Skip to content

· Private foundation

Gupta Agarwal Charitable Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$152k
Granted FY2024still arriving
21
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$69k
Largest
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$216kReligion$179kArts & Culture$87kCommunity Improvement$86kInternational$64kHealth$59kFood & Nutrition$15kCivil Rights$14kOther$0
02FY2024 · 21 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k16 grants · $42k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $41k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $69k
$2,500
Median grant
2
States reached
$4.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
#1220 Radha Krishna Temple$69,370
#1160 DFW Hindu Temple Society$10,502
#1310 American Heart Assoc$10,000
#1260 DFW Gujarati Samaj Inc$10,000
#1270 India Assoc of N Tx$10,000
#1240 Baylor Univ$8,000
#1300 Brahma Kumaris World Spiritual Org$5,000
#1250 Ekal Vichyalaya Fdtn USA$5,000
#1000 Shubham Foundation$4,000
# 1180 Parker University$2,500
#1230 Punjab Assoc Hasda Punjab$2,500
#1190 Dallas Indian Lions Club Charity$2,500
#1100 Greater Dallas Arya Samaj$2,500
#1120 Cistercian Preperatory School$2,000
#1130 Meditation Flowering Inc$2,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 65% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%Global Heritage Fund: $5k → 10%#1230 Punjab Assoc Hasda Punjab: $3k → 5%UNT: $6k → 8%Texas India Forum Inc: $50k → 8%Hindu Temple of Fort Worth: $5k → 11%#1100 Greater Dallas Arya Samaj: $3k → 14%#1240 Baylor Univ: $8k → 16%UNT: $6k → 8%Children's Medical Center Foundation: $5k → 14%Chinmaya Mission DallasFort Worth: $5k → 5%#1190 Dallas Indian Lions Club Charity: $3k → 14%University of Texas at Dallas: $100k → 14%EKAL VIDYALAYA FOUNDATION OF USA: $50k → 16%#1260 DFW Gujarati Samaj Inc: $10k → 14%EKAL VIDYALAYA FOUNDATION OF USA: $10k → 16%GDAS CANCER CLINIC: $5k → 5%#1270 India Assoc of N Tx: $10k → 14%Ekal Vidyalaya Foundation of USA: $10k → 16%US India Chamber of Commerce DFW: $55k → 14%Ekal Vidyalaya Foundation of USA: $8k → 16%SANATANA DHARMA FOUNDATION: $3k → 5%2 US INDIA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE DFW: $20k → 14%#1250 Ekal Vichyalaya Fdtn USA: $5k → 16%Gita Foundation: $5k → 5%US India Chamber of Commerce DFW: $6k → 14%#1000 Shubham Foundation: $4k → 5%US India Chamber of Commerce DFW: $5k → 14%UPASNA: $2k → 5%11 CISTERCIAN PREP SCHOOL: $3k → 14%#1130 Meditation Flowering Inc: $2k → 5%#1120 Cistercian Preperatory School: $2k → 14%Living for Zachary: $5k → 14%Living for Zachary: $5k → 14%#1160 DFW Hindu Temple Society: $11k → 14%#1220 Radha Krishna Temple: $69k → 5%#1310 American Heart Assoc: $10k → 14%RADHA KRISHNA TEMPLE: $56k → 5%BAYLOR SCOTT & WHITE FOUNDATION: $10k → 14%Global Seva Missions: $8k → 5%# 1180 Parker University: $3k → 14%DFW GUJARATI SAMAJ: $4k → 5%DALLAS FORT WORTH INDIAN CULTURAL SOCIETY: $25k → 14%DALLAS FORT WORTH INDIAN CULTURAL SOCIETY: $25k → 14%World Affairs Council of DallasFort Worth: $5k → 14%DALLAS FORT WORTH INDIAN CULTURAL SOCIETY: $13k → 14%Business Council for the Arts Dallas: $5k → 14%CROW COLLECTION OF ASIAN ART: $3k → 14%#1300 Brahma Kumaris World Spiritual Org: $5k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 7% of Gupta Agarwal Charitable Foundation Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 97% of the giving stays in TX; by stated purpose, 90%.

Gupta Agarwal Charitable Foundation Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 8.2% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

36%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$266k · 12 repeat orgs$481k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +22% since the first grant, against +15% for those funded once.

12 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2024, 11 since wound down; 20 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
32

Total granted

$266k
$331k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+22%
+15%

Still filing today

50%
31%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 2% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $150k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Arts & CultureHealthInternationalReligionSocial SciencePhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • EV
    EKAL VIDYALAYA FOUNDATION OF USA
    4× · 2018–2022 · $78k · revenue +22%
  • NT
    NORTH TEXAS FOOD BANK
    2× · 2020–2021 · $15k · revenue +35%
  • LF
    Living for Zachary
    2× · 2019–2020 · $10k · revenue +7%

Funded once

  • UO
    University of Texas at Dallas
    one grant, 2022 · $100k
  • RK
    RADHA KRISHNA TEMPLE
    one grant, 2023 · $56k
  • TI
    TEXAS INDIA FORUM
    one grant, 2019 · $50k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Radha Govind Dham Dallas

Religious Organization

Religion
2
Telangana Peoples Association of Dallas

The nbsp;purpose nbsp;of nbsp;telangana nbsp;peoples nbsp;associatiom nbsp;of nbsp;dallas nbsp;(tpad) nbsp;is nbsp;to nbsp;conduct nbsp;telengana nbsp;( nbsp;a nbsp;region nbsp;in nbsp;india) nbsp;festivals nbsp;and nbsp;events nbsp;like…

Arts & Culture
3
Bengali Association of Greater Dfw

Promote and sustain cultural, educational, religious, literary and charitable activities on behalf of the bengali community in dfw area.

