· Private foundation
Haggerty Family Foundation Inc
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| JACK HAGGERTY MEMORIAL SCHOLARSHIP | $3,000 |
| ST BENEDICT'S PREPARATORY SCHOOL | $1,500 |
| ST JOSEPH'S UNIVERSITY | $1,500 |
| DYSAUTONOMIA INT'L | $1,350 |
| IMAGINE A CENTER FOR COPING WITH LO | $1,000 |
| THE COMMUNITY FOOD BANK OF NJ | $950 |
| THOMPSON MEMORIAL PRESBYTERIAN CHUR | $800 |
| ST HELENS HELPING HANDS HEARTS | $800 |
| RENAISSANCE CHURCH | $750 |
| THE HENRY COE KINDERMAN PROJECT INC | $600 |
| WOUNDED WARRIOR | $550 |
| SCOTCH PLAINS FANWOOD SCHOLARSHIP F | $500 |
| P'NUTS FREEDOM FARM ANIMAL SANCTUAR | $500 |
| MARINE CORPS HERITAGE FOUNDATION | $400 |
| NATIONAL BRAIN TUMOR SOCIETY INC | $400 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $9k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 52% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +25% since the first grant, against +1% for the ones you funded once.
43 repeat relationships — 27 still active in FY2024, 16 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 87% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- IAIMAGINE A CENTER FOR COPING WITH LOSS5× · 2020–2024 · $6k · revenue +82%
- MCMARINE CORPS HERITAGE FOUNDATION7× · 2017–2024 · $4k · revenue +7%
- ECElizabeth Coalition to House the Homeless Inc7× · 2017–2024 · $4k · revenue +128%
Funded once
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2017 · $2k
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2017 · $500
- IAINDRALOKA ANIMAL SANCTUARY INCone grant, 2023 · $500 · revenue -15%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The New Jersey Coalition Against Sexual Assault (NJCASA) is driven by a mission to support all survivors of sexual violence, their loved ones, and the service providers who support them.
We are committed to providing exceptional quality care which sustains and improves both individual and community health, with a special concern for those who are poor, vulnerable and underserved.
The brain tumor network (btn) is dedicated to providing compassionate, personalized navigation services to brain tumor patients and caregivers. btn also assists patients in finding clinical trials that may be an appropriate match for them.…
Through organ and tissue donation and transplantation, the organization saves lives, gives hope and restores physical function. please refer to schedule o for the organization's community benefit statement.
The Womens Cancer Resource Center improves equitable access to cancer information, support and care.
To provide the highest quality heart, lung and vascular care in a collaborative and welcoming environment, while ensuring access for all.
Epilepsy services of new jersey (esnj) is a state-wide, non-profit charitable agency dedicated to helping to improve the quality of life for people affected by epilepsy and their loved ones. esnj will ensure that people with seizures find…
The mission of robert wood johnson university hospital is to improve the health and well-being of the patients and communities we serve by fostering an environment of excellence in all areas including the provision of the highest quality,…
Provides refuge for homeless and unwanted animals, adoption services for homeless animals, and spay/neuter services.
Breast cancer is the second leading cause of cancer death after lung cancer in women in the us overall, but its the leading cause of cancer death in black and hispanic women. geographical disparities in breast cancer incidence and…
Connectiong loved ones battling the same condition for mutual support
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Wounded Warrior Project Inc and the most unlike its peers is Southern Comfort Animal Rescue Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 19 years old; the field is 15. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 10% of your grantees by number, and just 15% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
24 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 24 of the 53 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds STEP AHEAD INC ↗
- Who funds IMAGINE A CENTER FOR COPING WITH LOSS ↗
- Who funds DYSAUTONOMIA INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
- Who funds MARINE CORPS HERITAGE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Elizabeth Coalition to House the Homeless Inc ↗
- Who funds GO WITH COURAGE INC ↗
- Who funds THE PAUL JACKSON FUND INC ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL BRAIN TUMOR SOCIETY INC ↗
- Who funds Community Food Bank Of New Jersey Inc ↗
- Who funds SAINT JOSEPH'S UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds Youth & Family Counseling Service Inc ↗
- Who funds WOMANSPACE INC ↗
- Who funds STEVS WISH INC ↗
- Who funds SMILE TRAIN INC ↗
- Who funds THE ELEPHANT SANCTUARY IN TENNESSEE ↗
- Who funds Josephine's Place Inc ↗
- Who funds ASKCA125 ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Investors Foundation Inc · Community Foundation of New Jersey · Verizon Foundation · Chubb Charitable Foundation · Union Foundation · Ej Grassmann Trust · The Ayco Charitable Foundation · Columbia Bank Foundation · The Hyde and Watson Foundation · Bristol-Myers Squibb Foundation Inc · Harold B & Dorothy a Snyder Foundation · Pseg Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Haggerty Family Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Womanspace Inc — 47% of income from government
- Wounded Warrior Project Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.