Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation Dossiers
Plinth

· Private foundation

Haberman Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$409k
Granted FY2024still arriving
75
Grants FY2024still arriving
11
States reached
$60k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
0196% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.

Health$939kPhilanthropy$419kEducation$411kReligion$217kArts & Culture$189kHousing & Shelter$164kEnvironment$110kHuman Services$105kOther$0
02FY2024 · 75 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k63 grants · $146k
  • $10k–50k11 grants · $203k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $60k
$2,500
Median grant
11
States reached
$7.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
VASCULITUS FOUNDATION$60,000
SCLERODERMA FOUNDATION$35,000
JEWISH UNITED FUND$34,000
A BETTER CHICAGO - EMERGENCY FUND$30,000
UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO$25,000
NORTHWESTERN MEMORIAL FOUNDATION$15,000
TEMPLE BETH EL$12,000
NORTH SHORE CONGREGATION ISRAEL$11,360
RAVINIA FESTIVAL$11,000
SHIRLEY RYAN ABILITYLAB$10,000
AMERICAN RED CROSS$10,000
LURIE CHILDRENS HOSPITAL FOUNDATION$10,000
KRAVIS CENTER FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS$7,500
JEWISH NATIONAL FUND$6,000
AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY$5,500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $85k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 90% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $5k → 14%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE: $10k → 12%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $5k → 14%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE: $5k → 12%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $5k → 14%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE: $5k → 12%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $3k → 14%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE: $5k → 12%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE: $5k → 12%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE: $5k → 12%ROOM ONE: $1k → 17%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE: $5k → 12%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE: $5k → 12%AFTERMATH: $5k → 14%EL CENTRO DE LA RAZA: $1k → 9%EL CENTRO DE LA RAZA: $1k → 9%EL CENTRO DE LA RAZA: $1k → 9%EL ENTRO DE LA RAZA: $1k → 9%EL ENTRO DE LA RAZA: $1k → 9%WELLSPRING FAMILY SERVICES: $500 → 9%WELLSPRING FAMILY SERVICES: $500 → 9%WELLSPRING FAMILY SERVICES: $500 → 9%EL CENTRO DE LA RAZA: $500 → 9%WELLSPRING FAMILY SERVICES: $500 → 9%EL CENTRO DE LA RAZA: $500 → 9%WELLSPRING FAMILY SERVICES: $500 → 9%CLEARBROOK: $1k → 14%CLEARBOOK: $500 → 14%CLEARBROOK: $500 → 14%JCC CHICAGO: $3k → 14%JCC CHICAGO: $1k → 14%JCC CHICAGO: $1k → 14%NORTH SHORE AUXILARY OF JEWISH CHILD & FAMILY SERVICES: $225 → 14%NORTH SHORE AUXILARY OF JEWISH CHILD & FAMILY SERVICES: $225 → 14%NORTH SHORE AUXILARY OF JEWISH CHILD & FAMILY SERVICES: $225 → 14%CJE SENIOR LIFE: $250 → 14%CJE SENIOR LIFE: $250 → 14%CJE SENIOR LIFE: $250 → 14%CJE SENIOR LIFE: $200 → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

WA
MN
IL
MI
NY
MA
IN
PA
NJ
CA
CO
MO
WV
VA
MD
AZ
NC
DC
LA
AL
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$2.8M · 107 repeat orgs$220k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +30% since the first grant, against +15% for the ones you funded once.

107 repeat relationships — 61 still active in FY2024, 46 since wound down; 11 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

107
56

Total granted

$2.8M
$192k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+30%
+15%

Still filing today

64%
55%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $27k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthArts & CultureHuman ServicesEducationEnvironmentAnimalsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • VF
    VASCULITIS FOUNDATION
    7× · 2017–2024 · $330k · revenue +82%
  • JU
    JEWISH UNITED FUND OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO
    8× · 2017–2024 · $272k · revenue +13%
  • University of Chicago
    8× · 2017–2024 · $195k · revenue +56%

Funded once

  • ST
    SPAY TODAY
    one grant, 2021 · $10k
  • AF
    AMERICAN FRIENDS OF THE OCEAN CLEANUP FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $10k · revenue +193%
  • RM
    Role Model Movement Inc
    one grant, 2020 · $10k · revenue -78%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Water Research Foundation

The purpose of the water research foundation (wrf) is a definitive research organization to advance the science of all things water to better meet the evolving needs of its subscribers and the water sector. to engage exclusively in…

Environment
2
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

—
3
American Academy of Neurology

The Academy's mission is to enhance member career fulfillment and promote brain health for all.

Community Improvement
4
Npr Foundation

The npr foundation ("foundation") is organized and operated exclusively for the benefit of its sole supported organization, national public radio, inc. ("npr inc."). the foundation supports npr inc. through various activities such as…

—
5
Federation of State Medical Boards of the United States Inc

The fsmb serves as the voice for state medical boards, supporting them through education, assessment, research and advocacy while providing services and initiatives that promote patient safety, quality health care and regulatory best…

Health
6
The Rand Corporation

Help improve policy and decision making through research and analysis.

