Skip to content

· Private foundation

Handelsman Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$29k
Granted FY2025still arriving
11
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$11k
Largest
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$218kEnvironment$65kArts & Culture$55kReligion$33kHousing & Shelter$24kHealth$15kFood & Nutrition$11kYouth Development$10kOther$0
02FY2025 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k9 grants · $8k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $21k
$649
Median grant
3
States reached
$13k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Chicago Botanic Garden$11,000
NorthShore Hospitals Foundation$10,000
Am Shalom$3,600
Art Institute of Chicago$1,100
Evans Scholars Foundation$750
Friends of Glencoe Public Library$649
Orphans of the Storm$600
International Crane Foundation$500
PAWS Chicago$300
The Glencoe Historical Society$300
The Museum of Modern Art$180
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–18, $125) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%YOUTH SERVICES OF GLENVIEWNORTHBROOK: $125 → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
WI
NY
MA
PA
CO
NM
NC
DC
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

82%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$365k · 31 repeat orgs$80k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +40% since the first grant, against +19% for those funded once.

31 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2025, 22 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

31
18

Total granted

$365k
$69k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+40%
+19%

Still filing today

61%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 63% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $11k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureAnimalsEducationHealthEnvironmentPublic Safety & DisasterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • University of Chicago
    2× · 2017–2019 · $150k · revenue +56%
  • CH
    CHICAGO HORTICULTURAL SOCIETY
    9× · 2017–2025 · $62k · revenue +37%
  • TA
    THE ART INSTITUTE OF CHICAGO
    8× · 2017–2025 · $30k · revenue +45%

Funded once

  • CL
    COLUMBIA LAW SCHOOL
    one grant, 2017 · $25k
  • PC
    PRIMO CENTER FOR WOMEN & CHILDRENgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $21k · revenue +126%
  • BB
    Big Brothers Big Sisters of Greater Pittsburgh Inc
    one grant, 2021 · $10k · revenue +19%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
American Museum of Natural History

The museum's mission statement is: "to discover, interpret, and disseminate - through scientific research and education - knowledge about human cultures, the natural world, and the universe."

Arts & Culture
2
The Adler Planetarium

The adler planetarium ('adler') is a not-for-profit cultural institution whose mission is to connect people to the universe and each other under the sky we all share. it aspires to be the world's premier center for engaging in astronomy…

Arts & Culture
3
Chicago Historical Society

The Chicago History Museum strives to be a destination for learning, inspiration, and civic engagement. Through dynamic exhibitions, tours, programs, digital resources, and special events, the Museum connects people to Chicago's history…

Arts & Culture
4
University of Chicago Medical Center

Our mission at the university of chicago medicine is to provide superior health care through rigorous research, innovative education, and comprehensive care and healing. in partnership with our colleagues, we pursue life-changing…

Health
5
The Pierpont Morgan Library

The Morgan Library & Museum celebrates and shares the history and process of human creativity from antiquity to the present day through the preservation, study, and interpretation of a dynamic and growing collection.

Education
6
Science Museum of Minnesota

The museum's mission statement is "turn on the science: inspire learning. inform policy. improve lives."

Arts & Culture
7
Denver Zoological Foundation

Inspiring communities to save wildlife for future generations.

Animals
8
University of Miami

See Form 990, Part I, Line 1, Description of Organization Mission.

Education
9
Kenneth C Griffin Museum of Science and Industry

The Kenneth C. Griffin Museum of Science and Industry (the Museum), a 501(c)(3) corporation, is the largest science museum in the Western hemisphere and home to thousands of artifacts. For 90 years, the Museum has been a premier…

Arts & Culture
10
Rush University Medical Center

The mission of Rush is to improve the health of the individuals and diverse communities we serve through the integration of outstanding patient care, education, research and community partnerships.

Health
11
Lincoln Park Zoological Society

Lincoln park zoo is dedicated to connecting people with nature by providing a free, family-oriented wildlife experience in the heart of chicago and by advancing the highest quality of animal care, horticulture, education, science and…

Animals
12
San Francisco Museum of Modern Art

See schedule osfmoma believes the art of our time is vital and shares it with passion and purpose, and that art and the creative process can open minds and help build a better world. for that reason, we assemble unparalleled collections,…

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Museum of Contemporary Art; the most unlike its peers is Museum At Dinosaur Junction. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

32 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 32 of the 51 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
32/32
Grantees still filing
25/32
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

University of Chicago: $150,000 · EducationUniversity of ChicagoTHE ART INSTITUTE OF CHICAGO: $29,600 · EducationTHE ART INSTITUTE OF CHICAGOPRIMO CENTER FOR WOMEN & CHILDREN: $21,000 · EducationPRIMO CENTER FOR WOMEN & CHILDREN+1 more: $300 · EducationAM SHALOM: $32,450 · OtherAM SHALOMYOUNG EISNER SCHOLARS: $29,500 · OtherYOUNG EISNER SCHOLARSCOLUMBIA LAW SCHOOL: $25,000 · OtherCOLUMBIA LAW SCHOOLWTTW CHICAGO PUBLIC MEDIA: $10,650 · OtherWTTW CHICAGO PUBLIC MEDIAFRIENDS OF THE GLENCOE PUBLIC LIBRARY: $6,275 · Other+26 more: $26,649 · Other+26 moreCHICAGO HORTICULTURAL SOCIETY: $61,939 · EnvironmentCHICAGO HORTICUL…EAGLE VALLEY LAND TRUST: $3,100 · EnvironmentRAVINIA FESTIVAL ASSOCIATION: $8,000 · Arts & CultureChicago Architecture Foundation: $2,100 · Arts & CultureMETROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ART: $1,480 · Arts & CultureMuseum of Modern Art: $1,265 · Arts & CultureMUSEUM OF CONTEMPORARY ART: $579 · Arts & CultureFIELD MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY: $500 · Arts & Culture+2 more: $275 · Arts & CultureEndeavor Health Clinical Operations: $10,000 · HealthNATIONAL MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS SOCIETY: $3,000 · Health+1 more: $250 · HealthURBAN GROWERS COLLECTIVE INC: $10,000 · Food & NutritionROADRUNNER FOOD BANK INC: $500 · Food & NutritionBig Brothers Big Sisters of Greater Pittsburgh Inc: $10,000 · Crime & Legal
Education$200,900Other$130,524Environment$65,039Arts & Culture$14,199Health$13,250Food & Nutrition$10,500Crime & Legal$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUniversity of Chicago: $150,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCHICAGO HORTICULTURAL SOCIETY: $61,939 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ART INSTITUTE OF CHICAGO: $29,600 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetPRIMO CENTER FOR WOMEN & CHILDREN: $21,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetBig Brothers Big Sisters of Greater Pittsburgh Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetURBAN GROWERS COLLECTIVE INC: $10,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetRAVINIA FESTIVAL ASSOCIATION: $8,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetORPHANS OF THE STORM: $3,750 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetEAGLE VALLEY LAND TRUST: $3,100 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS SOCIETY: $3,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY CHICAGO: $3,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetChicago Architecture Foundation: $2,100 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetINTERNATIONAL CRANE FOUNDATION INC: $1,800 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetMETROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ART: $1,480 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetMuseum of Modern Art: $1,265 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetRoosevelt University: $1,250 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFriends of Mountain Rescue Inc: $750 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetGlencoe Historical Society: $700 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetPAWS CHICAGO: $650 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetMUSEUM OF CONTEMPORARY ART: $579 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetROADRUNNER FOOD BANK INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFIELD MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY: $500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSKYLAND FIRE AND RESCUE CORPORATION: $300 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetWIKIMEDIA FOUNDATION INC: $300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Cradle Society: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWHITNEY MUSEUM OF AMERICAN ART: $175 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS: $150 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetYOUTH SERVICES OF GLENVIEWNORTHBROOK: $125 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMUSEUM AT DINOSAUR JUNCTION: $100 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetThe Anti-Cruelty Society: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds University of Chicago ↗
  • Who funds CHICAGO HORTICULTURAL SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds THE ART INSTITUTE OF CHICAGO ↗
  • Who funds PRIMO CENTER FOR WOMEN & CHILDREN ↗
  • Who funds Big Brothers Big Sisters of Greater Pittsburgh Inc ↗
  • Who funds URBAN GROWERS COLLECTIVE INC ↗
  • Who funds Endeavor Health Clinical Operations ↗
  • Who funds RAVINIA FESTIVAL ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds ORPHANS OF THE STORM ↗
  • Who funds EAGLE VALLEY LAND TRUST ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds HABITAT FOR HUMANITY CHICAGO ↗
  • Who funds Chicago Architecture Foundation ↗
  • Who funds INTERNATIONAL CRANE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds METROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ART ↗
  • Who funds Museum of Modern Art ↗
  • Who funds Roosevelt University ↗
  • Who funds Friends of Mountain Rescue Inc ↗
  • Who funds Glencoe Historical Society ↗
  • Who funds PAWS CHICAGO ↗
  • Who funds MUSEUM OF CONTEMPORARY ART ↗
  • Who funds ROADRUNNER FOOD BANK INC ↗
  • Who funds FIELD MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY ↗
  • Who funds SKYLAND FIRE AND RESCUE CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds WIKIMEDIA FOUNDATION INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

AbbVie FoundationIL13.5× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: AbbVie Foundation · The Chicago Community Trust · American Endowment Foundation · Renaissance Charitable Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Handelsman Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Handelsman Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →median 7%
  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: 7% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 51 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Handelsman Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph