Skip to content

· Private foundation

Hawk Ridgeview Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$1.1M
Granted FY2025still arriving
12
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$350k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Human Services$1.4MHealth$690kEducation$548kInternational$485kReligion$290kArts & Culture$165kYouth Development$90kPublic Safety & Disaster$80kOther$0
02FY2025 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k6 grants · $90k
  • $50k–250k5 grants · $650k
  • $250k+1 grant · $350k
$50,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$14M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CARNEGIE MELLON UNIVERSITY$350,000
CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF PITTSBURGH$150,000
GRANT FOUNDATION INC DBA HOPITAL ALBERT SCHWEITZER HAITI$150,000
SALVATION ARMY OF WESTERN PA$150,000
CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PITTSBURGH FOUNDATION$150,000
ALEX'S LEMONADE STAND FOUNDATION$50,000
OUR LADY OF SACRED HEART$25,000
CHILDREN'S MUSEUM OF PITTSBURGH$25,000
SAINT JOHN VIANNEY PARISH$10,000
MUSCARELLE MUSEUM OF ART$10,000
TOMS DOOR$10,000
CATO INSTITUTE$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $625k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 87% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%TOMS DOOR: $20k → 6%TOMS DOOR: $20k → 6%TOMS DOOR: $10k → 6%TOMS DOOR: $10k → 6%TOMS DOOR: $10k → 6%TOMS DOOR: $10k → 6%URBAN IMPACT FOUNDATION: $10k → 11%URBAN IMPACT FOUNDATION: $10k → 11%URBAN IMPACT FOUNDATION: $10k → 11%URBAN IMPACT FOUNDATION: $5k → 11%CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF PITTSBURGH: $150k → 11%CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF PITTSBURGH: $100k → 11%CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF PITTSBURGH: $100k → 11%CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF PITTSBURGH: $75k → 11%CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF PITTSBURGH: $50k → 11%CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF PITTSBURGH: $25k → 11%URBAN IMPACT FOUNDATION: $10k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$3.7M · 18 repeat orgs$75k to everyone else

18 repeat relationships: 11 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

18
7

Total granted

$3.7M
$65k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+49%
+88%

Still filing today

72%
29%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesInternationalHealthArts & CultureEducationYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CH
    CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PITTSBURGH FOUNDATION
    6× · 2020–2025 · $550k · revenue +6%
  • CM
    Carnegie Mellon University
    2× · 2024–2025 · $500k · revenue +25%
  • CC
    CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE DIOCESE OF PGH
    6× · 2020–2025 · $500k · revenue +49%

Funded once

  • MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC
    one grant, 2022 · $10k · revenue +13%
  • CC
    CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF GLENWOOD SPRINGS
    one grant, 2020 · $10k
  • YL
    YOUNG LIFE OF UPPER ST CLAIR (PA48)
    one grant, 2022 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia

The children's hospital of philadelphia, the oldest hospital in the united states dedicated exclusively to pediatrics, strives to be the world leader in the advancement of health care for children by integrating excellent patient care,…

Health
2
Point Park University

Provides innovative education in a dynamic urban setting. dedicated to academic excellence and community engagement,we prepare students of diverse backgrounds with the knowledge, skill,and experience to lead meaningful lives as informed…

—
3
La Roche University

La roche university advances learning informed by ethical and service-oriented values, reflecting its catholic heritage and the charism of the sisters of divine providence.

Education
4
University of Pittsburgh

The university of pittsburgh, founded in 1787, is one of the oldest institutions of higher education in the united states and one of the nation's top public research universities. for more than two centuries, the university of pittsburgh…

Education
5
Trustees of the University of Pennsylvania

The trustees of the university of pennsylvania (the "university") sees itself as having a public service mission. in such regard, the university aims to provide a rich and diverse educational environment for its students; to pioneer…

Education
6
St Mary's University

St. marys university, as a catholic marianist university, fosters the formation of people in faith and educates leaders for the common good through community, integrated liberal arts and professional education, and academic excellence.

—
7
The Trustees of Princeton University

Research, education and general - princeton university is a private not-for-profit, non-sectarian institution of higher learning with approximately 5,700 undergraduate and 3,300 graduate students. 2,500 students graduated in the 2024-2025…

Education
8
Albany College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences

We educate the next generation of leaders to improve the health of our society.

