Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation Dossiers
Plinth

· Private foundation

Halliburton Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$2.0M
Granted FY2024still arriving
54
Grants FY2024still arriving
16
States reached
$356k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.

Education$19MPhilanthropy$2.6MRecreation & Sports$593kCommunity Improvement$528kScience & Tech$414kHealth$397kEnvironment$178kYouth Development$75kOther$0
02FY2024 · 54 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k12 grants · $65k
  • $10k–50k31 grants · $751k
  • $50k–250k10 grants · $866k
  • $250k+1 grant · $356k
$20,000
Median grant
16
States reached
$8.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
AMERICAN ONLINE GIVING FOUNDATION$355,884
UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN$200,000
WEST POINT ASSOCIATION OF GRADUATES$112,500
AUGUSTANA COLLEGE$112,500
OKLAHOMA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION$72,000
SUSQUEHANNA UNIVERSITY$67,500
OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY$67,500
NORTHWEST UNIVERSITY$67,500
UNIVERSITY OF HOUSTON FOUNDATION$60,000
TEXAS CHILDRENS HOSPITAL$56,250
TEXAS A&M 12TH MAN FOUNDATION$50,063
THE ASSOCIATION OF FORMER STUDENTS$48,933
MCNEESE STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION$48,933
TEMPLE UNIVERSITY$45,000
LOUISIANA STATE U FOUNDATION$45,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 85% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%MONTANA TECH FOUNDATION: $560k → 16%VILLANOVA UNIVERSITY: $113k → 10%SUSQUEHANNA UNIVERSITY: $113k → 10%WEST POINT ASSOCIATION OF GRADUATES: $113k → 14%PERMIAN STRATEGIC PARTNERSHIP INC: $128k → 12%UNIVERSITY OF PIKEVILLE COLLEGE: $225k → 13%OILFIELD ENERGY CENTER: $65k → 15%UNIVERSITY OF LOUISIANA AT LAFAYETTE FOUNDATION: $245k → 16%OKLAHOMA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $72k → 19%AMERICAN ONLINE GIVING FOUNDATION: $1.2M → 12%TEXAS TECH FOUNDATION INC: $98k → 15%OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY: $113k → 15%NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY: $225k → 14%AUGUSTANA COLLEGE: $225k → 15%UNIVERSITY OF WYOMING FDN: $500k → 17%MCNEESE STATE UNIV FOUNDATION: $80k → 17%AMERICAN ONLINE GIVING FOUNDATION: $451k → 10%VILLANOVA UNIVERSITY: $113k → 10%SUSQUEHANNA UNIVERSITY: $113k → 10%CARNEGIE LIBRARY OF PITTSBURGH: $113k → 11%WEST POINT ASSOCIATION OF GRADUATES: $113k → 14%UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN MGR OF GIFT ADMINISTRATION: $113k → 10%UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA FOUNDATION: $63k → 13%American Online Giving Foundation I: $942k → 12%OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY: $68k → 15%NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY: $113k → 14%AUGUSTANA COLLEGE: $113k → 15%AMERICAN ONLINE GIVING FOUNDATION: $356k → 10%VILLANOVA UNIVERSITY: $113k → 10%SUSQUEHANNA UNIVERSITY: $113k → 10%TEXAS A & M FOUNDATION: $1.2M → 22%AMERICAN ONLINE GIVING FOUNDATION I: $798k → 12%THE OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY: $113k → 15%AUGUSTANA COLLEGE: $113k → 15%AMERICAN ONLINE GIVING FOUNDATION: $210k → 10%VILLANOVA UNIVERSITY: $113k → 10%SUSQUEHANNA UNIVERSITY: $68k → 10%TEXAS A & M FOUNDATION: $1.2M → 22%MONTANA TECH FOUNDATION: $68k → 15%VILLANOVA UNIVERSITY: $113k → 10%SUSQUEHANNA UNIVERSITY: $68k → 10%TEXAS A & M FOUNDATION: $1.2M → 22%SUSQUEHANNA UNIVERSITY: $68k → 10%TEXAS A & M FOUNDATION: $70k → 22%HOUSTON MUSEUM OF NATURAL SCIENCE: $325k → 16%GREATER HOUSTON COMMUNITY: $375k → 16%GREATER HOUSTON PARTNERSHIP: $200k → 16%GREATER HOUSTON PARTNERSHIP: $200k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

AK
NH
WA
MT
ND
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
OR
WY
SD
IA
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CT
CA
CO
NE
MO
KY
WV
MD
DE
NM
KS
AR
TN
NC
SC
DC
OK
LA
MS
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

86%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$18M · 99 repeat orgs$3.0M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +41% since the first grant, against +38% for the ones you funded once.