Public Benefit
7
National Opinion Research Center

See schedule onorc at the university of chicago conducts research and data science on critical societal issues to guide decision-making and the development of programs and public policy. our experts identify relationships and trends, and…

Social Science
8
Society for Neuroscience

Sfn's mission is to: 1. advance the understanding of the brain and the nervous system by bringing together scientists of all segments of neuroscience, by facilitating the integration of research directed at all levels of biological…

Health
9
Seattle Biomedical Research Institute

We conduct fundamental infectious disease research to generate critical new knowledge about pathogens and their interactions with see schedule o for continuationhumans to enable the discovery and development of novel interventions,…

—
10
Ucsf Foundation Investment Company

The organization provides professional investment management services for endowed gifts and financial assets entrusted to the ucsf foundation.

Education
11
Arc Research Institute

Our mission is to accelerate scientific progress, understand the root causes of disease, and narrow the gap between discoveries and impact on patients.

Health
12
Allosource

Inspired by the gift of donation from our communities, allosource responsibly provides innovative cellular and tissue allografts to advance patient healing.

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Wounded Warrior Project Inc and the most unlike its peers is Lauri S Bauer Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyCancer Support ServicesAnimal Rescue and ShelterSenior Support ServicesJewish Community Organizati…Pregnancy Support ServicesLgbtq+ Community SupportEnvironmental Conservation …Immigrant Worker SupportDevelopmental Disabilities …Community College Foundatio…Community Arts CentersFood Banks and PantriesYouth Development ServicesHealth Access Advocacy and …Policy Research and AdvocacyCommunity FoundationsAffordable Housing Developm…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 45 years old; the field is 20. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number18%1%<5yr13%2%5–10yr18%10%10–20yr15%24%20–35yr14%29%35–55yr22%34%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value18%1%<5yr13%1%5–10yr18%3%10–20yr15%19%20–35yr14%13%35–55yr22%63%55yr+

The field is 18% startups (under 5 years old) — 1% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
2%2/120
the rest of the field
12%
8,890/72,239

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

115 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 115 of the 181 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
13
Early backer (in before they grew)
112/115
Grantees still filing
84/115
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

VASCULITIS FOUNDATION — $330,200 · OtherVASCULITIS FOUNDATIONSCLERODERMA FOUNDATION — $250,000 · OtherSCLERODERMA FOUNDATIONUNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT CHAPEL HILL — $190,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT CHAPEL HILLNORTH SHORE CONGREGATION ISRAEL — $68,310 · Other+115 more — $1,040,793 · Other+115 moreJEWISH UNITED FUND OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO — $271,500 · PhilanthropyJEWISH UNIT…THE JEWISH FEDERATION OF SARASOTA-MANATEE INC — $23,650 · PhilanthropyTHE JEWISH …JEWISH FEDERATION OF SOUTH PALM BEACH COUNTY INC — $20,000 · PhilanthropyJEWISH FEDE…+6 more — $8,750 · PhilanthropyUniversity of Chicago — $194,600 · EducationUniversity…UNC HEALTH FOUNDATION INC — $50,000 · EducationUNC HEALTH…Youth Guidance — $30,000 · EducationYouth Guid…+3 more — $6,200 · EducationAmerican Heart Association Inc — $39,000 · HealthAnn & Robert H Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago — $25,000 · HealthRehabilitation Institute of Chicago — $20,000 · HealthPLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC — $17,850 · HealthALZHEIMERS RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC — $17,500 · HealthALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC — $16,000 · HealthJOHN LESTER FOUNDATION — $11,500 · Health+14 more — $46,625 · HealthRAVINIA FESTIVAL ASSOCIATION — $81,500 · Arts & CultureKUOW PUGET SOUND PUBLIC RADIO — $45,000 · Arts & CultureRAYMOND F KRAVIS CENTER FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS INC — $34,500 · Arts & Culture+9 more — $21,350 · Arts & CultureALL CHICAGO MAKING HOMELESSNESS HISTORY — $150,500 · Housing & ShelterSARAH'S CIRCLE — $10,000 · Housing & Shelter+2 more — $1,650 · Housing & ShelterJEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF COLORADO INC — $45,000 · Human ServicesWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC — $17,500 · Human ServicesEL CENTRO DE LA RAZA — $6,000 · Human ServicesAftermath March Fourth Coalition — $5,000 · Human ServicesJewish Community Centers of Chicago — $4,500 · Human Services+5 more — $7,125 · Human Services
Other$1,879,303Philanthropy$323,900Education$280,800Health$193,475Arts & Culture$182,350Housing & Shelter$162,150Human Services$85,125

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetVASCULITIS FOUNDATION — $330,200 over 7y, 6.5% of budgetJEWISH UNITED FUND OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO — $271,500 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Chicago — $194,600 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetALL CHICAGO MAKING HOMELESSNESS HISTORY — $150,500 over 6y, 0.7% of budgetRAVINIA FESTIVAL ASSOCIATION — $81,500 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetLEGAL VOICE — $52,500 over 8y, 0.7% of budgetUNC HEALTH FOUNDATION INC — $50,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetKUOW PUGET SOUND PUBLIC RADIO — $45,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetJEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF COLORADO INC — $45,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetNorthwestern University — $40,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc — $39,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetRAYMOND F KRAVIS CENTER FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS INC — $34,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetThe Anti-Cruelty Society — $33,300 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetOCEAN CONSERVANCY — $30,400 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetYouth Guidance — $30,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetHIAS INC — $30,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC — $26,680 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetAnn & Robert H Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago — $25,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE JEWISH FEDERATION OF SARASOTA-MANATEE INC — $23,650 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetJEWISH FEDERATION OF SOUTH PALM BEACH COUNTY INC — $20,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetRehabilitation Institute of Chicago — $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNORTHWEST IMMIGRANT RIGHTS PROJECT — $19,500 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetSEATTLE PARKS FOUNDATION — $18,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC — $17,850 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC — $17,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetALZHEIMERS RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC — $17,500 over 4y, 3.0% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC — $16,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetRAINIER VALLEY FOOD BANK — $16,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetSOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC — $14,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetThe Pride Foundation — $12,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetJOHN LESTER FOUNDATION — $11,500 over 6y, 12% of budgetHumane World for Animals Inc — $10,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF THE OCEAN CLEANUP FOUNDATION — $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetRole Model Movement Inc (NFP) — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSIERRA CLUB FOUNDATION — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATED — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSARAH'S CIRCLE — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget350ORG — $8,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetMETHOW CONSERVANCY — $7,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetSECOND SENSE — $6,900 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetEL CENTRO DE LA RAZA — $6,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetLAMBDA LEGAL DEFENSE & EDUCATION FUND INC — $6,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES — $6,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFLORIDA STUDIO THEATRE INC — $5,650 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC — $5,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetLAURI S BAUER FOUNDATION — $5,050 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetISLANDWOOD — $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCLIMATE SOLUTIONS — $5,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds VASCULITIS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH UNITED FUND OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO ↗
  • Who funds University of Chicago ↗
  • Who funds ALL CHICAGO MAKING HOMELESSNESS HISTORY ↗
  • Who funds RAVINIA FESTIVAL ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds LEGAL VOICE ↗
  • Who funds UNC HEALTH FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds KUOW PUGET SOUND PUBLIC RADIO ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF COLORADO INC ↗
  • Who funds Northwestern University ↗
  • Who funds American Heart Association Inc ↗
  • Who funds RAYMOND F KRAVIS CENTER FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS INC ↗
  • Who funds The Anti-Cruelty Society ↗
  • Who funds OCEAN CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds Youth Guidance ↗
  • Who funds HIAS INC ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC ↗
  • Who funds Ann & Robert H Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago ↗
  • Who funds THE JEWISH FEDERATION OF SARASOTA-MANATEE INC ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH FEDERATION OF SOUTH PALM BEACH COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago ↗
  • Who funds NORTHWEST IMMIGRANT RIGHTS PROJECT ↗
  • Who funds SEATTLE PARKS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC ↗
  • Who funds WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds ALZHEIMERS RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC ↗

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Seattle FoundationGs Donor Advised Phil…Puget Sound Energy Fo…AbbVie FoundationJewish Federation of …Baird Foundation IncTreeline FoundationKaleidoscope Foundati…The Sheri and Les Bil…Moccasin Lake Foundat…The Norcliffe Foundat…United Way of King Co…
Seattle FoundationWA29× affinity15 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Seattle Foundation · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Puget Sound Energy Foundation · AbbVie Foundation · Jewish Federation of Metropolitan Chicago · Baird Foundation Inc · Treeline Foundation · Kaleidoscope Foundation · The Sheri and Les Biller Family Foundation · Moccasin Lake Foundation · The Norcliffe Foundation · United Way of King County

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Haberman Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 80%1%4%8%15%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 4%
  • Hias Inc — 88% of income from government
  • Epilepsy Foundation of America — 22% of income from government
  • City Year Inc — 11% of income from government
  • Sharsheret Inc — 4% of income from government
  • Mote Marine Laboratory Inc — 4% of income from government
  • The Carroll Center for the Blind Inc — 3% of income from government
  • All Faiths Food Bank Inc — 1% of income from government
  • Palm Beach County Food Bank Inc — 0% of income from government
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc — 0% of income from government
  • Florida Studio Theatre Inc — 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
8get no government money at all
28report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 181 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines