Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Hageman Foundation of Hope

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$450k
Granted FY2024still arriving
29
Grants FY2024still arriving
10
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What you fund
0196% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20202024.

Religion$1.8MEducation$971kHuman Services$515kFood & Nutrition$271kPhilanthropy$144kYouth Development$129kInternational$83kCivil Rights$76kOther$0
02FY2024 · 29 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k18 grants · $46k
  • $10k–50k8 grants · $185k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $220k
$5,000
Median grant
10
States reached
$8.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HOPE ACADEMY$100,000
MONTICELLO HELP CENTER$60,000
BUFFALO FOOD SHELF$60,000
FAITH IN ACTION$40,000
UNION GOSPEL MISSION$35,000
SALVATION ARMY$25,000
LOVE INC BIG WOODS$20,000
LOVE IN THE NAME OF CHRIST - LOVE INC$20,000
SPECIAL OLYMPICS$17,500
SHARING & CARING HANDS$15,000
FR TOM RAYAR HANDS OF HOPE$12,000
LAKESIDE ACADEMY$5,000
LEGACY HUNTING & FISHING RETREAT$5,000
MN ADULTTEEN CHALLENGE$5,000
SAMARITAN'S PURSE$5,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $527k) land where the poverty rate runs at 6%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 14% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%MONTICELLO HELP CENTER: $65k → 5%WOUNDED WARRIORS PROJECT: $3k → 14%MONTICELLO HELP CENTER: $60k → 5%WOUNDED WARRIORS PROJECT: $3k → 14%MONTICELLO HELP CENTER: $55k → 5%WOUNDED WARRIORS PROJECT: $2k → 14%BUFFALO FOOD SHELF: $65k → 5%BUFFALO FOOD SHELF: $60k → 5%BUFFALO FOOD SHELF: $55k → 5%BUFFALO FOOD SHELF: $46k → 5%BUFFALO FOOD SHELF: $45k → 5%SHARING & CARING HANDS: $20k → 11%SHARING & CARING HANDS: $15k → 11%SHARING & CARING HANDS: $15k → 11%SHARING & CARING HANDS: $10k → 11%SHARING & CARING HANDS: $8k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

MN
IL
WI
NY
SD
CA
CO
VA
MD
AZ
KS
NC
MS
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$3.9M · 39 repeat orgs$137k to everyone else

39 repeat relationships — 28 still active in FY2024, 11 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

39
17

Total granted

$3.9M
$136k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+21%
+44%

Still filing today

44%
35%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
ReligionHuman ServicesHealthEducationPublic BenefitPhilanthropyOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WM
    WHAT MATTERS MINISTRIES AND MISSIONS
    2× · 2022–2023 · $1.0M · revenue +2%
  • HA
    HOPE ACADEMY INC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $835k · revenue +240%
  • BF
    BUFFALO FOOD SHELF
    5× · 2020–2024 · $271k · revenue +86%

Funded once

  • MH
    Mobile Hopegraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $50k · revenue +129%
  • UM
    UNITED METHODIST CHURCH OF BUFFALO
    one grant, 2020 · $42k
  • MT
    Minnesota Teen Challenge Incgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $10k · revenue +44%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Wounded Spirits Ministries

The focus of the ministry is to establish christian camps and retreats that will reach men and women who have been affected by post traumatic stress disorder with the gospel of jesus christ, and equip them to recognize, manage, and…

Recreation & Sports
2
Christian Mission for the United Nations Community

Christian Mission for the United Nations Community is a ministry aimed at leading the head of every nation and other top leaders to faith in Jesus Christ and helping them to walk in dependence upon God as they discharge the…

3
Springfield Rescue Mission

The goal of the springfield rescue mission since 1892 has been to meet the physical and spiritual needs of the hungry, homeless, addicted, and poor by introducing them to christ and helping them apply the word of god to every area of their…

Human Services
4
City Mission Society Inc

See schedule o description of our mission and vision.

Human Services
5
American Bible Society

Since 1816, american bible society has been fulfilling its mission of making the bible available to every person in a language and format each can understand and afford so all people may experience its life-changing message.

Religion
6
Shield of Faith Missions

Sof is called to empower warriors to find purpose, be resilient, and live well. we develop and provide customized treatment plans for veterans through our national network of partners.

Religion
7
Life As Mission
Unclassified
8
Summit Ministries Inc

Summit ministries is an educational christian ministry with the purpose of equipping tomorrow's servant leaders to analyze competing worldviews and champion the christian faith, inspiring each one to love god with all his heart, soul,…

9
Tri-State Christian Academy Inc

Our desire is to provide balanced, biblical direction to the child as a support to the home and to train each student to be self-disciplined and biblically directed in their walk with god and their fellow man. it is also our desire to meet…

Education
10
Free to Worship Ministries

This church will be that place of emergency where people can come any time of day or night. We will be a place that will lead people back to health both spiritually and naturally.

Religion
11
Time of Grace Ministry

Time of grace is for people who want more growth and less struggle in their spiritual walk. we share the truth of god's word simply and clearly through television, print, and digital media that people view millions of times each month. we…

Religion
12
Union Gospel Mission Association of St Paul Inc

We provide christ-centered, life-changing pathways for all people who are experiencing homelessness, hunger and addiction.

Human Services

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Wounded Warrior Project Inc and the most unlike its peers is Stma Breakfast Club. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyChristian Missionary Organi…Independent K-8 SchoolsVeteran Support ServicesCancer Support OrganizationsAnimal Rescue and AdoptionFood Pantries & AssistanceHomeless Services & Shelter
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 33 years old; the field is 20. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number17%0%<5yr12%3%5–10yr20%17%10–20yr17%31%20–35yr16%24%35–55yr18%24%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value17%0%<5yr12%2%5–10yr20%3%10–20yr17%76%20–35yr16%12%35–55yr18%8%55yr+

The field is 17% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 10% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/32
the rest of the field
10%
3,829/38,957

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

23 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 23 of the 57 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
23/23
Grantees still filing
19/23
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

SALVATION ARMY — $213,000 · OtherSALVATION ARMYFAITH IN ACTION — $202,000 · OtherFAITH IN ACTIONUNION GOSPEL MISSION INC — $194,500 · OtherUNION GOSPEL MISSION INCLOVE IN THE NAME OF CHRIST - LOVE INC — $168,000 · OtherLOVE IN THE NAME OF CHRIST - LOVE INCMN ADULTTEEN CHALLENGE — $117,500 · OtherMN ADULTTEEN CHALLENGEST FRANCIS XAVIER CHURCH — $98,150 · OtherST FRANCIS XAVIER CHURCHFR TOM RAYAR HANDS OF HOPE — $92,000 · OtherFR TOM RAYAR HANDS OF HOPESPECIAL OLYMPICS — $70,500 · OtherST FRANCIS XAVIER SCHOOL — $67,050 · Other+31 more — $238,848 · Other+31 moreWHAT MATTERS MINISTRIES AND MISSIONS — $1,000,000 · ReligionWHAT MATTERS MINISTRIES AND MISS…SAMARITAN'S PURSE — $82,500 · ReligionSAMARITAN'S PURSESTMA BREAKFAST CLUB — $50,000 · ReligionMobile Hope — $50,000 · ReligionHOPE ACADEMY INC — $835,000 · EducationHOPE ACADEMY INC+2 more — $12,500 · EducationBUFFALO FOOD SHELF — $271,000 · Human ServicesBUFFALO FOOD S…MONTICELLO CHRISTIAN SOCIAL SERVICES INC — $180,000 · Human ServicesMONTICELLO CHR…SHARING AND CARING HANDS INC — $67,500 · Human ServicesSHARING AND CA…+1 more — $11,500 · Human ServicesLEGACY FISHING RETREAT — $32,000 · Recreation & SportsMinnesota Teen Challenge Inc — $10,000 · HealthALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC — $7,000 · HealthAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC — $5,000 · HealthNATIONAL MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS SOCIETY — $1,000 · HealthMARINE TOYS FOR TOTS FOUNDATION — $10,000 · Philanthropy
Other$1,461,548Religion$1,182,500Education$847,500Human Services$530,000Recreation & Sports$32,000Health$23,000Philanthropy$10,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetWHAT MATTERS MINISTRIES AND MISSIONS — $1,000,000 over 2y, 9.3% of budgetHOPE ACADEMY INC — $835,000 over 5y, 2.2% of budgetBUFFALO FOOD SHELF — $271,000 over 5y, 6.4% of budgetUNION GOSPEL MISSION INC — $194,500 over 5y, 7.6% of budgetMONTICELLO CHRISTIAN SOCIAL SERVICES INC — $180,000 over 3y, 17% of budgetSAMARITAN'S PURSE — $82,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetSHARING AND CARING HANDS INC — $67,500 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetSTMA BREAKFAST CLUB — $50,000 over 2y, 6.4% of budgetMobile Hope — $50,000 over 1y, 8.2% of budgetLEGACY FISHING RETREAT — $32,000 over 5y, 9.7% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC — $11,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetMARINE TOYS FOR TOTS FOUNDATION — $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMinnesota Teen Challenge Inc — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPAWS FOR PURPLE HEARTS — $7,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION — $7,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC — $7,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetSUMMIT ACADEMY OIC — $5,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC — $5,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED SERVICE ORGANIZATIONS INC — $2,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetJUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT NORTH — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS SOCIETY — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTURNING POINT USA INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSACRED HEART SO MISSIONS HOUSING — $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds WHAT MATTERS MINISTRIES AND MISSIONS
  • Who funds HOPE ACADEMY INC
  • Who funds BUFFALO FOOD SHELF
  • Who funds UNION GOSPEL MISSION INC
  • Who funds MONTICELLO CHRISTIAN SOCIAL SERVICES INC
  • Who funds SAMARITAN'S PURSE
  • Who funds SHARING AND CARING HANDS INC
  • Who funds STMA BREAKFAST CLUB
  • Who funds Mobile Hope
  • Who funds LEGACY FISHING RETREAT
  • Who funds WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC
  • Who funds MARINE TOYS FOR TOTS FOUNDATION
  • Who funds Minnesota Teen Challenge Inc
  • Who funds PAWS FOR PURPLE HEARTS
  • Who funds STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION
  • Who funds ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC
  • Who funds SUMMIT ACADEMY OIC
  • Who funds AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The US Charitable Gift TrustMA11.4× affinity4 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The US Charitable Gift Trust · Renaissance Charitable Foundation Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Charities Aid Foundation America · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Hageman Foundation of Hope funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%1%5%11%20%your share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 0%
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Hageman Foundation of Hope?

Find your warmest path to Hageman Foundation of Hope through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 57 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph