Skip to content

· Private foundation

H and B Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$385k
Granted FY2025still arriving
12
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$89k
Largest
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$415kHealth$311kPhilanthropy$265kHousing & Shelter$263kRecreation & Sports$217kArts & Culture$165kReligion$127kFood & Nutrition$115kOther$0
02FY2025 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $5k
  • $10k–50k9 grants · $226k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $154k
$25,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$4.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Lima Rescue Mission$89,142
United Way of Greater Lima$65,000
Equestrian Therapy Program$40,000
Lifewise Academy$30,000
Lima Samaritan House Inc$26,000
University of Findlay$25,000
Lima Symphony Orchestra$25,000
West Ohio Food Bank$25,000
Lima Central Catholic$20,000
Our Daily Bread Soup Kitchen$20,000
Lima Family YMCA$15,000
Coleman Behavioral Health$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–24, $17k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%SAFY of Ohio: $10k → 13%SAFY of Ohio: $5k → 13%SAFY of Ohio: $2k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.8M · 16 repeat orgs$205k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +27% since the first grant, against +8% for those funded once.

16 repeat relationships: 11 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
5

Total granted

$1.8M
$175k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+27%
+8%

Still filing today

56%
40%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 92% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $30k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Housing & ShelterRecreation & SportsHealthEducationHuman ServicesFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MV
    Marmon Valley Ministries Inc
    6× · 2017–2024 · $217k · revenue +38%
  • LR
    LIMA RESCUE MISSION
    4× · 2022–2025 · $195k · revenue +276%
  • ET
    Equestrian Therapy Program
    9× · 2017–2025 · $190k · revenue +27%

Funded once

  • MH
    Mercy Health - St Rita's Medical Center LLC
    one grant, 2022 · $100k
  • SP
    Sts Peter Paul
    one grant, 2020 · $30k
  • FP
    Family Promise of Lima
    one grant, 2024 · $30k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Habitat for Humanity - Lima Area Inc

Habitat for Humanity- Lima Area Inc seeks to share the Gospel of Jesus Christ by working in partnership with people who blend their time, talent and gifts to build simple, decent housing with families in need so all are encouraged to be…

—
2
Ohio United Way

To strengthen the capacity of United Ways across Ohio and to advance the common good for Ohioans.

Philanthropy
3
Catholic Charities Southwestern Ohio

Catholic Charities Southwestern Ohio serves and empowers people through God's love in their times of vulnerability. We do so through a full range of local services that engage the community in building solidarity.

Human Services
4
Our Daily Bread Inc

Our Daily Bread feeds, shelters, and cares for the homeless and at-risk in our community while maintaining the dignity of our guests and offering opportunities for a new start.

Food & Nutrition
5
Hospice & Palliative Care of the Ohio Valley Inc

Helping individuals live with dignity through the final stage of life.

Human Services
6
West Texas Food Bank

The WTFB exists to collect, purchase, and distribute food to feed the hungry in 19 counties in West Texas in partnership with volunteers and community organizations and to educate these partners and the public at large about the real face…

—
7
Luther Home of Mercy Foundation Inc

Recognizing that we are all created in god's image, the luther home of mercy foundation board's mission is to support the programs and services of luther home of mercy. we are dedicated to helping individuals with intellectual and…

Human Services
8
Last Mile Food Rescue

Last Mile is a Greater Cincinnati food rescue organization on a mission to save good food and get it to those who need it most. We empower local change-makers to make a critical difference in the lives of our neighbors fighting food…

Food & Nutrition
9
West Ohio Community Action Partnership

Organized for the purpose of creating, developing and effecting programs and projects designed to enhance the economic development of Allen, Auglaize, and Mercer Counties and its citizens, particularly to those areas of the community and…

Community Improvement
10
Pueblo Rescue Mission

Because of our love for God, we extend his mercy as we strive to empower and improve the lives of unsheltered adults in Pueblo, CO, through provisions of food, shelter and navigational support services.

