Skip to content
Hashem Charitable Tr at a glance

· Private foundation

Hashem Charitable Tr

Its FY2026 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$154k
Granted FY2026still arriving
5
Grants FY2026still arriving
1
States reached
$120k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
0193% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2024 to 2026.

Philanthropy$10MReligion$322kArts & Culture$287kHealth$162kHuman Services$92kPublic Safety & Disaster$71kInternational$34kAnimals$2kOther$0
02FY2026 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2026

  • Under $10k2 grants · $5k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $30k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $120k
$11,500
Median grant
1
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MEMORIAL SLOAN KETTERING CANCER CEN$120,000
CAMP HASC$18,000
Individual grant recipient$11,500
AMERICAN FRIENDS OF KROVIM$4,500
ZICHRON TZVI ELIMELECH$29
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY24–24, $22k) land where the poverty rate runs at 20%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%BONEI OLAM: $20k → 20%A TIME: $2k → 20%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

6%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$697k · 9 repeat orgs$11M to everyone else

9 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2026, 7 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2026 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
21

Total granted

$697k
$11M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

0%
0%

Still filing today

78%
52%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2026, 12% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $136k went to new ones.

50%100%’24’25’26
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’24’25’26
PhilanthropyReligionHuman ServicesInternationalPublic BenefitArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FO
    FRIENDS OF UNITED HATZALAH INC
    2× · 2024–2025 · $287k · revenue 0%
  • NC
    NATIONAL COUNCIL OF YOUNG ISRAEL
    2× · 2024–2025 · $185k
  • ZT
    ZICHRON TZVI ELIMELECH
    3× · 2024–2026 · $92k · revenue -23%

Funded once

  • TF
    TYH Foundation
    one grant, 2025 · $10M
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2025 · $42k
  • UW
    UNITY WARRIORS INC
    one grant, 2024 · $33k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Zichron Chaim Avraham Foundation
Philanthropy
2
American Friends of Yeshiva Aish Hatorah
—
3
Tal Hashamayim Foundation
Religion
4
Zichron Avrohom Yosef
Philanthropy
5
Zichron Chaim Meir Foundation
Philanthropy
6
Yeshiva Ohr Yisroel
Philanthropy
7
Tzemach Yifroch Foundation
—
8
Zichroin Rabbeini Meshilem Feiish Ztl Foundation
—
9
Zicron Eliyahu Inc
—
10
Ezreinu Inc
Health
11
Idf Memorial Foundation
Philanthropy
12
The Keren Rachaim Fund
—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is American Friends of Netiv Aryeh Inc; the most unlike its peers is Tyh Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 33 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
18/18
Grantees still filing
2/18
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

TYH Foundation: $10,306,526 · PhilanthropyTYH Foundation+5 more: $83,035 · PhilanthropyNATIONAL COUNCIL OF YOUNG ISRAEL: $185,000 · OtherMEMORIAL SLOAN KETTERING CANCER CEN: $120,000 · OtherZICHRON TZVI ELIMELECH: $91,639 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $42,362 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $30,000 · Other+13 more: $97,756 · OtherFRIENDS OF UNITED HATZALAH INC: $286,800 · Arts & CultureCAMP HASC INC: $38,000 · ReligionAMERICAN FRIENDS OF NETIV ARYEH INC: $37,800 · ReligionZAKA NORTH INC: $19,800 · ReligionAMERICAN FRIENDS OF KARMIELS STUDENTS CHABAD INC: $11,400 · ReligionUNITY WARRIORS INC: $32,800 · Public Safety & DisasterBonei Olam Inc: $19,800 · Human ServicesA Torah Infertilty Medium Exchange: $1,800 · Human ServicesCHAI LIFELINE INC: $20,000 · Health
Philanthropy$10,389,561Other$566,757Arts & Culture$286,800Religion$107,000Public Safety & Disaster$32,800Human Services$21,600Health$20,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFRIENDS OF UNITED HATZALAH INC: $286,800 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetZICHRON TZVI ELIMELECH: $91,639 over 3y, 1.4% of budgetCAMP HASC INC: $38,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF NETIV ARYEH INC: $37,800 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetUNITY WARRIORS INC: $32,800 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetHEBRON FUND INC: $21,800 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCHAI LIFELINE INC: $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetJust One Chesed Inc: $19,800 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetTHE KOBY MANDELL FOUNDATION INC: $19,800 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetZAKA NORTH INC: $19,800 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetBonei Olam Inc: $19,800 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICA GIVES INC: $18,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetJGIVE-FRIENDS OF ASOR FUND USA INC: $3,635 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetA Torah Infertilty Medium Exchange: $1,800 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

FjcJewish Communal FundThe Ojc FundNational Philanthropi…Morgan Stanley Global…Vanguard Charitable E…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
FjcNY19.4× affinity7 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Fjc · Jewish Communal Fund · The Ojc Fund · National Philanthropic Trust · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Hashem Charitable Tr funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Hashem Charitable Tr. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24
no gov · 30%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    3get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–24
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Hashem Charitable Tr?

    Find your warmest path to Hashem Charitable Tr through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 33 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2026, released 2026. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Hashem Charitable Tr’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home