Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Harry and Judith Collins Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$182k
Granted FY2018
15
Grants FY2018
5
States reached
$100k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

99% of Harry and Judith Collins Foundation’s FY2025 grant dollars went to Rancho Santa Fe Foundation, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2025 names 1 organization directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2018, the last year Harry and Judith Collins Foundation named its own grantees at scale: 11 organizations, $182k. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

11
18
1
19
0
20
2
21
1
22
0
23
2
24
1
25

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20182025.

Philanthropy$2.4MArts & Culture$1.0MEnvironment$1.0MAnimals$505kEducation$59kRecreation & Sports$28kHealth$6kHuman Services$5kOther$0
02FY2018 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2018

  • Under $10k10 grants · $34k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $48k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $100k
$5,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$9k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF SAN DIEGO$100,000
PROPEL FOUNDATION INC$18,000
MONARCH SCHOOL PROJECT$10,000
RIDING EMPHASIZING INDIVIDUAL NEEDS AND STRENGTHS$10,000
RANCHO SANTA FE EDUCATION FOUNDATION$10,000
CHALLENGED ATHLETES FOUNDATION$6,500
AUTISM TREE PROJECT INC$5,000
TENDER LOVING CARE CANINE ASSISTANCE DOGS$5,000
SNOWMASS CHAPEL & COMMUNITY CENTER INC$5,000
BISHOP'S SCHOOL$3,000
ST BENEDICTS MONASTERY$2,500
COLORADO STATE UNIVERSTIY FOUNDATION$2,500
CALVERY ORPHAN OUTREACH MINISTRY$2,000
SEAN EDUARDO SANCHES SES TENNIS CENTER$1,500
JUVENILE DIABETES RESEARCH FOUNDATION$500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–21, $17k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%CHALLENGED ATHLETES FOUNDATION: $10k → 11%CHALLENGED ATHLETES FOUNDATION: $7k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

59%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.5M · 5 repeat orgs$1.1M to everyone else

5 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2018, 2 since wound down; 14 grantees were first funded in FY2018 (too recent to call). Read against FY2018, the last year this funder named its own grantees directly; its giving has since run through a sponsor, which reports no donor behind each grant.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
14

Total granted

$1.5M
$1.1M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+28%
+31%

Still filing today

80%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHealthArts & CultureEnvironmentAnimalsHuman ServicesOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TS
    THE SAN DIEGO SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA ASSOCIATION
    2× · 2021–2022 · $1.0M · revenue -11%
  • ZS
    ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF SAN DIEGO
    2× · 2018–2019 · $500k · revenue +28%
  • CA
    CHALLENGED ATHLETES INC
    2× · 2018–2021 · $17k · revenue +52%

Funded once

  • QB
    QUAIL BOTANICAL GARDENS FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2024 · $1.0M · revenue +12%
  • PF
    PROPEL FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2018 · $18k · revenue -55%
  • RS
    RANCHO SANTA FE EDUCATION FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2018 · $10k · revenue -62%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The San Diego Foundation

The san diego foundation inspires enduring philanthropy and enables community solutions to improve the quality of life in our region.

Philanthropy
2
San Diego State University Foundation Sdsu Research Foundation

To support and further the research, education and community service objectives of san diego state university.

Education
3
Santa Barbara Education Foundation

Santa Barbara Education Foundation (SBEF) provides and supports programs that enrich the academic, artistic, and personal development of all students in the Santa Barbara Unified School District.

Education
4
San Diego Jewish Academy

San Diego Jewish Academy empowers each student to learn for life, guided by Jewish values and rooted in strength of community.

Education
5
San Diego Society of Natural History

Conserving nature through science and discovery.

Arts & Culture
6
Silicon Schools Fund Inc

The mission of the silicon schools fund is to improve education through supporting the launch of excellent new schools, improving academic instruction in existing schools, and by funding some of the boldest innovations in education…

Education
7
San Diego Education Fund

Provide counseling and scholarships to high school students which enables them to either become teachers in the san diego unified school district or to major in math and science fields.

Health
8
Sacramento Zoological Society

The sacramento zoo inspires appreciation, respect and a connection with wildlife and nature through education, recreation and conservation.

Animals
9
Associated Students of San Diego State University

To support the social, recreational, cultural and education programs and facilities, both on campus and in the community, and to advocate for student interests, provide leadership opportunities and participate in shared governance.

10
San Diego Parks Foundation

To improve the quality of life of communities throughout the city of San Diego through equitable investments in parks, greenspace, and recreational opportunities.Vison - Every San Diegan has access to quality recreational facilities as…

Recreation & Sports
11
San Diego Opera Association

Mission: the mission of san diego opera is to deliver exceptional performances and exciting, accessible programs to diverse audiences, focusing on community partnerships, and the transformative and expressive power of the human voice. as…

Arts & Culture
12
The San Francisco School

A private school that cultivates and celebrates the intellectual, imaginative, and humanitarian promise of each student in a community that practices mutual respect, embraces diversity, and inspires passion for learning.

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Rancho Santa Fe Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Breakthrough T1D. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 20 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/13
Grantees still filing
9/13
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

RANCHO SANTA FE FOUNDATION — $2,385,000 · PhilanthropyRANCHO SANTA FE FOUNDATION+1 more — $10,000 · PhilanthropyTHE SAN DIEGO SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA ASSOCIATION — $1,000,000 · Arts & CultureTHE SAN DIEGO SYMPHONY…QUAIL BOTANICAL GARDENS FOUNDATION — $1,000,000 · EnvironmentQUAIL BOTANICAL GARDEN…ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF SAN DIEGO — $500,000 · AnimalsZOOLOGICAL …PROPEL FOUNDATION INC — $18,000 · EducationPOSITIVE COACHING ALLIANCE — $15,000 · EducationMONARCH SCHOOL PROJECT — $10,000 · EducationRiding Emphasizing Individual Needs & Strengths — $10,000 · OtherROARING FORK PRE-COLLEGIATE — $10,000 · OtherTENDER LOVING CARE CANINE ASSISTANCE DOGS — $5,000 · OtherSNOWMASS CHAPEL & COMMUNITY CENTER INC — $5,000 · OtherBISHOP SCHOOL — $3,000 · OtherCOLORADO STATE UNIVERSTIY FOUNDATION — $2,500 · OtherCALVERY ORPHAN OUTREACH MINISTRY — $2,500 · OtherST BENEDICTS MONASTERY — $2,500 · OtherAUTISM TREE PROJECT INC — $5,000 · Other+2 more — $2,000 · OtherCHALLENGED ATHLETES INC — $16,500 · Human Services
Philanthropy$2,395,000Arts & Culture$1,000,000Environment$1,000,000Animals$500,000Education$43,000Other$47,500Human Services$16,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetRANCHO SANTA FE FOUNDATION — $2,385,000 over 5y, 8.2% of budgetTHE SAN DIEGO SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA ASSOCIATION — $1,000,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetQUAIL BOTANICAL GARDENS FOUNDATION — $1,000,000 over 1y, 10% of budgetZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF SAN DIEGO — $500,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetPROPEL FOUNDATION INC — $18,000 over 1y, 18% of budgetCHALLENGED ATHLETES INC — $16,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetPOSITIVE COACHING ALLIANCE — $15,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetRANCHO SANTA FE EDUCATION FOUNDATION — $10,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetRiding Emphasizing Individual Needs & Strengths — $10,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetMONARCH SCHOOL PROJECT — $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetAUTISM TREE PROJECT INC — $5,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetSean Eduardo Sanchez SES Tennis Center — $1,500 over 1y, 2.5% of budgetBREAKTHROUGH T1D — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Rancho Santa Fe FoundationCA17.7× affinity6 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Rancho Santa Fe Foundation · The San Diego Foundation · Jewish Community Foundation of San Diego · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Harry and Judith Collins Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%your share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Harry and Judith Collins Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Harry and Judith Collins Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 20 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2018, released 2018. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph