Skip to content

· Private foundation

Harken Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$250k
Granted FY2025still arriving
80
Grants FY2025still arriving
18
States reached
$66k
Largest
01What it funds
0190% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Science & Tech$382kEnvironment$363kEducation$203kHousing & Shelter$166kArts & Culture$83kInternational$82kHealth$51kHuman Services$26kOther$0
02FY2025 · 80 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k74 grants · $78k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $56k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $116k
$500
Median grant
18
States reached
$672k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MARINE BIOLOGICAL LAB$66,238
THE 300 COMMITTEE LAND TRUST$50,000
WOODS HOLE COMMUNITY ASSOC$25,000
DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS$10,500
GDMI$10,000
YMCA CAPE COD$10,000
ALIGHT$6,000
MARINE BIOLOGICAL LAB$5,000
RAVINIA$5,000
RENSSELAER POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE$5,000
CARE$4,500
H FRANK CAREY HIGH SCHOOL$3,500
ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND$2,500
HABITAT FOR HUMANITY CAPE COD$2,500
FALMOUTH SERVICE CENTER$2,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $21k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 61% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%CRADLES TO CRAYONS: $500 → 8%PARENTS HELPING PARENTS: $500 → 8%WOUNDED WARIER PROJECT: $2k → 14%CHARITY NAVIGATOR: $200 → 7%PARENTS HELPING PARENTS: $500 → 8%WOUNDED WARIER PROJECT: $1k → 14%CRADLES TO CRAYONS: $104 → 8%PARENTS HELPING PARENTS: $250 → 8%LUSTGARTEN FOUNDATION: $1k → 6%LUSTGARTEN FOUNDATION: $500 → 6%MISERICORDIA HOME: $4k → 14%MISERICORDIA HOME: $3k → 14%MISERICORDIA HOME: $2k → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $500 → 14%WORLD FOOD PROGRAM: $500 → 14%CRADLES TO CRAYONS: $500 → 14%CRADLES TO CRAYONS: $400 → 14%CAPE ABILITIES: $2k → 8%CAPE ABILITIES: $1k → 8%CAPE ABILITIES: $750 → 8%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $500 → 8%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $500 → 8%PINE STREET INN: $500 → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NH
WA
MT
MN
IL
MI
NY
MA
OR
IA
OH
PA
NJ
CT
CA
CO
MO
WV
VA
MD
AZ
AR
TN
NC
DC
AL
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.3M · 86 repeat orgs$138k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +23% since the first grant, against +17% for those funded once.

86 repeat relationships: 53 still active in FY2025, 33 since wound down; 25 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

86
109

Total granted

$1.3M
$81k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+23%
+17%

Still filing today

72%
47%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 77% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $57k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
EnvironmentInternationalHealthEducationHuman ServicesPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • T3
    THE 300 COMMITTEE LAND TRUST INC
    5× · 2020–2025 · $180k · revenue +414%
  • Lake Forest College
    4× · 2020–2024 · $110k · revenue +50%
  • TF
    THE FREDERICK GUNN SCHOOL INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $31k · revenue +54%

Funded once

  • FO
    FRIENDS OF NOBSKA LIGHT INC
    one grant, 2021 · $20k · revenue +23%
  • PA
    PUENTE A LA SALUD COMUNITORIO
    one grant, 2020 · $6k
  • TC
    THE COLLEGE OF HEALTHCARE
    one grant, 2021 · $4k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Conservation International Foundation

Ci works to spotlight and secure the critical benefits that nature provides to humanity.

Environment
2
Project Drawdown

Project drawdown's mission is to drive meaningful climate action by advancing science-based solutions and strategies. project drawdown's work is focused on three pillars: science - advancing science-based climate solutions and strategies;…

Education
3
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
4
Sustainable Fisheries Partnership Foundation

To engage and catalyze global seafood supply chains in rebuilding depleted fish stocks and reducing the environmental impacts of fishing and fish farming.

Animals
5
American Association for the Advancement of Science

Advance science, engineering, and innovation throughout the world for the benefit of all. the world's largest multidisciplinary scientific society and a leading publisher of cutting-edge research through its science family of journals,…

Science & Tech
6
Ocean Conservancy

Ocean conservancy unites science, people, and policy to protect our ocean, today and for generations to come.

