Skip to content

· Private foundation

Harold & Nancy Kaplan Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$88k
Granted FY2025still arriving
10
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$40k
Largest
01What it funds
0192% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$229kPhilanthropy$103kInternational$94kHuman Services$68kArts & Culture$56kEducation$31kScience & Tech$31kHousing & Shelter$29kOther$0
02FY2025 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k8 grants · $23k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $65k
$5,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$677k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
JEWISH NATIONAL FUND$40,000
AMERICAN TECHNICAL SOCIETY$25,000
THEATRE ZONE$8,500
THE SHELTER FOR ABUSED WOMEN CHIL$5,000
SALVATION ARMY$5,000
COLLIER SENIOR CENTER$2,000
INSTITUTE FOR THE STUDY OF GLOBAL A$1,500
FRIENDS OF THE LIBRARY$1,000
DYSTONIA MEDICAL FOUNDATION$100
HOSPICE OF COLLIER COUNTY$100
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–23, $8k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 27% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%BOYS TOWN: $1k → 12%BOYS TOWN: $500 → 12%BOYS TOWN: $500 → 12%GOLDEN PAWS ASSISTANCE DOGS: $2k → 10%GOLDEN PAWS ASSISTANCE DOGS: $1k → 10%NAPLES SENIOR CENTER: $1k → 10%NAPLES SENIOR CENTER: $1k → 10%GUADALUPE CENTER: $1k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
MI
NY
MA
PA
NJ
CA
NE
KY
VA
MD
AZ
KS
TN
NC
DC
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

78%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$463k · 43 repeat orgs$133k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +29% since the first grant, against +25% for those funded once.

43 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2025, 40 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

43
47

Total granted

$463k
$100k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+29%
+25%

Still filing today

49%
23%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 30% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $34k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesArts & CultureEducationInternationalAnimalsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • T
    THEATREZONEINC
    5× · 2018–2025 · $21k · revenue +23%
  • SM
    ST MATTHEWS HOUSE INC
    5× · 2019–2023 · $9k · revenue +321%
  • AI
    ARTIS-NAPLES INC
    2× · 2017–2018 · $8k · revenue +27%

Funded once

  • SF
    SHELTER FOR ABUSED WOMEN CHILDREN
    one grant, 2023 · $15k
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF NORTH FLORIDA
    one grant, 2023 · $10k
  • TZ
    THEATER ZONE
    one grant, 2022 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Fairchild Tropical Botanic Garden Inc

We harness the power of plants for humankind and share the joy and beauty of tropical gardening with everyone. fairchild tropical botanic garden is a museum of tropical plants within a world famous, 83-acre designed landscape. it was…

Environment
2
Variety Children's Hospital

To inspire hope and promote lifelong health by providing the best care to every child.

Health
3
Florida Chamber of Commerce Foundation Inc

Working in partnership with state business leaders to secure florida's future.

—
4
Mote Marine Laboratory Inc

The advancement of marine and environmental sciences through scientific research, education and public outreach, leading new discoveries, revitalization and sustainability of our oceans and greater public understanding of our marine…

—
5
Gulf Coast Jewish Family and Community Services Inc

Inspired by jewish values, we protect the vulnerable, empower individuals and strengthen families. (continued on schedule o)

—
6
The Florida Center for Early Childhood Inc

The florida center supports the healthy development of young children, specializing in those with delays, disabilities or mental health challenges. our mission- "to help build and foster strong families and expand the potential of young…

Human Services
7
Miami Children's Health System Inc

Nicklaus Children's Health System is the region's only healthcare system exclusively for children. Our mission is to inspire hope and promote lifelong health by providing the best care to every child. TO PERFORM THE FUNCTIONS OF, OR TO…

Health
8
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center

Leadership in the prevention, treatment, and cure of cancer through excellence, vision and cost effectiveness in patient care, outreach programs, research, and education.

Health
9
Lowry Park Zoological Society of Tampa Inc

The mission of the Lowry Park Zoological Society of Tampa a/k/a ZooTampa at Lowry Park, is to rescue, rehabilitate and care for animals.(Expanded mission on Schedule O)ZooTampa creates exceptional personalized experiences that connect…

Animals
10
Pediatric Specialty Group Inc

Pediatric specialty group, inc. (d/b/a nicklaus children's pediatric specialists ("ncps")) is a physician-directed, multi-specialty pediatric group with a regional, national, and international presence in providing pediatric-centric care…

—
11
Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Tampa Bay Florida Inc

Spca tampa bay is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization that operates pinellas county's only nonprofit for-all animal shelter assisting all animals in need, regardless of species or circumstance, at its 10-acre campus in largo. (continued on…

Animals
12
Biscayne Bay Waterkeeper Inc

In 2024, biscayne bay waterkeeper (d/b/a miami waterkeeper) built on our reputation by navigating challenges, seizing opportunities, and continuing our unwavering commitment to safeguarding our precious waterways and finding local…

