Skip to content

· Private foundation

Habdank Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$109k
Granted FY2024still arriving
19
Grants FY2024still arriving
8
States reached
$38k
Largest
01What it funds
0182% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$141kReligion$70kInternational$37kArts & Culture$27kHealth$23kFood & Nutrition$23kHousing & Shelter$18kRecreation & Sports$6kOther$0
02FY2024 · 19 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k17 grants · $46k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $63k
$3,000
Median grant
8
States reached
$1.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
AF SCHOOL OF ST JUDE$38,147
Individual grant recipient$25,000
WESLEY THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY$7,500
WATER STEP$6,200
DARE TO CARE$5,000
OPPORTUNITY INTERNATIONAL$5,000
HEALING PLACE$5,000
LOUISVILLE ORCHESTRA$4,000
LINCOLN FOUNDATION$3,000
WEST END SCHOOL$3,000
NATIONAL MS SOCIETY$1,200
WATERFRONT BOTANICAL GARDENS$1,000
PARKLANDS OF FLOYDS FORK$1,000
IMPACT 100$1,000
Individual grant recipient$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–21, $2k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%ELEPHANT COOPERATION: $500 → 11%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $1k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NH
IL
NY
SD
PA
CT
CA
UT
CO
KY
MD
NC
SC
DC
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$579k · 23 repeat orgs$14k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +28% since the first grant, against +7% for those funded once.

23 repeat relationships: 14 still active in FY2024, 9 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

23
15

Total granted

$579k
$9k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+28%
+7%

Still filing today

57%
40%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
InternationalEducationHealthHuman ServicesArts & CultureYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TH
    THE HEALING PLACE INC
    7× · 2017–2024 · $32k · revenue +14%
  • DT
    DARE TO CARE INC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $23k · revenue +9%
  • TL
    THE LOUISVILLE ORCHESTRA INC
    7× · 2017–2024 · $22k · revenue +179%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2020 · $2k
  • SO
    SCHOOL OF ST JUDE
    one grant, 2018 · $1k
  • SO
    SCHOOL OF SAINT JUDE
    one grant, 2017 · $1k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Waterorg

Water.org's goal is to bring safe water and sanitation to the world through access to small, affordable loans.

International
2
Worldatwork

To sponsor and conduct educational conferences, seminars, workshops and symposia for purposes of informing members and other interested parties on current research, legislation and practices in all phases of employee reward programs…

Membership Benefit
3
Central Indiana Corporate Partnership Inc

Central indiana corporate partnership (cicp) is an alliance of indiana's business and research university leaders coming together to foster long-term prosperity for the region. cicp's mission is to transform the economy of indiana in order…

Community Improvement
4
World Resources Institute

Wri is committed to creating change that improves people's lives and ensures the natural world can thrive. (see schedule o)wri's bold vision requires a formula for success we call "count it. change it. scale it.":- count it: our work is…

International
5
The Water Research Foundation

The purpose of the water research foundation (wrf) is a definitive research organization to advance the science of all things water to better meet the evolving needs of its subscribers and the water sector. to engage exclusively in…

Environment
6
The Common Application Inc

The common application is a not-for-profit membership organization of over 1,100 colleges and universities across the globe committed to access, equity, and integrity in the college admission process. every year, over 1.5 million students…

Education
7
Worldwide Vets Incorporated

Our goal is to sustainably improve animal welfare, provide veterinary care, and improve veterinary education globally. in order to achieve this goal, we work in over 10 countries, across 5 continents, supporting local people and animals,…

Animals
8
Climate Breakthrough Inc

To launch breakthrough climate mitigation efforts by identifying, supporting, and unleashing innovative leaders with transformative strategies.

Human Services
9
Lifewater Inc

Lifewater international is a non-profit christian water development organization dedicated to effectively serving vulnerable children and families by partnering with underserved communities to overcome water poverty.

