· Private foundation
Gupta Agarwal Charitable Foundation Inc
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k16 grants · $42k
- $10k–50k4 grants · $41k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $69k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| #1220 Radha Krishna Temple | $69,370 |
| #1160 DFW Hindu Temple Society | $10,502 |
| #1310 American Heart Assoc | $10,000 |
| #1270 India Assoc of N Tx | $10,000 |
| #1260 DFW Gujarati Samaj Inc | $10,000 |
| #1240 Baylor Univ | $8,000 |
| #1300 Brahma Kumaris World Spiritual Org | $5,000 |
| #1250 Ekal Vichyalaya Fdtn USA | $5,000 |
| #1000 Shubham Foundation | $4,000 |
| # 1180 Parker University | $2,500 |
| #1230 Punjab Assoc Hasda Punjab | $2,500 |
| #1100 Greater Dallas Arya Samaj | $2,500 |
| #1190 Dallas Indian Lions Club Charity | $2,500 |
| #1120 Cistercian Preperatory School | $2,000 |
| #1130 Meditation Flowering Inc | $2,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 65% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Where the work is directed
The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.
About 7% of Gupta Agarwal Charitable Foundation Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 97% of the giving stays in TX; read by stated purpose it is 90% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +22% since the first grant, against +15% for the ones you funded once.
12 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2024, 11 since wound down; 20 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 2% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $150k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- EVEKAL VIDYALAYA FOUNDATION OF USA4× · 2018–2022 · $78k · revenue +22%
- NTNORTH TEXAS FOOD BANK2× · 2020–2021 · $15k · revenue +35%
- SBSOUTH BEND HEBREW DAY SCHOOL INC3× · 2021–2023 · $3k · revenue +4%
Funded once
- UOUniversity of Texas at Dallasone grant, 2022 · $100k
- RKRADHA KRISHNA TEMPLEone grant, 2023 · $56k
- TITEXAS INDIA FORUMone grant, 2019 · $50k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Religious Organization
The nbsp;purpose nbsp;of nbsp;telangana nbsp;peoples nbsp;associatiom nbsp;of nbsp;dallas nbsp;(tpad) nbsp;is nbsp;to nbsp;conduct nbsp;telengana nbsp;( nbsp;a nbsp;region nbsp;in nbsp;india) nbsp;festivals nbsp;and nbsp;events nbsp;like…
Promote and sustain cultural, educational, religious, literary and charitable activities on behalf of the bengali community in dfw area.
To provide education and knowledge about hindu religious and cultural activities and to heighten awareness of religious, ethnic, cultural and social values of people of indian origin.
Promote cultural sports & activities
Ichf's primary exempt purpose is to promote intercultural awareness by providing a platform for the interaction between indian and american cultures through workshops, presentations, and performances.
Cultural development and charity work for the state of telangana
Formed in 1993, the Classical Arts Society of Houston is a non-profit organization dedicated to promoting and maintaining the rich heritage of the classical performing arts of India. In particular, the organization presents South Indian…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is International Hindi Association and the most unlike its peers is Shubham Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 64 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds EKAL VIDYALAYA FOUNDATION OF USA ↗
- Who funds TEXAS INDIA FORUM ↗
- Who funds LIONS CLINIC OF TEXAS INC ↗
- Who funds NORTH TEXAS FOOD BANK ↗
- Who funds Living for Zachary ↗
- Who funds WORLD AFFAIRS COUNCIL OF DALLAS/FORT WORTH ↗
- Who funds GLOBAL HERITAGE FUND ↗
- Who funds CHILDREN'S MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds NORTH TEXAS BUSINESS COUNCIL FOR THE ARTS DBA BUSINESS COUNCIL FOR THE ARTS ↗
- Who funds DFW GUJARATI SAMAJ INC ↗
- Who funds PUNJABI ASSOCIATION HASDA PUNJAB INC ↗
- Who funds SOUTH BEND HEBREW DAY SCHOOL INC ↗
- Who funds SHUBHAM FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds CHETNA ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Texas Instruments Foundation · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Gupta Agarwal Charitable Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Gupta Agarwal Charitable Foundation Inc?
Find your warmest path to Gupta Agarwal Charitable Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.