Skip to content
Haehn Foundation Inc at a glance

· Private foundation

Haehn Foundation Inc

Its FY2026 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$78k
Granted FY2026still arriving
12
Grants FY2026still arriving
2
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Human Services$172kHealth$88kAnimals$87kYouth Development$80kEducation$79kScience & Tech$50kFood & Nutrition$50kHousing & Shelter$25kOther$0
02FY2026 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2026

  • Under $10k8 grants · $38k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $40k
$5,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$830k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
RUSTY'S ANGELS SANCTUARY$10,000
HUSHABYE NURSERY$10,000
AZ BRAINFOOD$10,000
SOUTHERN AZ RESEARCH SCIENCE & ENGINEERING FOUNDATION$10,000
MOPH CHAPTER #49$5,000
MOPH UNIT #49$5,000
HOMELESS YOUTH CONNECTION$5,000
EMPACT - SUICIDE PREVENTION CENTER$5,000
FRIENDS FOR LIFE ANIMAL RESCUE$5,000
ARIZONA BPW FOUNDATION$5,000
ZACK ZOLIN SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION$5,000
LIGHTHOUSE FOR HOPE$3,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–26, $110k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%MAGGIES PLACE: $5k → 11%YOUTH ON THEIR OWN: $10k → 15%MAGGIE'S PLACE: $5k → 11%YOUTH ON THEIR OWN: $5k → 15%YOUTH ON THEIR OWN: $5k → 15%HUSHABYE NURSERY: $10k → 11%HUSHABYE NURSERY: $10k → 11%HUSHABYE NURSERY: $6k → 11%HUSHABYE NURSERY: $5k → 11%EVE'S PLACE COMMUNITY SERVICES: $10k → 11%EVE'S PLACE: $5k → 11%HUSHABYE NURSERY: $10k → 11%HUSHABYE NURSERY: $8k → 11%HUSHABYE NURSERY: $7k → 11%ARIZONANS FOR CHILDREN INC: $5k → 11%GABRIEL'S ANGELS: $4k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$650k · 25 repeat orgs$74k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +40% since the first grant, against +12% for those funded once.

25 repeat relationships: 12 still active in FY2026, 13 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

25
12

Total granted

$650k
$74k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+40%
+12%

Still filing today

60%
25%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2026, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25’26
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25’26
Human ServicesHealthAnimalsYouth DevelopmentEducationInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • RS
    RUSTY S ANGELS SANCTUARY
    10× · 2017–2026 · $62k · revenue +74%
  • HN
    HUSHABYE NURSERY
    7× · 2020–2026 · $56k · revenue +278%
  • AB
    ARIZONA BRAINFOOD INC
    7× · 2019–2026 · $46k · revenue +17%

Funded once

  • TS
    THE SHINE PROJECT
    one grant, 2017 · $10k
  • AW
    ARIZONA WOMEN'S EDUCATION AND EMPLOYMENT INC
    one grant, 2018 · $10k · revenue -21%
  • SC
    SOJOURNER CENTERgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $10k · revenue +97%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
La Paloma Family Services Inc

We build relationships that enhance the development of skills, foster a sense of worth and enhance a belief in each child's individual potential.

—
2
Arizona Safe Baby Haven Foundation

Promotes Safe Haven education and awareness on the existing Safe Haven Law in Arizona to prevent the illegal abandonment of infants across the state.

Human Services
3
Alliance for Arizona Animal Protection

Prevention of animal cruelty and intervention on behalf of animals being abused.

Animals
4
Az Hugs
Human Services
5
Yavapai Big Brothers Big Sisters Foundation
—
6
Arizona Youth Partnership

Arizona youth partnership, (azyp), empowers youth to harness their strengths to live healthy and purposeful lives.

Health
7
Against Abuse Inc

To provide services, support, and education to all who experience the effects of family dysfunction and/or violence, past and present.

Human Services
8
Adoption Solutions of Arizona

Provide support services and counseling for expectant mothers and those hoping to adopt from arizona.

Human Services
9
Humane Society of Southern Arizona

To compassionately serve pets and the people who love them.

Animals
10
One Love Arizona Rescue Advocacy & Sterilization

One love arizona's mission is to spark brighter futures for people and pets through life-saving programs.

Animals
11
Child Crisis Arizona

To provide children and youth in arizona a safe environment, free from abuse and neglect, by creating strong and successful families.

Crime & Legal
12
Foster 360

Foster360 equips former clients of the foster care system to break the cycle of homelessness and abuse.

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is A New Leaf; the most unlike its peers is Friends for Life Animal Rescue. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

22 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 22 of the 37 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
18/22
Grantees still filing
15/22
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $29,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientSOUTHERN ARIZONA RESEARCH SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING FDN: $25,000 · OtherSOUTHERN ARIZONA RESEARCH SCIENCE AND ENG…AZ HAPPY TAILS INC: $20,000 · OtherAZ HAPPY TAILS INCArizona BPW Foundation Inc: $20,000 · OtherArizona BPW Foundation IncLADIES AUXILIARY MILITARY ORDER OF THE PURPLE HEART - CHAPTER 49: $20,000 · OtherLADIES AUXILIARY MILITARY ORDER OF THE PU…MILITARY ORDER OF THE PURPLE HEART - UNIT 49: $18,500 · OtherMILITARY ORDER OF THE PURPLE HEART - UNIT…MOPH CHAPTER #49: $13,000 · OtherMOPH UNIT #49: $13,000 · OtherLADIES AUXILIARY MILITARY ORDER OF THE PURPLE HEART - DEPT OF CA: $12,000 · OtherTHE SHINE PROJECT: $10,000 · OtherARIZONA WOMEN'S EDUCATION AND EMPLOYMENT INC: $10,000 · OtherAZ BUS & PROF WOMEN'S FDN: $10,000 · OtherNew Pathways For Youth: $25,000 · OtherNew Pathways For YouthFEED MY STARVING CHILDREN INC: $13,900 · Other+6 more: $24,500 · Other+6 moreHUSHABYE NURSERY: $56,000 · Human ServicesHUSHABYE NURSERYMAGGIE'S PLACE INC: $20,000 · Human ServicesMAGGIE'S PLACE INCYOUTH ON THEIR OWN: $20,000 · Human ServicesYOUTH ON THEIR OWNEVE'S PLACE INC: $15,000 · Human ServicesEVE'S PLACE INCSOJOURNER CENTER: $10,000 · Human ServicesSOJOURNER CENTERArizonans for Children Inc: $5,000 · Human Services+1 more: $4,000 · Human ServicesEMPACT-SUICIDE PREVENTION CENTER: $36,000 · HealthEMPACT-SUICI…LIGHTHOUSE FOR HOPE INC: $31,000 · HealthLIGHTHOUSE F…A NEW LEAF: $15,000 · HealthA NEW LEAFRUSTY S ANGELS SANCTUARY: $62,000 · AnimalsRUSTY S ANG…FRIENDS FOR LIFE ANIMAL RESCUE: $13,000 · AnimalsFRIENDS FOR…ZACK ZOLIN SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION: $37,000 · EducationZACK ZOLIN …Southern AZ Research Science & Eng FDN: $35,000 · EducationSouthern AZ…Homeless Youth Connection Inc: $28,000 · Youth DevelopmentTime to Blossom Inc: $27,000 · Youth DevelopmentARIZONA BRAINFOOD INC: $46,000 · Food & Nutrition
Other$263,900Human Services$130,000Health$82,000Animals$75,000Education$72,000Youth Development$55,000Food & Nutrition$46,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetRUSTY S ANGELS SANCTUARY: $62,000 over 10y, 1.9% of budgetHUSHABYE NURSERY: $56,000 over 7y, 0.6% of budgetARIZONA BRAINFOOD INC: $46,000 over 7y, 1.4% of budgetZACK ZOLIN SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION: $37,000 over 7y, 28% of budgetEMPACT-SUICIDE PREVENTION CENTER: $36,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetSouthern AZ Research Science & Eng FDN: $35,000 over 4y, 0.9% of budgetLIGHTHOUSE FOR HOPE INC: $31,000 over 6y, 4.5% of budgetHomeless Youth Connection Inc: $28,000 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetTime to Blossom Inc: $27,000 over 5y, 22% of budgetNew Pathways For Youth: $25,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetMAGGIE'S PLACE INC: $20,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetArizona BPW Foundation Inc: $20,000 over 3y, 99% of budgetYOUTH ON THEIR OWN: $20,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetEVE'S PLACE INC: $15,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetA NEW LEAF: $15,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFEED MY STARVING CHILDREN INC: $13,900 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS FOR LIFE ANIMAL RESCUE: $13,000 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetARIZONA WOMEN'S EDUCATION AND EMPLOYMENT INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetSOJOURNER CENTER: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetArizonans for Children Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetGABRIELS ANGELS INC: $4,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds RUSTY S ANGELS SANCTUARY ↗
  • Who funds HUSHABYE NURSERY ↗
  • Who funds ARIZONA BRAINFOOD INC ↗
  • Who funds ZACK ZOLIN SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds EMPACT-SUICIDE PREVENTION CENTER ↗
  • Who funds Southern AZ Research Science & Eng FDN ↗
  • Who funds LIGHTHOUSE FOR HOPE INC ↗
  • Who funds Homeless Youth Connection Inc ↗
  • Who funds Time to Blossom Inc ↗
  • Who funds New Pathways For Youth ↗
  • Who funds MAGGIE'S PLACE INC ↗
  • Who funds Arizona BPW Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds YOUTH ON THEIR OWN ↗
  • Who funds EVE'S PLACE INC ↗
  • Who funds A NEW LEAF ↗
  • Who funds FEED MY STARVING CHILDREN INC ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS FOR LIFE ANIMAL RESCUE ↗
  • Who funds ARIZONA WOMEN'S EDUCATION AND EMPLOYMENT INC ↗
  • Who funds SOJOURNER CENTER ↗
  • Who funds Arizonans for Children Inc ↗
  • Who funds GABRIELS ANGELS INC ↗
  • Who funds 2DARESCUE ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Arizona Community Fou…Thunderbirds CharitiesThe Yelp FoundationAmerican Express Foun…Employees Community F…The Foundation for Co…In-N-Out Burgers Foun…Virginia G Piper Char…Gannett Foundation IncEnterprise Holdings F…Charities Aid Foundat…American Online Givin…
Arizona Community FoundationAZ22× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Arizona Community Foundation · Thunderbirds Charities · The Yelp Foundation · American Express Foundation · Employees Community Fund of the Boeing Company · The Foundation for Community and Health Advancement · In-N-Out Burgers Foundation · Virginia G Piper Charitable Trust · Gannett Foundation Inc · Enterprise Holdings Foundation · Charities Aid Foundation America · American Online Giving Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Haehn Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Haehn Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 37 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2026, released 2026. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Haehn’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home