Environment
10
Wallin Education Partners

To ensure college and career success for high-potential students from low-income backgrounds, and through our efforts help build diverse, equitable, and vibrant communities. we do this through a comprehensive model of financial aid and…

Education
11
Arbor Research Collaborative for Health

Arbor research collaborative for health is committed to improving patient care through research that shapes medical policies and practice. in particular, arbor research conducts health outcomes research on chronic disease and end-stage…

Health
12
Commonwealth Care Alliance Inc

Commonwealth care alliance, inc.'s mission is to improve the health and well-being of people with significant needs by innovating, coordinating and providing the highest quality, individualized care.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Opportunity International Inc D/B/a Opportunity International-Us; the most unlike its peers is West End School Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

23 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 23 of the 43 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
22/23
Grantees still filing
18/23
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $216,100 · OtherIndividual grant recipientAF SCHOOL OF ST JUDE: $132,279 · OtherAF SCHOOL OF ST JUDEWESLEY THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY OF THE METHODIST CHURCH: $69,750 · OtherWESLEY THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY OF THE METHODIST CHURCHTHE HEALING PLACE INC: $31,500 · OtherTHE HEALING PLACE INC+29 more: $54,892 · Other+29 moreDARE TO CARE INC: $23,000 · Food & NutritionTHE LOUISVILLE ORCHESTRA INC: $22,000 · Arts & CultureWATERSTEP INC: $15,000 · Youth DevelopmentEDUCATION FOR ALL CHILDREN: $8,202 · InternationalOPPORTUNITY INTERNATIONAL INC D/B/A OPPORTUNITY INTERNATIONAL-US: $6,000 · International+1 more: $360 · InternationalOne World Childrens Fund: $7,500 · PhilanthropyLINCOLN FOUNDATION: $3,500 · EducationWest End School Inc: $3,000 · EducationDUKE UNIVERSITY: $500 · Education
Other$504,521Food & Nutrition$23,000Arts & Culture$22,000Youth Development$15,000International$14,562Philanthropy$7,500Education$7,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE HEALING PLACE INC: $31,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetDARE TO CARE INC: $23,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTHE LOUISVILLE ORCHESTRA INC: $22,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetWATERSTEP INC: $15,000 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetEDUCATION FOR ALL CHILDREN: $8,202 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetOne World Childrens Fund: $7,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetOPPORTUNITY INTERNATIONAL INC D/B/A OPPORTUNITY INTERNATIONAL-US: $6,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budget21ST CENTURY PARKS INC: $3,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetLINCOLN FOUNDATION: $3,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetWATERFRONT BOTANICAL GARDENS INC: $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetWest End School Inc: $3,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSCOTLAND STORM COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT INC: $1,300 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetELEPHANT COOPERATION: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDUKE UNIVERSITY: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGLOBALGIVING FOUNDATION INC: $360 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetENGINEERING WORLD HEALTH: $323 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHildegard House Incorporated: $300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOLORECTAL CANCER ALLIANCE: $150 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE HEALING PLACE INC ↗
  • Who funds DARE TO CARE INC ↗
  • Who funds THE LOUISVILLE ORCHESTRA INC ↗
  • Who funds WATERSTEP INC ↗
  • Who funds EDUCATION FOR ALL CHILDREN ↗
  • Who funds One World Childrens Fund ↗
  • Who funds OPPORTUNITY INTERNATIONAL INC D/B/A OPPORTUNITY INTERNATIONAL-US ↗
  • Who funds 21ST CENTURY PARKS INC ↗
  • Who funds LINCOLN FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds WATERFRONT BOTANICAL GARDENS INC ↗
  • Who funds West End School Inc ↗
  • Who funds ZOOM GROUP INC ↗
  • Who funds SCOTLAND STORM COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT INC ↗
  • Who funds WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds TWIN CITY SPORTS ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds ELEPHANT COOPERATION ↗
  • Who funds BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC ↗
  • Who funds DUKE UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds GLOBALGIVING FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds ENGINEERING WORLD HEALTH ↗
  • Who funds Hildegard House Incorporated ↗
  • Who funds COLORECTAL CANCER ALLIANCE ↗
  • Who funds American Heart Association Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Gheens Foundation IncKY21.9× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Gheens Foundation Inc · The Lewis and Gladys Bass Family Charitable Foundation · V V Cooke Foundation Corporation · Cralle Foundation Inc · The Community Foundation of Louisville Corporate Depository Inc · The Community Foundation of Louisville Depository Inc · The Community Foundation of Louisville Inc · Mightycause Charitable Foundation · Ina B Bond Ashbourne Charitable Fund Inc · W L Lyons Brown Foundation · Republic Bank Foundation Inc · Honorable Order of Kentucky Colonels Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Habdank Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Habdank Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Habdank Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Habdank Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 43 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Habdank’s filings →

More from the funding graph