Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation Dossiers
Plinth

· Private foundation

Harry and Masie Masto Foundation dba masto foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$546k
Granted FY2024still arriving
44
Grants FY2024still arriving
10
States reached
$52k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What you fund
0182% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2017–2024.

Philanthropy$633kCommunity Improvement$344kHuman Services$315kArts & Culture$200kCivil Rights$160kEducation$100kHealth$100kInternational$91kYouth Development$66kOther$661k
02FY2024 · 44 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k16 grants · $62k
  • $10k–50k27 grants · $432k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $52k
$10,000
Median grant
10
States reached
$8.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MUFG UNION BANK CARES FUND$52,360
TIDES FOUNDATION$36,333
POSSIBILITY LABS$26,250
KULTIVATE LABS$22,223
FUND FOR CONSTITUTIONAL GOVERNMENT$21,400
ASIAN AMERICAN FUTURES$20,000
FRIENDS OF MINIDOKA INC$20,000
OUTRIGHT ACTION INTERNATIONAL$20,000
NATIONAL JAPANESE AMERICAN MEMORIAL FOUNDATION$20,000
JAPANESE AMERICAN CITIZENS LEAGUE$20,000
ASIAN AMERICAN-PACIFIC ISLANDERS IN PHILANTHROPY$20,000
VISIBLE FIGURES$20,000
COMMUNITY INITIATIVES$16,500
CHINESE FOR AFFIRMATIVE ACTION$16,500
DENSHO$15,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY19–24, $308k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 60% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%REPOWER FUND: $20k → 11%RE POWER FUND: $15k → 14%COMMONWEAL: $10k → 8%THE ANGEL BAND PROJECT: $3k → 11%SISTERSONG WOMEN OF COLOR REPRODUCTIVE JUSTICE COLLECTIVE: $20k → 13%VISIBLE FIGURES: $30k → 9%CITY DIBS: $20k → 19%REPOWER FUND: $15k → 11%COMMONWEAL: $5k → 8%SISTERSONG WOMEN OF COLOR REPRODUCTIVE JUSTICE COLLECTIVE: $20k → 13%VISIBLE FIGURES: $30k → 9%COMMONWEAL: $3k → 8%SISTERSONG WOMEN OF COLOR REPRODUCTIVE JUSTICE COLLECTIVE: $20k → 13%VISIBLE FIGURES: $20k → 9%COMMONWEAL: $3k → 8%SISTERSONG WOMEN OF COLOR REPRODUCTIVE JUSTICE COLLECTIVE: $10k → 13%VISIBLE FIGURES: $15k → 9%VISIBLE FIGURES: $8k → 9%THE ACCOMPLIS COLLECTIVE INC: $5k → 17%REUNION OF AFRICAN DESCENDANTS INC: $1k → 17%YOUNG WOMEN'S FREEDOM CENTER: $10k → 10%POSSIBILITY LABS: $26k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

WA
ID
MN
IL
NY
MA
OR
NJ
CA
MO
VA
MD
AZ
SC
DC
HI
GA
TX

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 20% of Harry and Masie Masto Foundation dba masto foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another.

Harry and Masie Masto Foundation dba masto foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 14% directed abroad (not shown)

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

72%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.4M · 31 repeat orgs$553k to everyone else

31 repeat relationships — 17 still active in FY2024, 14 since wound down; 13 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

31
39

Total granted

$1.4M
$402k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-3%
+9%

Still filing today

87%
77%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 65% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $152k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesCivil RightsArts & CulturePhilanthropyCommunity ImprovementInternationalOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FO
    FRIENDS OF MINIDOKA INC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $75k · revenue +716%
  • BB
    BIG BEND COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION
    2× · 2017–2018 · $70k · revenue +44%
  • SI
    SISTERSONG INC
    4× · 2020–2023 · $70k · revenue +30%

Funded once

  • CP
    CARAVANSERAI PROJECTgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $25k · revenue +143%
  • AL
    ASTRAEA LESBIAN FOUND FOR JUSTICE
    one grant, 2018 · $20k
  • VT
    VIBE THEATER EXPERIENCE INC
    one grant, 2022 · $20k · revenue -29%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Forward Together

Forward Together is a national reproductive justice organization that centers people, families, and communities who experience reproductive oppression. They prioritize queer, trans, Black, Indigenous, and other peoples of color and utilize…

Health
2
Jobs with Justice San Francisco

A long-term, strategic alliance of labor, community, faith-based, and student organizations working together to build greater economic power for workers and community members through employee rights at work and access to good jobs,…

Employment
3
Out & Equal

To provide leadership and professional development, education and research to create workplaces free from discrimination.

