Skip to content

· Public charity

Harris County Domestic Violence Coordinating Council

The organization's mission is to coordinate and collaborate domestic violence services and systems to increase the safety of victims, hold perpetrators accountable, and prevent future domestic violence in harris county.

$10M
Granted FY2025still arriving
25
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$1.1M
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Human Services$4.9MCommunity Improvement$689kCrime & Legal$285kReligion$52kHealth$23k
02FY2025 · 25 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 25 grants below total $5,497,005, the rows itemized in this filing. The $10,090,195 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $4,593,190 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $9k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $151k
  • $50k–250k12 grants · $1.4M
  • $250k+7 grants · $4.0M
$87,829
Median grant
1
States reached
$5.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE BRIDGE OVER TROUBLED WATER$1,133,941
HOUSTON AREA WOMEN'S CENTER$829,536
BAY AREA TURNING POINT$700,649
FAMILY TIES$402,314
BETHELS FAMILY BAPTIST CHURCH$348,003
AN NISA$271,039
FAMILY TIME$270,895
UNIVERSITY OF HOUSTON$219,014
FORT BEND WOMEN'S CENTER$216,134
HOPE ACTIVE$193,008
THE UNIVERSTITY OF TEXAS HEALTH & SCIENCE CENTER OF HOUSTON$156,142
DEPELCHIN$114,921
THE LANDING$87,829
ASIANS FOR VICTIMS OF DOMESTIC ABUSE$76,576
CATHOLIC CHARITIES$75,009
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $7.9M) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 94% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%FORT BEND WOMEN'S CENTER: $216k → 8%HOPE ACTIVE: $193k → 14%FAMILIES TO FREEDOM: $96k → 14%FRESH SPIRIT: $43k → 16%FORT BEND WOMEN'S CENTER: $188k → 8%FAMILIES TO FREEDOM: $29k → 14%CATHOLIC CHARITIES: $103k → 16%FORT BEND WOMEN'S CENTER: $52k → 8%Houston Area Womens Center: $109k → 16%Fort Bend Women's Center: $42k → 8%Focusing Families: $16k → 14%CATHOLIC CHARITIES: $75k → 16%Houston Area Women's Center: $76k → 16%BY THE WAY CDC: $73k → 16%Fresh Spirit Wellness: $34k → 16%FAMILY TIME: $271k → 16%FAMILY TIME: $43k → 16%THE BRIDGE OVER TROUBLED WATER: $1.1M → 16%ASIANS FOR VICTIMS OF DOMESTIC ABUSE: $77k → 16%THE BRIDGE OVER TROUBLED WATER: $612k → 16%AVDA: $26k → 16%THE BRIDGE OVER TROUBLED WATER: $306k → 16%THE LANDING: $88k → 16%THE LANDING: $54k → 16%BAKER RIPLEY: $100k → 16%BAKER RIPLEY: $34k → 16%Northwest Assist Ministries: $11k → 16%HOUSTON AREA WOMEN'S CENTER: $918k → 16%NORTHWEST ASSISTANCE MINISTRIES: $9k → 16%HOUSTON AREA WOMEN'S CENTER: $830k → 16%KATY CHRISTIAN MINISTRIES: $42k → 16%NORTHWEST ASSISTANCE MINISTRIES: $9k → 16%HOUSTON AREA WOMEN'S CENTER: $462k → 16%DEPELCHIN: $115k → 16%KATY CHRISTIAN MINISTRIES: $34k → 16%BAY AREA TURNING POINT: $701k → 16%BAY AREA TURNING POINT: $492k → 16%BAY AREA TURNING POINT: $139k → 16%Bay Area Turning Point: $51k → 16%Bay Area Turning Point: $25k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$11M · 20 repeat orgs$871k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +23% since the first grant, against +20% for those funded once.

20 repeat relationships: 19 still active in FY2025, 1 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

20
3

Total granted

$11M
$91k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+23%
+20%

Still filing today

95%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 86% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $781k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’24’25
Human ServicesCrime & LegalEducationHealthCommunity ImprovementCivil RightsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HA
    Houston Area Women's Center
    6× · 2020–2025 · $2.4M · revenue +44%
  • BA
    Bay Area Turning Point Inc
    6× · 2020–2025 · $1.4M · revenue +51%
  • DI
    Daya Inc
    5× · 2021–2025 · $667k · revenue +162%

Funded once

  • ES
    E S EMPOWERED SURVIVOR INC
    one grant, 2020 · $52k
  • TM
    The Montrose Center
    one grant, 2020 · $23k · revenue -16%
  • FF
    FOCUSING FAMILIES
    one grant, 2020 · $16k · revenue +20%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Casa de Esperanza

Casa is a refuge, providing protection and education for people caught in the cylces of domestic violence, sexual assault and child assault. Casa is a healing community where women and children can receive the nurturing and support…

Human Services
2
Family Crisis Center Inc

The family crisis center provides intervention and advocacy for victims of sexual assault and domestic violence. this is done with counselors, court advocates and 24 hour shelter for victims and their children.

Human Services
3
Family Crisis Center

Assist individuals and families in crisis from domestic violence, sexual assault, crime and economic emergencies. Services are also available to friends and family members of those involved.

—
4
Eastland County Crisis Center Inc

To provide services designed to meet the physical, social, and emotional needs of domestic violence and sexual assault victims by providing for immediate, short, and long-term needs.

Human Services
5
Community Beyond Violence

CBV heals the trauma of sexual assault and domestic violence by providing crisis intervention, safety, advocacy, and education to survivors and our community.

—
6
Capital Area Family Violence Intervention Center Inc

To end domestic violence in the capital area through serving victims of domestic violence, educating the public about domestic violence, and working to eliminate economic, social and cultural conditions and attitudes that contribute to…

Human Services
7
Resource & Crisis Center of Galveston County Texas

The mission of the Resource & Crisis Center of Galveston County, Inc. is to promote the safety, well-being and best interests of victims of domestic violence, sexual assault, child abuse, and human trafficking and to advocate for the…

Human Services
8
Survivors Resources Inc Dba Safe Haven Inc of Pike County

Provide counseling, crisis intervention, 24 hour crisis hotline, advocacy, safe housing and supportive services to victims of sexual assault and domestic violence.

—
9
Family Assistance Program

Our agency provides tools necessary to create healthy interpersonal relationships, economic empowerment, and stable housing for victims of domestic violence, their children and runaway youth.

—
10
Safe Journey

To enhance empowerment, self-efficacy, safety and justice for women and their children who are victims of domestic violence, by providing free confidential support services and offering awareness and prevention education and information to…

Human Services
11
The Center for Women and Children in Crisis

Provide a caring, advocating, safe, and educationally based environment for survivors of domestic violence and sexual assault.

Health
12
Vida Legal Assistance Inc

VIDA mainly represents immigrant survivors of violent crimes particularly domestic violence sexual assault abuse and trafficking in persons modern-day slavery forced labor.

Crime & Legal
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Houston Area Women's Center; the most unlike its peers is By the Way Community Development Corp. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

25 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 25 of the 29 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
24/25
Grantees still filing
18/25
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE BRIDGE OVER TROUBLED WATERS INC: $2,628,174 · Human ServicesTHE BRIDGE OVER TROUBLED WATERS INCHouston Area Women's Center: $2,394,241 · Human ServicesHouston Area Women's CenterBay Area Turning Point Inc: $1,407,195 · Human ServicesBay Area Turning Point IncFORT BEND COUNTY WOMEN'S CENTER INC SOS/SHELTER-OUTREACH-SOLUTIONS: $497,752 · Human ServicesFORT BEND COUNTY WOMEN'S CENTER INC SOS/SHELTER-OUTREACH-SOLUTIONSFAMILY TIME CRISIS AND COUNSELING CENTER: $314,270 · Human Services+13 more: $1,499,765 · Human Services+13 moreBETHELS FAMILY BAPTIST CHURCH: $399,612 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF HOUSTON: $219,014 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HEALTH SCIENCE CENTER HOUSTON: $156,142 · OtherE S EMPOWERED SURVIVOR INC: $52,000 · OtherFAMILY TIES FAMILY RESOURCE SERVIC: $500,195 · Crime & LegalJustice For All Immigrants: $157,795 · Crime & LegalGalveston-Houston Immigrant Representation Project: $117,298 · Crime & LegalDaya Inc: $666,828 · Community ImprovementAN-NISA HOPE CENTER: $403,129 · EducationTHE TAHIRIH JUSTICE CENTER: $24,410 · Civil RightsThe Montrose Center: $22,500 · Health
Human Services$8,741,397Other$826,768Crime & Legal$775,288Community Improvement$666,828Education$403,129Civil Rights$24,410Health$22,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE BRIDGE OVER TROUBLED WATERS INC: $2,628,174 over 6y, 7.9% of budgetHouston Area Women's Center: $2,394,241 over 6y, 5.8% of budgetBay Area Turning Point Inc: $1,407,195 over 6y, 8.3% of budgetDaya Inc: $666,828 over 5y, 21% of budgetFAMILY TIES FAMILY RESOURCE SERVIC: $500,195 over 4y, 5.0% of budgetFORT BEND COUNTY WOMEN'S CENTER INC SOS/SHELTER-OUTREACH-SOLUTIONS: $497,752 over 5y, 1.8% of budgetAN-NISA HOPE CENTER: $403,129 over 4y, 13% of budgetFAMILY TIME CRISIS AND COUNSELING CENTER: $314,270 over 2y, 2.7% of budgetASIANS AGAINST DOMESTIC ABUSE: $222,624 over 3y, 18% of budgetCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE ARCHDIOCESE OF GALVESTON - HOUSTON: $178,404 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetJustice For All Immigrants: $157,795 over 3y, 6.2% of budgetSojourn Landing DBA The Landing: $141,870 over 3y, 2.5% of budgetBakerRipley: $133,994 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetFAMILIES TO FREEDOM INC: $124,968 over 3y, 11% of budgetGalveston-Houston Immigrant Representation Project: $117,298 over 3y, 1.7% of budgetAVDA: $102,576 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetKaty Christian Ministries: $92,400 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetFresh Spirit Wellness for Women: $76,949 over 3y, 7.2% of budgetNORTHWEST ASSISTANCE MINISTRIES: $28,596 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetTHE TAHIRIH JUSTICE CENTER: $24,410 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetThe Montrose Center: $22,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetFOCUSING FAMILIES: $16,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

United Way of Greater HoustonTX28.2× affinity11 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: United Way of Greater Houston · Shell USA Company Foundation · Greater Houston Community Foundation · Astros Foundation · Houston Endowment Inc · Texas Council on Family Violence Inc · Harry S & Isabel C Cameron Foundation Sentinel Trust Company · Texas Association Against Sexual Assault Inc · The Brown Foundation Inc · Texas Instruments Foundation · Texas Mutual Insurance Company · The Simmons Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Harris County Domestic Violence Coordinating Council funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Harris County Domestic Violence Coordinating Council. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%2%6%14%25%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    10report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Harris County Domestic Violence Coordinating Council?

    Find your warmest path to Harris County Domestic Violence Coordinating Council through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 29 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Harris County Domestic Violence Coordinating Council’s filings →

    More from the funding graph