Skip to content
Gulliver-Habel Family Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Gulliver-Habel Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$807
Granted FY2024still arriving
4
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$450
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$162kEducation$146kReligion$50kArts & Culture$37kFood & Nutrition$11kYouth Development$9kAnimals$6kEnvironment$5kOther$0
02FY2024 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$250
Median grant
1
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CEDAR HILLS UNITED CHURCH$450
OREGON REPERTORY SINGERS$250
AL-ANON FAMILY GROUPS$100
NORTWEST CATHOLIC COUNSELING CENTER$7
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 82% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%HASTING COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $30k → 11%CRANE TRUST: $5k → 12%NATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUST: $1k → 7%ARCHIVE INSTITUTE: $1k → 10%PANCREATIC CANCER ACTION NETWORK: $3k → 14%HAWAII COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $1k → 9%LAWRENCE PUBLIC LIBRARY: $5k → 15%CEDAR HILLS UNITED CHURCH CHRIST: $10k → 8%COLLEGE OF WILLIAM AND MARY: $3k → 7%HASTING COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $20k → 11%PANCREATIC CANCER ACTION NETWORK: $2k → 14%CEDAR HILLS UNITED CHURCH CHRIST: $8k → 8%OREGON FOOD BANK: $3k → 12%COLLEGE OF WILLIAM AND MARY: $3k → 7%HASTING COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $18k → 11%CEDAR HILLS UNITED CHURCH: $7k → 8%OREGON FOOD BANK: $3k → 12%COLLEGE OF WILLIAM AND MARY: $3k → 7%HASTING COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $16k → 11%CEDAR HILLS UNITED CHURCH: $7k → 8%OREGON FOOD BANK: $3k → 12%COLLEGE OF WILLIAM AND MARY: $3k → 7%HASTING COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $15k → 11%CEDAR HILLS UNITED CHURCH: $6k → 8%OREGON FOOD BANK: $2k → 12%COLLEGE OF WILLIAM AND MARY: $2k → 7%HASTING COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $15k → 11%CEDAR HILLS UNITED CHURCH: $6k → 8%CEDAR HILLS UNITED CHURCH CHRIST: $5k → 8%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $2k → 12%BEAVERTON EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $3k → 8%OREGON REPERTORY SINGERS: $7k → 12%OREGON REPERTORY SINGERS: $5k → 12%OREGON REPERTORY SINGERS: $5k → 12%OREGON REPERTORY SINGERS: $5k → 12%OREGON REPERTORY SINGERS: $4k → 12%OREGON REPERTORY SINGERS: $3k → 12%OREGON REPERTORY SINGERS: $3k → 12%FRIENDS OF THE CHILDREN: $2k → 12%FRIENDS OF THE CHILDREN: $2k → 12%FRIENDS OF THE CHILDREN: $2k → 12%NORTWEST CATHOLIC COUNSELING CENTER: $30k → 12%NORTWEST CATHOLIC COUNSELING CENTER: $30k → 12%NORTWEST CATHOLIC COUNSELING CENTER: $25k → 12%NORTWEST CATHOLIC COUNSELING CENTER: $20k → 12%NW CATHOLIC COUNSELING CENTER: $15k → 12%NW CATHOLIC COUNSELING CENTER: $15k → 12%NW CATHOLIC COUNSELING CENTER: $15k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
OR
OH
PA
CA
NE
VA
KS
TN
HI
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$416k · 26 repeat orgs$18k to everyone else

26 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2024, 22 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

26
21

Total granted

$416k
$18k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+25%
+25%

Still filing today

50%
29%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationArts & CultureHealthYouth DevelopmentInternationalEnvironmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HC
    HASTINGS COLLEGE FOUNDATION
    6× · 2017–2022 · $114k · revenue ×31
  • THE NORTHWEST CATHOLIC COUNSELING CENTER
    5× · 2020–2024 · $105k · revenue +6%
  • OREGON REPERTORY SINGERS
    8× · 2017–2024 · $31k · revenue +109%

Funded once

  • LP
    LAWRENCE PUBLIC LIBRARY
    one grant, 2018 · $5k
  • AR
    AMERICAN RED CROSS
    one grant, 2020 · $2k
  • AH
    American Heart Association Incgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $1k · revenue +43%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
2
Western University of Health Sciences

To produce, in a humanistic tradition, health care professionals and biomedical knowledge that will enhance and extend the quality of life in our communities.

—
3
Augustana College

Rooted in the liberal arts & sciences & lutheran expression of the christian faith, & is committed to offering a challenging education that develops qualities of mind, spirit, & body necessary for a rewarding life of leadership & service…

Education
4
Oregon Research Institute

Oregon research institute is an independent behavioral sciences research center dedicated to understanding human behavior and improving the quality of human life through the prevention and treatment of health, educational, and social…

Social Science
5
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
6
North Olympic Healthcare Network

To provide patient-centered, quality-driven, whole-person healthcare services, accessible to everyone in our community.

Health
7
Northeast College of Health Sciences

Northeast college of health sciences (the college) is committed to academic excellence, leadership, and professional best practices in the health sciences.

Education
8
Arbor Research Collaborative for Health

Arbor research collaborative for health is committed to improving patient care through research that shapes medical policies and practice. in particular, arbor research conducts health outcomes research on chronic disease and end-stage…

Health
9
University of Oregon Foundation

The purpose and mission of the foundation are, acting on its own or through affiliates, to support and assist the university of oregon in its activities by management and administration of foundation assets representing privately donated…

Education
10
National Committee for Quality Assurance

Our mission: to improve the quality of health care.our vision: better health care. better choices. better health.