Social Science
4
Girls for Gender Equity Inc

Girls for gender equity (gge) works intergenerationally, through a black feminist lens, to achieve gender and racial justice by centering the leadership of black girls and gender-expansive young people of color to reshape culture and…

Crime & Legal
5
Global Philanthropy Project Inc

Global Philanthropy Project (GPP or the Organization) is a collaboration of funders and philanthropic advisors working to expand global philanthropic support to advance the human rights of lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and intersex…

Philanthropy
6
Lavender Rights Project

Lavender Rights Project elevates the power, autonomy, and leadership of the black intersex & gender diverse community through intersectional legal and social services. We utilize the law as an organizing principle to affirm our civil…

Crime & Legal
7
Equal Justice Society

The Equal Justice Society (EJS) is transforming the nations consciousness on racethrough law, social science, and the arts. EJS works to dismantle structural andinstitutional racism to advance robust equal protection under the Fourteenth…

Civil Rights
8
Equality Now Inc

To achieve legal and systematic change that addresses violence and discrimination against women and girls around the world.

International
9
Queer Power Alliance

Queer Power Alliance is rooted in the LGBTQIA+ community and in solidarity with other marginalized communities. We strive for equity by disrupting systems of oppression holding back LGBTQIA+ communities through advocating, educating,…

Human Services
10
Asian Law Caucus

The Asian Law Caucus's mission is to promote, advance, and represent the legal and civil rights of Asian American Pacific Islander (AAPI) communities, recognizing that social, economic, political and racial inequalities continue to exist…

Crime & Legal
11
Fund for Justice

Fund for Justice is a nationally connected social impact research and advocacy organization that works to achieve fundamental, systemic reform by addressing policies and practicies that prevent individuals from reaching their full…

Crime & Legal
12
South Asian Americans Leading Together

South Asian Americans Leading Together is a national movement strategy and advocacy organization committed to racial justice through structural change.

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Repower Fund and the most unlike its peers is Lowcountry Gullah Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyLgbtq+ Community SupportWomen & Girls Leadership De…Affordable Housing Developm…Policy Research and AdvocacyImmigrant Worker SupportDomestic Violence ServicesCommunity Foundations
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 17 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%4%<5yr14%32%5–10yr19%16%10–20yr16%27%20–35yr13%18%35–55yr16%3%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%1%<5yr14%24%5–10yr19%9%10–20yr16%23%20–35yr13%39%35–55yr16%3%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/74
the rest of the field
13%
240,396/1,819,491

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

72 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2026, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 72 of the 87 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
10
Early backer (in before they grew)
72/72
Grantees still filing
34/72
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

