Skip to content
Harrington Cancer and Health Foundation at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Harrington Cancer and Health Foundation

To reduce the burden of cancer and to promote and serve the healthcare needs of residents living in amarillo and surrounding communities.

$2.4M
Granted FY2025still arriving
23
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$85k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$6.5MEducation$671kRecreation & Sports$137kCrime & Legal$50kHousing & Shelter$36kPhilanthropy$25kHuman Services$19k
02FY2025 · 23 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 23 grants below total $757,434, the rows itemized in this filing. The $2,370,973 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $1,613,539 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k4 grants · $31k
  • $10k–50k13 grants · $312k
  • $50k–250k6 grants · $415k
$26,875
Median grant
1
States reached
$72M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ASPIRE A MINDFUL PLACE$85,000
MEADOWS MENTAL HEALTH POLICY INSTIT$80,000
HEAL THE CITY$75,000
THE BRIDGE CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CTR$75,000
TEXAS TECH UNIV HEALTH SCIENCE CTR$50,000
SISTER BEAR FOUNDATION$50,000
OGH HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION$44,163
FAMILY SUPPORT SERVICES$33,000
DOWNTOWN WOMEN'S CENTER$30,000
BSA HEALTH SYSTEM$29,253
GOLDEN PLAINS COMMUNITY HOSPITAL$27,675
MOORE COUNTY HEALTH FOUNDATION$26,875
MOORE COUNTY HEALTH FOUNDATION$25,000
DIABETES FOUNDATION OF THE HIGH PLA$25,000
AMARILLO HEARING CLINIC$20,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–25, $241k) land where the poverty rate runs at 20%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%PANHANDLE COMMUNITY SERVICES: $10k → 20%FAMILY SUPPORT SERVICES: $55k → 20%FAMILY SUPPORT SERVICES: $33k → 20%FAMILY SUPPORT SERVICES: $10k → 20%FAMILY SUPPORT SERVICES: $9k → 20%THE BRIDGE CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CTR: $75k → 20%THE BRIDGE CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CTR: $50k → 20%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

85%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$6.9M · 24 repeat orgs$1.2M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +3% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

24 repeat relationships: 12 still active in FY2025, 12 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

24
23

Total granted

$6.9M
$953k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+3%
0%

Still filing today

71%
70%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 65% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $262k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthEducationHuman ServicesPhilanthropyArts & CultureReligionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HT
    HEAL THE CITY FREE CLINIC
    8× · 2017–2025 · $1.2M · revenue +51%
  • MC
    MOORE COUNTY HEALTH FOUNDATION
    6× · 2018–2025 · $501k · revenue +3% · 54% of their budget
  • DW
    DOWNTOWN WOMEN'S CENTER INC
    7× · 2018–2025 · $162k · revenue +21%

Funded once

  • TA
    THE AMARILLO COLLEGE FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2021 · $250k · revenue -63%
  • CENIKOR FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $100k · revenue +65%
  • KI
    KIDS INC OF AMARILLO
    one grant, 2022 · $100k · revenue -64%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Aaf Community Health Foundation

Support organization of amarillo area foundation, inc. to provide and support medical and health care facilities, services, and education in amarillo, texas, and the texas panhandle area.

Health
2
North Central Texas Medical Foundation
Health
3
Texas Foster Care & Adoption Serv

A state of texas licensed foster care and adoption agency that identifies and provides approved healing foster homes for children.

Human Services
4
Medical Center League House of Amarillo Texas Inc

To serve as a home away from home for patients and their families coming to amarillo, texas for health care treatment.

Health
5
University of North Texas Health Science Center At Ft Worth Health Systems

To improve the health and quality of life for the people of texas and beyond through excellence in education, research, clinical care, community engagement and to provide national leadership in primary care.

Health
6
Hendrick Home for Children
—
7
Amarillo Area Mental Health Consumers Inc

Provide peer-support, referrals & advocacy to mental health consumers.

Human Services
8
HealthTexas Provider Network

To deliver the highest value patient experience through quality, safety, accessibility, and cost-effectiveness, enhanced by medical education and research in collaboration with Baylor Scott & White Health (BSWH).

Health
9
Big Horn County Memorial Hospital Auxiliary
Health
10
Texas Health Harris Methodist Hospital Fort Worth

A faith-based organization whose mission is to improve the health of the people in the communities it serves regardless of their ability to pay.

Health
11
Cook Children's Medical Center

Knowing that every child's life is sacred, our promise is to improve the health of every child in our region through the prevention and treatment of illness, disease and injury.

Health
12
Tejas Health Care

To provide primary health and dental care to the underserved of fayette and lee counties, texas.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Hope and Healing Place Inc; the most unlike its peers is The Children's Heart Lane. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

40 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 40 of the 55 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

4
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
39/40
Grantees still filing
19/40
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

HEAL THE CITY FREE CLINIC: $1,244,901 · HealthHEAL THE CITY FREE CLINICTURN CENTER: $251,074 · HealthTURN CENTERMEADOWS MENTAL HEALTH POLICY INSTITUTE FOR TEXAS: $160,000 · HealthMEADOWS MENTAL HEALTH POLICY INSTITUT…RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF AMARILLO: $150,000 · HealthRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF AM…OGH HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION: $144,163 · HealthOGH HEALTHCARE FOUNDATIONCOALITION OF HEALTH SERVICES INC: $130,000 · HealthOklahoma Blood Institute: $100,000 · HealthDIABETES FOUNDATION OF THE HIGH PLAINS: $95,000 · Health+11 more: $403,063 · Health+11 moreTEXAS TECH FOUNDATION INC: $1,718,203 · EducationTEXAS TECH FOUNDATION INCWEST TEXAS A&M UNIV FOUNDATION: $629,375 · EducationWEST TEXAS A&M UNIV FOUNDATION+2 more: $17,536 · EducationNorthwest Hills Surgical Hosp: $338,128 · OtherNorthwest Hills Surgical HospBSA HOSPITAL: $330,516 · OtherBSA HOSPITALOCHILTREE HOSPITAL DISTRICT: $313,544 · OtherOCHILTREE HOSPITAL DISTRICTAMARILLO RECOVERY FROM ALCOHOL AND DRUGS INC: $300,000 · OtherAMARILLO RECOVERY FROM ALCOHOL…THE AMARILLO COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $250,000 · OtherTHE AMARILLO COLLEGE FOUNDATIO…DOWNTOWN WOMEN'S CENTER INC: $161,500 · OtherDOWNTOWN WOMEN'S CENTER INCCENIKOR FOUNDATION: $100,000 · Other+16 more: $420,992 · Other+16 moreMOORE COUNTY HEALTH FOUNDATION: $501,352 · Philanthropy+2 more: $20,000 · PhilanthropyTHE BRIDGE: $125,000 · Human ServicesFAMILY SUPPORT SERVICES OF AMARILLO: $106,000 · Human ServicesPANHANDLE COMMUNITY SERVICES: $10,000 · Human ServicesKIDS INC OF AMARILLO: $100,000 · Recreation & SportsTEXAS PANHANDLE WAR MEMORIAL FOUNDATION INC: $16,167 · Arts & CultureTHE CHILDREN'S HEART LANE: $10,000 · Arts & Culture
Health$2,678,201Education$2,365,114Other$2,214,680Philanthropy$521,352Human Services$241,000Recreation & Sports$100,000Arts & Culture$26,167

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTEXAS TECH FOUNDATION INC: $1,718,203 over 8y, 0.8% of budgetHEAL THE CITY FREE CLINIC: $1,244,901 over 8y, 15% of budgetWEST TEXAS A&M UNIV FOUNDATION: $629,375 over 4y, 1.5% of budgetMOORE COUNTY HEALTH FOUNDATION: $501,352 over 6y, 54% of budgetAMARILLO RECOVERY FROM ALCOHOL AND DRUGS INC: $300,000 over 2y, 15% of budgetTURN CENTER: $251,074 over 6y, 1.5% of budgetTHE AMARILLO COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $250,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetDOWNTOWN WOMEN'S CENTER INC: $161,500 over 7y, 1.6% of budgetMEADOWS MENTAL HEALTH POLICY INSTITUTE FOR TEXAS: $160,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF AMARILLO: $150,000 over 2y, 6.0% of budgetOGH HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION: $144,163 over 2y, 46% of budgetCOALITION OF HEALTH SERVICES INC: $130,000 over 5y, 2.1% of budgetTHE BRIDGE: $125,000 over 2y, 2.8% of budgetFAMILY SUPPORT SERVICES OF AMARILLO: $106,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetCENIKOR FOUNDATION: $100,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetKIDS INC OF AMARILLO: $100,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetOklahoma Blood Institute: $100,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetDIABETES FOUNDATION OF THE HIGH PLAINS: $95,000 over 6y, 3.1% of budgetDALLAM-HARTLEY COUNTIES HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION: $88,000 over 1y, 40% of budgetCAMP ALPHIE: $56,500 over 4y, 66% of budgetSISTER-BEAR FOUNDATION: $50,000 over 1y, 11% of budgetTHE HOPE AND HEALING PLACE INC: $34,058 over 1y, 7.6% of budgetDUMAS AREA CRISIS PREGNANCY CENTER: $33,114 over 1y, 4.6% of budgetPANHANDLE BREAST HEALTH: $32,274 over 3y, 18% of budgetHOPE CHOICE INC: $29,200 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetSHARING HOPE MINISTRY INC: $18,500 over 2y, 1.5% of budgetTEXAS PANHANDLE WAR MEMORIAL FOUNDATION INC: $16,167 over 1y, 3.2% of budgetHOPE TO OPPORTUNITIES FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetTHE CHILDREN'S HEART LANE: $10,000 over 1y, 17% of budgetAMARILLO AREA FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTEXAS DENTAL ASSOCIATION SMILES FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 3.0% of budgetHAVEN HEALTH CLINICS: $9,736 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetAMARILLO ISD FOUNDATION: $7,536 over 1y, 16% of budgetSwisher Memorial Healthcare System: $7,006 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFAMILY CARE FOUNDATION: $7,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetMARTHA'S HOME INC: $6,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetTHE UNITED WAY INC: $5,400 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Amarillo Area Foundat…Mary E Bivins Foundat…High Plains Christian…The Don & Sybil Harri…Josephine Anderson Ch…Mays FoundationDr Kent Roberts & Ile…Aaf Community Health …Xcel Energy FoundationAmarillo Business Fou…The United Way IncBruckner Family Found…
Amarillo Area Foundation IncTX68.3× affinity31 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amarillo Area Foundation Inc · Mary E Bivins Foundation · High Plains Christian Ministries Foundation · The Don & Sybil Harrington Foundation · Josephine Anderson Charitable Trust · Mays Foundation · Dr Kent Roberts & Ilene Roberts Balliett Foundation · Aaf Community Health Foundation · Xcel Energy Foundation · Amarillo Business Foundation · The United Way Inc · Bruckner Family Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Harrington Cancer and Health Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Harrington Cancer and Health Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%5%19%42%75%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →median 2%
  • Oklahoma Blood Institute: 2% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 55 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Harrington Cancer and Health’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home