Education
9
Institute for Advanced Study - Louis Bamberger & Mrs Felix Fuld Foundation

The institute for advanced study (the institute) is one of the world's leading centers for theoretical research and intellectual inquiry. see schedule o.

Science & Tech
10
Saint Joseph's University

As philadelphia's jesuit catholic university, saint joseph's provides a rigorous, student-centered education rooted in the liberal arts. we prepare students for personal excellence, professional success, and engaged citizenship. striving…

Education
11
Upmc Pinnacle Hospitals

Upmc pinnacle hospitals mission as a charitable organization is dedicatied to maintaining and improving the health and quality of life for all persons of the central pennsylvania area.

Health
12
St Catherine University

We educate women to lead and influence. we educate at all degree levels through valuing and integrating the liberal arts and professional education within the catholic intellectual tradition, see schedule oemphasizing scholarly inquiry and…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Urban Impact Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Little Sisters of the Poor. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 26 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/15
Grantees still filing
13/15
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SALVATION ARMY OF WESTERN PA: $765,000 · OtherSALVATION ARMY OF WESTERN PACarnegie Mellon University: $500,000 · OtherCarnegie Mellon UniversityGRANT FOUNDATION INC DBA HOPITAL ALBERT SCHWEITZER HAITI: $435,000 · OtherGRANT FOUNDATION INC DBA HOPITAL ALBERT SCHWEITZER HAITIOUR LADY OF SACRED HEART: $255,000 · OtherOUR LADY OF SACRED HEARTALEXS LEMONADE STAND FOUNDATION: $110,000 · Other+12 more: $275,000 · Other+12 moreCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE DIOCESE OF PGH: $500,000 · Human ServicesCATHOLIC CHARITIES…TOM'S DOOR INC: $80,000 · Human ServicesTOM'S DOOR INCURBAN IMPACT FOUNDATION: $45,000 · Human ServicesURBAN IMPACT FOUND…CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PITTSBURGH FOUNDATION: $550,000 · HealthCHILDREN'S HOSPI…CHILDREN'S MUSEUM OF PITTSBURGH: $105,000 · Arts & CultureCATO INSTITUTE: $50,000 · Public BenefitBROTHER'S BROTHER FOUNDATION: $40,000 · InternationalMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $10,000 · InternationalGROVE CITY COLLEGE: $47,500 · Education
Other$2,340,000Human Services$625,000Health$550,000Arts & Culture$105,000Public Benefit$50,000International$50,000Education$47,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PITTSBURGH FOUNDATION: $550,000 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetCarnegie Mellon University: $500,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE DIOCESE OF PGH: $500,000 over 6y, 1.0% of budgetALEXS LEMONADE STAND FOUNDATION: $110,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetCHILDREN'S MUSEUM OF PITTSBURGH: $105,000 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetTOM'S DOOR INC: $80,000 over 6y, 15% of budgetCATO INSTITUTE: $50,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetGROVE CITY COLLEGE: $47,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetURBAN IMPACT FOUNDATION: $45,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetBROTHER'S BROTHER FOUNDATION: $40,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetVALLEY YOUTH NETWORK: $30,000 over 3y, 4.4% of budgetSHINING STARS FOUNDATION: $30,000 over 3y, 1.5% of budgetLITTLE SISTERS OF THE POOR: $25,000 over 3y, 29% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Pittsburgh Project: $10,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PITTSBURGH FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Carnegie Mellon University ↗
  • Who funds CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE DIOCESE OF PGH ↗
  • Who funds ALEXS LEMONADE STAND FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S MUSEUM OF PITTSBURGH ↗
  • Who funds TOM'S DOOR INC ↗
  • Who funds CATO INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds GROVE CITY COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds URBAN IMPACT FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds BROTHER'S BROTHER FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds VALLEY YOUTH NETWORK ↗
  • Who funds SHINING STARS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds LITTLE SISTERS OF THE POOR ↗
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
  • Who funds The Pittsburgh Project ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Pittsburgh FoundationPA15.2× affinity5 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Pittsburgh Foundation · The Buhl Foundation · The Grable Foundation · The United Way of Southwestern Pennsylvania · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Hawk Ridgeview Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Hawk Ridgeview Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%2%8%17%30%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Hawk Ridgeview Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Hawk Ridgeview Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 26 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Hawk Ridgeview’s filings →

    More from the funding graph