Skip to content

· Private foundation

Harl & Evelyn Mansur Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$792k
Granted FY2025still arriving
31
Grants FY2025still arriving
11
States reached
$150k
Largest
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Religion$2.1MYouth Development$473kHuman Services$377kHealth$326kEducation$287kEmployment$204kArts & Culture$110kRecreation & Sports$105kOther$0
02FY2025 · 31 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k8 grants · $29k
  • $10k–50k19 grants · $408k
  • $50k–250k4 grants · $355k
$20,000
Median grant
11
States reached
$1.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
WATERFRONT CHURCH DC$150,000
STRAIGHT STREET$80,000
THE GOSPEL COALITION$75,000
THE LIVING STONE CHURCH$50,000
GOSPEL OF LIFE ASSOCIATIONS$40,000
HARLEM COMMUNITY CHURCH$36,000
VAMOS$34,656
UNITED REGIONAL HOSPITAL FOUNDATION$30,000
REDEEM INTERNATIONAL$25,000
KAKENYA CENTER FOR EXCELLENCE$25,000
YOUR MISSION MATTERS$25,000
MILE ONE MISSION$20,000
CH OF CH INDIA MISSIONS$20,000
TADSAW INC$20,000
GRACE MINISTRIES$20,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $243k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 86% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%MANUELITO NAVAJO CHILDRENS HOME: $20k → 32%HOSPICE OF WICHITA FALLS: $20k → 9%HOSPICE OF WICHITA FALLS: $15k → 9%CHILDRENS AID SOCIETY OF WEST TEXAS INC: $20k → 16%CHILDRENS AID SOCIETY OF WEST TEXAS INC: $10k → 16%CHILDRENS AID SOCIETY OF WEST TEXAS INC: $10k → 16%CHILDRENS AID SOCIETY OF WEST TEXAS INC: $10k → 16%CHILDRENS AID SOCIETY OF WEST TEXAS INC: $10k → 16%CHILDRENS AID SOCIETY OF WEST TEXAS INC: $10k → 16%ARC OF WICHITA COUNTY INC: $30k → 16%ARC OF WICHITA COUNTY INC: $30k → 16%ARC OF WICHITA COUNTY INC: $23k → 16%ARC OF WICHITA COUNTY INC: $20k → 16%ARC OF WICHITA COUNTY INC: $15k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

VT
WA
MT
IL
NY
OH
CO
MO
KY
VA
MD
NM
AR
DC
OK
AL
GA
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 7% of Harl & Evelyn Mansur Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 56% of the giving stays in TX; by stated purpose, 61%.

Harl & Evelyn Mansur Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

80%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$3.5M · 46 repeat orgs$870k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +26% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

46 repeat relationships: 20 still active in FY2025, 26 since wound down; 11 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

46
29

Total granted

$3.5M
$614k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+26%
0%

Still filing today

37%
7%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 68% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $257k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesInternationalHealthPublic BenefitArts & CultureRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BL
    BEACON LIGHTHOUSE INC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $204k · revenue +142%
  • TA
    THE ARC OF WICHITA COUNTY INC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $118k · revenue +142%
  • CA
    CHILDREN'S AID SOCIETY OF WEST TX INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $70k · revenue +29%

Funded once

  • EC
    EVANGEL CHURCH INC
    one grant, 2024 · $69k
  • HC
    HOPE CHURCH JOHNS CREEK
    one grant, 2022 · $50k
  • WC
    WEBSTERVILLE CHRISTIAN ACADEMY
    one grant, 2023 · $40k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Childrens Advocacy Center of West Texas Inc

The Organizations mission is to bring unity and efficiency to investigations of child abuse through the use of a multi-disciplinary team and, thereby, to provide the best possible services to victims of child abuse and their families.

Crime & Legal
2
West Texas Food Bank

The WTFB exists to collect, purchase, and distribute food to feed the hungry in 19 counties in West Texas in partnership with volunteers and community organizations and to educate these partners and the public at large about the real face…

—
3
Wichita Falls Faith Mission Inc

To provide christ-centered programs and services that lead the homeless toward self-sufficiency.

Religion
4
Food Bank of West Central Texas

To procure and distribute nutritional food to qualified agencies that feed the hungry of West Central Texas.

Food & Nutrition
5
UnBound North Texas

Unbound North Texas exists to support survivors and resource the community to fight human trafficking through Survivor Advocacy, a 24/7 Drop-In Center, and Prevention and Awareness.

—
6
Central Texas Children's Home

To provide family services and to provide residential child care for dependent children where there is a need to assist children and families disrupted by problems.

Human Services
7
Compassion Ministries of Waco

It is the mission of the organization to provide services to disadvantaged and homeless families with children; to reintegrate homeless families with children into permanent housing and employment.

Community Improvement
8
Interfaith Ministries of Wichita Falls Inc Dba Interfaith Outreach Services

The primary purpose of the organization is to provide assistance to temporarily disadvantaged individuals and families.

Human Services
9
Texprotects-the Texas Association for the Protection of Children

TexProtects advances public policy and local implementation to strenghten families to prevent child abuse and neglect.

