Skip to content

· Private foundation

Harrison Foundation Xxxxx3001

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$844k
Granted FY2024still arriving
21
Grants FY2024still arriving
9
States reached
$250k
Largest
01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$4.3MRecreation & Sports$956kYouth Development$338kHealth$334kReligion$237kPhilanthropy$185kHuman Services$171kArts & Culture$141kOther$0
02FY2024 · 21 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k10 grants · $24k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $80k
  • $50k–250k4 grants · $240k
  • $250k+2 grants · $500k
$10,000
Median grant
9
States reached
$6.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CENTRAL PARK CONSERVANCY$250,000
THE BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF$250,000
LOST TREE VILLAGE CHARITABLE FOUNDATION$75,000
NORTON CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION$65,000
WEST PALM GOLF COMMUNITY TRUST$50,000
ST CATHERINES SCHOOL$50,000
WOMENS COMMITTEE OF CENTER$25,000
CITY SQUASH$25,000
RADICAL HOPE INC$10,000
HARRISON FAMILY YMCA$10,000
VIRGINIA EPISCOPAL SCHOOL$10,000
SQUASH AND EDUCATION ALLIANCE INC$5,000
MASTERS TOURNAMENT FOUNDATION INC$5,000
HOOVER INSTITUTION$5,000
THOMAS C LARECQUE FOUNDATION$2,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–19, $10k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%DOCTORS OF THE WORLD: $10k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
WA
NY
MA
OH
PA
CT
CA
VA
MD
NC
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$6.4M · 31 repeat orgs$272k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +45% since the first grant, against +5% for those funded once.

31 repeat relationships: 15 still active in FY2024, 16 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

31
17

Total granted

$6.4M
$199k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+45%
+5%

Still filing today

48%
65%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 91% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $73k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’19’20’21’22’23’24
PhilanthropyRecreation & SportsHealthEducationArts & CultureEnvironmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CP
    CENTRAL PARK CONSERVANCY INC
    7× · 2017–2024 · $741k · revenue +76%
  • LT
    Lost Tree Village Charitable Foundation
    3× · 2020–2024 · $135k · revenue +45%
  • WP
    WEST PALM GOLF COMMUNITY TRUST INC
    2× · 2023–2024 · $100k · revenue +78%

Funded once

  • NI
    NCHOF INC
    one grant, 2023 · $100k
  • MM
    MACEDONIAN MINISTRY FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2023 · $20k · revenue -60%
  • HC
    HAWTHORNE COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION
    one grant, 2021 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
New York University

Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.

Education
2
Manhattanville University

To educate students to be ethical and socially responsible leaders in a global community.

Education
3
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
4
Institute for Advanced Study - Louis Bamberger & Mrs Felix Fuld Foundation

The institute for advanced study (the institute) is one of the world's leading centers for theoretical research and intellectual inquiry. see schedule o.

Science & Tech
5
New York Genome Center Inc

Operate a state-of-the-art, world-class genomic research center that creates and uses advanced genomics to understand the genetic basis of disease. for more information, see schedule o.

Health
6
The Trustees of Princeton University

Research, education and general - princeton university is a private not-for-profit, non-sectarian institution of higher learning with approximately 5,700 undergraduate and 3,300 graduate students. 2,500 students graduated in the 2024-2025…

Education
7
The American College of Trust and Estate Counsel

Enhance the ability of actec members to provide the most efficient and highest quality services to their clients; develop qualified trust and estate counselors; improve and reform probate, trust and tax laws, procedures, and standards of…

Community Improvement
8
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
9
Stony Brook Ophthalmology University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
10
Stony Brook Internists University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
11
Stony Brook Urology University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
12
Albert Einstein College of Medicine

Committed to exceptional healthcare quality for all and actively engaged with our community, einstein drives scientific discovery and educates compassionate leaders in health and science.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is New Visions for Public Schools Inc; the most unlike its peers is Masters Tournament Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

31 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 31 of the 55 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
31/31
Grantees still filing
26/31
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA: $2,100,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINAUNC- CHAPEL HILL COLLEGE OF ARTS AND SCI: $2,010,000 · OtherUNC- CHAPEL HILL COLLEGE OF ARTS AND SCITHE BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF: $265,000 · Other+30 more: $1,204,772 · Other+30 moreCENTRAL PARK CONSERVANCY INC: $740,999 · Recreation & SportsCENTRAL PARK …City Squash Inc: $72,500 · Recreation & SportsCity Squash I…+1 more: $10,000 · Recreation & SportsNCHOF INC: $100,000 · PhilanthropyJupiter Medical Center Foundation Inc: $35,000 · PhilanthropyNEW YORK CARES INC: $10,000 · PhilanthropyUnited Way of Greater Houston: $10,000 · Philanthropy+2 more: $10,000 · PhilanthropyTHE FOUNDATION FIGHTING BLINDNESS INC: $40,000 · HealthRADICAL HOPE INC: $25,000 · HealthTHOMAS G LABRECQUE FOUNDATION: $2,500 · HealthTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $20,000 · EducationNEW VISIONS FOR PUBLIC SCHOOLS INC: $12,500 · EducationTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $10,000 · EducationEXODUS SCHOOL: $10,000 · EducationYEAR UP INC: $2,000 · EducationTHE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK: $2,000 · EducationThe Society of the Four Arts Inc: $12,500 · Arts & Culture564 PARK AVENUE PRESERVATION FOUNDATION: $7,500 · Arts & CultureThe Preservation Foundation of Palm Beach Inc: $5,000 · Arts & CultureMACEDONIAN MINISTRY FOUNDATION INC: $20,000 · Religion
Other$5,579,772Recreation & Sports$823,499Philanthropy$165,000Health$67,500Education$56,500Arts & Culture$25,000Religion$20,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCENTRAL PARK CONSERVANCY INC: $740,999 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetLost Tree Village Charitable Foundation: $135,000 over 3y, 1.0% of budgetWEST PALM GOLF COMMUNITY TRUST INC: $100,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetNCHOF INC: $100,000 over 1y, 4.7% of budgetCity Squash Inc: $72,500 over 6y, 1.2% of budgetTHE FOUNDATION FIGHTING BLINDNESS INC: $40,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetJupiter Medical Center Foundation Inc: $35,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetRADICAL HOPE INC: $25,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetMACEDONIAN MINISTRY FOUNDATION INC: $20,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetMUSEUM OF AMERICAN FINANCE: $20,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $20,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetNEW VISIONS FOR PUBLIC SCHOOLS INC: $12,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetThe Society of the Four Arts Inc: $12,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetVILLAGE HEALTH WORKS: $11,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDOCTORS OF THE WORLD USA INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetEXODUS SCHOOL: $10,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetSQUASH AND EDUCATION ALLIANCE INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetNEW YORK CARES INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetUnited Way of Greater Houston: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget564 PARK AVENUE PRESERVATION FOUNDATION: $7,500 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetThe Michelle McGann Fund Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 4.9% of budgetFAMILY CENTERS INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Preservation Foundation of Palm Beach Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMASTERS TOURNAMENT FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOUNCIL ON FOREIGN RELATIONS INC: $4,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetLAKES ENVIRONMENTAL ASSOCIATION: $3,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetYEAR UP INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNORTH CAROLINA OUTWARD BOUND SCHOOL: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CENTRAL PARK CONSERVANCY INC ↗
  • Who funds Lost Tree Village Charitable Foundation ↗
  • Who funds WEST PALM GOLF COMMUNITY TRUST INC ↗
  • Who funds NCHOF INC ↗
  • Who funds City Squash Inc ↗
  • Who funds THE FOUNDATION FIGHTING BLINDNESS INC ↗
  • Who funds Jupiter Medical Center Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds RADICAL HOPE INC ↗
  • Who funds MACEDONIAN MINISTRY FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds MUSEUM OF AMERICAN FINANCE ↗
  • Who funds THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds NEW VISIONS FOR PUBLIC SCHOOLS INC ↗
  • Who funds The Society of the Four Arts Inc ↗
  • Who funds VILLAGE HEALTH WORKS ↗
  • Who funds TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA ↗
  • Who funds DOCTORS OF THE WORLD USA INC ↗
  • Who funds EXODUS SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds SQUASH AND EDUCATION ALLIANCE INC ↗
  • Who funds NEW YORK CARES INC ↗
  • Who funds United Way of Greater Houston ↗
  • Who funds 564 PARK AVENUE PRESERVATION FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds The Michelle McGann Fund Inc ↗
  • Who funds FAMILY CENTERS INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Goldman Sachs Charitable Gift FundNY19.6× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Goldman Sachs Charitable Gift Fund · Lift a Life Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · The Bessemer Giving Fund · The Reveas Foundation · The Raether Family Charitable Trust · The Meryl & Charles Witmer Charitable Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · The New York Community Trust · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Jewish Communal Fund · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Harrison Foundation Xxxxx3001 funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Harrison Foundation Xxxxx3001. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 70%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 20%
  • Family Centers Inc: 20% of income from government
  • Year Up Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
7get no government money at all
6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Harrison Foundation Xxxxx3001?

Find your warmest path to Harrison Foundation Xxxxx3001 through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 55 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Harrison Foundation Xxxxx3001’s filings →

More from the funding graph