Skip to content

Texas · Private foundation

Harry Wilson Loose Trust

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$300k
Granted FY2025(still arriving)
3
Grants FY2025
4
Organizations funded FY2024
75%
First-time grantees FY2024
Read the full brief
Median grant, FY2025
$80,000
Largest grant, FY2025
$200,000
Organizations funded a year
1 to 5
FY2018 to FY2024
States reached, FY2025
1
Total assets, FY2025
$7.0M
Applications
Takes unsolicited applications
Per its most recent filing; check its own site

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2024, 75% of the organizations Harry Wilson Loose Trust funded were first-time grantees, receiving 85% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 15% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $235k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationArts & CultureHealthInternationalCommunity ImprovementReligionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY2025still arriving3$300k67%
FY20244$275k75%
FY20232$285k50%
FY20223$315k100%
FY20215$268k80%
FY20203$260k100%
FY20195$261k80%
FY20181$250k100%
97% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Arts & Culture$933kEducation$361kCommunity Improvement$280kHealth$250kHuman Services$210kYouth Development$200kInternational$75kHousing & Shelter$50kOther$0

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2017 to FY2025, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

Show all 16 grantees

Plus 7 recipients with no EIN on record ($695k), not named here.

Where it is load-bearing

Each grantee by its size and the share of its budget Harry Wilson Loose Trust supplied at peak.

25%50%75%100%$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSherwood Center for the Exceptional Child: $250,000 over 1y, 6.3% of budgetUnion Station Kansas City Inc: $172,750 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetKansas City Art Institute: $152,750 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetNegro Leagues Baseball Museum Inc: $150,000 over 1y, 5.3% of budgetMattie Rhodes Memorial Society D/B/A Mattie Rhodes Center: $140,000 over 1y, 2.8% of budgetThe Nelson Gallery Foundation: $105,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetWilliam Jewell College: $100,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetUmkc Foundation: $92,750 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetNonprofit Connect Network Learn Grow: $80,000 over 1y, 6.3% of budgetJunior Achievement of Middle America Inc: $75,000 over 1y, 3.6% of budgetAssistance League of Kansas City: $70,000 over 2y, 3.2% of budgetPartnership for Regional Educational Preparation - Kansas City Inc: $58,000 over 1y, 3.0% of budgetPublic Television 19 Inc: $52,750 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetTrust Neighborhoods: $50,000 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetBike Walk Kc: $10,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 15.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Oppenstein Brothers FoundationMO22.1× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Oppenstein Brothers Foundation · United Way of Greater Kansas City Inc · Ewing Marion Kauffman Foundation · Greater Kansas City Community Foundation · Muriel McBrien Kauffman Family Foundation · The Kansas City Royals Foundation · The H & R Block Foundation · Truman Heartland Community Foundation · Nichols Company Charitable Trust · School Smart Kc Inc · The Sosland Foundation · Marion and Henry Bloch Family Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare Harry Wilson Loose Trust with peer funders

About Harry Wilson Loose Trust

How much does Harry Wilson Loose Trust give?
Harry Wilson Loose Trust reported 3 grants totaling $300,000 in its FY2025 IRS filing. It funded between 1 and 5 organizations a year over FY2018 to FY2024.
What does Harry Wilson Loose Trust fund?
By grant dollars over FY2017 to FY2025, its largest causes are Arts & Culture (38%), Education (15%), Community Improvement (11%).
Who are Harry Wilson Loose Trust's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2017 to FY2025: Sherwood Center for the Exceptional Child ($250k), Heart of America Council Boy Scouts of America ($200k), Union Station Kansas City Inc ($173k).
Does Harry Wilson Loose Trust fund new organizations?
In FY2024, 75% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Does Harry Wilson Loose Trust accept unsolicited applications?
Its most recent filing reports that it accepts unsolicited grant applications.
Which funders back the same organizations as Harry Wilson Loose Trust?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include Oppenstein Brothers Foundation, United Way of Greater Kansas City Inc, Ewing Marion Kauffman Foundation.
Where is Harry Wilson Loose Trust based?
Harry Wilson Loose Trust is based in TX.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 23 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Harry Wilson Loose’s filings →

More from the funding graph