Skip to content
Harvest Christian Ministries Inc at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Harvest Christian Ministries Inc

The organization's mission is to facilitate christian ministry by equipping the individuals and families through discipleship, financial literacy and community and economic development.

$378k
Granted FY2024still arriving
10
Grants FY2024still arriving
6
States reached
$64k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2022 to 2024.

Religion$686kPhilanthropy$336kYouth Development$154kHuman Services$82kEducation$79kInternational$43kHealth$18kRecreation & Sports$15kOther$0
02FY2024 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 10 grants below total $333,983, the rows itemized in this filing. The $378,156 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $44,173 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $8k
  • $10k–50k7 grants · $202k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $124k
$35,780
Median grant
6
States reached
$1.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
DUE WEST ROBOTICS$63,800
HEART OF HOPE INDIA$59,923
ABBEVILLE YOUTH CENTER$40,200
CAROLINA CHAPLAINCY PROGRAM$36,000
HOPE FORCE INTERNATIONAL$35,780
SERVE INDIA MINISTRIES$31,680
ARTISTS IN CHRISTIAN TESTIMONY INTL INC$24,000
MEXICO NATIVE MISSIONS$24,000
OPEN GATE MISSIONS$10,200
THE MOM COMMUNITY$8,400
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–22, $10k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%MANY HANDS FOR HAITI: $10k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
IL
NY
WY
IA
OH
PA
TN
NC
SC
GA
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

80%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.1M · 15 repeat orgs$292k to everyone else

15 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2024, 7 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
11

Total granted

$1.1M
$218k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+9%
+30%

Still filing today

87%
9%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 78% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $74k went to new ones.

50%100%’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’22’23’24
ReligionYouth DevelopmentHuman ServicesHealthEducationPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • ARTISTS IN CHRISTIAN TESTIMONY INC
    3× · 2022–2024 · $138k · revenue +27%
  • HF
    Hope Force International
    3× · 2022–2024 · $122k · revenue +20%
  • AY
    ABBEVILLE YOUTH CENTER
    3× · 2022–2024 · $114k · revenue +9%

Funded once

  • RB
    REDEMPTION BY GRACE MINISTRIES
    one grant, 2022 · $52k
  • BA
    BOW AND ARROW CENTER OF HOPE
    one grant, 2022 · $35k
  • HC
    HEIRS COVENANT CHURCH
    one grant, 2022 · $25k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Kings Commission Ministries

Our mission is to carry out the commands of our Lord Jesus Christ to take the Good News of the gospel to the whole world teaching people to obey everything He commanded. We work among mostly low-literacy populations so we do this by…

—
2
Vision International Missions

To propagate the gospel of jesus christ; to examine candidates and appoint missionaries. to endorse missionary programs according to standards set forth in the new testament, to establish churches, church schools & mission societies in…

Religion
3
Connect the World

The purpose of the organization is to share the passionate love of god the father throughout the world, his salvation through his son, the lord jesus christ, and to lead people to an experience with the holy spirit and his power. our…

Religion
4
Oceans of Mercy

Missionary work in the nation of India

Religion
5
Sole Ministries

None

Religion
6
Gods Promise Ministries International

Religious Purposes

Housing & Shelter
7
Sowers Ministry Inc

Humanitarian / EducationSOWERS stands for Serving Orphans Widows Educating & Reaching Society.Founded in 2001 by Rev. Jayakumar Babu Salluri, Pastor Jay, God has used this ministry to educate 1,048 pastors, start and support 170 village…

Religion
8
International Christian Partners Llc

Childrens Home and Ministry in India

Religion
9
Full Gospel Church in India & Shepherd Children's Home

Providing educational and religious support to orphanage children

Human Services
10
Heart Bridge International

Heart Bridge International exists to equip and empower Christians around the world to fulfill the Great Commission. The organization provides free ministry training, discipleship resources, and practical coaching to under-resourced…

Religion
11
Message to All Nations Man

To reach out with the message of the gospel of jesus to the last, least, and the lost

Human Services
12
Face to Faith Ministry

Our mission is to make disciples of jesus christ by engaging indigenous pastors around the world. our vision is to train pastors and their congregants to share the gospel in a friendly, non-denominational approach across all ethnicities,…

Religion
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Hope Force International; the most unlike its peers is Mom Community Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 29 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

5
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/17
Grantees still filing
10/17
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ARTISTS IN CHRISTIAN TESTIMONY INC: $138,400 · ReligionARTISTS IN CHRISTIAN TESTIMONY INCHope Force International: $122,204 · ReligionHope Force InternationalSERVE INDIA MINISTRIES: $92,060 · ReligionSERVE INDIA MINISTRIESCAROLINA CHAPLAINCY PROGRAM: $87,300 · ReligionCAROLINA CHAPLAINCY PROGRAMMEXICO NATIVE MISSIONS: $72,000 · ReligionMEXICO NATIVE MISSIONSHOPE UNIVERSAL INC: $27,000 · ReligionHEART OF HOPE INDIA: $317,744 · PhilanthropyHEART OF HOPE INDIAREDEMPTION BY GRACE MINISTRIES: $52,200 · OtherREDEMPTION BY GRACE …BOW AND ARROW CENTER OF HOPE: $35,200 · OtherBOW AND ARROW CENTER…ARROWS OF TRUTH MINISTRY: $28,843 · OtherARROWS OF TRUTH MINI…HEIRS COVENANT CHURCH: $25,000 · OtherHEIRS COVENANT CHURC…OPEN GATE MISSIONS: $18,700 · OtherOPEN GATE MISSIONSCOLD SPRINGS MISSION FUNDS: $18,120 · OtherCOLD SPRINGS MISSION…SATURATE GLOBAL: $17,500 · OtherSATURATE GLOBALABWE FOUNDATION INC: $15,000 · OtherABWE FOUNDATION INCABBEVILLE COUNTY DIVE TEAM: $15,000 · OtherABBEVILLE COUNTY DIV…WARWICK VALLEY CHURCH OF THE NAZARENE: $12,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $12,000 · OtherOPEN GATE MISSIONS: $10,200 · Other+1 more: $5,500 · OtherABBEVILLE YOUTH CENTER: $114,050 · Youth DevelopmentABBEVILLE …NORTHERN YOUTH PROGRAMS OF MINNESOTA: $22,000 · Youth DevelopmentNORTHERN Y…DUE WEST ROBOTICS: $63,800 · EducationCAPTIVATING MONTESSORI SCHOOL: $15,100 · EducationMom Community Inc: $46,800 · Human ServicesMANY HANDS FOR HAITI: $10,000 · Human ServicesSALVATION OAKS RECOVERY COMMUNITY INC: $18,000 · HealthFAIR PLAY CAMP SCHOOL INC: $18,000 · HealthFRESHWATER COAST COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $12,000 · Community Improvement
Religion$538,964Philanthropy$317,744Other$265,263Youth Development$136,050Education$78,900Human Services$56,800Health$36,000Community Improvement$12,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetHEART OF HOPE INDIA: $317,744 over 3y, 49% of budgetARTISTS IN CHRISTIAN TESTIMONY INC: $138,400 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetHope Force International: $122,204 over 3y, 2.6% of budgetABBEVILLE YOUTH CENTER: $114,050 over 3y, 22% of budgetSERVE INDIA MINISTRIES: $92,060 over 3y, 1.0% of budgetCAROLINA CHAPLAINCY PROGRAM: $87,300 over 3y, 35% of budgetMEXICO NATIVE MISSIONS: $72,000 over 3y, 36% of budgetDUE WEST ROBOTICS: $63,800 over 1y, 47% of budgetMom Community Inc: $46,800 over 3y, 7.7% of budgetARROWS OF TRUTH MINISTRY: $28,843 over 2y, 36% of budgetHOPE UNIVERSAL INC: $27,000 over 2y, 5.6% of budgetNORTHERN YOUTH PROGRAMS OF MINNESOTA: $22,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetSALVATION OAKS RECOVERY COMMUNITY INC: $18,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetFAIR PLAY CAMP SCHOOL INC: $18,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetFRESHWATER COAST COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $12,000 over 1y, 12% of budgetMANY HANDS FOR HAITI: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Anabaptist FoundationServant FoundationNatl Christian Charit…Raymond James Charita…Network for GoodThe Bank of America C…Fidelity Investments …Donor Advised Charita…Amazonsmile Foundation
Anabaptist FoundationPA23.2× affinity9 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Anabaptist Foundation · Servant Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · Network for Good · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Harvest Christian Ministries Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Harvest Christian Ministries Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2023
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%3%13%28%50%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Harvest Christian Ministries Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Harvest Christian Ministries Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 29 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Harvest Christian Ministries’ filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home