99 repeat relationships — 38 still active in FY2024, 61 since wound down; 12 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

99
109

Total granted

$18M
$2.7M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+41%
+38%

Still filing today

58%
31%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 83% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $274k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationHealthArts & CultureScience & TechYouth DevelopmentPublic BenefitOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TA
    Texas A&M Foundation
    8× · 2017–2024 · $3.8M · revenue +90%
  • MT
    MONTANA TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION
    2× · 2017–2022 · $605k · revenue +58%
  • VU
    VILLANOVA UNIVERSITY
    5× · 2017–2022 · $563k · revenue +50%

Funded once

  • Houston Museum of Natural Sciencegraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $325k · revenue +33%
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF LOUISIANA AT LAFAYETTE FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2023 · $245k
  • PS
    Permian Strategic Parnership Inc
    one grant, 2020 · $139k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Trinity University

Trinity university is an independent co-educational university whose mission is excellence in the interrelated areas of teaching, research and services.

Education
2
Lehigh University

The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…

Education
3
Furman University

The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.

Education
4
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
5
President and Fellows of Harvard College

Undergraduate, graduate, and professional education and research across a broad array of academic domains.

Education
6
Trustees of Tufts College

Education and Research

Education
7
The University of TexasTexas a&M Investment Management Company

To generate superior long-term investment returns to support The University of Texas and Texas A&M University systems as they provide world-class teaching, push the boundaries of discovery, and achieve excellence in patient healthcare for…

Education
8
The George Washington University

The mission of the george washington university (gw) is to educate individuals in liberal arts, languages, sciences, learned professions, and other courses and subjects of study, and to conduct scholarly research and publish the findings…

Education
9
Loyola University

Loyola University New Orleans, a Jesuit and Catholic institution of higher education, welcomes students of diverse backgrounds and prepares them to lead meaningful lives with and for others; to pursue truth, wisdom, and virtue; and to work…

Education
10
Pacific University

A diverse and sustainable learning community dedicated to discovery and excellence in teaching, scholarship and practice, pacific university inspires students to think, care, create and pursue justice in our world.

Education
11
University of the Sciences in Philadelphia

University of the sciences prepares students to become leaders, innovators, and skilled practitioners in the sciences, the health professions, and related disciplines. we deliver excellence in teaching, research, and service through a safe…

—
12
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Texas a&M Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Rise 5280. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 57 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%3%<5yr14%6%5–10yr19%8%10–20yr16%12%20–35yr13%18%35–55yr16%54%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%0%<5yr14%4%5–10yr19%18%10–20yr16%1%20–35yr13%35%35–55yr16%42%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/140
the rest of the field
13%
240,396/1,819,425

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

123 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 123 of the 225 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
12
Early backer (in before they grew)
121/123
Grantees still filing
99/123
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Texas A&M Foundation — $3,817,533 · EducationTexas A&M FoundationMONTANA TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION — $605,000 · EducationMONTANA TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY FOUNDATIONVILLANOVA UNIVERSITY — $562,500 · EducationVILLANOVA UNIVERSITYSUSQUEHANNA UNIVERSITY — $540,000 · EducationSUSQUEHANNA UNIVERSITYUNIVERSITY OF WYOMING FOUNDATION — $506,750 · EducationAUGUSTANA COLLEGE — $450,000 · Education+56 more — $3,444,147 · Education+56 moreAmerican Online Giving Foundation I — $1,740,386 · OtherAmerican Online Giving Foundation IUNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN — $1,583,007 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTINUNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT EL PASO — $806,300 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT EL PASOGreater Houston Partnership Inc — $400,000 · Other+124 more — $5,647,863 · Other+124 moreAMERICAN ONLINE GIVING FOUNDATION INC — $2,181,262 · PhilanthropyAMERICAN ONL…GREATER HOUSTON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $375,000 · PhilanthropyGREATER HOUS…RADY CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION SAN DIEGO — $168,750 · PhilanthropyRADY CHILDRE…Houston Museum of Natural Science — $325,000 · Arts & CultureOFFSHORE RIG MUSEUM INC — $39,400 · Arts & CultureNorthwestern University — $337,500 · Recreation & SportsASSOCIATION OF THE GRADUATES OF THE UNITED STATES MILITARY ACADEMY — $225,000 · Public BenefitNextOp Inc — $10,000 · Public BenefitPERMIAN STRATEGIC PARTNERSHIP INC — $127,778 · Community ImprovementRise 5280 — $10,000 · Community Improvement
Education$9,925,930Other$10,177,556Philanthropy$2,725,012Arts & Culture$364,400Recreation & Sports$337,500Public Benefit$235,000Community Improvement$137,778

Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTexas A&M Foundation — $3,817,533 over 8y, 0.5% of budgetAMERICAN ONLINE GIVING FOUNDATION INC — $2,181,262 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetMONTANA TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION — $605,000 over 2y, 7.0% of budgetVILLANOVA UNIVERSITY — $562,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetSUSQUEHANNA UNIVERSITY — $540,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF WYOMING FOUNDATION — $506,750 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetAUGUSTANA COLLEGE — $450,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetGreater Houston Partnership Inc — $400,000 over 3y, 1.3% of budgetGREATER HOUSTON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $375,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNorthwestern University — $337,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetHouston Museum of Natural Science — $325,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetMCNEESE STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION — $312,970 over 7y, 0.5% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATION — $274,747 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTEXAS TECH FOUNDATION INC — $253,317 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetOklahoma State University Foundation — $226,982 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetASSOCIATION OF THE GRADUATES OF THE UNITED STATES MILITARY ACADEMY — $225,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTHE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS FOUNDATION INC — $176,036 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetUniversity of Houston Foundation — $170,502 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetRADY CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION SAN DIEGO — $168,750 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA FOUNDATION INC — $165,688 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTIGER ATHLETIC FOUNDATION — $164,165 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetTHE GRATITUDE INITIATIVE — $162,700 over 7y, 31% of budgetTHE ASSOCIATION OF FORMER STUDENTS OF TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY — $161,433 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetPERMIAN STRATEGIC PARTNERSHIP INC — $127,778 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetWEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC — $118,875 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCARNEGIE LIBRARY OF PITTSBURGH — $112,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetWilliam Marsh Rice University — $109,664 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTexas Alliance for Minorities in Engineering Inc — $103,750 over 4y, 7.1% of budgetANGELO STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC — $95,000 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetINDEPENDENT PETROLEUM ASSOCIATION — $90,500 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetUniversity of Michigan — $90,000 over 3y, 21% of budgetGEORGIA TECH FOUNDATION INC — $88,063 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetKIPP Inc dba Knowledge is Power Program Inc — $78,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetLSU FOUNDATION — $71,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetKANSAS STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION — $69,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetC-STEM TEACHER AND STUDENT SUPPORT SERVICES — $69,000 over 6y, 21% of budgetNORTHWEST UNIVERSITY — $67,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCORNELL COLLEGE — $67,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSDSM&T CENTER FOR ALUMNI RELATIONS & ADVANCEMENT — $59,340 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCUREBOUND — $56,250 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetTexas Children's Hospital — $56,250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Kansas University Endowment Association — $56,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetColorado Association of Black Professional Engineers & Scientists — $55,000 over 3y, 9.7% of budgetPRO-VISION INC — $50,000 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetCOLORADO STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION — $50,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetYELLOWSTONE ACADEMY INC DBA YELLOWSTONE SCHOOLS — $50,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetSouthern Methodist University — $48,825 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTemple University - Of The Commonwealth System of Higher Education — $45,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Texas A&M Foundation ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN ONLINE GIVING FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds MONTANA TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds VILLANOVA UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds SUSQUEHANNA UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF WYOMING FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds AUGUSTANA COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds Greater Houston Partnership Inc ↗
  • Who funds GREATER HOUSTON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Northwestern University ↗
  • Who funds Houston Museum of Natural Science ↗
  • Who funds MCNEESE STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds TEXAS TECH FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Oklahoma State University Foundation ↗
  • Who funds ASSOCIATION OF THE GRADUATES OF THE UNITED STATES MILITARY ACADEMY ↗
  • Who funds THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds University of Houston Foundation ↗
  • Who funds RADY CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION SAN DIEGO ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds TIGER ATHLETIC FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE GRATITUDE INITIATIVE ↗
  • Who funds THE ASSOCIATION OF FORMER STUDENTS OF TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds PERMIAN STRATEGIC PARTNERSHIP INC ↗
  • Who funds WEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC ↗

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Greater Houston Commu…Shell USA Company Fou…Baker Hughes Foundati…Strake FoundationAlbert & Ethel Herzst…The Blackbaud Giving …Centerpoint Energy Fo…Harry S & Isabel C Ca…Texas Instruments Fou…The US Charitable Gif…Ernst & Young Foundat…Ibm International Fou…
Greater Houston Community FoundationTX38.1× affinity27 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Greater Houston Community Foundation · Shell USA Company Foundation · Baker Hughes Foundation · Strake Foundation · Albert & Ethel Herzstein Charitable Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Centerpoint Energy Foundation Inc · Harry S & Isabel C Cameron Foundation Sentinel Trust Company · Texas Instruments Foundation · The US Charitable Gift Trust · Ernst & Young Foundation · Ibm International Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Halliburton Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 80%2%6%14%25%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 2%
  • Massachusetts Institute of Technology — 35% of income from government
  • The Trustees of Princeton University — 11% of income from government
  • The University of Tulsa — 5% of income from government
  • St John's College — 2% of income from government
  • Willamette University — 1% of income from government
  • Wellesley College — 1% of income from government
  • Tower Hill School Association — 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
8get no government money at all
15report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Halliburton Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Halliburton Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 225 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines