· Private foundation
Haehn Foundation Inc
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k7 grants · $42k
- $10k–50k3 grants · $30k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| RUSTY'S ANGELS SANCTUARY | $10,000 |
| AZ BRAINFOOD | $10,000 |
| SOUTHERN AZ RESEARCH SCIENCE & ENGINEERING FOUNDATION | $10,000 |
| HUSHABYE NURSERY | $8,000 |
| A NEW LEAF | $8,000 |
| ZACK ZOLIN SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION | $8,000 |
| LIGHTHOUSE FOR HOPE | $5,000 |
| LA FRONTERA-EMPACT | $5,000 |
| MOPH CHAPTER #49 | $4,000 |
| MOPH UNIT #49 | $4,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $100k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +34% since the first grant, against +12% for the ones you funded once.
25 repeat relationships — 10 still active in FY2025, 15 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- RSRUSTY S ANGELS SANCTUARY9× · 2017–2025 · $52k · revenue +74%
- HNHUSHABYE NURSERY6× · 2020–2025 · $46k · revenue +278%
- ABARIZONA BRAINFOOD INC6× · 2019–2025 · $36k · revenue +17%
Funded once
- SCSOJOURNER CENTERgraduatedone grant, 2020 · $10k · revenue +46%
- TSTHE SHINE PROJECTone grant, 2017 · $10k
- ABAZ BUS & PROF WOMEN'S FDNone grant, 2020 · $10k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
We build relationships that enhance the development of skills, foster a sense of worth and enhance a belief in each child's individual potential.
Promotes Safe Haven education and awareness on the existing Safe Haven Law in Arizona to prevent the illegal abandonment of infants across the state.
Arizona youth partnership, (azyp), empowers youth to harness their strengths to live healthy and purposeful lives.
Foster360 equips former clients of the foster care system to break the cycle of homelessness and abuse.
No cost legal services provided to vulnerable young people and trafficking survivors to help eliminate barriers to safety, stability, and opportunity. Specializing in family law, criminal history repair, vital document collection, and…
To rescue and save homeless, unwanted, abandoned, neglected, and abused dogs
Prevention of animal cruelty and intervention on behalf of animals being abused.
Az wins is a coalition of organizations dedicated to achieving public policies that benefit working arizona families and advancing an inclusive, engaged, just and equitable state for all arizonans. in 2024 az wins substantially reduced its…
To compassionately serve pets and the people who love them.
To provide services, support, and education to all who experience the effects of family dysfunction and/or violence, past and present.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is A New Leaf and the most unlike its peers is Friends for Life Animal Rescue. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
22 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 22 of the 37 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds RUSTY S ANGELS SANCTUARY ↗
- Who funds HUSHABYE NURSERY ↗
- Who funds ARIZONA BRAINFOOD INC ↗
- Who funds ZACK ZOLIN SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds EMPACT-SUICIDE PREVENTION CENTER ↗
- Who funds LIGHTHOUSE FOR HOPE INC ↗
- Who funds Time to Blossom Inc ↗
- Who funds New Pathways For Youth ↗
- Who funds Southern AZ Research Science & Eng FDN ↗
- Who funds Homeless Youth Connection Inc ↗
- Who funds MAGGIE'S PLACE INC ↗
- Who funds YOUTH ON THEIR OWN ↗
- Who funds A NEW LEAF ↗
- Who funds EVE'S PLACE INC ↗
- Who funds Arizona BPW Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds FEED MY STARVING CHILDREN INC ↗
- Who funds SOJOURNER CENTER ↗
- Who funds ARIZONA WOMEN'S EDUCATION AND EMPLOYMENT INC ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS FOR LIFE ANIMAL RESCUE ↗
- Who funds Arizonans for Children Inc ↗
- Who funds GABRIELS ANGELS INC ↗
- Who funds 2DARESCUE ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Arizona Community Foundation · Thunderbirds Charities · The Yelp Foundation · American Express Foundation · Employees Community Fund of the Boeing Company · The Foundation for Community and Health Advancement · In-N-Out Burgers Foundation · Virginia G Piper Charitable Trust · Gannett Foundation Inc · Enterprise Holdings Foundation · Charities Aid Foundation America · American Online Giving Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Haehn Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.