Health
11
Oregon Agricultural Trust

Oregon agricultural trust partners with farmers and ranchers to protect agricultural lands for the benefit of oregons economy, communities, and landscapes.

Environment
12
Wilson College

Wilson college empowers students to be confident and critical thinkers, creative visionaries, effective communicators, honorable leaders, and agents of justice.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is National Philanthropic Trust; the most unlike its peers is Transplant House. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

22 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 22 of the 49 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
21/22
Grantees still filing
18/22
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE NORTHWEST CATHOLIC COUNSELING CENTER: $105,007 · OtherTHE NORTHWEST CATHOLIC COUNSELING CENTERNW CATHOLIC COUNSELING CENTER: $45,000 · OtherNW CATHOLIC COUNSELING CENTERCEDAR HILLS UNITED CHURCH: $26,175 · OtherCEDAR HILLS UNITED CHURCHCEDAR HILLS UNITED CHURCH CHRIST: $22,750 · OtherCEDAR HILLS UNITED CHURCH CHRISTCOLLEGE OF WILLIAM AND MARY: $13,500 · OtherOREGON FOOD BANK: $11,000 · Other+25 more: $36,915 · Other+25 moreHASTINGS COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $113,500 · EducationHASTINGS COLLEGE FOUNDATIONBEAVERTON EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $7,500 · EducationBEAVERTON EDUCATION FOUNDATION+3 more: $2,000 · EducationOREGON REPERTORY SINGERS: $31,325 · Arts & CultureALL CLASSICAL PUBLIC MEDIA INC: $1,147 · Arts & Culture+2 more: $1,500 · Arts & CulturePANCREATIC CANCER ACTION NETWORK INC: $4,500 · HealthDONATE LIFE NORTHWEST: $1,500 · HealthAmerican Heart Association Inc: $1,000 · HealthTRANSPLANT HOUSE: $1,000 · HealthFRIENDS OF THE CHILDREN: $6,000 · Youth DevelopmentMEDICAL TEAMS INTERNATIONAL: $2,000 · InternationalHAWAII COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $1,000 · PhilanthropyNATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUST: $1,000 · PhilanthropyKANSAS LAND TRUST INC: $1,000 · Environment
Other$260,347Education$123,000Arts & Culture$33,972Health$8,000Youth Development$6,000International$2,000Philanthropy$2,000Environment$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE NORTHWEST CATHOLIC COUNSELING CENTER: $105,007 over 5y, 3.0% of budgetOREGON REPERTORY SINGERS: $31,325 over 8y, 1.8% of budgetOREGON FOOD BANK: $11,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetBEAVERTON EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $7,500 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE CHILDREN: $6,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetPANCREATIC CANCER ACTION NETWORK INC: $4,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLITERARY ARTS INC: $2,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetMEDICAL TEAMS INTERNATIONAL: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetDONATE LIFE NORTHWEST: $1,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetALL CLASSICAL PUBLIC MEDIA INC: $1,147 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHAWAII COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKANSAS LAND TRUST INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetMEHARRY MEDICAL COLLEGE: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUST: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTRANSPLANT HOUSE: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE ALEXANDRIA ARCHIVE INSTITUTE: $1,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetTrinity University: $500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWILLAMETTE WEST HABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOREGON PUBLIC BROADCASTING: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOREGON COLLEGE OF ORIENTAL MEDICINE: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds HASTINGS COLLEGE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE NORTHWEST CATHOLIC COUNSELING CENTER ↗
  • Who funds OREGON REPERTORY SINGERS ↗
  • Who funds OREGON FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds BEAVERTON EDUCATION FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF THE CHILDREN ↗
  • Who funds PANCREATIC CANCER ACTION NETWORK INC ↗
  • Who funds LITERARY ARTS INC ↗
  • Who funds MEDICAL TEAMS INTERNATIONAL ↗
  • Who funds DONATE LIFE NORTHWEST ↗
  • Who funds ALL CLASSICAL PUBLIC MEDIA INC ↗
  • Who funds American Heart Association Inc ↗
  • Who funds HAWAII COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds KANSAS LAND TRUST INC ↗
  • Who funds MEHARRY MEDICAL COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUST ↗
  • Who funds TRANSPLANT HOUSE ↗
  • Who funds THE ALEXANDRIA ARCHIVE INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds Trinity University ↗
  • Who funds WILLAMETTE WEST HABITAT FOR HUMANITY ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Oregon Community …Maybelle Clark Macdon…Juan Young TrustThe Jackson FoundationOCF Joseph E Weston P…Marie Lamfrom Charita…The Blackbaud Giving …American Online Givin…Natl Christian Charit…Vanguard Charitable E…National Philanthropi…Donor Advised Charita…
The Oregon Community FoundationOR17.9× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Oregon Community Foundation · Maybelle Clark Macdonald Fund · Juan Young Trust · The Jackson Foundation · OCF Joseph E Weston Public Foundation · Marie Lamfrom Charitable Foundation Trust · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Gulliver-Habel Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Gulliver-Habel Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 2%
  • Oregon Food Bank: 21% of income from government
  • Medical Teams International: 14% of income from government
  • Literary Arts Inc: 10% of income from government
  • Oregon College of Oriental Medicine: 2% of income from government
  • Oregon Public Broadcasting: 1% of income from government
  • Oregon Repertory Singers: 0% of income from government
  • All Classical Public Media Inc: 0% of income from government
  • The Northwest Catholic Counseling Center: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Gulliver-Habel Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Gulliver-Habel Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 49 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Gulliver-Habel Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home