Environment
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Naples Botanical Garden Inc; the most unlike its peers is Father Flanagan's Boys' Home. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

36 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 36 of the 99 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
36/36
Grantees still filing
30/36
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

NCH HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION: $185,000 · OtherNCH HEALTHCARE FOUNDATIONJEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER NAPLES INC: $60,000 · OtherJEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER NAPLES INCIndividual grant recipient: $36,700 · OtherIndividual grant recipientAMERICAN TECHNICAL SOCIETY: $25,000 · Other+74 more: $267,628 · Other+74 moreJEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC: $88,000 · InternationalJEWISH NATIONA…ISRAEL TENNIS CENTERS FOUNDATION INC: $3,900 · International+2 more: $4,500 · InternationalTHEATREZONEINC: $21,000 · Arts & CultureARTIS-NAPLES INC: $7,500 · Arts & CultureCENTER FOR THE ARTS OF BONITA SPRINGS INC: $1,000 · Arts & CultureST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $6,200 · HealthPARALYZED VETERANS OF AMERICA: $4,500 · HealthALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $4,050 · HealthFLORIDA LIONS EYE CLINC INC: $3,300 · HealthMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF SOUTHERN FLORIDA INC: $2,500 · HealthAMERICAN PARKINSON DISEASE ASSOC: $1,750 · Health+1 more: $50 · HealthST MATTHEWS HOUSE INC: $9,150 · Housing & ShelterMARINE TOYS FOR TOTS FOUNDATION: $4,050 · PhilanthropyUNITED WAY OF COLLIER AND THE KEYS INC: $4,000 · PhilanthropyGolden PAWS Assistance Dogs Inc: $2,500 · Human ServicesBAKER SENIOR CENTER NAPLES INC: $2,000 · Human ServicesFather Flanagan's Boys' Home: $2,000 · Human ServicesGuadalupe Center Inc: $1,000 · Human Services
Other$574,328International$96,400Arts & Culture$29,500Health$22,350Housing & Shelter$9,150Philanthropy$8,050Human Services$7,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetJEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC: $88,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER NAPLES INC: $60,000 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetTHEATREZONEINC: $21,000 over 5y, 0.8% of budgetST MATTHEWS HOUSE INC: $9,150 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetARTIS-NAPLES INC: $7,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $6,200 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetNAPLES BOTANICAL GARDEN INC: $5,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetNAPLES ZOO INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPARALYZED VETERANS OF AMERICA: $4,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $4,050 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMARINE TOYS FOR TOTS FOUNDATION: $4,050 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED WAY OF COLLIER AND THE KEYS INC: $4,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetPathways Early Education Center of Immokalee Inc: $4,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetISRAEL TENNIS CENTERS FOUNDATION INC: $3,900 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFLORIDA LIONS EYE CLINC INC: $3,300 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE LIBRARY: $3,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetGolden PAWS Assistance Dogs Inc: $2,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN SOCIETY FOR TECHNION ISRAEL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF SOUTHERN FLORIDA INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPATTY BAKER HUMANE SOCIETY NAPLES INC: $2,150 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetBAKER SENIOR CENTER NAPLES INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFather Flanagan's Boys' Home: $2,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN PARKINSON DISEASE ASSOC: $1,750 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF COLLIER COUNTY FLOR: $1,750 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CONSERVANCY OF SOUTHWEST FLORIDA: $1,650 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetMake-A-Wish Foundation of Greater PA and West Virginia Inc: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKEYSTONE COLLEGE: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGuadalupe Center Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCENTER FOR THE ARTS OF BONITA SPRINGS INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE FOUNDERS FUND INC: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPAWS FOR PURPLE HEARTS: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFeeding America: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLiteracy Volunteers of Collier County Inc: $250 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds JEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER NAPLES INC ↗
  • Who funds THEATREZONEINC ↗
  • Who funds ST MATTHEWS HOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds ARTIS-NAPLES INC ↗
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
  • Who funds NAPLES BOTANICAL GARDEN INC ↗
  • Who funds NAPLES ZOO INC ↗
  • Who funds PARALYZED VETERANS OF AMERICA ↗
  • Who funds ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds MARINE TOYS FOR TOTS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF COLLIER AND THE KEYS INC ↗
  • Who funds Pathways Early Education Center of Immokalee Inc ↗
  • Who funds ISRAEL TENNIS CENTERS FOUNDATION INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Collier Community Foundation IncFL23.7× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Collier Community Foundation Inc · The League Club Inc · The Richard M Schulze Family Foundation · The Martin Foundation Inc · Carol B Phelon Foundation · The Ayco Charitable Foundation · Naples Children Foundation Inc · Suncoast Credit Union Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · National Philanthropic Trust · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Harold & Nancy Kaplan Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Harold & Nancy Kaplan Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 100%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →median 3%
  • Naples Botanical Garden Inc: 3% of income from government
  • Guadalupe Center Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
10get no government money at all
9report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 99 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Harold & Nancy Kaplan’s filings →

More from the funding graph