Skip to content
Harold & Elaine Friedland Family Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Harold & Elaine Friedland Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$156k
Granted FY2024still arriving
16
Grants FY2024still arriving
4
States reached
$58k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

International$181kHealth$149kYouth Development$145kHuman Services$127kPhilanthropy$108kRecreation & Sports$19kEducation$15kArts & Culture$6kOther$0
02FY2024 · 16 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k11 grants · $22k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $76k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $58k
$5,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$665k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM$57,500
ISRAEL TENNIS CENTER FOUNDATION$27,800
BOCA RATON REGIONAL HOSPITAL FOUNDATION$20,000
FRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES$16,000
JEWISH FEDERATION OF SOUTH PALM BEACH COUNTY$12,500
SERVING UP HOPE$7,500
JEWISH ADOPTION FOSTER CARE$7,200
AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION INC$5,000
BOCA INTERNATIONAL JEWISH FILM FESTIVAL INC$1,000
CHILDRENS HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA$350
THE PAP CORPS$300
FRIENDS OF RITTENHOUSE SQUARE$250
PLAY FOR PINK INC$150
SEMINOLE REGION CHARITY GOLF TOURNAMENT INCORPORATED$125
MEMORIAL SLOAN KETTERING CANCER CENTER$100
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–23, $3k) land where the poverty rate runs at 18%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 94% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%FAMILIES BEHIND THE BADGE CHILDRENS FOUNDATION INC: $200 → 7%THE SUNDAY LOVE PROJECT: $1k → 22%MORSELIFE FOUNDATION: $200 → 11%THE WELCOMING CENTER: $1k → 22%ADOLPH & ROSE LEVIS JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER: $500 → 11%ADOLPH & ROSE LEVIS JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER: $100 → 11%YOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF SOUTH PALM BEACH COUNTY INC: $100 → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NY
IN
PA
NJ
VA
MD
AR
NC
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 65% of Harold & Elaine Friedland Family Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

Harold & Elaine Friedland Family Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

85%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$556k · 25 repeat orgs$96k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +59% since the first grant, against +23% for those funded once.

25 repeat relationships: 11 still active in FY2024, 14 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

25
33

Total granted

$556k
$67k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+59%
+23%

Still filing today

64%
73%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 80% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $29k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthHuman ServicesEducationPhilanthropyInternationalArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AF
    AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM
    7× · 2017–2024 · $141k · revenue +206%
  • FRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES
    6× · 2019–2024 · $39k · revenue +115%
  • AH
    American Heart Association Inc
    7× · 2017–2024 · $37k · revenue +33%

Funded once

  • NATIONAL MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS SOCIETY
    one grant, 2023 · $26k · revenue +8%
  • FA
    FLORIDA ATLANTIC UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2023 · $10k · revenue +17%
  • BR
    Boca Raton Regional Hospital Incgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $10k · revenue +78%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Neurology Associates of Stony Brook University Faculty Practice Corp

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
2
Stony Brook Surgical Associates University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
3
Stony Brook Urology University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
4
Stony Brook Internists University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
5
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc

The mission of dfci is to provide expert, compassionate, and equitable care to children, adults, and their families, while advancing the understanding, diagnosis, treatment, cure, and prevention of cancer and related diseases. we train new…

Health
6
Stony Brook Childrens Services University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
7
Sanford Burnham Prebys Medical Discovery Institute

Sanford burnham prebys medical discovery institute's mission is to advance the biomedical sciences by cultivating the next generation of scientific leaders, providing meaningful opportunities for researchers of all backgrounds to learn,…

Health
8
Stony Brook Orthopedic Associates University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
9
Stony Brook Ophthalmology University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
10
The Lieber Institute Inc

The mission of the institute is to translate basic genetic and molecular mechanisms of schizophrenia and related developmental brain disorders into clinical advances that change the lives of affected individuals. it is catalyzing a new…

Health
11
The Trustees of Princeton University

Research, education and general - princeton university is a private not-for-profit, non-sectarian institution of higher learning with approximately 5,700 undergraduate and 3,300 graduate students. 2,500 students graduated in the 2024-2025…

Education
12
University of Maryland Anesthesiology Associates Pa

Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Jewish Federation of South Palm Beach County Inc; the most unlike its peers is Liumi Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

48 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 48 of the 65 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
11
Early backer (in before they grew)
47/48
Grantees still filing
39/48
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ISRAEL TENNIS CENTER FOUNDATION: $144,225 · OtherISRAEL TENNIS CENTER FOUNDATIONJEWISH ADOPTION FOSTER CARE: $119,600 · OtherJEWISH ADOPTION FOSTER CARETHE PAP CORPS: $21,490 · OtherTHE PAP CORPS+33 more: $39,583 · Other+33 moreAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM: $141,200 · InternationalAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN D…FRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES: $39,275 · InternationalFRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFEN…+1 more: $2,500 · InternationalJEWISH FEDERATION OF SOUTH PALM BEACH COUNTY INC: $106,925 · PhilanthropyJEWISH FEDERATIO…+3 more: $2,325 · PhilanthropyAmerican Heart Association Inc: $37,025 · HealthAmerican Heart …NATIONAL MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS SOCIETY: $25,750 · HealthNATIONAL MULTIP…Unite for HER: $12,525 · HealthUnite for HERBoca Raton Regional Hospital Inc: $10,000 · HealthBoca Raton Regi…HYDROCEPHALUS ASSOCIATION: $4,500 · HealthTHE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA: $3,925 · HealthRUTH & NORMAN RALES JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES INC: $3,571 · Health+8 more: $8,160 · Health+8 moreBoca Raton Regional Hospital Foundation Inc: $20,000 · Community ImprovementFLORIDA ATLANTIC UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 · EducationTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $3,000 · EducationWILLIAM PENN CHARTER SCHOOL INC: $1,000 · Education+2 more: $500 · EducationSERVING UP HOPE INC: $7,500 · Recreation & Sports
Other$324,898International$182,975Philanthropy$109,250Health$105,456Community Improvement$20,000Education$14,500Recreation & Sports$7,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM: $141,200 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetJEWISH FEDERATION OF SOUTH PALM BEACH COUNTY INC: $106,925 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES: $39,275 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $37,025 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS SOCIETY: $25,750 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBoca Raton Regional Hospital Foundation Inc: $20,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetUnite for HER: $12,525 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetFLORIDA ATLANTIC UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBoca Raton Regional Hospital Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSERVING UP HOPE INC: $7,500 over 1y, 4.5% of budgetFRIENDS OF RITTENHOUSE SQUARE: $6,478 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetHYDROCEPHALUS ASSOCIATION: $4,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetCURTIS INSTITUTE OF MUSIC: $4,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA: $3,925 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetPennsylvania Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals: $3,700 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetRUTH & NORMAN RALES JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES INC: $3,571 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN SOCIETY FOR TECHNION ISRAEL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPHILADELPHIA CHILDREN'S ALLIANCE: $2,300 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetLIVING BEYOND BREAST CANCER: $2,200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHEREDITARY NEUROPATHY FOUNDATION INC: $1,900 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetDIABETES RESEARCH INSTITUTE FOUNDATION INC: $1,700 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetJEFFERSON HEALTH - NORTHEAST FOUNDATION: $1,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPLAY FOR PINK INC: $1,070 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetTHE KOBY MANDELL FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCherished Creations Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetWELCOMING CENTER FOR NEW PENNSYLVANIANS: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBOCA INTERNATIONAL JEWISH FILM FESTIVAL INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetTHE SUNDAY LOVE PROJECT INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetWILLIAM PENN CHARTER SCHOOL INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetADOLPH & ROSE LEVIS JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER INC: $600 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTRANSPLANT HOUSE: $560 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSCORE Association: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTRI COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSEMINOLE REGION CHARITY GOLF TOURNAMENT INC: $325 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetALPHA CHI OMEGA FOUNDATION INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BROOKLYN COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCITY YEAR INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFAMILIES BEHIND THE BADGE CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMORSELIFE FOUNDATION INC: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHELPUSADOPTORG INC: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFREE LIBRARY OF PHILADELPHIA FOUNDATION: $150 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetODYSSEY HOUSE INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF SOUTH PALM BEACH COUNTY INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLIUMI INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMILES FOR MIGRAINE: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetALLIANCE FOR KIDS INC: $85 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Cigna Group Found…Chubb Charitable Foun…The Philadelphia Foun…Arthur J Gallagher Fo…The Saramar Charitabl…Phillies Charities IncThe William Penn Foun…Charities Aid Foundat…Ge Aerospace Foundati…The Pfizer Foundation…Jpmorgan Chase Founda…Aetna Foundation Inc
The Cigna Group FoundationPA19.3× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Cigna Group Foundation · Chubb Charitable Foundation · The Philadelphia Foundation · Arthur J Gallagher Foundation · The Saramar Charitable Fund · Phillies Charities Inc · The William Penn Foundation · Charities Aid Foundation America · Ge Aerospace Foundation · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Aetna Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Harold & Elaine Friedland Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Harold & Elaine Friedland Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 140%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 11%
  • City Year Inc: 11% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
14get no government money at all
7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 65 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Harold & Elaine Friedland Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home