of income from government
- Northeastern Vermont Regional Hosp Inc — 1% of income from government
- Copley Health Systems Inc — 1% of income from government
- Copley Hospital Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.