—
4
Dfw Indian Cultural Society

To provide education and knowledge about hindu religious and cultural activities and to heighten awareness of religious, ethnic, cultural and social values of people of indian origin.

Religion
5
Gujaratis of North America
Arts & Culture
6
Slkps Dfw

Promote cultural sports & activities

Arts & Culture
7
Indian Cultural Heritage Foundation

Ichf's primary exempt purpose is to promote intercultural awareness by providing a platform for the interaction between indian and american cultures through workshops, presentations, and performances.

Arts & Culture
8
Sindhi Association of North America
—
9
Swami Dayanand Education Foundation
Education
10
Greater Austin Telangana Association

Cultural development and charity work for the state of telangana

Arts & Culture
11
Classical Arts Society of Houston

Formed in 1993, the Classical Arts Society of Houston is a non-profit organization dedicated to promoting and maintaining the rich heritage of the classical performing arts of India. In particular, the organization presents South Indian…

Arts & Culture
12
Sanjay Shah Foundation
Philanthropy
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is International Hindi Association; the most unlike its peers is Shubham Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 64 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/18
Grantees still filing
12/18
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

University of Texas at Dallas: $100,000 · OtherUniversity of Texas at Dallas#1220 Radha Krishna Temple: $69,370 · Other#1220 Radha Krishna TempleUS India Chamber of Commerce DFW: $66,000 · OtherUS India Chamber of Commerce DFWDALLAS FORT WORTH INDIAN CULTURAL SOCIETY: $62,500 · OtherDALLAS FORT WORTH INDIAN CULTURAL SOCIETYRADHA KRISHNA TEMPLE: $55,500 · OtherRADHA KRISHNA TEMPLETEXAS INDIA FORUM: $50,000 · OtherTEXAS INDIA FORUM2 US INDIA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE DFW: $20,000 · Other+44 more: $174,252 · Other+44 moreEKAL VIDYALAYA FOUNDATION OF USA: $78,000 · InternationalEKAL VIDYALA…WORLD AFFAIRS COUNCIL OF DALLAS/FORT WORTH: $5,000 · InternationalWORLD AFFAIR…LIONS CLINIC OF TEXAS INC: $25,000 · HealthLiving for Zachary: $10,000 · HealthCHILDREN'S MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION: $5,000 · HealthNORTH TEXAS BUSINESS COUNCIL FOR THE ARTS DBA BUSINESS COUNCIL FOR THE ARTS: $5,000 · Arts & CultureDFW GUJARATI SAMAJ INC: $4,000 · Arts & CulturePUNJABI ASSOCIATION HASDA PUNJAB INC: $3,500 · Arts & CultureSHUBHAM FOUNDATION: $3,000 · Arts & CultureGLOBAL HERITAGE FUND: $5,000 · Social ScienceSOUTH BEND HEBREW DAY SCHOOL INC: $3,000 · EducationSANATANA DHARMA FOUNDATION INC: $2,500 · ReligionInternational Hindi Association: $300 · Religion
Other$597,622International$83,000Health$40,000Arts & Culture$15,500Social Science$5,000Education$3,000Religion$2,800

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetEKAL VIDYALAYA FOUNDATION OF USA: $78,000 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetTEXAS INDIA FORUM: $50,000 over 1y, 2.0% of budgetLIONS CLINIC OF TEXAS INC: $25,000 over 1y, 2.0% of budgetNORTH TEXAS FOOD BANK: $15,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLiving for Zachary: $10,000 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetCHILDREN'S MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNORTH TEXAS BUSINESS COUNCIL FOR THE ARTS DBA BUSINESS COUNCIL FOR THE ARTS: $5,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetWORLD AFFAIRS COUNCIL OF DALLAS/FORT WORTH: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetDFW GUJARATI SAMAJ INC: $4,000 over 1y, 23% of budgetPUNJABI ASSOCIATION HASDA PUNJAB INC: $3,500 over 2y, 1.6% of budgetSHUBHAM FOUNDATION: $3,000 over 2y, 1.5% of budgetSOUTH BEND HEBREW DAY SCHOOL INC: $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSANATANA DHARMA FOUNDATION INC: $2,500 over 1y, 13% of budgetCHETNA: $2,500 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetPRATHAM USA: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetInternational Hindi Association: $300 over 1y, 0.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds EKAL VIDYALAYA FOUNDATION OF USA ↗
  • Who funds TEXAS INDIA FORUM ↗
  • Who funds LIONS CLINIC OF TEXAS INC ↗
  • Who funds NORTH TEXAS FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds Living for Zachary ↗
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds NORTH TEXAS BUSINESS COUNCIL FOR THE ARTS DBA BUSINESS COUNCIL FOR THE ARTS ↗
  • Who funds GLOBAL HERITAGE FUND ↗
  • Who funds WORLD AFFAIRS COUNCIL OF DALLAS/FORT WORTH ↗
  • Who funds DFW GUJARATI SAMAJ INC ↗
  • Who funds PUNJABI ASSOCIATION HASDA PUNJAB INC ↗
  • Who funds SHUBHAM FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds SOUTH BEND HEBREW DAY SCHOOL INC ↗
  • Who funds SANATANA DHARMA FOUNDATION INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Texas Instruments FoundationTX11.7× affinity4 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Texas Instruments Foundation · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Gupta Agarwal Charitable Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Gupta Agarwal Charitable Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%2%6%14%25%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Gupta Agarwal Charitable Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Gupta Agarwal Charitable Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 64 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Gupta Agarwal’s filings →

    More from the funding graph