Skip to content

· Private foundation

H L & Elizabeth M Brown Foundation

Its FY2023 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$491k
Granted FY2023
10
Grants FY2023
2
States reached
$181k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2023.

Arts & Culture$281kEducation$130kHealth$100kHuman Services$70kReligion$50kFood & Nutrition$40kScience & Tech$20kHousing & Shelter$5k
02FY2023 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2023

  • Under $10k1 grant · $5k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $155k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $331k
$30,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
TEXAS BALLET THEATER INC$180,717
PERMIAN BASIN BEHAVIOR HEALTH CENTER$100,000
TEXAS CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY$50,000
TARRANT AREA FOOD BANK$40,000
LENA POPE HOME$30,000
ANDERSON RANCH ARTS CENTER$25,000
BOTANICAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE OF TEXAS$20,000
GILL CHILDREN'S SERVICES$20,000
SIXTY AND BETTER$20,000
UNION GOSPEL MISSION OF TARRANT COUNTY$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY23–23, $50k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%SIXTY AND BETTER: $20k → 11%LENA POPE HOME: $30k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 8% of H L & Elizabeth M Brown Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

H L & Elizabeth M Brown Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

59%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$411k · 3 repeat orgs$285k to everyone else

3 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2023, 0 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

3
1

Total granted

$411k
$50k

Still filing today

100%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 52% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $235k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23
Arts & CultureEducationHuman ServicesHealthScience & TechOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TB
    TEXAS BALLET THEATER INC
    6× · 2017–2023 · $226k · revenue +160%
  • TC
    TEXAS CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY
    5× · 2017–2023 · $130k · revenue +60%
  • AR
    ANDERSON RANCH ARTS CENTER
    3× · 2020–2023 · $56k · revenue +67%

Funded once

  • SA
    ST ANN'S CATHOLIC CHURCH
    one grant, 2020 · $50k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
University of North Texas Health Science Center At Ft Worth Health Systems

To improve the health and quality of life for the people of texas and beyond through excellence in education, research, clinical care, community engagement and to provide national leadership in primary care.

Health
2
Center for 20TH Century Texas Studies
—
3
Texas Public Radio

The mission of Texas Public Radio is to engage, inspire and inform, bringing people together to better understand their community and world.

Arts & Culture
4
Tx Performing Chinese Arts
—
5
The University of TexasTexas a&M Investment Management Company

To generate superior long-term investment returns to support The University of Texas and Texas A&M University systems as they provide world-class teaching, push the boundaries of discovery, and achieve excellence in patient healthcare for…

Education
6
Texas Wesleyan University

Texas wesleyan university, guided by its deep methodist heritage, provides transformational learning experiences and research opportunities to a diverse group of students to develop their full potential as individuals and as members of the…

Education
7
Children's Health System of Texas

With more than 1 million patient visits each year, Children's Health is North Texas' leading pediatric health system and among the largest in the nation. For more than a century, our mission has been clear: make life better for children.…

Health
8
Baylor University

The mission of baylor university is to educate men and women for worldwide leadership and service by integrating academic excellence and christian commitment within a caring community.

Education
9
Scott & White Memorial Hospital

Founded as a Christian ministry of healing, Baylor Scott & White Health (BSWH) promotes the well-being of all individuals, families and communities.

Health
10
Baylor Research Institute

To improve the care and well being of our community, nationally and internationally, through innovative clinically relevant research that is consistent with the mission, vision and values of Baylor Scott & White Health (BSWH).

Health
11
Baylor All Saints Medical Center

Founded as a Christian ministry of healing, Baylor Scott & White Health (BSWH) promotes the well-being of all individuals, families and communities.

Health
12
Banner -University Medical Group

Assist banner health complete its mission to make health care easier so life can be better by providing integrated & coordinated care & population health management.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Anderson Ranch Arts Center; the most unlike its peers is Texas Christian University. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 11 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
7/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

TEXAS BALLET THEATER INC: $225,717 · Arts & CultureTEXAS BALLET THEATER INCANDERSON RANCH ARTS CENTER: $55,500 · Arts & CultureANDERSON RANCH ARTS CENTERTEXAS CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY: $130,000 · EducationTEXAS CHRISTIAN UNIVERSI…GILL CHILDREN'S SERVICES INC: $20,000 · EducationGILL CHILDREN'S SERVICES…PERMIAN BASIN BEHAVIORAL HEALTH CENTER: $100,000 · HealthPERMIAN BASIN BE…ST ANN'S CATHOLIC CHURCH: $50,000 · OtherST ANN'S CATHOL…Tarrant Area Food Bank: $40,000 · OtherTarrant Area Fo…Union Gospel Mission of Tarrant County: $5,000 · OtherLENA POPE HOME INC: $30,000 · Human ServicesSIXTY AND BETTER INC: $20,000 · Human ServicesBOTANICAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE OF TEXAS INC: $20,000 · Science & Tech
Arts & Culture$281,217Education$150,000Health$100,000Other$95,000Human Services$50,000Science & Tech$20,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTEXAS BALLET THEATER INC: $225,717 over 6y, 1.8% of budgetTEXAS CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY: $130,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetPERMIAN BASIN BEHAVIORAL HEALTH CENTER: $100,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetANDERSON RANCH ARTS CENTER: $55,500 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetTarrant Area Food Bank: $40,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLENA POPE HOME INC: $30,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSIXTY AND BETTER INC: $20,000 over 1y, 2.5% of budgetBOTANICAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE OF TEXAS INC: $20,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetGILL CHILDREN'S SERVICES INC: $20,000 over 1y, 2.4% of budgetUnion Gospel Mission of Tarrant County: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Alcon Foundation IncTX17.9× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Alcon Foundation Inc · Thomas M Helen McKee & John P Ryan Fo John P Ryan Foundation Inc · Bnsf Railway Foundation · Robert D and Catherine R Alexander Foundation · Crystelle Waggoner Charitable Trust · The Roach Foundation Inc · Community Foundation of North Texas (Tax · Communities Foundation of Texas Inc · Leo Potishman Foundation Xxxxx3002 · Amon G Carter-Star Tele Emply Fund · McCallum Family Foundation · The Morris Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization H L & Elizabeth M Brown Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from H L & Elizabeth M Brown Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to H L & Elizabeth M Brown Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to H L & Elizabeth M Brown Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 11 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on H L & Elizabeth M Brown’s filings →

    More from the funding graph