Youth Development
10
Still Water Christian Ministries Inc

To offer Kingdom partners a holy and unforgettable experience at our Texas Hill Country retreat and camp facility highlighting the still waters of God's majestic creation.

Recreation & Sports
11
Castle Care Community Ministries

Our mission is to end Veteran homelessness in Texas and throughout America by providing shelter, transitional living, counseling, case management, job training and job placement.

Housing & Shelter
12
His Story Coaching and Counseling

Christian coaching, counseling, assessment and consulting services to the communities of Tarrant County, Texas.

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Children's Aid Society of West Tx Inc; the most unlike its peers is Mexican American Veteran Association. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

24 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 24 of the 86 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

3
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
23/24
Grantees still filing
15/24
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE GOSPEL COALITION INC: $470,000 · OtherTHE GOSPEL COALITION INCSTRAIGHT STREET: $376,000 · OtherSTRAIGHT STREETWATERFRONT CHURCH DC: $295,000 · OtherWATERFRONT CHURCH DCSISTERS OF ST FRANCIS: $151,234 · OtherKAKENYA CENTER FOR EXCELLENCE: $145,000 · OtherCH OF CH INDIA MISSIONS: $126,500 · OtherCROSS TRAIL OUTFITTER OF TEXAS: $123,000 · Other+67 more: $1,963,239 · Other+67 moreTHE ARC OF WICHITA COUNTY INC: $118,166 · Human ServicesCHILDREN'S AID SOCIETY OF WEST TX INC: $70,000 · Human ServicesHospice of Wichita Falls Inc: $35,000 · Human ServicesMANUELITO NAVAJO CHILDRENS HOME: $20,000 · Human ServicesBEACON LIGHTHOUSE INC: $203,500 · HealthFIRST STEP OF WICHITA FALLS INC: $15,000 · HealthRedeem International: $50,000 · InternationalCambodia Christian Ministries: $20,000 · InternationalLIFE LINE OF HOPE A NON-PROFIT: $12,000 · InternationalYOUR MISSION MATTERS: $65,000 · ReligionNORTHWEST TEXAS FIELD AND STREAM ASSOC: $56,000 · Recreation & SportsD Disaster Helping Hand Inc: $50,000 · Public Safety & Disaster
Other$3,649,973Human Services$243,166Health$218,500International$82,000Religion$65,000Recreation & Sports$56,000Public Safety & Disaster$50,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBEACON LIGHTHOUSE INC: $203,500 over 5y, 1.1% of budgetTHE ARC OF WICHITA COUNTY INC: $118,166 over 5y, 3.5% of budgetENTRUST: $70,000 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetCHILDREN'S AID SOCIETY OF WEST TX INC: $70,000 over 6y, 1.1% of budgetYOUR MISSION MATTERS: $65,000 over 3y, 2.5% of budgetNORTHWEST TEXAS FIELD AND STREAM ASSOC: $56,000 over 2y, 37% of budgetRedeem International: $50,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetD Disaster Helping Hand Inc: $50,000 over 6y, 40% of budgetHospice of Wichita Falls Inc: $35,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetDFW HONOR FLIGHT: $30,000 over 3y, 4.0% of budgetMexican American Veteran Association: $20,000 over 5y, 58% of budgetTADSAW INC: $20,000 over 1y, 6.0% of budgetCambodia Christian Ministries: $20,000 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetProject Back to School: $20,000 over 2y, 8.5% of budgetFELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES: $17,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BOYS CLUB OF WICHITA FALLS INC DBA BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF WICHITA FALLS: $15,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetFIRST STEP OF WICHITA FALLS INC: $15,000 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetLIBERTY UNIVERSITY INC: $12,341 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetLIFE LINE OF HOPE A NON-PROFIT: $12,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetTRINITY FORUM INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetArts Council Wichita Falls Area Inc: $10,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetThe Museum of North Texas History: $8,000 over 3y, 2.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds BEACON LIGHTHOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds THE ARC OF WICHITA COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds ENTRUST ↗
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S AID SOCIETY OF WEST TX INC ↗
  • Who funds YOUR MISSION MATTERS ↗
  • Who funds NORTHWEST TEXAS FIELD AND STREAM ASSOC ↗
  • Who funds Redeem International ↗
  • Who funds D Disaster Helping Hand Inc ↗
  • Who funds Hospice of Wichita Falls Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

James N McCoy FoundationTX22× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: James N McCoy Foundation · Wichita Falls Area Community Foundation · Donnell Foundation · The Fain Foundation · Bryant Edwards Foundation Inc · J S Bridwell Foundation · Community Foundation of North Texas (Tax · Leota Steed Foundation · Gene Conley Foundation · Guinn Foundation Inc · Hazel & Henry S Grace Foundation · Julia Lee Taubert Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Harl & Evelyn Mansur Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Harl & Evelyn Mansur Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%4%15%34%60%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 86 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Harl & Evelyn Mansur’s filings →

    More from the funding graph