Skip to content
Guadalupe County United Way at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Guadalupe County United Way

Improve the quality of life throughout Guadalupe County by raising and allocating funds to addres a broad range of health, well-being, and human service needs.

$191k
Granted FY2025still arriving
9
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$14k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Human Services$609kCrime & Legal$131kHealth$129kArts & Culture$125kPublic Benefit$33kRecreation & Sports$25kHousing & Shelter$22kEducation$15kOther$0
02FY2025 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 9 grants below total $74,083, the rows itemized in this filing. The $191,412 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $117,329 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k7 grants · $50k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $24k
$8,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$86k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Salvation Army Seguin Unit$13,750
SO TX Pregnancy Care Center$10,000
Family Life Center$9,000
DAVA Unit 61$8,000
GV Habitat for Humanity$8,000
Redwood Comm Center$8,000
GRASP$6,000
Family Violence Shelter$5,833
Children's Advocacy$5,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $311k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 24% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%Redwood Comm Center: $10k → 10%Redwood Comm Center: $10k → 10%GRASP: $12k → 16%Redwood Comm Center: $10k → 10%GRASP: $10k → 16%Redwood Comm Center: $10k → 10%GRASP: $10k → 16%Redwood Comm Center: $10k → 10%GRASP: $10k → 16%GRASP: $10k → 16%Redwood Comm Center: $8k → 10%GRASP: $6k → 16%Redwood Comm Center: $8k → 10%GRASP: $6k → 16%Redwood Comm Center: $8k → 10%GRASP: $6k → 16%Redwood Comm Center: $8k → 10%GRASP: $6k → 16%Family Life Center: $9k → 10%Family Life Center: $9k → 10%Family Life Center: $9k → 10%Family Life Center: $8k → 10%Family Life Center: $8k → 10%Family Life Center: $8k → 10%Family Life Center: $8k → 10%Family Life Center: $8k → 10%Family Life Center: $7k → 10%Guadalupe Valley Christian Counseling Ctr: $6k → 10%GV Christian Counseling Center: $6k → 10%GV Christian Counseling Center: $6k → 10%GV Christian Counseling Center: $6k → 10%Guadalupe Valley Christian Advocacy: $6k → 10%Trulight 127 Ministries: $8k → 10%Comal Co Senior Citizens FDN: $7k → 10%Comal Co Senior Citizens FDN: $7k → 10%Comal Co Senior Citizens FDN: $7k → 10%Comal Co Senior Citizens Foundation: $7k → 10%Comal Co Senior Citizens Foundation: $7k → 10%Comal Co Senior Citizens FDN: $7k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.1M · 16 repeat orgs$44k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +28% since the first grant, against +11% for those funded once.

16 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
6

Total granted

$1.1M
$44k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+28%
+11%

Still filing today

75%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesCrime & LegalHealthArts & CultureRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • GC
    Guadalupe County Children's Advocacy Center
    9× · 2017–2025 · $123k · revenue +122%
  • GV
    GUADALUPE VALLEY FAMILY VIOLENCE SHELTER
    9× · 2017–2025 · $110k · revenue +89%
  • TD
    TEATRO DE ARTES DE JUAN SEGUIN
    8× · 2017–2024 · $106k · revenue +4%

Funded once

  • SM
    SAN MARCOS CISD
    one grant, 2023 · $9k
  • T1
    TRULIGHT 127 MINISTRIES INC
    one grant, 2020 · $8k · revenue +4%
  • SY
    SEGUIN YOUTH SERVICES INC
    one grant, 2020 · $8k · revenue +11%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Central Texas Pregnancy Care Center

Pregnancy counseling

Human Services
2
Santa Fe Family Service

Santa Fe Family Service helps individuals & families within the Santa Fe Independent School District by counsel, guidance, and other necessary assistance to achieve normal living, or the best possible adjustment for the welfare of the…

—
3
Guadalupe Community Development Corporation Inc

Community development

Housing & Shelter
4
Eastland County Crisis Center Inc

To provide services designed to meet the physical, social, and emotional needs of domestic violence and sexual assault victims by providing for immediate, short, and long-term needs.

Human Services
5
Southeastern Oklahoma Family Services Inc

Provide mental health counseling to needy families and persons in south central Oklahoma

Recreation & Sports
6
Great Oaks Counseling Center

Great oaks is committed to serving the emotional and relational needs of the gallatin valley by providing clinically excellent individual, marriage and family therapy.

Religion
7
Christian Cupboard Inc

Provide no-cost nutritional assistance for adults and children in seguin and guadalupe county, texas

Human Services
8
Saafe House

Saafe house is committed to empowering victims of family violence and sexual assault by providing individualized, immediate, free, and confidential services. our goal is to prevent family violence.

Health
9
Childrens Advocacy Center of Laredo-Web

The center is fully operational treatment facility involving child victims of physical and sexual abuse. Children affected by abuse were provided with therapy and professional guidance through the legal and counseling system which the…

Health
10
Court Appointed Special Advocates of Hidalgo Count

To provide services for the protection of abused and neglected children that are in the custody of the State of Texas.

Civil Rights
11
Pregnancy Help Center of San Gabriel Valley Inc

The pregnancy help center of san gabriel provides a safe caring environment where women who may be pregnant or who are pregnant can be supported with dignity during and after pregnancy.

Health
12
Guadalupe Neighborhood Development Corporation

GNDC celebrates over 40 years of service to its community as high quality affordable housing provider to families from East Austin. GNDC also works for the improvement, revitalization and preservation of the residential neighborhood. GNDC…

Community Improvement
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Guadalupe Valley Family Violence Shelter; the most unlike its peers is South Texas Pregnancy Care Center. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 23 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/18
Grantees still filing
14/18
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

GUADALUPE VALLEY FAMILY VIOLENCE SHELTER: $110,000 · Human ServicesGUADALUPE VALLEY FAMILY VIOLENCE SHELTERREDWOOD COMMUNITY CENTER INC: $82,000 · Human ServicesREDWOOD COMMUNITY CENTER INCGREATER RANDOLPH AREA SERVICES PROGRAM INC: $75,500 · Human ServicesGREATER RANDOLPH AREA SERVICES PROGRAM INCFAMILY LIFE CENTER OF NEW BRAUNFELS: $73,833 · Human ServicesFAMILY LIFE CENTER OF NEW BRAUNFELSCOMAL COUNTY SENIOR CITIZENS FOUNDATION: $42,000 · Human ServicesCOMAL COUNTY SENIOR CITIZENS FOUNDATIONGuadalupe Valley Christian Counseling Center: $29,500 · Human ServicesGuadalupe Valley Christian Counseling Cente…+1 more: $8,000 · Human ServicesTHE SALVATION ARMY: $109,250 · OtherTHE SALVATION ARMYDisabled American Veterans Auxiliary: $65,000 · OtherDisabled American Veterans Au…CITY OF SEGUIN: $33,000 · OtherCITY OF SEGUINTEXAS 4-H: $25,400 · OtherTEXAS 4-HGUADALUPE VALLEY HABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $22,000 · OtherGUADALUPE VALLEY HABITAT FOR …+4 more: $28,792 · Other+4 moreGuadalupe County Children's Advocacy Center: $123,000 · Crime & LegalGuadalupe Cou…SEGUIN YOUTH SERVICES INC: $7,500 · Crime & LegalSEGUIN YOUTH …SOUTH TEXAS PREGNANCY CARE CENTER: $87,167 · HealthSOUTH TEXAS P…GUADALUPE REGIONAL MEDICAL FOUNDATION: $42,000 · HealthGUADALUPE REG…TEATRO DE ARTES DE JUAN SEGUIN: $106,333 · Arts & CultureTEATRO DE …SEGUIN-GUADALUPE COUNTY SENIOR CITIZENS CENTER: $24,500 · Recreation & SportsSAN ANTONIO AREA FOUNDATION: $5,200 · Philanthropy
Human Services$420,833Other$283,442Crime & Legal$130,500Health$129,167Arts & Culture$106,333Recreation & Sports$24,500Philanthropy$5,200

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetGuadalupe County Children's Advocacy Center: $123,000 over 9y, 2.9% of budgetGUADALUPE VALLEY FAMILY VIOLENCE SHELTER: $110,000 over 9y, 2.9% of budgetTEATRO DE ARTES DE JUAN SEGUIN: $106,333 over 8y, 6.3% of budgetSOUTH TEXAS PREGNANCY CARE CENTER: $87,167 over 9y, 4.1% of budgetREDWOOD COMMUNITY CENTER INC: $82,000 over 9y, 20% of budgetGREATER RANDOLPH AREA SERVICES PROGRAM INC: $75,500 over 9y, 1.0% of budgetFAMILY LIFE CENTER OF NEW BRAUNFELS: $73,833 over 9y, 1.9% of budgetDisabled American Veterans Auxiliary: $65,000 over 9y, 0.7% of budgetGUADALUPE REGIONAL MEDICAL FOUNDATION: $42,000 over 6y, 1.5% of budgetCOMAL COUNTY SENIOR CITIZENS FOUNDATION: $42,000 over 6y, 0.6% of budgetGuadalupe Valley Christian Counseling Center: $29,500 over 5y, 4.8% of budgetSEGUIN-GUADALUPE COUNTY SENIOR CITIZENS CENTER: $24,500 over 4y, 2.5% of budgetGUADALUPE VALLEY HABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $22,000 over 3y, 1.1% of budgetTRULIGHT 127 MINISTRIES INC: $8,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSEGUIN YOUTH SERVICES INC: $7,500 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetTCP COUNSELING & WELLNESS SERVICES TCP MARRIAGE & FAMILY SERVICES: $7,500 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetCOMMUNITY COUNCIL OF SOUTH CENTRAL TEXAS INC: $6,125 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSAN ANTONIO AREA FOUNDATION: $5,200 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Guadalupe County Children's Advocacy Center ↗
  • Who funds GUADALUPE VALLEY FAMILY VIOLENCE SHELTER ↗
  • Who funds TEATRO DE ARTES DE JUAN SEGUIN ↗
  • Who funds SOUTH TEXAS PREGNANCY CARE CENTER ↗
  • Who funds REDWOOD COMMUNITY CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds GREATER RANDOLPH AREA SERVICES PROGRAM INC ↗
  • Who funds FAMILY LIFE CENTER OF NEW BRAUNFELS ↗
  • Who funds Disabled American Veterans Auxiliary ↗
  • Who funds GUADALUPE REGIONAL MEDICAL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds COMAL COUNTY SENIOR CITIZENS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Guadalupe Valley Christian Counseling Center ↗
  • Who funds SEGUIN-GUADALUPE COUNTY SENIOR CITIZENS CENTER ↗
  • Who funds GUADALUPE VALLEY HABITAT FOR HUMANITY ↗
  • Who funds TRULIGHT 127 MINISTRIES INC ↗
  • Who funds SEGUIN YOUTH SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds TCP COUNSELING & WELLNESS SERVICES TCP MARRIAGE & FAMILY SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY COUNCIL OF SOUTH CENTRAL TEXAS INC ↗
  • Who funds SAN ANTONIO AREA FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Gvec Charitable Found…San Antonio Area Foun…John L Santikos Chari…San Antonio Food BankAmerican Online Givin…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Gvec Charitable FoundationTX24.1× affinity9 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Gvec Charitable Foundation · San Antonio Area Foundation · John L Santikos Charitable Foundation · San Antonio Food Bank · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Guadalupe County United Way funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Guadalupe County United Way. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%2%6%14%25%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 23 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Guadalupe County United Way’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home