TIDES FOUNDATION — $398,344 · PhilanthropyTIDES FOUNDATIONASIAN AMERICAN FUTURES — $72,500 · PhilanthropyASIAN AMERICAN FUTURESAsian AmericansPacific Islanders in Philanthropy Inc — $70,000 · PhilanthropyAsian AmericansPacific Isl…COMMUNITY INITIATIVES — $46,482 · PhilanthropyCOMMUNITY INITIATIVES+5 more — $46,000 · Philanthropy+5 moreMARRIAGE FOR ALL JAPAN — $106,644 · OtherMARRIAGE FOR ALL JAPANMUFG UNION BANK CARES FUND — $52,360 · OtherMUFG UNION BANK CARES FUNDASIAN AMERICANS PACIFIC ISLANDER IN PHILANTHROPYCHANGE PHILANTHROPY — $50,000 · OtherASIAN AMERICANS PACIFIC ISLANDER IN PH…OUTRIGHT INTERNATIONAL — $50,000 · OtherOUTRIGHT INTERNATIONALTHE ASTRAEA FOUNDATION INC — $39,125 · OtherSEATTLE INDIAN HEALTH BOARD — $70,000 · OtherSEATTLE INDIAN HEALTH BOARDEMPOWERMENT ENTERPRISE II — $46,112 · OtherFUND FOR CONSTITUTIONAL GOVERNMENT — $42,800 · OtherSOUTHWEST INDIGENOUS WOMEN'S COALTION — $57,500 · OtherSOUTHWEST INDIGENOUS WOMEN'S COALTIONLTSC COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION — $36,432 · Other+28 more — $367,400 · Other+28 moreHorizons Foundation — $263,000 · Community ImprovementHorizons Found…KULTIVATE LABS — $55,223 · Community ImprovementKULTIVATE LABS+4 more — $25,500 · Community Improvement+4 moreVISIBLE FIGURES — $102,500 · Human ServicesVISIBLE FIGUR…SISTERSONG INC — $70,000 · Human ServicesSISTERSONG IN…REPOWER FUND — $50,000 · Human ServicesREPOWER FUNDPOSSIBILITY LABS — $26,250 · Human ServicesPOSSIBILITY L…COMMONWEAL — $20,000 · Human ServicesCOMMONWEALCITY DIBS SOCIETY — $20,000 · Human ServicesCITY DIBS SOC…+6 more — $25,750 · Human Services+6 moreDENSHO — $75,000 · Arts & CultureFRIENDS OF MINIDOKA INC — $75,000 · Arts & CultureVIBE THEATER EXPERIENCE INC — $20,000 · Arts & CultureSeattle JazzED — $10,000 · Arts & Culture+4 more — $20,000 · Arts & CultureChinese for Affirmative Action — $55,168 · Civil RightsASIAN AMERICAN WOMEN'S POLITICAL INITIATIVE INC — $35,000 · Civil RightsLife is Work — $20,000 · Civil RightsNEW GEORGIA PROJECT INC — $15,000 · Civil RightsGLOBAL ACTION FOR TRANS EQUALITY INC — $10,000 · Civil RightsFUNDERS FOR LESBIAN AND GAY ISSUES INC DBA FUNDERS FOR LGBTQ ISSUES — $7,500 · Civil Rights+5 more — $17,500 · Civil RightsBIG BEND COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION — $70,000 · EducationTHE HIGHLAND PROJECT INC — $20,000 · EducationNEW BREATH FOUNDATION — $10,000 · Education
Philanthropy$633,326Other$918,373Community Improvement$343,723Human Services$314,500Arts & Culture$200,000Civil Rights$160,168Education$100,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTIDES FOUNDATION — $398,344 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetHorizons Foundation — $263,000 over 7y, 0.7% of budgetVISIBLE FIGURES — $102,500 over 4y, 49% of budgetDENSHO — $75,000 over 4y, 1.3% of budgetFRIENDS OF MINIDOKA INC — $75,000 over 5y, 10% of budgetASIAN AMERICAN FUTURES — $72,500 over 4y, 1.3% of budgetBIG BEND COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION — $70,000 over 2y, 3.1% of budgetSISTERSONG INC — $70,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetSEATTLE INDIAN HEALTH BOARD — $70,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetAsian AmericansPacific Islanders in Philanthropy Inc — $70,000 over 3y, 1.2% of budgetSOUTHWEST INDIGENOUS WOMEN'S COALTION — $57,500 over 2y, 3.8% of budgetKULTIVATE LABS — $55,223 over 2y, 1.9% of budgetChinese for Affirmative Action — $55,168 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetREPOWER FUND — $50,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetOUTRIGHT INTERNATIONAL — $50,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetCOMMUNITY INITIATIVES — $46,482 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetEMPOWERMENT ENTERPRISE II — $46,112 over 3y, 6.6% of budgetFUND FOR CONSTITUTIONAL GOVERNMENT — $42,800 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetTHE ASTRAEA FOUNDATION INC — $39,125 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetLTSC COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION — $36,432 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetASIAN AMERICAN WOMEN'S POLITICAL INITIATIVE INC — $35,000 over 2y, 5.0% of budgetHUMAN RIGHTS WATCH INC — $30,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAlliance for Global Justice Corp — $26,400 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetPOSSIBILITY LABS — $26,250 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCARAVANSERAI PROJECT — $25,000 over 1y, 6.0% of budgetNational Japanese American Memorial Foundation — $20,000 over 1y, 10% of budgetVIBE THEATER EXPERIENCE INC — $20,000 over 1y, 2.7% of budgetDONORS OF COLOR NETWORK INC — $20,000 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetLife is Work — $20,000 over 1y, 6.6% of budgetCOMMONWEAL — $20,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetCITY DIBS SOCIETY — $20,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetJAPANESE AMERICAN CITIZENS LEAGUE - PUYALLUP VALLEY — $20,000 over 1y, 5.1% of budgetTHE HIGHLAND PROJECT INC — $20,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetNEW GEORGIA PROJECT INC — $15,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetNATIONAL NETWORK OF ABORTION FUNDS LILITH FUND — $15,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetNATIONAL CENTER FOR LGBTQ RIGHTS FKA NATIONAL CENTER FOR LESBIAN RIGHTS — $15,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetGLOBAL ACTION FOR TRANS EQUALITY INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetSeattle JazzED — $10,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetTHE PHILANTHROPY WORKSHOP INC DBA FORWARD GLOBAL — $10,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCHICANA FOUNDATION OF NORTHERN CA DBA CHICANA LATINA FOUNDATION — $10,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetYOUNG WOMEN EMPOWERED — $10,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetYOUNG WOMEN'S FREEDOM CENTER — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNATIONAL CENTER FOR FAMILY PHILANTHROPY INC — $10,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetDruid Heights Community Development Corporation — $10,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetFRIENDS OF MAJAL INC — $10,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetNEW BREATH FOUNDATION — $10,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetDIDTECHNOLOGY INC — $10,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetHISPANICS IN PHILANTHROPY — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Tides FoundationAmalgamated Charitabl…Wellspring Philanthro…Surdna Foundation IncSilicon Valley Commun…Novo FoundationThe San Francisco Fou…The California Endowm…Borealis PhilanthropyThe David and Lucile …New Venture FundThe Ford Foundation
Tides FoundationCA34.6× affinity24 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Tides Foundation · Amalgamated Charitable Foundation Inc · Wellspring Philanthropic Fund Inc · Surdna Foundation Inc · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · Novo Foundation · The San Francisco Foundation · The California Endowment · Borealis Philanthropy · The David and Lucile Packard Foundation · New Venture Fund · The Ford Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Harry and Masie Masto Foundation dba masto foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%3%13%28%50%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 100%
  • Druid Heights Community Development Corporation — 100% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
13report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Harry and Masie Masto Foundation dba masto foundation?

Find your warmest path to Harry and Masie Masto Foundation dba masto foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 87 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines