· Private foundation
Guerrero Family Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2019–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k43 grants · $109k
- $10k–50k1 grant · $13k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $63k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| FRIENDS OF CARITAS | $62,500 |
| SPONSORS FOR EDUCATIONAL OPPORTUNITY | $12,500 |
| CENTER FOR THE ARTS | $7,000 |
| THE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF JACKSON HOLE | $6,500 |
| TETON LITERACY CENTER | $6,000 |
| LSU COLLEGE OF BUSINESS | $5,000 |
| PINE CAY PROJECT | $5,000 |
| OUR LADY OF THE MOUNTAIN | $5,000 |
| EB RESEARCH PARTNERSHIP | $5,000 |
| COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF JACKSON HOLE | $5,000 |
| US AGAINST ALZHEIMER'S | $5,000 |
| GRAND TETON NATIONAL PARK FOUNDATION | $4,000 |
| ST JOHNS HEALTH | $3,500 |
| HABITAT FOR HUMANITY | $3,000 |
| LAWRENCEVILLE SCHOOL | $3,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $59k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 75% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
41 repeat relationships — 37 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $6k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- SFSPONSORS FOR EDUCATIONAL OPPORTUNITY INC5× · 2020–2024 · $50k · revenue +125%
EB RESEARCH PARTNERSHIP INC5× · 2020–2024 · $28k · revenue +14%- TLTETON LITERACY CENTER4× · 2021–2024 · $26k · revenue +85%
Funded once
THE YWCA PRINCETON INCone grant, 2020 · $25k · revenue +20%- BCBRAIN CHEMISTRY LABS THE INSTITUTE FOR ETHNOMEDICINEone grant, 2019 · $20k
- TRTETON RAPTOR CENTERone grant, 2023 · $10k · revenue -39%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Research, education and general - princeton university is a private not-for-profit, non-sectarian institution of higher learning with approximately 5,700 undergraduate and 3,300 graduate students. 2,500 students graduated in the 2024-2025…
The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.
The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.
To educate students to be ethical and socially responsible leaders in a global community.
Undergraduate, graduate, and professional education and research across a broad array of academic domains.
Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.
Fordham university, the jesuit university of new york, is committed to the discovery of wisdom and the transmission of learning, through research and through education of the highest quality. for more information, see schedule o.
Education and Research
Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.
Rooted in the liberal arts & sciences & lutheran expression of the christian faith, & is committed to offering a challenging education that develops qualities of mind, spirit, & body necessary for a rewarding life of leadership & service…
Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.
University of the sciences prepares students to become leaders, innovators, and skilled practitioners in the sciences, the health professions, and related disciplines. we deliver excellence in teaching, research, and service through a safe…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Community Foundation of Jackson Hole and the most unlike its peers is Grand Teton National Park Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 32 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
45 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 45 of the 64 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds FRIENDS OF CARITAS CUBANA CORP ↗
- Who funds SPONSORS FOR EDUCATIONAL OPPORTUNITY INC ↗
- Who funds EB RESEARCH PARTNERSHIP INC ↗
- Who funds TETON LITERACY CENTER ↗
- Who funds THE YWCA PRINCETON INC ↗
- Who funds USAGAINSTALZHEIMER'S ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF JACKSON HOLE ↗
- Who funds PCS CAPITAL & ENDOWMENT FUND INC ↗
- Who funds St John's Health Foundation ↗
- Who funds GRAND TETON NATIONAL PARK FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds TURNING POINT PREGNANCY RESOURCE CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds TETON RAPTOR CENTER ↗
- Who funds SERVICE TO SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds WARRIOR-SCHOLAR PROJECT FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds BABA'S BUNCH FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds THE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK ↗
- Who funds FREEDOM SERVICE DOGS INC ↗
- Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
- Who funds CLIMB DBA CLIMB WYOMING ↗
- Who funds The Peddie School ↗
- Who funds University of Chicago ↗
- Who funds TRUSTEES OF THE LAWRENCEVILLE SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds HISTORICAL SOCIETY OF PRINCETON ↗
- Who funds CENTER FOR SUPPORTIVE SCHOOLS INC ↗
- Who funds The Art Association of Jackson Hole ↗
- Who funds One22 Inc ↗
- Who funds The Doug Coombs Foundation ↗
- Who funds THE INSTITUTE FOR ETHNOMEDICINE INC DBA BRAIN CHEMISTRY LABS ↗
- Who funds DANCERS WORKSHOP ↗
- Who funds The Friends of Foundation Academy Inc ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Sipprelle Charitable Corp · Community Foundation of Jackson Hole · Princeton Area Community Foundation Inc · The Brooks Foundation · Perkins Charitable Foundation · Shepherds - a Family Foundation · Hughes Charitable Foundation · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Wyoming Community Foundation · The McKnight Foundation · Bristol-Myers Squibb Foundation Inc · The Miami Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Guerrero Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution — 63% of income from government
- Isles Inc — 21% of income from government
- Center for Supportive Schools Inc — 9% of income from government
- Turning Point Inc — 5% of income from government
- Princeton Charter School Inc — 5% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Guerrero Family Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Guerrero Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.