Environment
7
Friends of the Earth

Friends of the earth strives for a more healthy and just world by defendng the environment and human health while advancing social and economic justice by conducting research and education, transforming the economy so it protects the…

Environment
8
Lowell Observatory

The mission of lowell observatory is to pursue the study of astronomy, especially the study of our solar system and its evolution; to conduct pure research in astronomical phenomena; and to maintain quality public education and outreach…

Science & Tech
9
Rainforest Trust

Rainforest trust saves endangered wildlife and protects our planet by creating rainforest reserves through partnerships, community engagement, and donor support.

International
10
Target Als Foundation Inc

Our mission is to break down barriers to als research to find effective treatments. by uniting academia, the pharma and biotech industry, government, venture capital, related nonprofits, and the als community, we aim to overcome the…

Education
11
New York University

Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.

Education
12
American Museum of Natural History

The museum's mission statement is: "to discover, interpret, and disseminate - through scientific research and education - knowledge about human cultures, the natural world, and the universe."

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is National Park Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Feilding Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

126 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 126 of the 223 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
17
Early backer (in before they grew)
125/126
Grantees still filing
92/126
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MARINE BIOLOGICAL LAB: $303,354 · OtherMARINE BIOLOGICAL LABHABITAT FOR HUMANITY CAPE COD: $152,500 · OtherHABITAT FOR HUMANITY CAPE CODWOODS HOLE COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION INC: $25,000 · Other+131 more: $241,097 · Other+131 moreTHE 300 COMMITTEE LAND TRUST INC: $180,333 · EnvironmentTHE 300 COMMITTEE LAN…GULF OF MAINE INSTITUTE INC: $69,091 · EnvironmentGULF OF MAINE INSTITU…+14 more: $26,590 · Environment+14 moreLake Forest College: $109,500 · EducationLake Forest C…THE FREDERICK GUNN SCHOOL INC: $30,500 · EducationTHE FREDERICK…Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute: $24,000 · EducationRensselaer Po…+9 more: $8,025 · EducationMARINE BIOLOGICAL LABORATORY: $145,950 · Science & TechMARINE BIOL…+2 more: $2,600 · Science & TechMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $24,500 · InternationalALIGHT: $21,000 · InternationalCOOPERATIVE FOR ASSISTANCE AND RELIEF EVERYWHERE INC: $7,500 · InternationalSave The Children Federation Inc: $6,000 · InternationalTHE UNION OF CONCERNED SCIENTISTS INC: $4,500 · InternationalMercy Corps: $3,000 · International+10 more: $11,000 · InternationalFRIENDS OF NOBSKA LIGHT INC: $20,000 · Arts & CultureTHE JOFFREY BALLET: $2,000 · Arts & CultureWGBH Educational Foundation: $1,096 · Arts & Culture+5 more: $2,075 · Arts & CultureMISERICORDIA HOME: $8,000 · Human ServicesCAPE ABILITIES INC: $3,250 · Human ServicesWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $3,000 · Human ServicesCRADLES TO CRAYONS INC: $1,504 · Human ServicesMARC LUSTGARTEN PANCREATIC CANCER FOUNDATION: $1,500 · Human ServicesAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $1,500 · Human ServicesPARENTS HELPING PARENTS INC: $1,250 · Human Services+4 more: $1,354 · Human Services
Other$721,951Environment$276,014Education$172,025Science & Tech$148,550International$77,500Arts & Culture$25,171Human Services$21,358

Showing the 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE 300 COMMITTEE LAND TRUST INC: $180,333 over 5y, 3.7% of budgetMARINE BIOLOGICAL LABORATORY: $145,950 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetLake Forest College: $109,500 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetGULF OF MAINE INSTITUTE INC: $69,091 over 5y, 49% of budgetTHE FREDERICK GUNN SCHOOL INC: $30,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetWOODS HOLE COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION INC: $25,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $24,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetRensselaer Polytechnic Institute: $24,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetALIGHT: $21,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF NOBSKA LIGHT INC: $20,000 over 1y, 9.0% of budgetSMILE TRAIN INC: $16,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetFALMOUTH SERVICE CENTER INC: $12,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetFALMOUTH HOUSING TRUST: $11,500 over 4y, 1.2% of budgetNATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC: $8,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMISERICORDIA HOME: $8,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCOOPERATIVE FOR ASSISTANCE AND RELIEF EVERYWHERE INC: $7,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetBUZZARDS BAY COALITION: $7,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetPARTNERS IN HEALTH A NONPROFIT CORPORATION: $6,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetFeeding America: $6,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetSave The Children Federation Inc: $6,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FARMLAND TRUST: $5,824 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE UNION OF CONCERNED SCIENTISTS INC: $4,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATED: $4,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $4,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetDEPAUL UNIVERSITY: $4,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCAPE ABILITIES INC: $3,250 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $3,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMercy Corps: $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMDRC: $2,765 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWoodwell Climate Research Center Inc: $2,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetKESHET INC: $2,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetFINCA INTERNATIONAL INC: $2,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC: $2,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetASSOCIATION TO PRESERVE CAPE COD INC: $2,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCamp for All Kids: $2,323 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetPARKINSON'S FOUNDATION INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUnited States Association for UNHCR: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE JOFFREY BALLET: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $1,715 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCRADLES TO CRAYONS INC: $1,504 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetMARC LUSTGARTEN PANCREATIC CANCER FOUNDATION: $1,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTECHNOSERVE INC: $1,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGREATER BOSTON FOOD BANK INC: $1,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $1,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTRUSTEES OF BOSTON UNIVERSITY: $1,461 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetZACHARIAS SEXUAL ABUSE CENTER: $1,250 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetEVANS SCHOLARS FOUNDATION: $1,250 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetPARENTS HELPING PARENTS INC: $1,250 over 3y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE 300 COMMITTEE LAND TRUST INC ↗
  • Who funds MARINE BIOLOGICAL LABORATORY ↗
  • Who funds Lake Forest College ↗
  • Who funds GULF OF MAINE INSTITUTE INC ↗
  • Who funds THE FREDERICK GUNN SCHOOL INC ↗
  • Who funds WOODS HOLE COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
  • Who funds Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute ↗
  • Who funds ALIGHT ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF NOBSKA LIGHT INC ↗
  • Who funds SMILE TRAIN INC ↗
  • Who funds FALMOUTH SERVICE CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds FALMOUTH HOUSING TRUST ↗
  • Who funds NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC ↗
  • Who funds MISERICORDIA HOME ↗
  • Who funds COOPERATIVE FOR ASSISTANCE AND RELIEF EVERYWHERE INC ↗
  • Who funds BUZZARDS BAY COALITION ↗
  • Who funds PARTNERS IN HEALTH A NONPROFIT CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds Feeding America ↗
  • Who funds Save The Children Federation Inc ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FARMLAND TRUST ↗
  • Who funds THE UNION OF CONCERNED SCIENTISTS INC ↗
  • Who funds ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATED ↗
  • Who funds THE NATURE CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds DEPAUL UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds CAPE ABILITIES INC ↗
  • Who funds WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Cape Cod Foundation IncMA31.9× affinity13 shared granteesties to 9 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Cape Cod Foundation Inc · Stanley W Watson Foundation · Mutual Bancorp Foundation Inc Fka Cape Cod 5 Foundation Inc · Martha's Vineyard Bank Charitable Foundation Inc · Cape Cod Five Cents Savings Bank Charitable Foundation Trust · Jewish Federation of Metropolitan Chicago · Josephine and Louise Crane Foundation · Eastern Bank Foundation · George H Lusk Trust · Esther Simon 1952 Charitable Trust Xxxxx8006 · Highland Park Community Foundation · Hermann Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Harken Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Harken Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 170%3%13%28%50%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 11%
  • Association to Preserve Cape Cod Inc: 100% of income from government
  • The Samaritans On Cape Cod: 82% of income from government
  • Cape Abilities Inc: 81% of income from government
  • Mercy Corps: 47% of income from government
  • Buzzards Bay Coalition: 37% of income from government
  • Save the Children Federation Inc: 30% of income from government
  • Greater Boston Food Bank Inc: 22% of income from government
  • Marine Biological Laboratory: 20% of income from government
  • Trustees of Boston University: 12% of income from government
  • New England Aquarium Corporation: 12% of income from government
  • Woodwell Climate Research Center Inc: 11% of income from government
  • Pine Street Inn Inc: 11% of income from government
  • Hubbard Brook Research Foundation: 6% of income from government
  • Gosnold Inc: 5% of income from government
  • West Falmouth Library Inc: 2% of income from government
  • Cradles to Crayons Inc: 2% of income from government
  • The Trustees of Reservations: 2% of income from government
  • Special Olympics Massachusetts Inc: 1% of income from government
  • Massachusetts Audubon Society Inc: 1% of income from government
  • Wgbh Educational Foundation: 1% of income from government
  • Rosie's Place Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Partners in Health a Nonprofit Corporation: 0% of income from government
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Keshet Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
17get no government money at all
19report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
3rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Harken Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Harken Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 223 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Harken’s filings →

More from the funding graph