Skip to content

Texas · Private foundation

Harry S Moss Heart Trust

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$3.5M
Granted FY2025(still arriving)
14
Grants FY2025
10
Organizations funded FY2024
30%
First-time grantees FY2024
Read the full brief
Median grant, FY2025
$250,000
Largest grant, FY2025
$750,000
Organizations funded a year
4 to 11
FY2020 to FY2024
States reached, FY2025
1
Total assets, FY2025
$62M
Applications
Takes unsolicited applications
Per its most recent filing; check its own site

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2024, 30% of the organizations Harry S Moss Heart Trust funded were first-time grantees, receiving 43% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 57% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.7M went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24
HealthEducationPhilanthropyHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY2025still arriving9$3.5M22%
FY202410$4.1M30%
FY202311$2.9M55%
FY20225$2.1M40%
FY20214$1.3M75%
FY20208$2.0Mn/a
100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Health$13MEducation$2.5MHuman Services$10kReligion$10kArts & Culture$5k

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2020 to FY2025, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

Show all 18 grantees

What it could do for these grantees

Plus 6 recipients with no EIN on record ($5.8M), not named here.

Where it is load-bearing

Harry S Moss Heart Trust supplied at least a quarter of the budget for 1 of its grantees at some point. The chart plots its 18 largest grantees; load-bearing ones sit top left.

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $2,500,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetThe University of Texas Foundation Inc: $2,180,100 over 3y, 1.3% of budgetTexas Health Resources Foundation: $1,765,000 over 4y, 2.1% of budgetBaylor Health Care System Foundation: $1,215,000 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetSouthwest Transplant Alliance Inc: $562,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetDallas Methodist Hospitals Foundation Inc: $480,000 over 2y, 1.7% of budgetUniversity of North Texas Foundation Inc: $325,000 over 2y, 1.2% of budgetParkland Foundation: $300,000 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetUnthsc Foundation: $240,000 over 2y, 4.3% of budgetBlack Heart Association: $155,000 over 1y, 31% of budgetChildren's Medical Center Foundation: $150,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetBreakthrough T1d: $100,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBaylor College of Medicine: $75,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTexas Heart Institute: $70,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetArlington-Mansfield Area Young Men's Christian Association: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBrother Bills Helping Hand: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetLiving for Zachary: $7,500 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetTexas Ballet Theater Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 18.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Fichtenbaum Charitable TrustTX13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Fichtenbaum Charitable Trust · Hillcrest Foundation · Communities Foundation of Texas Inc · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare Harry S Moss Heart Trust with peer funders

About Harry S Moss Heart Trust

How much does Harry S Moss Heart Trust give?
Harry S Moss Heart Trust reported 14 grants totaling $3,502,600 in its FY2025 IRS filing. It funded between 4 and 11 organizations a year over FY2020 to FY2024.
What does Harry S Moss Heart Trust fund?
By grant dollars over FY2020 to FY2025, its largest causes are Health (84%), Education (16%), Human Services (0%).
Who are Harry S Moss Heart Trust's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2020 to FY2025: American Heart Association Inc ($2.5M), The University of Texas Foundation Inc ($2.2M), Texas Health Resources Foundation ($1.8M).
Does Harry S Moss Heart Trust fund new organizations?
In FY2024, 30% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Does Harry S Moss Heart Trust accept unsolicited applications?
Its most recent filing reports that it accepts unsolicited grant applications.
Which funders back the same organizations as Harry S Moss Heart Trust?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include Fichtenbaum Charitable Trust, Hillcrest Foundation, Communities Foundation of Texas Inc.
Where is Harry S Moss Heart Trust based?
Harry S Moss Heart Trust is based in TX.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 24 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Harry S Moss Heart’s filings →

More from the funding graph