—
11
Hospice of Wichita Falls Inc

Care, hope, and support for all when illness threatens life.

Human Services
12
Toledo Northwestern Ohio Food Bank

To enable other community organizations to end hunger. we strive to maximize community resources by effectively obtaining and distributing food through a food collection and distribution system.

Food & Nutrition
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Lima Rescue Mission; the most unlike its peers is Marmon Valley Ministries Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 23 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
7/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

United Way of Greater Lima Inc: $245,000 · OtherUnited Way of Greater Lima IncSt Rose Parish: $185,000 · OtherSt Rose ParishLima Symphony Orchestra: $165,000 · OtherLima Symphony OrchestraLima Central Catholic: $115,000 · OtherLima Central CatholicMercy Health - St Rita's Medical Center LLC: $100,000 · OtherMercy Health - St Rita's Medical Center LLCSt Joseph's Catholic Church: $95,000 · OtherSt Joseph's Catholic ChurchOUR DAILY BREAD SOUP KITCHEN INC: $65,000 · OtherOUR DAILY BREAD SOUP KITCHEN INCLima Family YMCA: $60,000 · Other+7 more: $154,000 · Other+7 moreLIMA RESCUE MISSION: $194,596 · Housing & ShelterLIMA RESCUE MI…LIMA'S SAMARITAN HOUSE INC: $58,000 · Housing & ShelterLIMA'S SAMARIT…RESTORATION HOUSE OF LIMA INC: $10,000 · Housing & ShelterMarmon Valley Ministries Inc: $217,393 · Recreation & SportsMarmon Valle…Equestrian Therapy Program: $190,000 · HealthEquestrian…The University of Findlay: $115,000 · EducationWest Ohio Food Bank: $50,000 · Food & NutritionLIFEWISE INC: $30,000 · Youth Development
Other$1,184,000Housing & Shelter$262,596Recreation & Sports$217,393Health$190,000Education$115,000Food & Nutrition$50,000Youth Development$30,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUnited Way of Greater Lima Inc: $245,000 over 8y, 4.0% of budgetMarmon Valley Ministries Inc: $217,393 over 6y, 14% of budgetLIMA RESCUE MISSION: $194,596 over 4y, 12% of budgetEquestrian Therapy Program: $190,000 over 9y, 6.3% of budgetThe University of Findlay: $115,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetOUR DAILY BREAD SOUP KITCHEN INC: $65,000 over 3y, 13% of budgetLIMA'S SAMARITAN HOUSE INC: $58,000 over 8y, 4.5% of budgetWest Ohio Food Bank: $50,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetLIFEWISE INC: $30,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetThe Lima Community Foundation: $20,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSPECIALIZED ALTERNATIVES FOR FAMILIES & YOUTH OF OHIO INC: $17,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetRESTORATION HOUSE OF LIMA INC: $10,000 over 1y, 3.7% of budgetWOOSTER ROTARY FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 7.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds United Way of Greater Lima Inc ↗
  • Who funds Marmon Valley Ministries Inc ↗
  • Who funds LIMA RESCUE MISSION ↗
  • Who funds Equestrian Therapy Program ↗
  • Who funds The University of Findlay ↗
  • Who funds OUR DAILY BREAD SOUP KITCHEN INC ↗
  • Who funds LIMA'S SAMARITAN HOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds West Ohio Food Bank ↗
  • Who funds LIFEWISE INC ↗
  • Who funds The Lima Community Foundation ↗
  • Who funds SPECIALIZED ALTERNATIVES FOR FAMILIES & YOUTH OF OHIO INC ↗
  • Who funds RESTORATION HOUSE OF LIMA INC ↗
  • Who funds WOOSTER ROTARY FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Dayton Foundation DepositoryOH21.4× affinity8 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Dayton Foundation Depository · Ar-Hale Family Foundation Inc · Community Foundations Inc · Columbus Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization H and B Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from H and B Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to H and B Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to H and B Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 23 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on H and B Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph